首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

小麦玉米田耕作模式的防风蚀效果
引用本文:杨彩红,冯福学,柴强,耿艳香,伏星舟.小麦玉米田耕作模式的防风蚀效果[J].中国沙漠,2019,39(4):9-15.
作者姓名:杨彩红  冯福学  柴强  耿艳香  伏星舟
作者单位:1. 甘肃农业大学 林学院, 甘肃 兰州 730070;2. 甘肃农业大学 水利水电工程学院, 甘肃 兰州 730070;3. 甘肃农业大学 甘肃省干旱生境作物学重点实验室, 甘肃 兰州 730070;4. 甘肃农业大学 农学院, 甘肃 兰州 730070
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(41561062,31301283,31771738);甘肃省自然科学基金项目(18JR3RA176);甘肃省高等学校基本科研项目(2017A-030);甘肃农业大学学科建设开放基金项目(GSAU-XKJS-2018-106);现代农业绿肥产业体系项目(CARS-22-G-12)
摘    要:通过风洞实验,在5个风速下对6种耕作方式下农田土壤风蚀速率、0~20 cm风沙流结构进行了模拟研究。结果表明:保护性耕作土壤风蚀速率较传统耕作平均降低20%~40%;保护性耕作和传统耕作条件下土壤风蚀速率均随风速的增大呈幂函数递增,但在传统耕作条件下递增较快;风速14 m·s^-1是荒漠绿洲农田土壤风蚀加剧转折点,当风速>14m·s^-1时保护性耕作下风蚀速率较传统耕作明显降低;0~20 cm内,传统耕作和保护性耕作下输沙率与高度分别呈线性和指数关系,保护性耕作下0~4 cm输沙量和输沙量百分比(Q0~4/Q0~20)均低于传统耕作。

关 键 词:免耕轮作  间作  土壤风蚀  风洞实验  风沙流结构
收稿时间:2018-05-15
修稿时间:2018-06-25

Soil Wind Erosion in Wheat/Maize Intercropping with Zero Tillage and Straw Retention
Yang Caihong,Feng Fuxue,Chai Qiang,Geng Yanxiang,Fu Xingzhou.Soil Wind Erosion in Wheat/Maize Intercropping with Zero Tillage and Straw Retention[J].Journal of Desert Research,2019,39(4):9-15.
Authors:Yang Caihong  Feng Fuxue  Chai Qiang  Geng Yanxiang  Fu Xingzhou
Institution:1. College of Forestry, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China;2. College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China;3. Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China;4. College of Agronomy, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
Abstract:Through wind tunnel experiment, the rate of soil wind erosion and blown sand structure under condition of conservational tillage and conventional tillage were studied. The results indicated that:The mean rates of soil wind erosion under conservational tillage were 20 to 40 percent less than that under conventional tillage. A power functions was found between the rate of wind erosion and wind velocity in the eight simulated tillage conditions, and the rate of wind erosion increased faster with the increasing wind velocity under conventional tillage. Wind velocity of 14 m·s-1 was the significant point to aggravate soil wind erosion, while conservational tillage greatly decreased the rate of soil wind erosion when the wind velocity beyond 14 m·s-1. In the height of 0-20 cm, the sand transport rate under conventional tillage decreased within increasing height by a negative line function, while negative exponential functions were founded under conservational tillage. Under conservational tillage, the total volume of sand transport in 0-4 cm and sand transport percent between 0-4 cm and 0-20 cm were less than that under conventional tillage.
Keywords:no tillage with crop rotation  intercropping  soil wind erosion  wind tunnel test  structure of wind-sand flow  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国沙漠》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国沙漠》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号