首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到19条相似文献,搜索用时 441 毫秒
1.
从金刚石中获取的包体矿物经电子探针分析其成分与镍黄铁矿相同, 该包体矿物晶体形态完好, 外形为三(六)方对称.用CCD单晶衍射仪对该矿物进行了单晶德拜衍射, 得到的39个衍射峰, 经粉末法指标化程序判别和计算, 这些衍射峰分别属于两种结构的镍黄铁矿的衍射峰: 一套为菱面体结构(六方定向)镍黄铁矿的衍射; 另一套属于立方结构的镍黄铁矿结构的衍射.菱面体结构镍黄铁矿的晶胞参数: a=0.690 62 nm, c=1.720 95 nm, V=0.710 85 nm3(六方定向); aR=0.698 61 nm, α=59.244 5°, V=0.236 95 nm3(菱面体定向).菱面体结构的衍射表明该镍黄铁矿在地幔超高压环境中形成, 出现立方结构的衍射, 反映了金刚石破碎后, 该镍黄铁矿包体在常压下相变的结果.   相似文献   

2.
对α-石英双晶上具有不同结晶学意义的晶面和切面进行了腐蚀像的微分干涉显微镜(DIC)观察与研究。经研究发现,在鉴定道芬双晶与巴西双晶上,除了双晶缝合线有差异(道芬双晶双晶缝合线为曲线而巴西双晶的双晶缝合线为直线)外,不同的结晶学晶面或切面上这两种双晶的腐蚀像也各不相同。在六方柱{1010}面存在道芬双晶处,直角梯形蚀坑的方位关系为二次轴关系;六方柱{1010}面上存在巴西双晶处,直角梯形蚀坑的方位关系为对称面关系。菱面体{1011}面上存在道芬双晶处,道芬双晶双晶缝合线两端分别是菱面体正形、菱面体负形出露处,导致蚀坑形状不同;菱面体{1011}面上存在巴西双晶处,不规则三角形蚀坑形态的方位关系为对称面关系;三方柱切面{1120}面上存在道芬双晶处,道芬双晶双晶缝合线两端分别是三方柱正形、三方柱负形出露处,导致蚀坑形状不同;三方柱切面{11120}面上存在巴西双晶处,椭圆形或四边形蚀坑方位应为对称面关系,但实验中未见到。这一研究对认清α-石英道芬双晶和巴西双晶腐蚀像的对称关系,鉴定α-石英的双晶类型具有理论与实际意义。  相似文献   

3.
比利亚谷矿床是内蒙古额尔古纳成矿带内新发现的一个铅锌(银)矿床,具有大型矿床的成矿潜力。主矿体呈脉状产于上侏罗统塔木兰沟组和满克头鄂博组火山岩地层中,受NW,NWW向张性断裂构造控制;主要金属矿物有方铅矿、闪锌矿、黄铁矿、黄铜矿、辉银矿等。为确定该矿床的成矿流体特征及成因类型,对矿石中的石英、重晶石和闪锌矿开展了流体包裹体的岩相学观察、显微测温和激光拉曼光谱分析。结果表明,上述矿物中主要发育富液相、CO2三相和少量含子矿物三相包裹体;富液相包裹体的均一温度与盐度分别为102℃~378℃和0.2%~10.5%NaCleqv,CO2三相包裹体的均一温度和盐度分别为124℃~256℃和1.8~11.2%NaCleqv,舍子矿物三相包裹体的均一温度与盐度分别为220℃和42.4%NaCleqv。单个流体包裹体气相成分的激光拉曼光谱分析显示,除石英中的部分富液相包裹体的气体成分含CO2外,不同矿物中的富液相包裹体的气体成分均为H2O。此外,该矿床成矿流体的盐度范围波动较大,重晶石中包裹体的均一温度分布范围较广,因此成矿流体属不均匀流体,流体混合作用是该矿床的重要成矿机制。综合认为,比利亚谷铅锌(银)矿床应属赋存于中生代火山岩中的与浅成一超浅成岩浆作用有关的中低温热液脉型矿床。  相似文献   

4.
为探讨新疆坡北岩体坡七侵入体中铜镍硫化物矿(化)体的成因,采用显微镜观察、磁性胶体浸润和电子探针分析等方法,对主要的金属矿物磁黄铁矿、镍黄铁矿开展了成因矿物学研究。结果表明,浸染状、稠密浸染状矿石中,磁黄铁矿为六方(NC型)磁黄铁矿,或六方磁黄铁矿与散点状单斜(4C型)磁黄铁矿构成的不规则状交生体。六方磁黄铁矿是高温结晶后缓慢降温的产物,而不规则状交生体是流体交代六方磁黄铁矿的结果。块状矿石中的磁黄铁矿是六方与单斜变体构成叶片状/箱状交生体,其成因与快速降温和热事件干扰有关。镍黄铁矿富集Co,在各类矿石中均可分为3个世代(Pn1,Pn2,Pn3),在结晶过程中硫逸度随着温度的降低而减小。等轴晶系辉砷钴矿、自形镍黄铁矿及高温黄铜矿的晶出暗示金属硫化物结晶温度普遍偏高。  相似文献   

5.
倪智勇  李诺  管申进  张辉  薛良伟 《岩石学报》2008,24(9):2058-2068
河南灵宝大湖金-钼矿床位于小秦岭金矿田,属典型的断控脉状矿床。成矿过程经历3个阶段:早阶段为黄铁矿-石英脉,遭受变形、破碎,应形成于挤压或压剪过程;中阶段为细粒的辉钼矿-黄铁矿-石英网脉,贯入到早阶段黄铁矿或石英矿物的裂隙(可呈共轭状),应形成于剪切环境;晚阶段石英-碳酸盐细脉具梳状构造,充填于张性或张扭性裂隙。即,流体成矿作用发生在赋矿断裂由挤压或压扭转向伸展或张扭性的过程中。旱阶段只发育CO2-H2O型流体包裹体;中阶段流体包裹体类型复杂,有纯CO2型、CO2-H2O型、H2O-NaCl型和含子晶包裹体,指示流体沸腾作用强烈;而晚阶段只发育水溶液包裹体。早、中、晚3个阶段的流体包裹体均一温度分别集中在400—500℃、290~470℃、220~260℃;估计的早、中阶段流体的最低捕获压力分别为138~331MPa和78~237MPa,对应于成矿深度分别为13.8km~11.0km和7.8km~8.0km。因此,成矿流体具中-高温、中-深成、低盐度、富CO2的特征,与中-深成造山型矿床一致。大湖金-钼矿床的成矿流体形成和演化及其成矿作用可利用CMF模式进行合理解释。  相似文献   

6.
新疆-甘肃北山金矿南带的成矿流体演化和成矿机制   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
刘伟  潘小菲 《岩石学报》2006,22(1):171-188
北山金矿南带是西北5省区规模最大的金矿带。选择北山南带的新金厂、老金厂和小西弓金矿床,在矿床地质和岩相学研究的基础上,对脉石英的流体包裹体进行了显微温度计和激光拉曼探针气体成分测定;对石英和矿石黄铁矿的包裹体H2O,CO2和CH4进行了H和C同位素组成测定,对石英和黄铁矿分别做了O和S同位素组成测定。3个金矿床的脉石英含有富CO2+CH4、H2O溶液以及H2O-CO2+CH4包裹体。小西弓金矿床流体包裹体的均一化温度主要介于270℃-450℃,一部分H2O溶液包裹体圈闭了高盐度流体(16.43—18.63wt.%NaCl equiv.),大部分H2O溶液包裹体和全部富CO2+CH。包裹体代表了中-低盐度(2.8%-13.6%)流体。新金厂金矿床流体包裹体的均一化温度主要介于210℃-346℃;一部分流体包裹体圈闭了高盐度(10.98%~14%NaCl equiv.)流体,一部分H2O溶液包裹体和绝大多数富CO2+CH4包裹体圈闭了中-低盐度(2.9%-8.81%NaCl equiv.)流体。老金厂金矿床H2O溶液包裹体的均一化温度主要分布于141℃-400℃,含盐度介于1.4%-8.28%,属于中-低盐度流体。进行了大气降水-围岩^18O/^16O、D/H交换反应模拟。小西弓矿床早期硫化物-石英脉金矿成矿流体对应较高的水/岩比(=0.01—0.05),其^18O/^16O和D/H组成更受钾长花岗岩者控制,硫化物的δ^34S值也接近钾长花岗岩的黄铁矿者,指示热液流体围绕着钾长花岗岩的对流淋滤。成矿晚期,围绕着花岗岩侵入体的热液对流崩溃,矿区围岩内发育更大尺度的彼此分离的弥漫性流体渗透淋滤;相应地,小西弓矿床晚期蚀变岩金矿成矿流体的8D值对应低水/岩比(0.005-≈0.01),其δ^18O值变化范围较宽,受当地中元古界变质岩控制,蚀变岩型金矿黄铁矿的δ^34S值也接近中元古界长英质片岩的黄铁矿者。新金厂金矿和老金厂金矿成矿流体的δD值和δ^18O值对应的水/岩值分别介于0.004—0.01和0.007~0.02,与岩浆流体或者下二叠统哲斯群辉绿岩和英安岩围岩具有更密切的关系。新金厂金矿和老金厂金矿黄铁矿样品的δ^34S值介于-2.58‰和-6.32‰,指示S来源于下二叠统哲斯群辉绿岩、英安岩和碳质板岩围岩。3个金矿的石英包裹体CO2(δ^13C=-2.20‰--9.14‰),以及石英和黄铁矿包裹体CH4(δ^13C=013.10‰--27.40‰)不平衡;前者来源于幔源岩浆去气,后者来源于哲斯群碳质板岩或者中元古界长英质片岩中的还原碳。3个金矿黄铁矿包裹体的CO(δ^13C=-10.79‰--23.62‰)主要来源于哲斯群碳质板岩或中元古界长英质片岩中的还原碳,但是,也混合了较少的岩浆CO2。包裹体CO2和CH4δ^13C值的系统变化,也反映了从岩浆侵位和去气、流体对流,到围岩中流体大面积弥漫性渗透淋滤的演化过程。CH4介入成矿流体,导致流体不混溶和金的沉淀。北山金矿南带的形成既不同于典型的造山带型金矿床,也不同于与侵入岩有关的金矿床。我们提出北山金矿南带的成矿模式为:岩浆去气和流体对流、岩石挤压破碎、流体弥漫性渗透淋滤。  相似文献   

7.
地幔岩中流体包裹体研究   总被引:5,自引:2,他引:3  
卢焕章 《岩石学报》2008,24(9):1954-1960
地幔岩石中的流体包裹体代表地幔流体的样品。地幔流体包裹体可以存在从地幔来的金刚石,地幔捕虏体和岩浆碳酸岩中。研究这些岩石和矿物中的流体包裹体可以得出其所代表的地幔流体的温度、压力、成分和同位素。我们目前见到的这三类地幔岩石的包裹体主要可在橄榄石、辉石、金刚石、方解石和磷灰石中见到。这些包裹体可以粗略地分为CO2包襄体和硅酸盐熔融体包裹体。又可细分为四类包裹体:(1)富碳酸盐的硅酸盐熔融包裹体。这种包裹体在金刚石、地幔岩捕虏体和岩浆碳酸盐岩中见到,它又可分为结晶质熔融包裹体和玻璃包裹体。(2)CO2包裹体。这种包裹体大多见于地幔捕虏体中,在金刚石和岩浆碳酸岩中也可见到。(3)含硫化物的包裹体。这种包裹体见于地幔捕虏体中,与纯CO2包裹体和含CO2的熔融包裹体共存。(4)高密度的流体包裹体。这种包裹体见于金刚石中,是一种高盐度、高密度的含K、Cl和H2O的流体包裹体,又可分为高卤水包裹体和含卤水的富硅的碳酸盐岩浆包裹体。从对金刚石、地幔捕虏体和岩浆碳酸盐岩中流体包裹体的研究表明,地幔流体存在不均匀性和不混溶性。  相似文献   

8.
粉色水晶内针状包裹体的成分与分布特征研究   总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0  
胡哲  郭颖 《岩矿测试》2018,37(3):306-312
粉色水晶内部的针状包裹体常被认为是三组呈三方对称的金红石或蓝线石,至今未有定论。本文选取含有针状包裹体的4颗星光粉晶,利用宝石学显微镜、激光拉曼光谱仪及紫外可见分光光度计对样品进行观察与测试,以确定包裹体的分布特征及矿物种类。无损拉曼测试发现包裹体的特征振动峰949 cm-1、999 cm-1与蓝线石标准峰相匹配,可确定针状包裹体为蓝线石或与其极为相近的矿物。放大检查发现,包裹体直径约0.5μm,长度可达毫米级,近定向分布,整体上呈汇聚状,在某些位置可粗略分为三组,同组针状包裹体近似平行分布。造成六射星光的三组蓝线石立体相交,未观察到明显的三方对称关系,与水晶的结晶习性无直接关系,故认为蓝线石为先成包裹体,在水晶的生长过程中被捕获。紫外可见分光光谱仅显示粉色蓝线石的特征吸收,表明大量的粉色蓝线石包裹体对粉色水晶的粉色有一定贡献。  相似文献   

9.
福建丁家山铅锌矿区磁黄铁矿成因矿物学特征研究   总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3  
通过野外观察、光学显微镜、矿物场填图、X射线衍射、微区成分分析等手段,针对福建丁家山铅锌矿区磁黄铁矿的成因矿物学特征进行研究。结果表明,丁家山铅锌矿区磁黄铁矿具沿北东向断层串珠状排布,揭示明显的热液成矿特征;矿区内有4类产出形态各异的磁黄铁矿,多为单斜、六方混合相磁黄铁矿,其中单斜磁黄铁矿为六方磁黄铁矿的固溶体分离产物,指示矿区成矿为缓慢的降温过程;六方磁黄铁矿结晶温度在322℃~304℃之间,与同成矿期石英包裹体均一测温结果完全符合。六方磁黄铁矿-黄铁矿-闪锌矿成矿压力计计算结果集中在0.2GPa~0.3GPa之间,与该区燕山期花岗岩成岩压力完全一致。由此认为丁家山铅锌矿为燕山期花岗岩与中-新元古代马面山岩群龙北溪组上段经区域变质的富钙质岩发生接触交代作用而形成的矽卡岩型矿床。  相似文献   

10.
王磊  朱永峰 《矿床地质》2014,33(3):575-595
新疆哈图金矿床存在2种成因的黄铁矿,沉积成因的草莓状或细粒黄铁矿与热液成因黄铁矿。草莓状黄铁矿富Ni贫As,被热液矿物充填或交代。热液成因的细脉浸染状黄铁矿具多阶段演化特征:早期黄铁矿(Py1)呈疏松多孔的海绵状结构,被后期黄铁矿增生,As含量范围明显间断,早期黄铁矿(Py1)是草莓体在热液叠加下重结晶的产物。Py2以Py1为核继续生长,致密均一的晶体内部存在长柱状毒砂、蠕虫状闪锌矿、磁黄铁矿、黄铜矿、黝铜矿和自然金包体,晶间和裂隙中充填黄铜矿、黝铜矿、闪锌矿和自然金。主成矿阶段的黄铁矿与大量毒砂共生呈脉状(Py3a)或浸染状(Py3b),晶间可见黄铜矿、闪锌矿、磁黄铁矿、车轮矿和自然金。热液黄铁矿的Ni、S含量较低,而As含量较高。随着成矿作用的进行,As逐渐替代黄铁矿中的S。根据矿物共生组合,可将哈图金矿床成岩成矿作用划分为草莓状黄铁矿阶段、石英-钠长石阶段(Ⅰ)、白云母-磷灰石阶段(Ⅱ)、黄铁矿-自然金阶段(Ⅲ)、毒砂-黄铁矿阶段(Ⅳ)和石英-方解石阶段(Ⅴ),成矿期白云母(Ms2和Ms3)和磷灰石(Ap2)富FeO、MgO、MnO。与草莓状黄铁矿伴生的泥质和石墨,显著改变了成矿流体的氧逸度,诱发金沉淀形成金矿化。  相似文献   

11.
Quantifying strain birefringence halos around inclusions in diamond   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
The pressure and temperature conditions of formation of natural diamond can be estimated by measuring the residual stress that an inclusion remains under within a diamond. Raman spectroscopy has been the most commonly used technique for determining this stress by utilising pressure-sensitive peak shifts in the Raman spectrum of both the inclusion and the diamond host. Here, we present a new approach to measure the residual stress using quantitative analysis of the birefringence induced in the diamond. As the analysis of stress-induced birefringence is very different from that of normal birefringence, an analytical model is developed that relates the spherical inclusion size, R i, host diamond thickness, L, and measured value of birefringence at the edge of the inclusion, \Updelta n(R\texti )\textav \Updelta n(R_{\text{i}} )_{\text{av}} , to the peak value of birefringence that has been encountered; to first order \Updelta n\textpk = (3/4)(L/R\texti )  \Updelta n(R\texti )\textav \Updelta n_{\text{pk}} = (3/4)(L/R_{\text{i}} ) \, \Updelta n(R_{\text{i}} )_{\text{av}} . From this birefringence, the remnant pressure (P i) can be calculated using the photoelastic relationship \Updelta n\textpk = - (3/4)n3 q\textiso P\texti \Updelta n_{\text{pk}} = - (3/4)n^{3} q_{\text{iso}} P_{\text{i}} , where q iso is a piezo-optical coefficient, which can be assumed to be independent of crystallographic orientation, and n is the refractive index of the diamond. This model has been used in combination with quantitative birefringence analysis with a MetriPol system and compared to the results from both Raman point and 2D mapping analysis for a garnet inclusion in a diamond from the Udachnaya mine (Russia) and coesite inclusions in a diamond from the Finsch mine (South Africa). The birefringence model and analysis gave a remnant pressure of 0.53 ± 0.01 GPa for the garnet inclusion, from which a source pressure was calculated as 5.7 GPa at 1,175°C (temperature obtained from IR analysis of the diamond host). The Raman techniques could not be applied quantitatively to this sample to support the birefringence model; they were, however, applied to the largest coesite inclusion in the Finsch sample. The remnant pressure values obtained were 2.5 ± 0.1 GPa (birefringence), 2.5 ± 0.3 GPa (2D Raman map), and 2.5–2.6 GPa (Raman point analysis from all four inclusions). However, although the remnant pressures from the three methods were self-consistent, they led to anomalously low source pressure of 2.9 GPa at 1,150°C (temperature obtained from IR analysis) raising serious concerns about the use of the coesite-in-diamond geobarometer.  相似文献   

12.
A paleo-alluvial 0.21 ct yellow diamond (L058) from Bingara (NSW) has three inclusions of coesite (two subequant crystals and one thin plate), each under more than 3.1 GPa internal pressure as measured by Raman spectroscopy. These inclusions cause overlapping birefringent retardation stress/strain haloes in the host diamond, visible under cross-polarised light. The complicated retardation pattern is quantified by mapping targeted retardation contours (170 nm, 270 nm and 380 nm) onto a photo of the diamond. A mathematical model of retardation is developed for each inclusion, and then the combined light retardations (CLR) are calculated using radial and tangential components with spherical and elliptical geometries. The CLR model reproduces most features of the measured data, but remaining differences may be due to local release of stress/strain by two short fractures radiating from one inclusion.  相似文献   

13.
We report the first finding of diamond and moissanite in metasedimentary crustal rocks of Pohorje Mountains (Slovenia) in the Austroalpine ultrahigh‐pressure (UHP) metamorphic terrane of the Eastern Alps. Microscopic observations and Raman spectroscopy show that diamond occurs in situ as inclusions in garnet, being heterogeneously distributed. Under the optical microscope, diamond‐bearing inclusions are of cuboidal to rounded shape and of pinkish, yellow to brownish colour. The Raman spectra of the investigated diamond show a sharp, first order peak of sp3‐bonded carbon, in most cases centred between 1332 and 1330 cm?1, with a full width at half maximum between 3 and 5 cm?1. Several spectra show Raman bands typical for disordered graphitic (sp2‐bonded) carbon. Detailed observations show that diamond occurs either as a monomineralic, single‐crystal inclusion or it is associated with SiC (moissanite), CO2 and CH4 in polyphase inclusions. This rare record of diamond occurring with moissanite as fluid‐inclusion daughter minerals implies the crystallization of diamond and moissanite from a supercritical fluid at reducing conditions. Thermodynamic modelling suggests that diamond‐bearing gneisses attained P–T conditions of ≥3.5 GPa and 800–850 °C, similar to eclogites and garnet peridotites. We argue that diamond formed when carbonaceous sediment underwent UHP metamorphism at mantle depth exceeding 100 km during continental subduction in the Late Cretaceous (c. 95–92 Ma). The finding of diamond confirms UHP metamorphism in the Pohorje Mountains, the most deeply subducted part of Austroalpine units.  相似文献   

14.
Microinclusions in octahedral diamond crystals from kimberlites of Shandong Province, eastern China, have been studied with analytical scanning electron microscopy. Native iron, tungsten, and lead; Fe-Cr intermetallic compounds; polydymite; ilmenite; halite; and matlockite (PbFCl) have been identified on the crystal surfaces. Microinclusions of native iron and chrome, Fe-Cr intermetallic compounds, pentlandite, Cr-free garnet, calcite, and apatite, as well as a relatively large (100 × 270 μm) inclusion representing an intergrowth of clinopyroxene, calcite, and apatite, have been revealed on the surfaces of fresh chips of the samples. The deep geological processes that could have resulted in the formation of such unusual mineral assemblages are discussed in the light of new experimental data.  相似文献   

15.
As a step towards resolving the genesis of inclusions in diamonds, a new technique is presented. This technique combines cathodoluminescence (CL) and electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) using a focused ion beam–scanning electron microscope (FIB–SEM) instrument with the aim of determining, in detail, the three-dimensional diamond zonation adjacent to a diamond inclusion. EBSD reveals that mineral inclusions in a single diamond have similar crystallographic orientations to the host, within ±0.4°. The chromite inclusions record a systematic change in Mg# and Cr# from core to the rim of the diamond that corresponds with a ~80°C decrease of their formation temperature as established by zinc thermometry. A chromite inclusion, positioned adjacent to a boundary between two major diamond growth zones, is multi-faceted with preferred octahedral and cubic faces. The chromite is surrounded by a volume of non-luminescent diamond (CL halo) that partially obscures any diamond growth structures. The CL halo has apparent crystallographic morphology with symmetrically oriented pointed features. The CL halo is enriched in ~200 ppm Cr and ~80 ppm Fe and is interpreted to have a secondary origin as it overprints a major primary diamond growth structure. The diamond zonation adjacent to the chromite is complex and records both syngenetic and protogenetic features based on current inclusion entrapment models. In this specific case, a syngenetic origin is favoured with the complex form of the inclusion and growth layers indicating changes of growth rates at the diamond–chromite interface. Combined EBSD and 3D-CL imaging appears an extremely useful tool in resolving the ongoing discussion about the timing of inclusion growth and the significance of diamond inclusion studies.  相似文献   

16.
In an attempt to better define the depths of formation of eclogitic-paragenesis diamonds from the Argyle lamproite pipe, we have employed a Laser Raman microprobe to determine the Raman peak shift of a garnet inclusion (extracted from diamond) with pressure in a diamond-anvil pressure cell. On the basis of these data, we further found that the in situ garnet inclusions record near-atmospheric pressures within the limits of experimental uncertainty. Data on the compressibility and thermal expansivity of both diamond and garnet were used to define a P-T curve for the entrapment of garnet in diamond. A window within the range 47 kbar at 1100° C (150 km) to 93 kbar at 1500° C (280 km) for the formation of syngenetic garnet inclusions in diamond is defined by the intersection of the continental geotherm with the diamond-graphite boundary and the entrapment curve determined in the present study. This P-T window is consistent with the constraints imposed by other petrological studies of co-existing inclusions. Most of eclogitic-paragenesis diamonds from Argyle are estimated to have formed at a depth less than 250 km, if temperature estimates from petrological study are used.  相似文献   

17.
Sulfide inclusions in diamonds, the most common of all inclusions, contain critical evidence about the timing and physical/chemical conditions prevailing during diamond formation. Typically, sulfide inclusions are encapsulated as a monosulfide solid solution (Mss) in the Fe-Ni-S system, with a minor amount of Cu. This Mss and the enclosing diamond have sufficiently different thermal expansion properties, so that, after encapsulation, the Mss creates a series of cracks in the diamond radiating from the sulfide. On cooling, this increase in volume permits the Mss to undergo exsolution to an assemblage of pyrrhotite + pentlandite + chalcopyrite + pyrite. The kinetics of this exsolution is so rapid that practically no Mss remains in nature. Instead, in recovered diamonds, all sulfides that originally were Mss now consist of this fine-grained assemblage. Chalcopyrite prefers to form around the edges of the inclusions and also migrates into the minute cracks in the diamonds. It is the bulk composition of the Mss as encapsulated that is important for interpretation of diamond petrogenesis (P- versus E-type diamonds) and to the commonly used Re-Os dating technique. However, this bulk composition is definitely not attainable with polished sections cut through the inclusions. The assumption that the kernel of the sulfide inclusion for Re-Os age dating represents the entire original Mss may also be incorrect, depending what has been lost, mostly chalcopyrite, which has migrated into the surrounding cracks within the diamond host.  相似文献   

18.
The results of the study of diamonds with inclusions of high-pressure modification of SiO2 (coesite) by Raman spectroscopy are reported. It is established that the octahedral crystal from the Zapolyarnaya pipe is characterized by the highest residual pressure (2.7 ± 0.07 GPa). An intermediate value of this parameter (2.1 ± 0.07 GPa) was obtained for a crystal of transitional habit from the Maiskaya pipe. The minimal Raman shift was registered for coesite in diamond from the Komsomol’skaya–Magnitnaya pipe and provided a calculated residual pressure of 1.8 ± 0.03 GPa. The residual pressures for crystals from the placer deposits of the Kuoika and Bol’shaya Kuonamka rivers are 2.7 ± 0.07 and 3.1 ± 0.1 GPa, respectively. Octahedral crystals were formed in the mantle at a higher pressure than rhombododecahedral diamonds.  相似文献   

19.
Twenty-five diamonds recovered from 21 diamondiferous peridotitic micro-xenoliths from the A154 South and North kimberlite pipes at Diavik (Slave Craton) match the general peridotitic diamond production at this mine with respect to colour, carbon isotopic composition, and nitrogen concentrations and aggregation states. Based on garnet compositions, the majority of the diamondiferous microxenoliths is lherzolitic (G9) in paragenesis, in stark contrast to a predominantly harzburgitic (G10) inclusion paragenesis for the general diamond production. For garnet inclusions in diamonds from A154 South, the lherzolitic paragenesis, compared to the harzburgitic paragenesis, is distinctly lower in Cr content. For microxenolith garnets, however, Cr contents for garnets of both the parageneses are similar and match those of the harzburgitic inclusion garnets. Assuming that the microxenolith diamonds reflect a sample of the general diamond population, the abundant Cr-rich lherzolitic garnets formed via metasomatic overprinting of original harzburgitic diamond sources subsequent to diamond formation, conversion of original harzburgitic diamond sources occurred in the course of metasomatic overprint re-fertilization. Metasomatic overprinting after diamond formation is supported by the finding of a highly magnesian olivine inclusion (Fo95) in a microxenolith diamond that clearly formed in a much more depleted environment than indicated by the composition of its microxenolith host. Chondrite normalized REE patterns of microxenolith garnets are predominantly sinusoidal, similar to observations for inclusion garnets. Sinusoidal REEN patterns are interpreted to indicate a relatively mild metasomatic overprint through a highly fractionated (very high LREE/HREE) fluid. The predominance of such patterns may explain why the proposed metasomatic conversion of harzburgite to lherzolite appears to have had no destructive effect on diamond content. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号