共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
Migration of Depocenters and Accumulation Centers and its Indication of Subsidence Centers in the Mesozoic Ordos Basin 总被引：3，自引：2，他引：1
Based on the integrated study of structure attributions and characteristics of the original basin in combination with lithology and lithofacies, sedimentary provenance analysis and thickness distribution of the Mesozoic Ordos Basin, it is demonstrated that the depocenters migrated counterclockwise from southeast to the north and then to the southwest from the Middle-Late Triassic to the Early Cretaceous. There were no unified and larger-scale accumulation centers except several small isolated accumulation centers before the Early Cretaceous. The reasons why belts of relatively thick strata were well developed in the western basin in several stages are that this area is near the west boundary of the original Ordos Basin, there was abundant sediment supply and the hydrodynamic effect was strong. Therefore, they stand for local accumulation centers. Until the Early Cretaceous, depocenters, accumulation centers and subsidence centers were superposed as an entity in the southwest part of the Ordos Basin. Up to the end of the Middle Jurassic, there still appeared a paleogeographic and paleostructural higher-in-west and lower-in-east framework in the residual basin to the west of the Yellow River. The depocenters of the Ordos Basin from the Middle–Late Triassic to the Middle Jurassic were superposed consistently. The relatively high thermal maturation of Mesozoic and Paleozoic strata in the depocenters and their neighborhood suggest active deep effects in these areas. Generally, superposition of depocenters in several periods and their consistency with high thermal evolution areas reveal the control of subsidence processes. Therefore, depocenters may represent the positions of the subsidence centers. The subsidence centers (or depocenters) are located in the south of the large-scale cratonic Ordos Basin. This is associated with flexural subsidence of the foreland, resulting from the strong convergence and orogenic activity contemporaneous with the Qinling orogeny. 相似文献
2.
鄂尔多斯盆地中生代沉积和堆积中心迁移及其地质意义 总被引：11，自引：1，他引：10
通过对鄂尔多斯盆地中生代构造属性、原盆面貌、岩性岩相组合、物源分析和厚度分布特征等的综合研究表明,从中晚三叠世至早白垩世,盆地沉积中心由东南向北、再向西南发生逆时针迁移;在盆地西部,早白垩世沉积前没有统一或规模较大的堆积中心,仅存在孤零分布或彼此分割、规模不大的局部堆积中心。盆地西部多个时期出现的地层较厚分布区带,是该区距盆地西界较近,物源供给充足、水动力作用强所致,故代表局部堆积中心。早白垩世,沉积、堆积和沉降中心才在盆地西南部“三位一体” 叠合分布。直到中侏罗世末,在黄河之西的今盆地残留区,总体仍呈西高东低的古地理—构造格局。盆地中晚三叠世—中侏罗世各期的沉积中心在位置上大体一致,上下大部重叠;该沉积中心及近邻,古生界和中生界的热演化程度为盆地最高,显示该区深部作用较为活跃。综合分析认为,中生代各期沉积中心的叠置及其与高热演化地区的重合,反映为总体受沉降中心控制所致,可作为盆地沉降中心的代表。大型鄂尔多斯克拉通内盆地中生代各期沉积(沉降)中心在位置上偏于盆地南部,与秦岭造山带同期强烈的会聚造山活动产生的前陆挠曲沉降相关。 相似文献
3.
构造沉降作为盆地成因研究中的重要组成部分,对其特征进行分析有助于盆地成因的解析。本次通过对鄂尔多斯盆地内5口典型探井的多期不整合所代表的的剥蚀厚度进行恢复,结合去压实矫正模型以及平均密度、平均古水深等参数的确定,较为精确地刻画出了鄂尔多斯盆地不同构造单元自早寒武世至今的构造沉降特征,同时结合裂谷盆地瞬时拉张模型、裂后热坳陷模型以及前陆盆地挠曲模型对构造沉降曲线进行了模拟,对盆地成因进行分析。鄂尔多斯盆地中寒武世—中生代末期主要由早古生代沉降旋回、二叠—三叠纪沉降旋回与侏罗—白垩纪沉降旋回组成。其中岩石圈热冷却作用引起的沉降贯穿全地质时期。早古生代沉降旋回中,中寒武世的加速沉降主要体现在盆地南部,沉降机制为岩石圈伸展减薄,中奥陶世马家期为全盆地尺度的加速沉降,沉降机制仍为岩石圈伸展减薄。二叠—三叠纪沉降旋回中,晚二叠世—早-中三叠世为该旋回的加速沉降期,该期加速沉降具有多幕裂陷的特征。侏罗—白垩纪沉降旋回中,中侏罗世盆地南部处于缓慢沉降期,沉降机制为岩石圈热冷却作用,晚侏罗世—早白垩世,除伊盟隆起,盆地整体处于加速沉降期,沉降机制为前陆盆地引起的挠曲沉降。 相似文献
4.
《International Geology Review》2012,54(11):1417-1442
ABSTRACTThe Ordos Basin, situated in the western part of the North China Craton, preserves the 150-million-year history of North China Craton disruption. Those sedimentary sources from Late Triassic to early Middle Jurassic are controlled by the southern Qinling orogenic belt and northern Yinshan orogenic belt. The Middle and Late Jurassic deposits are received from south, north, east, and west of the Ordos Basin. The Cretaceous deposits are composed of aeolian deposits, probably derived from the plateau to the east. The Ordos Basin records four stages of volcanism in the Mesozoic–Late Triassic (230–220 Ma), Early Jurassic (176 Ma), Middle Jurassic (161 Ma), and Early Cretaceous (132 Ma). Late Triassic and Early Jurassic tuff develop in the southern part of the Ordos Basin, Middle Jurassic in the northeastern part, while Early Cretaceous volcanic rocks have a banding distribution along the eastern part. Mesozoic tectonic evolution can be divided into five stages according to sedimentary and volcanic records: Late Triassic extension in a N–S direction (230–220 Ma), Late Triassic compression in a N–S direction (220–210 Ma), Late Triassic–Early Jurassic–Middle Jurassic extension in a N–S direction (210–168 Ma), Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous compression in both N–S and E–W directions (168–136 Ma), and Early Cretaceous extension in a NE–SW direction (136–132 Ma). 相似文献
5.
鄂尔多斯盆地中生代地层剥蚀量估算及其地质意义 总被引：42，自引：3，他引：39
盆地演化中地层的沉积与剥蚀及盆地的历史构造形态变动是盆地分析及其矿产富集的重要影响因素。本文考虑到盆地西部白垩系的声波时差资料的分段性和估算中生代三叠纪以来抬升剥蚀事件强度所需选择合理方法的重要性,采用钻井分层资料“点连线,线线相交闭合”方式,应用以地层对比为主的方法估算了三叠纪以来4期地层抬升并遭受剥蚀的剥蚀量。估算结果发现,白垩纪末期为三叠纪以来最强烈一期全盆抬升剥蚀事件,三叠纪末期、中侏罗世和侏罗纪末期等3期剥蚀事件相对较弱。剥蚀强度分布与盆地演化模拟结果表明,盆地自三叠纪以来的构造变动表现为一掀斜过程;对盆地三叠系油气生成、运聚的影响分析认为,三叠系烃源岩在晚侏罗世前已生烃,掀斜构造演化过程使油气运移指向盆地东部及东南地区。 相似文献
6.
中生代鄂尔多斯盆地陆源碎屑成分及其构造属性 总被引：24，自引：5，他引：19
运用区域沉积-构造背景分析与陆源碎屑成分判别构造环境相结合的综合研究方法,在对鄂尔多斯盆地沉积-构造特征及其演化历史研究的基础上,采用Dickinson等陆源碎屑成分与构造环境关系判别标准和图版,统计分析了鄂尔多斯盆地中生代陆源碎屑成分特征及其与盆地构造属性的关系。结果表明,中生代鄂尔多斯盆地具有前陆盆地的性质,但又不同于典型的前陆盆地,称之为类前陆盆地似乎更能反映盆地的实际。 相似文献
7.
Changes of Late Mesozoic Tectonic Regimes around the Ordos Basin (North China) and their Geodynamic Implications 总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4
A synthesis is given in this paper on late Mesozoic deformation pattern in the zones around the Ordos Basin based on lithostratigraphic and structural analyses. A relative chronology of the late Mesozoic tectonic stress evolution was established from the field analyses of fault kinematics and constrained by stratigraphic contact relationships. The results show alternation of tectonic compressional and extensional regimes. The Ordos Basin and its surroundings were in weak N-S to NNE-SSW extension during the Early to Middle Jurassic, which reactivated E-W-trending basement fractures. The tectonic regime changed to a multi-directional compressional one during the Late Jurassic, which resulted in crustal shortening deformation along the marginal zones of the Ordos Basin. Then it changed to an extensional one during the Early Cretaceous, which rifted the western, northwestern and southeastern margins of the Ordos Basin. A NW-SE compression occurred during the Late Cretaceous and caused the termination of sedimentation and uplift of the Ordos Basin. This phased evolution of the late Mesozoic tectonic stress regimes and associated deformation pattern around the Ordos Basin best records the changes in regional geodynamic settings in East Asia, from the Early to Middle Jurassic post-orogenic extension following the Triassic collision between the North and South China Blocks, to the Late Jurassic multi-directional compressions produced by synchronous convergence of the three plates (the Siberian Plate to the north, Paleo-Pacific Plate to the east and Lhasa Block to the west) towards the East Asian continent. Early Cretaceous extension might be the response to collapse and lithospheric thinning of the North China Craton. 相似文献
8.
深层油气成藏机理研究的首要前提是要明确烃源岩的热演化历史,这对区域油气勘探潜力的评价有着重要的指导意义。鄂尔多斯盆地西南缘蓟县系烃源岩在中生代以来的热演化史有何特征,是否受早白垩世岩浆热作用的影响,影响程度如何等问题的不明确,制约着人们对该地区中元古界烃源岩的生烃潜力的认识及进一步勘探开发的思路。通过对安口—铜城地区出露的三叠系、侏罗系及铜城岩体进行磷灰石裂变径迹、磷灰石/锆石(U-Th)/He测试,结合镜质组反射率数据,分别恢复了该地区沉积岩在中三叠世以来和侵入岩在早白垩世以来的冷却历史,结合岩浆岩体的空间分布特征和泥页岩镜质组反射率,估算蓟县系烃源岩古地温。热年代学模拟表明,蓟县系烃源岩自中生代以来先后经历了三叠纪—侏罗纪的正常埋深增温,达到了生烃温度门限,自早白垩世约130～110 Ma开始冷却,其中个别样品表现为自始新世中期至45 Ma微弱加速冷却,中新世晚期至8 Ma以来快速冷却。研究表明,中晚侏罗世是鄂尔多斯盆地西南缘蓟县系生烃的关键时期,烃源岩处于主生油温度范围,之后的早白垩世晚期岩浆侵入事件的热作用范围有限,对蓟县系烃源岩古地温的影响仅发生在局部地区。鄂尔多斯盆地西南缘... 相似文献
9.
10.
YANG Minghui LI Liang ZHOU Jin JIA Huichong SUN Xiao GONG Ting DING Chao 《《地质学报》英文版》2015,89(5):1636-1648
The hydrocarbon potential of the Hangjinqi area in the northern Ordos Basin is not well known, compared to the other areas of the basin, despite its substantial petroleum system.Restoration of a depth-converted seismic profile across the Hangjinqi Fault Zone(HFZ) in the eastern Hangjinqi area shows one compression that created anticlinal structures in the Late Triassic, and two extensions in ~Middle Jurassic and Late Early Cretaceous, which were interrupted by inversions in the Late Jurassic–Early Early Cretaceous and Late Cretaceous, respectively.Hydrocarbon generation at the well locations in the Central Ordos Basin(COB) began in the Late Triassic.Basin modeling of Well Zhao-4 suggests that hydrocarbon generation from the Late Carboniferous–Early Permian coal measures of the northern Shanbei Slope peaked in the Early Cretaceous, predating the inversion in the Late Cretaceous.Most source rocks in the Shanbei Slope passed the main gas-migration phase except for the Hangjinqi area source rocks(Well Jin-48).Hydrocarbons generated from the COB are likely to have migrated northward toward the anticlinal structures and traps along the HFZ because the basin-fill strata are dipping south.Faulting that continued during the extensional phase(Late Early Cretaceous) of the Hangjinqi area probably acted as conduits for the migration of hydrocarbons.Thus, the anticlinal structures and associated traps to the north of the HFZ might have trapped hydrocarbons that were charged from the Late Carboniferous–Early Permian coal measures in the COB since the Middle Jurassic. 相似文献
11.
鄂尔多斯盆地位于华北地台西部。在详细分析地层接触关系、构造界面特征、地层发育特征和连续性、盆地沉积与周边构造的关系、物源区性质、沉积体系配置与相分布、古水流样式等各种要素的基础上,重建了鄂尔多斯盆地侏罗纪至白垩纪的原始面貌,并将其演化划分为4个阶段。其中,第一阶段（早侏罗世至中侏罗世早期）和第二阶段（中侏罗世Bathonian—Callovian期）沉积盆地的范围和沉积体系的配置关系大体类似,两者最为重要的区别是前者有聚煤作用发生,后者没有煤层发育,其原因是古气候变化造成的;第三阶段（晚侏罗世）盆地收缩至桌子山—石沟驿—六盘山一线东侧;第四阶段（早白垩世）盆地的范围有所扩大,但东界可能被限制于现今的吕梁山以西。 相似文献
12.
十万大山盆地中生代沉积充填特征及其演化 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
十万大山盆地是印支期以来发展起来的中、新生代陆相盆地。盆地自晚三叠世-白垩纪具有比较典型的碰撞前陆盆地特征。该时期盆地的地层、沉积相类型及时空展布、沉积旋回和沉积边界的迁移具有明显的规律性。盆地的沉积地层多以山麓相、河流相为主,尚有少量滨浅湖相沉积,具近物源沉积特征;沉积相展布自晚三叠世至白垩纪具有沉积范围小-大-小-大的规律;沉积旋回呈现了浅-深-浅的规律;沉积边界和沉降中心不断向北和北东方向迁移。这些规律反映了十万大山前陆盆地的构造演化,即晚三叠世碰撞逆冲活动启动,盆地进入前陆盆地发育阶段;早、中侏罗世造山活动强烈,盆地沉降幅度大,物源供应充足;晚侏罗世造山活动减缓,盆地相对萎缩;白垩纪造山活动再次加强,盆地处于第二个发育期。 相似文献
13.
鄂尔多斯侏罗纪盆地形成演化和聚煤规律 总被引：32，自引：2，他引：30
鄂尔多斯盆地是在演太平洋构造域和特提斯构造域共同影响下形成的中生代大型内陆拗陷。其演化过程可分为早侏罗世-中侏罗世早期、中侏罗世、晚侏罗世和早白垩世4个阶段,旱侏罗世-中侏罗世早期为重要的聚煤期。聚煤区围绕盆地沉降中心呈环带状展布,煤层层数、厚度及横向变化规律在盆地不同部位表现出不同特点。构造转折期与有利于植物大量繁殖的古气候的有机匹配是控制煤层形成的主要因素。现今盆地范围是后期改造的结果。 相似文献
14.
鄂尔多斯盆地中生代构造演化特征及油气分布 总被引：7，自引：0，他引：7
从地球动力学背景分析了鄂尔多斯盆地中生代构造演化特征,按构造演化序列将中生代盆地演化分为早-中三叠世盆地格架奠定期、晚三叠世盆地生油岩形成期、早-中侏罗世构造稳定期、晚侏罗世生排烃高峰期、早白垩世盆地整体抬升期及晚白垩世盆地消亡期等6个阶段.并指出中生代盆地构造演化各阶段对油气源的形成、油气聚集,以及对油气圈闭成藏等油气分布规律均有不同程度的影响及控制作用. 相似文献
15.
扬子北缘黄陵地区古构造应力场于晚中生代经历发生了重大转变,是扬子板块与华北板块在三叠纪碰撞造山之后陆内构造变形的体现。由黄陵背斜周缘晚中生代盆地充填记录所反映出这一变革的起始时间为中侏罗世晚期。早侏罗世-中侏罗世早期,盆地内沉积了以桐竹园组为代表的河流-湖泊相岩层,由沉积碎屑成分和古水流统计所得出的物源区为北部的秦岭地区,黄陵背斜上部可能也接受了碎屑沉积;中侏罗世晚期-晚侏罗世,沉积中心发生了改变,表现为仅仅在黄陵背斜西侧的秭归盆地内有所保存,沉积环境以曲流河到辫状河流和三角洲为主,物源区则局限于黄陵背斜;早白垩世初期,周坪盆地和宜昌盆地为沉积中心,近缘冲积扇和辫状河流体系占据主体,物源区依然为黄陵地区,两盆地在黄陵背斜南缘可能相连,黄陵背斜上部的原下侏罗统被剥蚀;早白垩世晚期-晚白垩世,远安盆地逐渐发育,盆地西缘为冲积扇-辫状河流体系,中、 东部则以曲流河-湖泊沉积环境为主体,并间有干旱沙漠环境。原型盆地再造结果显示,早侏罗世-中侏罗世早期盆地展布具有近东西向特点,古地貌总体呈现出北部为山脉、 南部为盆地的格局;中侏罗世晚期以来,盆地呈近南北向,黄陵背斜逐渐形成山脉,盆地位于其东西两侧。两期盆地沉积特征反映了扬子北缘古构造应力场由近南北向转变为近东西向的过程。 相似文献
16.
合肥盆地中生代地层时代与源区的碎屑锆石证据 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
合肥盆地位于大别造山带北侧、郯庐断裂带西侧,其发育过程与这两大构造带演化密切相关。本次工作对合肥盆地南部与东部出露的中生代砂岩与火山岩进行了锆石年代学研究,从而限定了各组地层的沉积时代,确定了火山岩喷发时间,指示了沉积物的源区。这些年代学数据表明,合肥盆地南部的中生代碎屑岩自下而上分别为下侏罗统防虎山组、中侏罗统圆筒山组或三尖铺组、下白垩统凤凰台组与周公山组(或黑石渡组)与上白垩统戚家桥组,其间缺失上侏罗统。盆地东部白垩系自下而上为下白垩统朱巷组与响导铺组和上白垩统张桥组。该盆地出露的毛坦厂组或白大畈组火山岩喷发时代皆为早白垩世(130～120 Ma)。盆地南部的下——中侏罗统及白垩系源区皆为大别造山带,分别对应该造山带的后造山隆升与造山后伸展隆升。而盆地东部白垩系的源区始终为东侧的张八岭隆起带,后者属于郯庐断裂带伸展活动中的上升盘。 相似文献
17.
侏罗系是柴达木盆地最重要的源储层系之一。通过野外地质、剖面实测、地震解释、显微构造分析等大量系列资料的综合应用与分析,认为研究区自中生代以来,经历了印支期右行逆冲-走滑构造运动、早—中侏罗世伸展运动、早白垩世北西-南东向挤压及新生代南北向挤压运动,它们与早侏罗世至中侏罗世早期(小煤沟组至大煤沟组)在NE向伸展应力场作用下形成的断陷盆地、中侏罗世晚期至晚侏罗世(彩石岭组—洪水沟组)热力沉降坳陷盆地、早白垩世南北向挤压坳陷盆地密切相关。侏罗纪原型盆地发育三类沉积边界,即盆缘不整合边界(缓坡型和陡坡型边界)、盆内正断层边界、后期逆断层改造边界。不同的现存盆地边界类型对原型盆地恢复的作用不同。侏罗纪盆地以东昆仑构造带为界具有"北陆南洋"的古地理格局,柴达木地区的侏罗纪盆地主要发育在沿岸造山带和岛弧带的山前坳陷以及薄弱的柴北缘加里东俯冲碰撞带之上,形成相对分隔的独立盆地群。柴达木早、中、晚侏罗世原型盆地的分布因受到古特提斯洋向北偏东方向的俯冲作用和阿尔金断裂左旋走滑作用的影响,其沉积中心和沉积范围呈现出从早到晚向东北方向逐渐迁移的规律。早侏罗世盆地的沉积沉降中心主要位于柴北缘西部的冷湖—马海一带,中侏罗世盆地的沉积沉降中心主要位于柴北缘中段的大柴旦—怀头他拉一带,而晚侏罗世盆地的沉积沉降中心主要位于德令哈—乌兰一带。 相似文献
18.
19.
川西前陆盆地中—新生代各构造层的残余厚度展布和沉积特征分析发现,四川克拉通周缘的前陆盆地在晚三叠世时期发育于龙门山山前,明显属于龙门山褶皱逆冲构造载荷所形成的前渊凹陷;侏罗纪早期的沉积地层呈面状分布,没有表现出显著的挠曲沉降,指示了一个构造相对平静的阶段;中侏罗世早期前渊凹陷迁移至龙门山北段和米仓山山前,前渊沉积从晚三叠世的北东向转换为近东西向,广泛的湖泊相沉积预示了前陆盆地的欠充填状态;中侏罗世中晚期,川西盆地沉降中心又迁移到大巴山山前,相应的挠曲变形又从近东西向转化为北西向,构成了大巴山的前渊凹陷;晚侏罗世—早白垩世时期,沉降中心再次回到米仓山山前,巨厚的前渊凹陷沉积指示了米仓山冲断带的主要活动时期;白垩纪末—古近纪的前渊凹陷则跃迁至雅安—名山地区。川西前陆盆地的同造山沉降中心以四川盆地中心为核心在西部和北部呈弧形迁移,沉积序列不断更替和叠加。中生界各构造层底界构造图显示现今的构造低部位位于川西北地区和川西南地区,在川西北地区均有东西走向的等值线分布,而川西南地区等值线走向则为北东-南西向。因此分析认为,晚侏罗世至早白垩世的构造变形可能控制了川西盆地现今的地层变形,形成了川西北地区的南北向构造挤压结构,而晚期的新生代构造变形则主要体现在川西盆地的西南部,形成北东-南西向的地层展布特征。 相似文献