共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 296 毫秒
1.
2.
由于天线本身的特性及机械加工等原因,GPS卫星和接收机天线相位中心与其几何中心不重合,从而产生相位中心偏差。某些类型的天线该偏差甚至可达数cm,直接影响高精度GPS测量的精确可靠性[1]。讨论了GAMIT软件在高精度GPS数据处理中进行天线相位中心改正的原理、方法和策略,结合美国IGS观测站及南加州区域站观测数据,对改正方法及策略进行了实验对比与分析。结果表明:对接收机天线相位中心和卫星天线相位中心采用模型改正,而卫星天线相位中心偏移不改正,所得到的基线解算结果较好[2];地面接收机天线方位角的变化对U方向的基线解算结果有较大影响,在高精度GPS测量中,必须进行天线方位角的变化改正。 相似文献
3.
4.
针对天线相位中心改正影响GPS数据解算以及处理软件不能识别接收机天线类型的问题,该文提出了利用近似型号的天线进行数据处理的方法。首先利用IGS站精确确定天线相位中心改正对数据解算造成的影响,再利用IGMAS站验证方法的可靠性。该文选取部分IGS、IGMAS站的数据,利用GAMIT软件进行试验并分析。结果表明,当不使用天线相位改正模型时,增大了单天基线解的NRM_S值,并增加15.5%的基线误差,对精密定位能带来平均2cm的影响;当将处理软件不识别的天线换成近似能识别的天线时,基线解效果要比不使用天线改正效果好,水平和垂向的定位精度均在3.9mm左右,比使用原装能识别天线的定位精度稍差。该方法既保证了精度,也较为简单快捷。 相似文献
5.
对于高精度的GNSS数据处理,特别是当多种品牌的GNSS接收机共同作业时,对天线进行相位中心改正是非常有必要的。当采用TBC处理非天宝类型GNSS接收机数据时,在导入数据时,有时会出现不识别接收机和天线类型的错误或警告。通过修改Rinex格式文件头的接收机及天线类型,使其与TBC软件中接收机及天线配置文件中信息一致,问题得到解决。本文还对此类问题做了一些引申,结语给出了若干条建议。 相似文献
6.
7.
本文从天线相位中心改正的原理出发,介绍了如何在 GAMIT 中添加天线相位中心改正参数,并通过两组实验分别验证了几种GAMIT解算中未知类型天线相位中心的改正方法,对实验结果进行比对分析,对几种方案的适用情况进行了总结。 相似文献
8.
GPS天线相位中心误差是影响GPS测量精度的一项重要误差源。因此,在进行高精度的GPS定位测量时,必须进行天线定向,并对天线相位中心进行必要的模型改正。介绍了采用规范中常规相对定位检测法,检测出天线相位中心偏差的水平分量与垂直分量,并分析了该方法存在的不足。针对该方法的不足,提出了一种改进的新检测方法。实例表明,新方法可以快速简便地检测出天线相位中心偏差的水平分量,并具有较高的精度和可靠性,适合野外对GPS天线的检测。 相似文献
9.
由于天线本身的特性及机械加工等原因,GPS卫星和接收机天线相位中心与其几何中心不重合,从而产生相位中心偏差。某些类型的天线该偏差甚至可达数cm,直接影响高精度GPS测量的精确可靠性。IGS改正模型文件中给出的是每隔5°方位角和天顶角时的天线相位中心变化改正值,本文用VS程序设计通过线性内插算法获得任意方位角和天顶角下的相位中心变化改正值。 相似文献
10.
11.
Investigation of GPS antenna mean phase centre offsets using a full roving observation strategy 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
L. Bányai 《Journal of Geodesy》2005,79(4-5):222-230
In practice, a relatively simple calibration method of full rotation and antenna swapping techniques can be used to control individual GPS antenna mean phase centre offsets without any ground truth survey. Based on these techniques a new full roving strategy is introduced, which is a generalisation of the full rotation and antenna swapping techniques for estimating all of the three components of the mean phase centre offsets in one processing step. This new technique can be used not only for calibration purposes, but also as an observation strategy for a local high-precision network. In the latter case, the proposed method is similar to the classical geodetic approaches, where the biases are cancelled or estimated by proper observation strategies. 相似文献
12.
在精密定位中,GNSS接收机天线相位中心变化是必须进行改正的影响因素。目前成熟的微波暗室法和自动机器人法,对于一般用户而言,不具备相关实验条件,而野外相对法相对简单、易操作。为此,本文利用相对检测法,对GNSS接收机天线相位中心变化进行检测。实例表明,此方法可获得精度优于±3 mm的检测结果,因此可利用此方法对其他类型天线PCV值进行检测,也可借鉴此方法对北斗接收机天线相位中心变化进行检测。同时论文分析了影响检测精度,提出了有益改进建议。 相似文献
13.
施品浩 《武汉大学学报(信息科学版)》1990,(1)
本文讨论了GPS测量的重要误差来源之一——接收机天线相位中心漂移误差,研究了表征平均相位中心的基本参数及其检测和处理方法。如果用户设备进行了这种检测,并对观测成果作了相应的修正,目前大部分商品接收机在几十公里以内的短过测量中,精度可以提高到3 mm+2 ppm·d(d为边长,单位:km),同时解决了混合机组参加GPS网观测和处理的难题。 相似文献
14.
Markus Rothacher 《GPS Solutions》2001,4(4):55-60
Three major GPS antenna calibration methods are available toda: the relative field calibrations using the GPS data collected
on short baselines, the absolute field calibrations, where the GPS antenna is rotated and tilted by a robot, and calibration
measurements in an anechoic chamber. Mean antenna offsets and the elevation-dependent phase center variations of GPS antennas
determined by all three techniques are compared to assess their accuracy. The analysis of global GPS data with these sets
of calibration values reveals that the offsets and variations of the satellite antenna phase centers have to be considered,
too, to obtain a consistent picture. ? 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 相似文献
15.
一种顾及现势指向的上行天线阵相位中心精确标校方法 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
针对上行天线阵相位中心标校技术粗糙、精度不高等问题,引入精密工程测量技术测定天线实际状态,提出了一种顾及现势指向的相位中心精确标校方法。首先,利用工业摄影测量系统获取天线各姿态的型面数据,并通过最小二乘法拟合求解出现势性强的机械轴;然后,用矩阵法解算各姿态下机械轴的交点作为旋转中心;最后,基于反角度加权插值法推估得到天线在任意姿态下的机械轴,进而从投影中心沿机械轴延伸既定长度获得可靠的相位中心。以3台φ3 m上行阵天线为试验对象,通过工程控制网统一摄影测量坐标系,并按照本文方法标校天线相位中心。电信号合成效果表明,本文方法能有效克服天线自重变形、机械安装等因素的影响,实现了相位中心的精确标校,增强了上行天线阵合成信号的幅度。 相似文献
16.
Absolute calibration of GPS antennas: laboratory results and comparison with field and robot techniques 总被引：5，自引：2，他引：5
A critical assessment of the accuracy of GPS antenna calibration is most effectively done by comparison between different calibration methods. We present new chamber calibrations of five different GPS receiver antenna types in an anechoic chamber and a comparison of an individual antenna calibrated by the absolute field calibration technique with robot mount of IfE/GEO++. The accuracy is described using standard error parameters which allow the characterization of the quality of different antennas. The results validate the absolute calibration methods at the 1-mm level and confirm the presence of significant variations in quality between antennas of different design. For the antenna pattern we directly use the measured phase variations and do not have to fit any functions for the chamber calibrations. We include the results of an earlier test made with a set of identical antennas calibrated at five different institutions: two using the absolute field technique with robot mount and three others applying the standard field calibration with reference antenna. 相似文献
17.
18.
Influence of different GPS receiver antenna calibration models on geodetic positioning 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
Q. Baire C. Bruyninx J. Legrand E. Pottiaux W. Aerts P. Defraigne N. Bergeot J. M. Chevalier 《GPS Solutions》2014,18(4):529-539
To better understand how receiver antenna calibration models contribute to GPS positioning error budget, we compare station positions estimated with different calibration models: igs05.atx, igs08.atx and individual antenna calibrations. First, the impact of switching from the igs05.atx antenna calibration model to the igs08.atx antenna calibration model is investigated using the EUREF Permanent Network historical data set from 1996 until April 2011. It is confirmed that these position offsets can be effectively represented by the igs05.atx to igs08.atx latitude-dependent model. Then, we demonstrate that the position offsets resulting from the use of individual calibrations instead of type mean igs08.atx calibrations can reach up to 1 cm in the up component, while in the horizontal, the offsets generally stay below 4 mm. Finally, using six antennas individually calibrated by a robot as well as in an anechoic chamber, we observe a position agreement of 2 mm in the horizontal component and a bias of 5 mm in the up component. Larger position offsets, dependent on the antenna/radome type, are, however, found when these individual calibrations are compared to type mean calibrations of two tested antennas. 相似文献
19.
Oliver Montenbruck Miquel Garcia-Fernandez Yoke Yoon Steffen Schön Adrian Jäggi 《GPS Solutions》2009,13(1):23-34
Phase center variations of the receiver and transmitter antenna constitute a remaining uncertainty in the high precision orbit
determination (POD) of low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites using GPS measurements. Triggered by the adoption of absolute phase
patterns in the IGS processing standards, a calibration of the Sensor Systems S67-1575-14 antenna with GFZ choke ring has
been conducted that serves as POD antenna on various geodetic satellites such as CHAMP, GRACE and TerraSAR-X. Nominal phase
patterns have been obtained with a robotic measurement system in a field campaign and the results were used to assess the
impact of receiver antenna phase patterns on the achievable positioning accuracy. Along with this, phase center distortions
in the actual spacecraft environment were characterized based on POD carrier phase residuals for the GRACE and TerraSAR-X
missions. It is shown that the combined ground and in-flight calibration can improve the carrier phase modeling accuracy to
a level of 4 mm which is close to the pure receiver noise. A 3.5 cm (3D rms) consistency of kinematic and reduced dynamic
orbit determination solutions is achieved for TerraSAR-X, which presumably reflects the limitations of presently available
GPS ephemeris products. The reduced dynamic solutions themselves match the observations of high grade satellite laser ranging
stations to 1.5 cm but are potentially affected by cross-track biases at the cm-level. With respect to the GPS based relative
navigation of TerraSAR-X/TanDEM-X formation, the in-flight calibration of the antenna phase patterns is considered essential
for an accurate modeling of differential carrier phase measurements and a mm level baseline reconstruction.
相似文献
| Oliver MontenbruckEmail: |
20.
在高精度GNSS定位中,接收机天线相位中心偏差(PCO)和天线相位中心变化(PCV)的影响不可忽略。目前,IGS发布的绝对天线相位模型文件中包含了GPS/GLONASS系统的标定值,但是没有发布北斗系统(BDS)的标定值。本文借助机械臂可以控制天线自由旋转,在数小时内实现全方位GNSS观测的特性,采用历元间差分的方法对接收机天线包括GPS L1/L2和BDSB1I/B2I/B3I等多个频点的PCO和PCV分别进行标定和拟合。标定结果表明,比较最小二乘估计的GPS PCO与IGS发布值,其STD和RMS在L1/L2上均小于1 mm;BDS PCO估计值的STD在B1I/B2I/B3I上分别为0.5、0.3、0.3 mm。利用球谐函数拟合的GPS PCV格网值与IGS发布值相比,其偏差在天顶距小于75°时均小于1.5 mm。BDS PCV拟合值范围均在-5~8 mm,且随天顶距变化曲线呈现波谷状。BDS PCV在低高度角处拟合值波动较大,随方位角变化曲线峰值-峰值最大达到了5.6 mm。 相似文献