| 2021年滦州MS4.3地震和2015年昌黎MS4.2地震震源参数及构造意义研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李 赫,董一兵,王熠熙.2021年滦州MS4.3地震和2015年昌黎MS4.2地震震源参数及构造意义研究[J].大地测量与地球动力学,2022,42(12):1281-1287. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李 赫 董一兵 王熠熙 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 基于京津冀地震台网观测资料，利用CAP方法反演滦州MS4.3地震、昌黎MS4.2地震及其MS3.3余震的震源机制，并利用近震深度震相获得更为准确的震源深度，结合双差定位法获得2个地震序列的震源分布结果，对发震构造及成因关联开展分析研究。结果显示：1）滦州MS4.3地震的节面Ⅰ走向、倾角、滑动角分别为211°、85°、168°，节面Ⅱ分别为302°、78°、5°，震源错动类型为走滑型，震源深度为8 km，地震序列的震源分布呈NNE向，短轴剖面显示断层面倾角近垂直，认为其发震断层面为节面Ⅰ；昌黎MS4.2地震及MS3.3余震的节面Ⅰ分别为189°、68°、161°及190°、61°、170°，节面Ⅱ分别为286°、72°、23°及285°、81°、29°，震源错动类型同为走滑型，震源深度为10.5 km，地震序列的震源分布呈NNE向，短轴剖面显示断层面倾角近垂直，认为其发震断层面为节面Ⅰ；2）基于滦州MS4.3地震、昌黎MS4.2地震及滦州MS7.1地震的震源参数结果，结合区域地质构造等资料分析认为，3次地震的发震构造不是上地壳先存断裂，而可能与震源区的深部构造背景密切相关，即壳内包体现象是孕育这些地震的共同基础。
|
| 关 键 词： | 滦州MS4.3地震 昌黎MS4.2地震 滦州MS7.1地震 发震构造 低速层 |
Research on the Source Parameters and Tectonic Significance of the 2021 LuanzhouMS4.3 Earthquake and the 2015 ChangliMS4.2 Earthquake |
| |
| LI He,DONG Yibing,WANG Yixi.Research on the Source Parameters and Tectonic Significance of the 2021 LuanzhouMS4.3 Earthquake and the 2015 ChangliMS4.2 Earthquake[J].Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics,2022,42(12):1281-1287. |
| |
| Authors: | LI He DONG Yibing WANG Yixi |
| |
| Abstract: | In order to explore their seismogenic structures and their genesis, based on the observation data of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Seismic Network, we use the CAP method to invert the focal mechanism solutions and centroid depths of the LuanzhouMS4.3 earthquake, the ChangliMS4.2 earthquake and theirMS3.3 aftershocks. We use the local seismic depth phase sPL to obtain more accurate moments. According to the depth of the center, combined with the double-difference positioning method, we obtain the source distribution results of the two sequences, and analyze the seismogenic structure and genetic correlation. The results show that: 1) The strike, dip and slip angles of nodal plane Ⅰ of the LuanzhouMS4.3 earthquake are 211°, 85°, and 168°, respectively, and nodal plane Ⅱ are 302°, 78°, and 5°, respectively. It is a strike-slip type, the focal depth is 8 km, the focal distribution of the earthquake sequence is NNE, and the short-axis section seismic distribution shows a near-vertical dip and a high dip angle. It is considered that the seismogenic fault plane is a nodal plane Ⅰ. The nodal plane Ⅰ of the aftershocks are 189°, 68°, 161° and 190°, 61°, 170° respectively; the nodal plane Ⅱ are 286°, 72°, 23° and 285°, 81°, 29°, respectively. The focal dislocation type is both strike-slip type, the focal depth is 10.5 km, the focal distribution of the earthquake sequence is NNE direction, the short-axis section shows a near-vertical dip, high dip angle, and the seismogenic fault plane is considered to be the nodal plane Ⅰ. 2) Based on the source parameters of the LuanzhouMS4.3 earthquake, the ChangliMS4.2 earthquake and the LuanzhouMS7.1 earthquake, combined with regional geological structural data, we believe that the seismogenic structures of these three earthquakes are not preexisting in the shallow crust. It may be related to the low-velocity layer in the crust in the source area, and the interlaced inclusions of high-velocity and low-velocity bodies in the crust are the common basis for these earthquakes. |
| |
| Keywords: | Luanzhou MS4 3 earthquake Changli MS4 2 earthquake Luanzhou MS7 1 earthquake seismogenic structure low velocity layer |
|
| 点击此处可从《大地测量与地球动力学》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《大地测量与地球动力学》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
