共查询到16条相似文献，搜索用时 187 毫秒
1.
核爆当量和埋藏深度是地下核试验的两个重要参数.根据中国东北地区区域范围内地震台站观测记录,利用Pn,Pg,Sn和Lg波波形,计算水平分量的尾波振幅包络,调查2006年10月9日,2009年5月25日,2013年2月13日和2016年1月6日四次朝鲜地下核试验的爆炸当量和埋藏深度.以牡丹江(MDJ)台站记录为例,对两个水平分量波形进行带通滤波,计算平均波形的振幅包络.最终得到区域地震台站水平分量振幅包络,振幅稳定,包络振幅的变化清晰地显示区域震相的位置.区域震相的时间域振幅包络由震源谱函数、传播效应、台基响应和传递函数及尾波形状函数构成.通过网格搜索的方法,拟合水平分量记录的波形包络,可以获得核爆当量和埋藏深度的估计.结果表明,朝鲜四次地下核试验爆炸当量以时间为序从0.6±0.2kt到3.0±1.5kt,增加至10.0±2.0kt,再降到8.0±2.0kt.2006年核爆的埋藏深度较浅,为150±100m,2009年朝鲜核试验的埋藏深度为350±100m,2013年和2016年朝鲜核试验的深度非常一致,均为500±200m.这些结果与前人的调查结果一致性较高,说明使用单一地震台站时间域水平分量尾波振幅包络是可能同时约束地下核试验爆炸当量和埋藏深度的. 相似文献
2.
自2006年至2017年,朝鲜民主主义人民共和国在中朝边界地区的试验场进行了6次地下核试验.本文综合报道根据东北亚地区的宽频带数字地震资料利用地震学方法对这六次地下核爆炸的研究.结果表明,朝鲜地下核试验在区域台网产生的地震记录具有典型浅源爆炸的特征.针对上述资料发展了处理核爆数据的方法并据此得出各次朝鲜核爆的地震学参数,包括事件识别、当量测定、以及震中相对定位等.对6次核爆和4次天然地震P/S类型谱振幅比的统计分析表明,2 Hz以上台网平均谱振幅比可以正确地将朝鲜核爆从天然地震中识别出来,从而有效监测在朝鲜半岛进行的当量大于0.5 kt的地下核试验.同时也发现,建立在体波-面波震级比之上的识别方法不适用于朝鲜核试验场.通过建立中朝边界地区基于Lg波的体波震级系统,计算了各次朝鲜核试验的体波震级mb（Lg）,并由此估计了它们的地震学当量,其值介于0.5 kt至60 kt之间.由于缺少爆炸埋藏深度的数据,上述当量有可能被低估,因而有必要对深度影响做进一步研究.以第一次爆炸的位置为参考震中,利用Pn波相对走时数据和高精度相对定位方法获得了各次核爆在试验场中的精确定位. 相似文献
3.
利用成都数字地震台网的波形记录资料,研究了四川地区地震辐射能量〖WTHX〗E〖WTBZ〗s、σapp视应力等震源参数及相互关系.对时域波形数字记录首先进行数据处理,包括带通滤波,快速富氏变换,扣除仪器幅频特性;经反变换,回到时间域,给出数字波形时间序列,选取所有方向的整个p波和s波段数据;二次变换到频率域内计算速度和地动位移的功率谱积分,进而求得各台站记录的地震波辐射能量和视应力等震源参数.研究了2000年5月到2004年8月成都数字地震台网记录的224个3级以上地震的震源参数.四川地区地震辐射能量〖WTHX〗E〖WTBZ〗s与地震矩M0,应力降Δσ与视应力σapp,视应力σapp与震级ML大体成正比.其中地震视应力σapp与震级分布数据较宽,地震视应力与破裂尺度ra的关系也较分散.同时研究了四川地区近年视应力σapp的空间分布.方法是将计算的σapp值在一定空间邻域内作平均,从而绘出等值线.分析结果表明,σapp值的相对高值区分布在四川南部的川滇交界和北部的川甘交界一带.同时研究了四川地区地震视应力值的时间分布.最后对中小地震视应力σapp及其他震源谱参数的意义作了讨论. 相似文献
4.
利用震源距23 km范围内观测的2000年姚安MS65地震余震记录，计算了震源及近邻区域的尾波规一直达S波在频率15～20 Hz之间的傅里叶谱振幅.结果显示谱振幅随震源距增大而增大， 在对谱振幅进行了震源辐射方向性校正之后, 才出现谱振幅随震源距衰减的现象.由此获得了震源及近邻区域S波的Q(f)值,可表示为QS(f)=89f098其值比由尾波得出的姚安地区的平均QC(f)值低得多，表明了震源破裂带的强烈非均匀性对QS(f)的重大影响. 相似文献
5.
利用震源距23 km范围内观测的2000年姚安MS65地震余震记录，计算了震源及近邻区域的尾波规一直达S波在频率15～20 Hz之间的傅里叶谱振幅.结果显示谱振幅随震源距增大而增大， 在对谱振幅进行了震源辐射方向性校正之后, 才出现谱振幅随震源距衰减的现象.由此获得了震源及近邻区域S波的Q(f)值,可表示为QS(f)=89f098其值比由尾波得出的姚安地区的平均QC(f)值低得多，表明了震源破裂带的强烈非均匀性对QS(f)的重大影响. 相似文献
6.
朝鲜自2006年10月9日第一次开展地下核试验以来,分别于2009年5月25日、2013年2月12日、2016年1月6日、2016年9月9日和2017年9月3日相继进行了5次规模较大的核试验.由于核爆炸和天然地震的震源机制不同,可以通过核爆炸产生的地震波来进行核试验的监测,核试验相关地震学研究一直是国内外专家关注的焦点.本文分别从事件定位、性质识别、当量和埋藏深度等几个方面总结了近些年来朝鲜核试验相关地震学的研究进展,并基于文献计量学方法对朝鲜核试验相关地震学研究现状进行分析,综合结果表明,近些年基于朝鲜核试验的相关地震学研究的主要研究方向为核试验定位、当量估算以及震源深度等. 相似文献
7.
利用分别由Love波和Rayleigh波得到的S波速度结构的差值（VSH-VSV）对中国大陆及邻区海域（70°E～145°E，15°N～55°N）地壳上地幔中的偏振各向异性进行研究.初步研究结果表明，各向异性在空间分布上存在不均匀性：（1）在小于150 km的深度范围内，VSH>VSV的各向异性体占主导地位，反映出在地球的浅部岩石圈内的水平应力作用及软流圈顶部物质的水平向流动对各向异性的形成起主导作用.在大陆地区，各向异性的强度随深度有显著变化.上地壳和上地幔盖层中的各向异性普遍较弱，而在流变性较强的下地壳和软流圈存在较大范围的各向异性.这一现象说明下地壳在岩石圈变形中可能有解耦作用.（2）在大于200 km深度的软流圈下部主要表现为VSH<VSV的各向异性，说明地幔物质垂直运动相对占优势地位.（3）在中国大陆东部可以看出一个大致趋势：在构造比较稳定的地区，岩石圈中VSH>VSV的各向异性比较显著，而软流圈中VSH<VSV的各向异性较弱；在构造活动比较强烈的地区，软流圈中VSH<VSV的各向异性占主导地位.（4）印度板块低角度向青藏高原下俯冲影响了中国大陆西部地区各向异性的特征.印度板块向北运动水平挤压中国西部大陆，使得物质定向重结晶，从而在岩石圈下部产生显著的VSH>VSV各向异性. 相似文献
8.
地幔主要矿物橄榄石［(Mg089Fe011)2SiO4］的相变与深源地震的解释以及俯冲带和周围地幔的相互作用相关. 其中，形核率和长大率是刻画其相变动力学的两个重要参数. 因为实验技术的原因，目前人们还没有基于实验数据给出橄榄石的形核率. 本文首先通过对挤碰物理图像的分析，对边界形核情形的相变动力学理论中表征挤碰程度的无量纲参数进行了修正. 在此基础上，根据已有的实验资料，首次对橄榄石相变的形核率进行了估计. 通过对形核率数据的拟合，可以得到形核率参数K0和γ1/3. 得到两个形核率参数的变化范围分别为K0=55×1021～87×1027s-1·m-2·K-1，γ1/3=0～020 J·m-2，最佳拟合值为：K0=69×1024s-1·m-2·K-1，γ1/3=016 J·m-2. 相似文献
9.
2016年1月6日,朝鲜再次进行了地下核试验.和上次2013核试验相比,此次试验震中位置接近,不同震相的平均幅值比却表现出明显的差异：在短周期P波幅值减小的情况下,长周期Rayleigh面波幅值增强,Love面波幅值减小.这给判断两次试验当量的相对大小带来了困难.本文在给出两次试验短周期P波和长周期面波幅值比测量结果的基础上,从地下核爆炸震源机制的角度对观测现象进行分析解释.研究结果表明,虽然各种形式的构造应力源都可以很好地拟合单次试验的长周期面波资料,但只有逆断层形式的构造应力释放能够解释两次试验不同震相幅值比差异现象.这是关于朝鲜核试验震源机制的一个新的发现,对于认识其震源性质具有重要意义. 相似文献
10.
11.
利用1995年至2009年中国东北及邻近地区11个宽频带台站记录到的77个地震事件、3个化学爆炸和2次朝鲜核爆的区域地震资料,标定该区域台网的Rayleigh波震级.通过对8~25 s 周期的垂直分量Rayleigh波形进行分析,获取基于最大振幅的面波震级.计算82个区域事件不同周期的台基响应,经过台基校正后取最大振幅的面波震级为事件震级.2006年和2009年两次朝鲜核爆的面波震级分别为2.93±0.19和3.62±0.21.将地震和核爆事件的面波震级Ms与体波震级mb(Lg)进行比较,发现根据该区域台网的数据利用Ms-mb识别方法无法鉴别朝鲜地区的核爆与地震.朝鲜核爆的面波震级相对较大,使Ms-mb识别方法失效,其原因可能是源区介质的不均匀性、由核爆炸冲击引发的深部的拉伸破坏被抑制,或者是近爆源区存在张性的构造预应力.假定核爆可能的埋藏深度范围是0.01~1.0 km,用Rayleigh波震级估计朝鲜核爆的当量,对2006年和2009年核爆当量的估值范围分别为0.42~3.17 kt和2.06~15.53 kt. 相似文献
12.
利用区域地震台网数字波形资料,对2017年9月23日朝鲜ML3.4地震进行地震矩张量反演计算与参数稳定性评估,获得了此次地震的震源机制解.结果表明,地震矩心深度为3 km,标量地震矩为1.34×1014 N·m,矩震级为MW3.4.地震矩张量结果分解后,双力偶分量（DC）为96.4%,补偿线性矢量偶极分量（CLVD）为-0.8%,震源体体积变化的各向同性分量（ISO）为-2.8%.主压应力P轴方位角为144°,倾角为74°,主张应力T轴方位角为341°,倾角为15°.其中一个节面的参数为：走向248°,倾向60°,滑动角-94°.地震震源体积变化分量很小,震源机制类型属于典型的由断层剪切位错引起的正断层型地震事件,且主张应力T轴方向与区域近地表应变率场方向一致.由于朝鲜2017年9月3日核试验释放的能量对局部区域应力场进行了扰动,致使核试验场附近地壳岩体处于破裂的临界状态,2017年9月23日朝鲜ML3.4地震事件可能是区域应力场作用下的一次山体滑动事件. 相似文献
13.
Heming Xu Arthur J. Rodgers Ilya N. Lomov Oleg Y. Vorobiev 《Pure and Applied Geophysics》2014,171(3-5):507-521
Seismic source characteristics of low-yield (0.5–5 kt) underground explosions are inferred from hydrodynamic simulations using a granite material model on high-performance (parallel) computers. We use a non-linear rheological model for granite calibrated to historical near-field nuclear test data. Equivalent elastic P-wave source spectra are derived from the simulated hydrodynamic response using reduced velocity potentials. Source spectra and parameters are compared with the models of Mueller and Murphy (Bull Seism Soc Am 61:1675–1692, 1971, hereafter MM71) and Denny and Johnson (Explosion source phenomenology, pp 1–24, 1991, hereafter DJ91). The source spectra inferred from the simulations of different yields at normal scaled depth-of-burial (SDOB) match the MM71 spectra reasonably well. For normally buried nuclear explosions, seismic moments are larger for the hydrodynamic simulations than MM71 (by 25 %) and for DJ91 (by over a factor of 2), however, the scaling of moment with yield across this low-yield range is consistent for our calculations and the two models. Spectra from our simulations show higher corner frequencies at the lower end of the 0.5–5.0 kt yield range and stronger variation with yield than the MM71 and DJ91 models predict. The spectra from our simulations have additional energy above the corner frequency, probably related to non-linear near-source effects, but at high frequencies the spectral slopes agree with the f ?2 predictions of MM71. Simulations of nuclear explosions for a range of SDOB from 0.5 to 3.9 show stronger variations in the seismic moment than predicted by the MM71 and DJ91 models. Chemical explosions are found to generate higher moments by a factor of about two compared to nuclear explosions of the same yield in granite and at normal depth-of-burial, broadly consistent with comparisons of nuclear and chemical shots at the US Nevada Test Site (Denny, Proceeding of symposium on the non-proliferation experiment, Rockville, Maryland, 1994). For all buried explosions, the region of permanent deformation and material damage is not spherical but extends along the free surface above and away from the source. The effect of damage induced by a normally buried nuclear explosion on seismic radiation is explored by comparing the motions from hydrodynamic simulations with those for point-source elastic Green’s functions. Results show that radiation emerging at downward takeoff angles appears to be dominated by the expected isotropic source contribution, while at shallower angles the motions are complicated by near-surface damage and cannot be represented with the addition of a simple secondary compensated linear vector dipole point source above the shot point. The agreement and differences of simulated source spectra with the MM71 and DJ91 models motivates the use of numerical simulations to understand observed motions and investigate seismic source features for underground explosions in various emplacement media and conditions, including non-linear rheological effects such as material strength and porosity. 相似文献
14.
—?Official Russian sources in 1996 and 1997 have stated that 340 underground nuclear tests (UNTs) were conducted during 1961–1989 at the Semipalatinsk Test Site (STS) in Eastern Kazakhstan. Only 271 of these nuclear tests appear to have been described with well-determined origin time, coordinates and magnitudes in the openly available technical literature. Thus, good open documentation has been lacking for 69 UNTs at STS.¶The main goal of our study was to provide detections, estimates of origin time and location, and magnitudes, for as many of these previously undocumented events as possible. We used data from temporary and permanent seismographic stations in the former USSR at distances from 500?km to about 1500?km from STS. As a result, we have been able to assign magnitude for eight previously located UNTs whose magnitude was not previously known. For 31 UNTs, we have estimated origin time an d assigned magnitude — and for 19 of these 31 we have obtained locations based on seismic signals. Of the remaining 30 poorly documented UNTs, 15 had announced yields that were less than one ton, and 13 occurred simultaneously with another test which was detected. There are only two UNTs, for which the announced yield exceeds one ton and we have been unable to find seismic signals.¶Most of the newly detected and located events were sub-kiloton. Their magnitudes range from 2.7 up to 5.1 (a multi-kiloton event on 1965 Feb. 4 that was often obscured at teleseismic stations by signals from an earthquake swarm in the Aleutians).¶For 17 small UNTs at STS, we compare the locations (with their uncertainties) that we had earlier determined in 1994 from analysis of regional seismic waves, with ground-truth information obtained in 1998. The average error of the seismically-determined locations is only about 5?km. The ground-truth location is almost alw ays within the predicted small uncertainty of the seismically-determined location.¶Seismically-determined yield estimates are in good agreement with the announced total annual yield of nuclear tests, for each year from 1964 to 1989 at Semipalatinsk.¶We also report the origin time, location, and seismic magnitude of 29 chemical explosions and a few earthquakes on or near STS during the years 1961–1989.¶Our new documentation of STS explosions is important for evaluating the detection, location, and identification capabilities of teleseismic and regional arrays and stations; and how these capabilities have changed with time. 相似文献
15.
G.R. Dargahi-Noubary 《Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors》1982,28(4):287-290
Further evidence supporting a non-stationary model for seismic P-waves from underground nuclear explosions are given. Results of fitting this model are compared with findings of Töksoz, Ben-Menaheim and Harkrider (1964) and Helmberger and Harkrider (1972). A method of studying dependence of the principle parameters of this model on yield of event is briefly discussed. 相似文献
16.
D. N. Anderson H. J. Patton S. R. Taylor J. L. Bonner N. D. Selby 《Pure and Applied Geophysics》2014,171(3-5):537-547
The Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT), a global ban on nuclear explosions, is currently in a ratification phase. Under the CTBT, an International Monitoring System (IMS) of seismic, hydroacoustic, infrasonic and radionuclide sensors is operational, and the data from the IMS is analysed by the International Data Centre (IDC). The IDC provides CTBT signatories basic seismic event parameters and a screening analysis indicating whether an event exhibits explosion characteristics (for example, shallow depth). An important component of the screening analysis is a statistical test of the null hypothesis H 0: explosion characteristics using empirical measurements of seismic energy (magnitudes). The established magnitude used for event size is the body-wave magnitude (denoted m b) computed from the initial segment of a seismic waveform. IDC screening analysis is applied to events with m b greater than 3.5. The Rayleigh wave magnitude (denoted M S) is a measure of later arriving surface wave energy. Magnitudes are measurements of seismic energy that include adjustments (physical correction model) for path and distance effects between event and station. Relative to m b, earthquakes generally have a larger M S magnitude than explosions. This article proposes a hypothesis test (screening analysis) using M S and m b that expressly accounts for physical correction model inadequacy in the standard error of the test statistic. With this hypothesis test formulation, the 2009 Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea announced nuclear weapon test fails to reject the null hypothesis H 0: explosion characteristics. 相似文献