Comparative Analysis and Assessment of Forest Landowner Typologies |
| |
| Authors: | Ashley A Dayer Shorna Broussard Allred Richard C Stedman |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Department of Natural Resources, Human Dimensions Research Unit , Cornell University , Ithaca , New York , USA;2. Cornell Lab of Ornithology , Cornell University , Ithaca , New York , USA;3. Department of Natural Resources, Human Dimensions Research Unit , Cornell University , Ithaca , New York , USA |
| |
| Abstract: | Landowner typologies help researchers and practitioners understand similarities and differences among landowners, allowing more targeted education and communications. These typologies have rarely been rigorously assessed before recommended for use. We assessed three typologies created with one data set using three methods: reliability through split halves, predictive validity using external variables, and application of quality typology criteria. We conducted the work using a New York State landowner survey data set about early successional habitat management behavior. According to the assessment, none of the three typologies stood out as clearly the best—each had its strengths and weaknesses. The assessment provided a more complete understanding of different approaches and will allow researchers to be more informed when they select a typology to use to inform education and communications. |
| |
| Keywords: | landowner motivations natural resource communication private forest owners Reasoned Action Approach reliability validity |
|
|
