首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

TRMM3B42降水产品在鄱阳湖流域梅川江子流域的精度评价(英文)
引用本文:刘军志,朱阿兴,段峥.TRMM3B42降水产品在鄱阳湖流域梅川江子流域的精度评价(英文)[J].资源与生态学报(英文版),2012(4):359-366.
作者姓名:刘军志  朱阿兴  段峥
作者单位:[1]中同科学院地理科学与资源研究所资源与环境信息系统国家晕点实验室,北京100101 [2]中国科学院大学,北京100049 [3]威斯康星大学(麦迪逊)地理系,威斯康星州,WI53706,美国 [4]代尔夫特理工大学,代尔夫特,2628CN,荷兰
基金项目:the State High-Tech Development Plan of China (No. 2011AA120305);the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41023010)
摘    要:在鄱阳湖流域的梅川江子流域,利用52个站点9年(2001-2005及2007-2010)的日降水数据对V6和V7两个版本的TRMM 3B42降水产品进行了精度评价。该评价针对多个时空尺度进行,包括栅格和流域两个空间尺度,日、月和年三个时间尺度。为避免尺度不匹配问题,本文利用泰森多边形方法将点尺度的站点观测数据转换到与TRMM数据相同的栅格尺度。评价结果表明,V6和V7两个版本的TRMM3B42降水产品差别较小,整体上均轻微高估了降水量(偏差均为0.04)。在日尺度,栅格和流域空间尺度上V6和V7TRMM3B42降水产品的精度均较差,相对均方根误差在135%-199%之间。因此,在该地区利用3B42数据进行日尺度的水文分析前需要对其进行校正。在月和年尺度,栅格和流域两个空间尺度上V6和V7两个版本的TRMM 3B42降水产品精度均较高,决定系数达到0.91-0.99,相对均方根误差在4%-23%之间。这表明TRMM 3B42降水产品在该地区月和年尺度的水文分析方面具有很好的应用前景。

关 键 词:降水  TRMM  3B42  泰森多边形  精度评价  鄱阳湖流域

Evaluation of TRMM 3B42 Precipitation Product Using Rain Gauge Data in Meichuan Watershed, Poyang Lake Basin, China
LIU Junzhi,ZHU A-Xing,* and DUAN Zheng.Evaluation of TRMM 3B42 Precipitation Product Using Rain Gauge Data in Meichuan Watershed, Poyang Lake Basin, China[J].Journal of Resources and Ecology,2012(4):359-366.
Authors:LIU Junzhi  ZHU A-Xing  * and DUAN Zheng
Institution:1 State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China; 2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3 Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA; 4 Delft University of Technology, Delft, 2628 CN, Netherlands
Abstract:This study evaluated Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Multi-satellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) product i.e. TRMM 3B42 data, using data from 52 rain gauge stations around the Meichuan watershed, which is a representative watershed of Poyang Lake basin in China. Both the latest Version 7 (V7) and previous Version 6 (V6) of TRMM 3B42 data were compared and evaluated for a 9-year period covering 2001-2005 and 2007-2010. The evaluations were conducted at different spatial (grid and watershed) and temporal (daily, monthly and annual) scales. For evaluation at grid scale, the Thiessen polygon method was used to transform pointed-based rain gauge data to areal precipitation at the same grid scale (0.25°) as TRMM 3B42 data. The results showed that there was little difference in performances of V6 and V7 TRMM 3B42 products. Overall, both V6 and V7 products slightly overestimated precipitation with a bias of 0.04. At daily scale, both V6 and V7 data were considered to be unreliable with large relative RMSE (135%-199%) at the two spatial scales, and they were deficient in capturing large storms. These results suggest that local calibration with rain gauge data should be conducted before V6 and V7 TRMM 3B42 data are used at daily scale. At monthly and annual scales, V6 and V7 TRMM 3B42 data match the rain gauge data well (R2=0.91-0.99, relative RMSE = 4%-23%) at both grid and watershed scale and thus have good potential for hydrological applications.
Keywords:precipitation  TRMM 3B42  Thiessen polygons  evaluation  Poyang Lake
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号