首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

全球海潮模型最新进展及在中国沿海精度评估
引用本文:范长新.全球海潮模型最新进展及在中国沿海精度评估[J].大地测量与地球动力学,2019,39(5):476-481.
作者姓名:范长新
作者单位:交通运输部天津水运工程科学研究所,天津市塘沽新港二号路2618号,300456;天津水运工程勘察设计院,天津市塘沽新港二号路2618号,300456
基金项目:中国水利水电科学研究院青年科学研究专项;天津市科技计划创新平台与人才专项;中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项
摘    要:介绍TPXO、FES、Chinatide、MIKE Global Tide、Utide等典型海潮模型,总结归纳其同化潮汐数据来源和最新的海洋地形数据,利用我国沿岸长期验潮站以外的26个中短期潮位观测站评估TPXO等海潮模型预报精度。结果表明,全球海潮模型对我国沿海M2分潮的预报精度普遍较低,且主导了几种海潮模型在中国海域的整体预报精度;相比MIKE Global Tide和TPXO7.2,TPXO8、TPXO_Yellow Sea 2010和TPXO_China&Ind模型在我国沿海的预报精度更高。

关 键 词:海潮模型  卫星测高  中国沿海  精度评估

Latest Advances of Global Ocean Tide Models and Their Accuracy Comparisons in Coastal Areas of China
FAN Changxin.Latest Advances of Global Ocean Tide Models and Their Accuracy Comparisons in Coastal Areas of China[J].Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics,2019,39(5):476-481.
Authors:FAN Changxin
Abstract:A series of representative new global ocean models(TPXO, FES2014, MIKE Global Tide, Chinatide, et al.) are reviewed. Meantime, the available multi-sourced global tidal data and the latest international ocean topographic datasets are also summarized. The harmonic constituents of 26 short/middle-term tidal gauge stations along Chinese coastline are used to estimate the accuracy of 6 global ocean tide models. The comparison of RSSs formed by 8 principal constituents shows that the prediction accuracies of M2 constituents given by different GOMs are generally low in China sea, and the M2’s prediction error contributes 70%~90% of the overall accuracy. In contrast to MIKE Global Tide and TPXO7.2, the performance of TPX08, TPXO_Yellow Sea 2010 and TPXO_China&Ind are better in China coastal area.
Keywords:global ocean tide model  satellite altimetry     coastal areas of China  accuracy comparison  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《大地测量与地球动力学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《大地测量与地球动力学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号