首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

MODIS V006和V005全球反照率产品精度对比分析
引用本文:冯智明,闻建光,肖青,游冬琴,林兴稳,吴小丹.MODIS V006和V005全球反照率产品精度对比分析[J].遥感学报,2018,22(1):97-109.
作者姓名:冯智明  闻建光  肖青  游冬琴  林兴稳  吴小丹
作者单位:中国科学院遥感与数字地球研究所遥感科学国家重点实验室;中国科学院大学;
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(编号:41671363)
摘    要:反照率作为一种非常重要的地表能量平衡、全球变化研究的参数,在众多研究领域中得到了广泛的应用,到目前为止已经有多种全球范围的反照率产品进行业务化生产和发布,针对不同反照率产品质量评价的研究也变得愈加重要。MODLAND团队在MODIS V005反照率产品反演算法的基础上通过改进16天周期内观测数据加权的方法生产出新版本的反照率产品MODIS V006。本文针对MODIS两个版本V005及V006的反照率产品,利用FLUXNET地面站点数据,比较验证两个版本反照率的总体精度以及在不同地表类型条件下的精度差异,同时通过交叉验证的方法分析二者的差异及稳定性。验证结果表明,MODIS V006反照率产品虽然在全反演高质量的数据比例上较V005有所下降,但是在同等条件下V006在提高时间分辨率的同时其精度也有所提高,在不同的地表类型条件下精度也优于V005,且在时间序列分布上具有稳定比例的高质量数据,可以满足大多数应用的精度需求。

关 键 词:遥感  反照率验证  MODIS  FLUXNET  质量控制标识
收稿时间:2016/11/23 0:00:00

Comparison of global albedo products of MODIS V006 and V005 based on FLUXNET
FENG Zhiming,WEN Jianguang,XIAO Qing,YOU Dongqin,LIN Xingwen and WU Xiaodan.Comparison of global albedo products of MODIS V006 and V005 based on FLUXNET[J].Journal of Remote Sensing,2018,22(1):97-109.
Authors:FENG Zhiming  WEN Jianguang  XIAO Qing  YOU Dongqin  LIN Xingwen and WU Xiaodan
Institution:State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China,State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China,State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China,State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China,State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China and State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Abstract:Land surface albedos represent an important parameter in the Earth''s energy balance, and they play a crucial role in the global change and climate systems. Numerous global or regional land surface albedo products with various spatial resolutions and temporal frequencies have been released. Thus, the quality analysis of albedo products has become increasingly important. On the basis of the algorithm of a version 5 albedo product (MODIS V005), a new daily product version (MODIS V006) with a high temporal resolution is generated with MODLAND. The new albedo product requires urgent validation, and its accuracy should be known before extensive use.On the basis of sites with adequate spatial representativeness in the FLUXNET network, direct comparisons between different versions of albedo products and in situ albedos were conducted. To investigate the accuracy under various land cover type conditions of the two versions of albedo products, we divided the ground measurements into six classes and calculated several evaluation indicators. Two different versions of products were also compared using a cross-validation method under the prior knowledge that V005 has been extensively estimated and that the method achieves good performance in various validation works. At the same time, the Quality Control (QC) flag was investigated to analyze the stability of the new albedo products. The direct comparison results indicate that two versions of products show good consistency against the in situ albedos. However, V006 performs better than V005 during the same experimental time. For the accuracy under different land cover types, all the evaluation indicators briefly show that V006 products achieve a better match with in situ albedos than V005 products. As the V006 has a high temporal resolution, accurately capturing the rapid changes of land surface albedos is relatively easy, especially during snow-covered days. The comparison result obtained through the cross-validation method indicates that except for a few slightly high values, the V006 product effectively matches the V005 product. Although the percentage of QC flag indicating the good quality of the V006 product is lower than that of the V005 product, data show the stable performance of both products in the span of three years.The MODIS V006 product has a shorter temporal resolution and higher accuracy than the V005 product. The trends of the two albedo products over the time series highlight their good consistency. However, V006 performs better than MODIS V005 during snow-covered times. This finding is expected to play a significant role in many other research fields.
Keywords:remote sensing  validation of albedo  MODIS  FLUXNET  quality control flag
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《遥感学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《遥感学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号