共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 125 毫秒
1.
LIU Rui-feng CHEN Yun-tai Peter Bormann REN Xiao HOU Jian-min ZOU Li-ye YANG Hui 《地震学报(英文版)》2006,19(1)
By using orthogonal regression method, a systematic comparison is made between surface wave magnitudes determined by Institute of Geophysics of China Earthquake Administration (IGCEA) and National Earthquake Information Center of US Geological Survey (USGS/NEIC) on the basis of observation data collected by the two institutions between 1983 and 2004. A formula is obtained which reveals the relationship between surface wave magnitudes determined by China seismograph network and US seismograph network. The result shows that, as different calculation formulae and observational instruments are used, surface wave magnitude determined by IGCEA is generally greater by 0.2 than that determined by NEIC: for M=3.5～4.5 earthquakes, it is greater by 0.3;for M=5.0～6.5 earthquakes, it is greater by 0.2;and for M≥7.0 earthquakes, it is greater by no more than 0.1. 相似文献
2.
Comparison between earthquake magnitudes determined by China seismograph network and US seismograph network （Ⅱ）： Surface wave magnitude 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
By using orthogonal regression method, a systematic comparison is made between surface wave magnitudes determined by Institute of Geophysics of China Earthquake Administration （IGCEA） and National Earthquake Information Center of US Geological Survey （USGS/NEIC） on the basis of observation data collected by the two institutions between 1983 and 2004. A formula is obtained which reveals the relationship between surface wave magnitudes determined by China seismograph network and US seismograph network. The result shows that, as different calculation formulae and observational instruments are used, surface wave magnitude determined by IGCEA is generally greater by 0.2 than that determined by NEIC： for M=3.5-4.5 earthquakes, it is greater by 0.3; for M=5.0-6.5 earthquakes, it is greater by 0.2; and for M≥7.0 earthquakes, it is greater by no more than 0.1. 相似文献
3.
LIU Rui-feng CHEN Yun-tai Peter Bormann REN Xiao HOU Jian-min ZOU Li-ye YANG Hui 《地震学报(英文版)》2005,18(6)
By using orthogonal regression method, a systematic comparison is made between body wave magnitudes determined by Institute of Geophysics of China Earthquake Administration (IGCEA) and National Earthquake Information Center of US Geological Survey (USGS/NEIC) on the basis of observation data from China and US seismograph networks between 1983 and 2004. The result of orthogonal regression shows no systematic error between body wave magnitude mb determined by IGCEA and mb (NEIC). Provided that mb (NEIC) is taken as the benchmark, body wave magnitude determined by IGCEA is greater by 0.2～0.1 than the magnitude determined by NEIC for M=3.5～4.5 earthquakes; for M=5.0～5.5 earthquakes, there is no difference; and for M≥6.0 earthquakes, it is smaller by no more than 0.2. This is consistent with the result of comparison by IDC (International Data Center). 相似文献
4.
Introduction Gutenberg (1945a, b) introduced body wave magnitude based on P, PP and S waves (with a period of 0.5~12.0 s) of teleseismic events. Body wave magnitude includes mb determined with short-period seismograph and mB determined with middle- and long-period seismographs. Some-times it is written as m, which is referred to as unified earthquake magnitude. mb represents earth-quake magnitude measured with body wave amplitude around 1 s, while mB represents earthquake magnitude measured … 相似文献
5.
选取了攀枝花近5年中763、DK－1地震仪记录较好的地震资料，用不同方法测算了地震台的面波震级台站改正值。经分析对比，认为“按震中距分离”计划得到的结果最好。列出了根据震中距求取面波台站改正值的实用简表，并用1999年2月763仪记录的41个地震、1999年1－8月DK－1仪记录的26个速报地震予以检验，地震震级准确率有明显提高。 相似文献
6.
D.W. Simpson R.M. Kebeasy C. Nicholson M. Maamoun R.N.H. Albert E.M. Ibrahim A. Megahed A. Gharib A. Hussain 《Journal of Geodynamics》1987,7(3-4)
A telemetered network of 8 short-period seismograph stations was installed at Aswan Reservoir in July 1982 to monitor induced seismicity near the site of a magnitude 5
earthquake which occurred in November 1981. A continuous monitor of the seismicity is provided by pen and ink recording of 4 stations. An event detector is used to identify events of interest, for which all of the stations are recorded on magnetic tape. Approximate displacement magnifications are 40, 000 at 1 hz with a maximum of 500, 000 at 20 hz. 相似文献
7.
大量的观测资料表明我国大震速报台网与世界台网震级存在较大的偏差，而７６３面波震级与世界台网比较一致的事实，提出了将７６３面波震级用于大震速报的建议及其可行性。 相似文献
8.
R.D. Adams 《Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors》1979,18(2):114-120
The New Zealand seismograph network is one of the oldest established and most extensive in the world. From the installation of a Milne seismograph in 1900, it has now grown to consist of 36 permanent stations and two telemetered arrays. The network's stations provide for the recording of world earthquakes over an area that extends from the Pacific Islands to Antarctica, but its main emphasis is given to the study of local seismicity in New Zealand. Instrumentation varies from very low magnification instruments capable of recording the strongest earthquakes, to modern high-magnification networks, and a digitally recording Seismic Research Observatory. A set of portable recorders is also available for field studies. Present analysis procedures are being revised to take account of lateral variations in seismic velocity and attenuation. 相似文献
9.
10.
震级是表示地震自身大小的一个量,是地震的基本参数之一,正确使用震级,对于科学研究、地震预报、地震应急等工作至关重要.本文从震级的发展过程、震级的单色性、震级统一的不可行性、震级转换的危害性、震级优选的科学性等方面,论述了震级的使用方法,以便技术人员和管理人员在实际工作中能够正确地使用地震的震级. 相似文献
11.
震级是表示地震自身大小的一个量,是地震的基本参数之一,正确使用震级,对于科学研究、地震预报、地震应急等工作至关重要。本文从震级的发展过程、震级的单色性、震级统一的不可行性、震级转换的危害性、震级优选的科学性等方面,论述了震级的使用方法,以便技术人员和管理人员在实际工作中能够正确地使用地震的震级。 相似文献
12.
Comparison between different earthquake magnitudes determined by China Seismograph Network 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
By linear regression and orthogonal regression methods, comparisons are made between different magnitudes (lo-cal magnitude ML, surface wave magnitudes MS and MS7, long-period body wave magnitude mB and short-period body wave magnitude mb) determined by Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, on the basis of observation data collected by China Seismograph Network between 1983 and 2004. Empirical relations between different magnitudes have been obtained. The result shows that: 1 As different magnitude scales reflect radiated energy by seismic waves within different periods, earthquake magnitudes can be described more objectively by using different scales for earthquakes of different magnitudes. When the epicentral distance is less than 1 000 km, local magnitude ML can be a preferable scale; In case M<4.5, there is little difference between the magnitude scales; In case 4.5MS, i.e., MS underestimates magnitudes of such events, therefore, mB can be a better choice; In case M>6.0, MS>mB>mb, both mB and mb underestimate the magnitudes, so MS is a preferable scale for deter-mining magnitudes of such events (6.08.5, a saturation phenomenon appears in MS, which cannot give an accurate reflection of the magnitudes of such large events; 2 In China, when the epicentral distance is less than 1 000 km, there is almost no difference between ML and MS, and thus there is no need to convert be-tween the two magnitudes in practice; 3 Although MS and MS7 are both surface wave magnitudes, MS is in general greater than MS7 by 0.2~0.3 magnitude, because different instruments and calculation formulae are used; 4 mB is almost equal to mb for earthquakes around mB4.0, but mB is larger than mb for those of mB≥4.5, because the periods of seismic waves used for measuring mB and mb are different though the calculation formulae are the same. 相似文献
13.
采用线性回归和正交回归方法,利用中国地震台网1983-2004年的观测资料,对中国地震局地球物理研究所测定的地方性震级ML、面波震级MS与MS7、长周期体波震级mB、短周期体波震级mb进行对比,给出了它们之间的经验关系式.研究结果表明:①由于不同的震级标度反映了地震波在不同周期范围内辐射地震波能量的大小,因此对于不同大小的地震,使用不同的震级标度更能客观地描述地震的大小.当震中距小于1 000 km时,用地方性震级ML可以较好地测定近震的震级.当地震的震级M＜4.5时,各种震级标度之间相差不大.当4.5＜M＜6.0时,mB＞MS,MS标度低估了较小地震的震级,因此用mB可以较好地测定较小地震的震级.当M＞6.0时,MS＞mB＞mb,mB与mb标度均低估了较大地震的震级,用MS可以较好地测定出较大地震(6.0＜M＜8.5)的震级.当M＞8.5时,MS出现饱和现象,不能正确地反映大地震的大小;②在我国境内,当震中距＜1 000 km时,ML与区域面波震级MS基本一致,在实际应用中无需对它们进行震级的换算;③虽然MS与MS7同为面波震级,但由于所使用的仪器和计算公式不同,MS比MS7系统地偏高0.2～0.3级;④对于长周期体波震级mB和短周期体波震级mb,虽然使用的计算公式相同,但由于使用的地震波周期不同,对于mB=4.0左右的地震,mB与mb几乎相等,而对于mB≥4.5的地震,则mB＞mb. 相似文献
14.
15.
采用正交回归方法， 利用中国地震局地球物理研究所（IGCEA）和美国地质调查局国家地震信息中心（USGS/NEIC）1983——2004年的观测资料，对这两个机构测定的面波震级进行了系统的比较，得到了中国地震台网与美国地震台网面波震级之间的关系式. 结果表明，由于使用的震级计算公式和观测仪器不同，IGCEA测定的面波震级总体上要比NEIC测定的结果偏高0.2级；对于3.5~4.5级的地震，IGCEA测定的震级比NEIC测定的震级偏高0.3级；对于5.0~6.5级的地震，IGCEA偏高0.2级；对于7.0级以上的地震，IGCEA偏高小于0.1级. 相似文献
16.
徐元耀 《地震地磁观测与研究》1993,14(3):33-36
对大丰地震台井下摆1983-1992年的观测资料统计分析,发现井下摆测定的震级普遍低于江苏省地震局台网的平均震级,且和震中距有一定的关系。通过对震级偏差的计算得出大丰台的台站校正值。同时,对偏差的原因进行了探讨。 相似文献
17.
利用云南地震台网记录的云南及其周边地区2000～2017年的宽频带数字地震资料,按照新的震级国家标准《地震震级的规定》(GB17740-2017)的测定方法,使用同一套软件,对地方性震级M_L、面波震级M_S、宽频带面波震级M_S(BB)、短周期体波震级m_b、宽频带体波震级m_B(BB)和矩震级M_W重新进行人工测量。并分别用一般线性回归和正交回归方法,对不同震级之间的关系进行对比,给出它们之间的经验关系式。研究结果表明:(1)当M4.5时,各种震级之间相差不大,使用地方性震级M_L可以较好地表示地震的大小,也能够更加充分地反映区域特性;当4.5≤M8.0时,宽频带面波震级M_S(BB)和矩震级MW均能较好地表示地震的大小,但矩震级M_W的测定需要一定时间,因此在速报工作和大震应急中,可以使用M_S(BB)表示地震的大小; M_S(BB)的测定方法与国际接轨,消除0.2的震级偏差。(2)对于面波震级MS和宽频带面波震级M_S(BB),由于面波测量的位置、计算公式和量归函数不同,M_S比M_S(BB)系统偏高0.2左右;短周期体波震级mb较宽频带体波震级m_B(BB)整体偏小0.2左右,主要区别在于仿真模式。(3)宽频带面波震级M_S(BB)和宽频带体波震级m_B(BB)均在垂直向原始宽频带记录上直接测定,取消波形仿真环节,另外,相比测定m_B(BB)震中距要求大于5度,许多台站被限制,M_S(BB)更利于区域台网测定。(4)当3.5≤ML≤6.5时,M_L较M_W整体偏大; M_S≥3.5时,M_S也较M_W整体偏大,且均随着震级增加,偏差值呈上升趋势。(5)当M≥8.0时,面波震级出现饱和现象,使用矩震级M_W表示M≥8.0地震的大小。 相似文献
18.
19.
如何正确使用新的震级国家标准 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
震级的使用规定是新的震级国家标准《地震震级的规定》（GB17740-2017）的重要内容。为便于广大技术人员和管理人员在实际工作中更好地理解和执行该标准,本文从震级的科学应用和社会应用2个方面详细介绍震级的使用规定。 相似文献
20.
使用P波快速测定国家台网大震标准震级 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
本文针对国家台网速报面波震级测定时间偏长和中深源地震震级速报有一定偏差的问题,采用IASPEI推荐的宽频带体波震级mB及宽频带P波矩震级MWP对2009—2013年国家台网地震速报的大震进行了对比分析。对于经过转换成MW后的mB和MWP震级来说,其结果均与我国速报地震发布的震级M有一定的偏差,一般表现为偏小。其中,对于6.0—6.9级地震,mB偏差相对较小,但离散度相对较大(整体偏差要比平均偏差大不少);对于7.0—7.9级地震,MWP偏差相对较小;而对于8.0级以上地震,由于震级饱和等原因,mB偏差较大,但MWP偏差相对较小,一般主要表现为偏小。总体来说,MW(MWP)的稳定性要比MW(mB)更好一些(线性回归的相关系数更大,标准误差更小)。对于综合mB和MWP震级来说,由于采取分段平均的方法,结果的稳定性有了一定的提高,但较大地震仍以偏小为主,如果在综合震级MP上加0.2,则可以得出与M震级较为接近的结果。通过MW(mB)、MW(MWP)、MP(M)、M与MW(GCMT)的对比,可以验证综合标准震级MP(M)和国家台网速报震级M具备一定的可信度,而MP(M)可作为P波快速测定的震级,所以用MP(M)作为大震速报初报震级,在某种程度上是可行的。 相似文献