共查询到15条相似文献，搜索用时 580 毫秒
1.
《武汉大学学报(信息科学版)》2021,(6)
非差模糊度经过未校准硬件延迟小数部分(fractional cycle bias,FCB)产品改正后恢复整周特性,能够显著缩短精密单点定位(precise point positioning,PPP)的初始化时间。服务端采用非组合模型估计FCB产品时,由于电离层误差的影响,原始频点L1和L2的FCB无法准确分离,因此提出一种基于消电离层组合FCB产品的非组合PPP部分模糊度固定方法。由于传统服务端消电离层组合FCB产品算法与用户端非组合模糊度固定算法具有一致性,可采用星间单差的宽巷和原始频点模糊度构建窄巷模糊度,利用消电离层组合FCB产品进行分步模糊度固定。采用全球120个MGEX(multi-GNSS experiment)测站作为服务端生成消电离层组合FCB和非组合FCB产品,再选取全球未参与服务端解算的10个测站进行评估验证。实验结果表明,相对于使用传统非组合FCB的模糊度固定方法,静态情况下,所提方法收敛精度平均提升25.0%,收敛时间缩短21.1%;仿动态条件下,所提方法收敛精度平均提升26.7%,收敛时间缩短17.9%。 相似文献
2.
《武汉大学学报(信息科学版)》2021,(6)
高精度电离层修正是非差非组合精密单点定位(precise point positioning, PPP)加速收敛的重要前提。首先基于参考站网台站观测数据,以非差非组合精密单点定位提取的电离层延迟作为建模数据源,提出一种基于多项式模型的估计天顶电离层延迟参数以及卫星硬件延迟的单差电离层模型。然后开发了服务端和用户端相应软件系统,服务端提取电离层延迟和进行单差建模,并将模型参数播发给用户端作为电离层约束进行非差非组合精密单点定位。最后在欧洲地区通过PPP提取电离层进行拟合实验,结果表明,广域地区GPS和俄罗斯GLONASS(global navigation satellite system)单系统电离层模型内外符合精度分别为1 TECu(total electron content unit)和3 TECu。采用电离层约束的非差非组合动态精密单点定位,统计136个1 h时段的定位结果,发现在附加电离层约束PPP实验中,78个时段(57.35%)收敛时间在5 min内,97个时段(71.32%)在10 min内,122个时段(89.7%)在15 min内,132个时段(97.06%)在25 min内;在无约束PPP实验中,上述收敛时间内结果分别为15个(11.03%)、64个(47.06%)、91个(66.91%)、110个(80.88%)。 相似文献
3.
基于非差非组合PPP-RTK的大气改正模型及其性能验证 总被引：2，自引：3，他引：2
高精度的大气改正是加快PPP-RTK收敛的重要前提。本文以区域跟踪网台站数据为基础,基于非差非组合PPP提取斜路径电离层和天顶对流层延迟,作为PPP-RTK大气建模的数据源。电离层延迟采用基于斜路径星间单差的改正模型,对流层采用非差天顶对流层模型,设计了相关的服务端和用户端软件系统。在系统设计上,通过服务端提取数据构建大气模型并播发,用户端接收参数并用于实时PPP-RTK定位。对上海区域进行服务端和用户端的试验,服务端计算的参数表明：GPS、GALILEO、BDS系统的电离层、对流层模型内符合精度为6~7 mm。用户端的646组PPP-RTK伪动态试验表明：水平方向30 s内收敛的占比为89.16%、1 min内收敛的占比为91.80%、2 min内收敛的占比为95.98%;三维方向收敛结果中,上述收敛时间尺度分别占总数的86.22%、88.70%和93.34%。附加大气约束后,模糊度固定率为95.59%,收敛后水平方向和三维方向定位RMSE分别为2.35和4.63 cm。实时动态试验表明,PPP首次固定时间为36 s,水平和三维定位精度分别达到了1.13和3.21 cm。 相似文献
4.
无电离层组合、Uofc和非组合精密单点定位观测模型比较 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
GNSS精密单点定位技术因其只采用单台接收机就能获得高精度的定位结果而成为近年来的研究热点。精密单点定位通常采用3种模型:无电离层组合模型、Uofc模型与非组合模型。本文从模糊度固定的角度详细论述了这3种模型的相互关系,公式推导证明了非组合模型与Uofc模型等价,且都优于无电离层组合模型;与采用等价性原理消去电离层延迟的Uofc模型相比,非组合模型将电离层延迟作为参数求解,能为用户提供附加电离层先验约束的条件,从而方便地转换为电离层加权模型。在固定宽巷模糊度的情况下,采用模糊度精度因子(ADOP)对模糊度的固定效率进行了分析,验证了Uofc模型相对于无电离层组合模型具有噪声小、不损失原始观测信息等优点。而附电离层约束的非组合模型在高精度先验电离层信息约束下能有效提高模糊度固定效率。 相似文献
5.
星间单差精密单点定位部分模糊度固定方法 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
针对传统的精密单点定位(PPP)技术由于收敛速度慢、获取高精度位置信息所需时间较长而无法满足用户对于快速高精度定位的需求的问题,该文采用了单差小数周偏差(FCB)产品固定模糊度的方法,以及部分模糊度固定的固定策略,来达到最优化使用固定解的PPP.通过对测站的数据的静态和仿动态实验分析验证,结果表明,进行部分模糊度固定的固定解定位精度要优于使用模糊度浮点解进行PPP得到的实数解的定位精度,收敛速度也有提升;而且相比于全模糊度固定策略,部分模糊度固定策略可以提升模糊度的历元固定率,使更多的固定模糊度的卫星可以参与定位,提升了定位的精度和收敛速度. 相似文献
6.
3种GPS+BDS组合PPP模型比较与分析 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
无电离层组合和非组合模型是GNSS精密单点定位(PPP)常用的两种函数模型。本文通过详细分析PPP的两种函数模型各类参数间的相关特性,建立了参数独立的函数模型。对非组合PPP模型的电离层参数引入虚拟观测方程进行约束,有效提高了PPP的收敛速度。最后,从定位精度和收敛时间两方面分析不同函数模型的GPS单系统和GPS+BDS组合PPP静态、模拟动态定位效果。结果表明:GPS单系统和GPS+BDS组合PPP定位精度相当,静态的无电离层组合与非组合PPP均可达到厘米至毫米级精度,动态PPP精度的平面优于3cm,高程优于5cm;无电离层组合PPP收敛时间优于非组合的PPP,电离层加权非组合PPP的收敛时间最短。动态定位中,电离层加权模型相比于无电离层组合模型,可减少约15%的收敛时间,相比于非组合模型,可减少约34%。 相似文献
7.
模糊度固定能够显著提高精密单点定位(PPP)的精度和收敛速度,是国内外卫星导航定位领域的研究热点．本文通过最小二乘法分离接收机端和卫星端小数周偏差(FCB),恢复非差模糊度的整数特性,将得到的卫星端FCB提供给用户,能够实现非差模糊度固定的PPP．采用全球IGS跟踪站的观测数据进行非差FCB解算,实验结果表明,宽巷FCB的稳定性较好,一周内变化小于0.1周,而窄巷FCB一天内变化较大．将获得的FCB用于模糊度固定PPP实验,E、N、U三个方向的定位精度分别为0.7 cm、0.8 cm和2.1 cm,与浮点解PPP相比,分别提高68％、51％和37％,验证了本文估计的FCB用于模糊度固定PPP的定位性能 相似文献
8.
整数相位钟法精密单点定位模糊度固定模型及效果分析 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
精密单点定位(PPP)模糊度固定方法有3种:星间单差法、整数相位钟法和钟差解耦法,但目前仅法国CNES公开发布用于整数相位钟法PPP模糊度固定的产品,因此研究基于整数相位钟法的用户端PPP模糊度固定模型很有必要.本文分析了整数相位钟法PPP模糊度固定模型,着重指出该模型与传统浮点解PPP模型的区别;提出一种顾及质量控制的逐级模糊度固定策略用于具体实施PPP模糊度固定.大量动态PPP解算试验表明:与浮点解PPP相比,固定解PPP具有更快的收敛速度且定位精度和稳定性更好. 相似文献
9.
小数周偏差可用于精密单点定位的模糊度固定,其时变特性对于FCB的播发间隔、数据总量有着重要影响。当前北斗应用进入成熟期,对北斗FCB时变特性及其变化进行研究,有利于推广北斗PPP模糊度固定应用。本文基于单差FCB的生成方法,对2017年和2019年的北斗FCB时变特性展开研究,并改进了IGSO卫星窄巷FCB的播发间隔,通过已知测站固定解PPP解算,验证了改进后的北斗FCB产品。试验表明：2019年北斗FCB的稳定性相比2017年大幅提高;IGSO卫星可每天播发一组窄巷FCB,相比原有播发间隔减小73.4%的数据总量;改进后FCB可有效应用于北斗固定解PPP,收敛速度相比浮点解提升43.1%。 相似文献
10.
由于BDS卫星的星座特性及卫星的轨道和钟差的精度影响,使得传统消电离层组合精密单点定位(PPP)的初始化时间较长。针对上述问题,文中对附加电离层约束的非组合精密单点定位算法进行研究。首先介绍非组合PPP算法,分析其与传统PPP的差异;其次分别利用CODE电离层格网产品,以反距离加权算法计算的站星电离层延迟、低阶球谐函数建立的区域电离层产品等作为先验信息对非组合PPP进行约束。通过MGEX观测网实测数据静态和仿动态计算表明,相比传统消电离层组合PPP,附加电离层约束的非组合PPP能够有效缩短初始化时间,同时能够获得高精度的定位结果。 相似文献
11.
Rapid PPP ambiguity resolution using GPS+GLONASS observations 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
Integer ambiguity resolution (IAR) in precise point positioning (PPP) using GPS observations has been well studied. The main challenge remaining is that the first ambiguity fixing takes about 30 min. This paper presents improvements made using GPS+GLONASS observations, especially improvements in the initial fixing time and correct fixing rate compared with GPS-only solutions. As a result of the frequency division multiple access strategy of GLONASS, there are two obstacles to GLONASS PPP-IAR: first and most importantly, there is distinct code inter-frequency bias (IFB) between satellites, and second, simultaneously observed satellites have different wavelengths. To overcome the problem resulting from GLONASS code IFB, we used a network of homogeneous receivers for GLONASS wide-lane fractional cycle bias (FCB) estimation and wide-lane ambiguity resolution. The integer satellite clock of the GPS and GLONASS was then estimated with the wide-lane FCB products. The effect of the different wavelengths on FCB estimation and PPP-IAR is discussed in detail. We used a 21-day data set of 67 stations, where data from 26 stations were processed to generate satellite wide-lane FCBs and integer clocks and the other 41 stations were selected as users to perform PPP-IAR. We found that GLONASS FCB estimates are qualitatively similar to GPS FCB estimates. Generally, 98.8% of a posteriori residuals of wide-lane ambiguities are within \(\pm 0.25\) cycles for GPS, and 96.6% for GLONASS. Meanwhile, 94.5 and 94.4% of narrow-lane residuals are within 0.1 cycles for GPS and GLONASS, respectively. For a critical value of 2.0, the correct fixing rate for kinematic PPP is only 75.2% for GPS alone and as large as 98.8% for GPS+GLONASS. The fixing percentage for GPS alone is only 11.70 and 46.80% within 5 and 10 min, respectively, and improves to 73.71 and 95.83% when adding GLONASS. Adding GLONASS thus improves the fixing percentage significantly for a short time span. We also used global ionosphere maps (GIMs) to assist the wide-lane carrier-phase combination to directly fix the wide-lane ambiguity. Employing this method, the effect of the code IFB is eliminated and numerical results show that GLONASS FCB estimation can be performed across heterogeneous receivers. However, because of the relatively low accuracy of GIMs, the fixing percentage of GIM-aided GPS+GLONASS PPP ambiguity resolution is very low. We expect better GIM accuracy to enable rapid GPS+GLONASS PPP-IAR with heterogeneous receivers. 相似文献
12.
卫星钟差解算及其星间单差模糊度固定 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
整数相位模糊度解算可以显著提高GNSS精密单点定位（PPP）的精度。本文提出一种解算卫星钟差的方法,通过固定星间单差模糊度恢复出能够支持单台接收机进行整数模糊度解算的卫星钟差,即所谓的“整数”钟差。为了实现星间单差模糊度固定,分别通过卫星端宽巷FCB解算和模糊度基准的选择与固定恢复出宽巷和窄巷模糊度的整数性质。为了证明本文方法的可行性,采用IGS测站的GPS数据进行卫星钟差解算试验。结果表明,在解算钟差时,星间单差模糊度固定的平均成功率为73%。得到的卫星钟差与IGS最终钟差产品相比,平均的RMS和STD分别为0.170和0.012 ns。448个IGS测站的星间单差宽巷和窄巷模糊度小数部分的分布表明本文得到的卫星钟差和FCB产品具备支持PPP用户进行模糊度固定的能力。基于以上产品开展了模拟动态PPP定位试验,结果表明模糊度固定之后,N、E、U和3D的定位精度（RMS）分别达到0.009、0.010、0.023和0.027 m,与不固定模糊度或采用IGS钟差的结果相比,分别提高了30.8%、61.5%、23.3%和37.2%。 相似文献
13.
Ambiguity resolved precise point positioning with GPS and BeiDou 总被引：2，自引：1，他引：1
This paper focuses on the contribution of the global positioning system (GPS) and BeiDou navigation satellite system (BDS) observations to precise point positioning (PPP) ambiguity resolution (AR). A GPS + BDS fractional cycle bias (FCB) estimation method and a PPP AR model were developed using integrated GPS and BDS observations. For FCB estimation, the GPS + BDS combined PPP float solutions of the globally distributed IGS MGEX were first performed. When integrating GPS observations, the BDS ambiguities can be precisely estimated with less than four tracked BDS satellites. The FCBs of both GPS and BDS satellites can then be estimated from these precise ambiguities. For the GPS + BDS combined AR, one GPS and one BDS IGSO or MEO satellite were first chosen as the reference satellite for GPS and BDS, respectively, to form inner-system single-differenced ambiguities. The single-differenced GPS and BDS ambiguities were then fused by partial ambiguity resolution to increase the possibility of fixing a subset of decorrelated ambiguities with high confidence. To verify the correctness of the FCB estimation and the effectiveness of the GPS + BDS PPP AR, data recorded from about 75 IGS MGEX stations during the period of DOY 123-151 (May 3 to May 31) in 2015 were used for validation. Data were processed with three strategies: BDS-only AR, GPS-only AR and GPS + BDS AR. Numerous experimental results show that the time to first fix (TTFF) is longer than 6 h for the BDS AR in general and that the fixing rate is usually less than 35 % for both static and kinematic PPP. An average TTFF of 21.7 min and 33.6 min together with a fixing rate of 98.6 and 97.0 % in static and kinematic PPP, respectively, can be achieved for GPS-only ambiguity fixing. For the combined GPS + BDS AR, the average TTFF can be shortened to 16.9 min and 24.6 min and the fixing rate can be increased to 99.5 and 99.0 % in static and kinematic PPP, respectively. Results also show that GPS + BDS PPP AR outperforms single-system PPP AR in terms of convergence time and position accuracy. 相似文献
14.
精密单点定位（precise point positioning，PPP）的初始化速度是制约PPP实时应用的主要因素。基于连续运行参考系统（continuously operating reference system，CORS）获取大气改正产品可以改善非组合PPP收敛时间，同时可定量探究各类大气产品对实时PPP浮点解的影响，并评估产品的精度与有效性。实时PPP实验结果表明，相对于传统PPP模式，引入电离层产品使PPP东方向收敛时间显著改善，北方向与高程方向次之，且基于非组合PPP方法获取的区域PPP电离层产品（分别改善85%、61%、18%）优于无几何距离组合相位平滑伪距方法获取的区域平滑电离层产品；引入对流层产品对高程方向的收敛时间有显著改善（52%）。而相较于单一产品和其他产品组合约束，区域PPP电离层产品和区域对流层产品组合约束PPP拥有更好的性能，对东、北、高程方向分别改善85%、63%、69%。 相似文献
15.
Generating GPS satellite fractional cycle bias for ambiguity-fixed precise point positioning 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
With the development of precise point positioning (PPP), the School of Geodesy and Geomatics (SGG) at Wuhan University is now routinely producing GPS satellite fractional cycle bias (FCB) products with open access for worldwide PPP users to conduct ambiguity-fixed PPP solution. We provide a brief theoretical background of PPP and present the strategies and models to compute the FCB products. The practical realization of the two-step (wide-lane and narrow-lane) FCB estimation scheme is described in detail. With GPS measurements taken in various situations, i.e., static, dynamic, and on low earth orbit (LEO) satellites, the quality of FCB estimation and the effectiveness of PPP ambiguity resolution (AR) are evaluated. The comparison with CNES FCBs indicated that our FCBs had a good consistency with the CNES ones. For wide-lane FCB, almost all the differences of the two products were within ±0.05 cycles. For narrow-lane FCB, 87.8 % of the differences were located between ±0.05 cycles, and 97.4 % of them were located between ±0.075 cycles. The experimental results showed that, compared with conventional ambiguity-float PPP, the averaged position RMS of static PPP can be improved from (3.6, 1.4, 3.6) to (2.0, 1.0, 2.7) centimeters for ambiguity-fixed PPP. The average accuracy improvement in the east, north, and up components reached 44.4, 28.6, and 25.0 %, respectively. A kinematic, ambiguity-fixed PPP test with observation of 80 min achieved a position accuracy of better than 5 cm at the one-sigma level in all three coordinate components. Compared with the results of ambiguity-float, kinematic PPP, the positioning biases of ambiguity-fixed PPP were improved by about 78.2, 20.8, and 65.1 % in east, north, and up. The RMS of LEO PPP test was improved by about 23.0, 37.0, and 43.0 % for GRACE-A and GRACE-B in radial, tangential, and normal directions when AR was applied to the same data set. These results demonstrated that the SGG FCB products can be produced with high quality for users anywhere around the world to carry out ambiguity-fixed PPP solutions. 相似文献