共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
星蚀期北斗卫星轨道性能分析——SLR检核结果 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
星蚀期北斗卫星的轨道性能是北斗卫星导航系统性能分析的重要部分。了解北斗卫星导航系统星历中星蚀期轨道的精度,不仅可为系统服务性能评估提供支持,还有助于了解星蚀期精密定轨中相关模型可能存在的问题,进而为精密定轨函数模型改进提供参考。本文基于2014年1月至2015年7月的卫星激光测距资料,重点分析了星蚀期对北斗不同类型卫星轨道的影响,同时也对北斗广播星历和精密星历中整体轨道径向精度进行检核。结果表明:星蚀期内(尤其是偏航机动期间),IGSO/MEO卫星的广播星历和精密星历轨道均存在明显的精度下降;广播星历轨道径向误差达1.5~2.0m,精密星历轨道径向误差超过10.0cm。但仅从轨道径向残差序列中难以发现星蚀期对GEO卫星轨道是否有显著影响。非星蚀期间,IGSO/MEO卫星和GEO卫星的广播星历轨道径向精度分别优于0.5 m和0.9 m。IGSO/MEO卫星的精密星历轨道径向精度优于10.0cm,GEO卫星的轨道径向精度约50.0cm,且存在40.0cm左右的系统性偏差。 相似文献
2.
The BeiDou satellite navigation system (BDS) is different from other global navigation satellite systems (GNSSs) because of its special constellation, which consists of satellites in geostationary earth orbit, inclined geosynchronous earth orbit (IGSO), and medium earth orbit (MEO). Compared to MEO satellites, the observations of IGSO satellites cover only a small range of nadir angles. Therefore, the estimation of phase center offsets (PCOs) suffers from high correlation with other estimation parameters. We have estimated the phase center offsets for BeiDou IGSO and MEO satellites with a direct PCO parameters model, and constraints are applied to cope with the correlation between the PCOs and other parameters. Validation shows that the estimated PCO parameters could be used to improve the accuracy of orbit and clock offset overlaps. Compared with the Multi-GNSS Experiment antenna phase center correction model, the average improvements of the proposed method for along-track, cross-track, and radial components are 19 mm (31%), 5 mm (14%), and 2 mm (15%) for MEO satellites, and 13 mm (17%), 12 mm (21%), and 5 mm (19%) for IGSO satellites. For clock offset overlaps, average improvements of standard deviation and root mean square (RMS) are 0.03 ns (20%) and 0.03 ns (12%), respectively. The RMS of precise coordinates in the BDS-only positioning was also improved significantly with a level of 24 mm (30%) in the up-direction. Finally, the overall uncertainty of the estimated results is discussed. 相似文献
3.
针对北斗卫星导航系统的卫星姿态模型、天线相位中心改正及卫星定轨数据处理策略未统一的现状,该文对比分析了武汉大学和德国地学研究中心提供的北斗事后精密轨道和钟差产品的差异及精度,结合实测数据,通过分析精密单点定位的定位精度来比较两中心精密轨道和钟差的差异。实验结果表明:北斗卫星的精密轨道精度与轨道类型有关,地球静止轨道(GEO)卫星的轨道精度为米级,倾斜地球同步轨道(IGSO)卫星的轨道精度为分米级,中地球轨道(MEO)卫星切向、法向和径向的精度分别为10.81、5.41和3.37cm;GEO卫星钟差精度优于0.38ns,IGSO卫星钟差优于0.25ns,MEO卫星钟差优于0.15ns;两家分析中心产品的北斗静态精密单点定位的平面精度相当;北斗静态精密单点定位的RMS统计值平面精度优于3cm,三维精度优于7cm。 相似文献
4.
星间单程伪距联合监测站数据确定北斗三号卫星轨道和钟差 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
提出利用原始单程星间伪距数据联合地面监测站载波相位和伪距数据同时确定北斗卫星轨道和钟差的方法。该方法引入时间窗概念,用多项式表示卫星钟差,从而能够直接对非同时观测的原始单程伪距数据进行平差处理。收集中国境内的6个iGMAS监测站和星间测距数据对北斗三号卫星进行轨道和钟差确定试验。结果表明,轨道重叠段互差在R、T和N方向的RMS分别为0.078、0.321和0.375 m,钟差重叠段互差的RMS和STD分别达到0.589和0.519 ns。相比于仅用国内监测站数据的结果,轨道和钟差的改进幅度分别超过80%和60%。星间链路单程伪距残差的平均RMS为0.083 m,星间链路信号发射和接收设备时延偏差估值的平均稳定度分别为0.53和0.72 ns。 相似文献
5.
针对北斗导航卫星系统首创的GEO+IGSO+MEO混合星座设计,本文研究了根据不同星座,采取不同约束条件和数据处理策略的北斗卫星精密定轨方法,提出了一种针对北斗系统混合星座的分层约束精密定轨方案。该方案首先将北斗卫星分为非GEO(IGSO/MEO)和GEO两部分进行解算,利用GPS解算的公共参数对北斗IGSO/MEO精密定轨形成有效约束,然后固定GPS和北斗IGSO/MEO解算结果,最后单独对北斗GEO卫星进行强约束下的轨道解算。利用实测数据进行了精密定轨试验,试验结果表明:采用本文提出的方法,北斗GEO卫星和非GEO卫星三维重叠弧段轨道精度分别为0.688 m和0.042 m,比传统方法分别提高了54.2%和72.4%。另外,采用激光测距检核和测站坐标静态精密单点定位的方法对轨道精度进行了验证,激光检核精度提高了44.3%,测站坐标在水平和高程方向上精度分别平均提升了21.5%和20.7%。 相似文献
6.
Initial results of precise orbit and clock determination for COMPASS navigation satellite system 总被引：8，自引：3，他引：5
Qile Zhao Jing Guo Min Li Lizhong Qu Zhigang Hu Chuang Shi Jingnan Liu 《Journal of Geodesy》2013,87(5):475-486
The development of the COMPASS satellite system is introduced, and the regional tracking network and data availability are described. The precise orbit determination strategy of COMPASS satellites is presented. Data of June 2012 are processed. The obtained orbits are evaluated by analysis of post-fit residuals, orbit overlap comparison and SLR (satellite laser ranging) validation. The RMS (root mean square) values of post-fit residuals for one month’s data are smaller than 2.0 cm for ionosphere-free phase measurements and 2.6 m for ionosphere-free code observations. The 48-h orbit overlap comparison shows that the RMS values of differences in the radial component are much smaller than 10 cm and those of the cross-track component are smaller than 20 cm. The SLR validation shows that the overall RMS of observed minus computed residuals is 68.5 cm for G01 and 10.8 cm for I03. The static and kinematic PPP solutions are produced to further evaluate the accuracy of COMPASS orbit and clock products. The static daily COMPASS PPP solutions achieve an accuracy of better than 1 cm in horizontal and 3 cm in vertical. The accuracy of the COMPASS kinematic PPP solutions is within 1–2 cm in the horizontal and 4–7 cm in the vertical. In addition, we find that the COMPASS kinematic solutions are generally better than the GPS ones for the selected location. Furthermore, the COMPASS/GPS combinations significantly improve the accuracy of GPS only PPP solutions. The RMS values are basically smaller than 1 cm in the horizontal components and 3–4 cm in the vertical component. 相似文献
7.
卫星帆板及本体受照情况变化复杂,导致卫星光压摄动力的变化难以准确模制,既是动力学定轨的最大误差源,也是定轨预报精度降低的主要原因。针对此问题,采用北斗地面系统的区域监测网数据,详细比较了3种主要的经验模型（T20模型、ECOM5参数模型、ECOM9参数模型）对不同卫星的适用性情况。结果显示,在春秋分前后,地球同步轨道（geosynchronous earth orbit,GEO）卫星使用ECOM9参数模型最好,其解算的卫星钟差与星地双向钟差的互差标准差优于2 ns;对于倾斜地球同步轨道（inclined geosynchronous satellite orbit,IGSO）卫星和中地球轨道（medium earth orbit,MEO）卫星,无论是在动偏期间还是姿态模式转换期间,T20模型表现出更好的适用性。不同于此前国内外学者的相关研究,试验表明,对BDS混合星座的不同类型卫星、同一卫星的不同时段,应采用不同的经验太阳光压模型,以获得更高的定轨和预报精度。 相似文献
8.
姿态模式切换期间QZSS卫星轨道及其钟差产品特性分析 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
导航卫星姿态控制模式切换对精密定轨解算得到的轨道和钟差均有较大影响。本文首先从理论上分析了卫星偏航姿态及其对精密定轨的影响,然后分别以卫星激光测距检核和钟差多项式拟合的方法对IGS MGEX分析中心的QZSS卫星轨道和钟差产品精度进行评价,最后以谱分析方法和改进阿伦方差揭示了卫星钟差的周期特性。基于2014年全年的QZSS卫星轨道和钟差产品的研究表明,一年内有两次长约20 d的地影季,太阳角呈现半年周期的波动;QZSS卫星在低太阳角时有零偏保护,其卫星轨道和钟差精度都与太阳角有显著相关性;卫星钟差具有与轨道周期相近的周期项,且周期项振幅与太阳角的大小也具有相关性,表明现有的定轨策略存在不足。考虑到QZSS与目前北斗星座中IGSO和MEO卫星姿态控制模式的相似性,该结论对于研究我国BDS姿态切换期间的精密定轨有一定参考价值。 相似文献
9.
北斗卫星天线相位中心改正模型精化及对精密定轨和定位影响分析 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
针对BDS-2和BDS-3卫星联合精密定轨和精密定位中高精度BDS-2 IGSO/MEO卫星天线相位中心改正在轨估计模型的缺失问题,本文采用了改进的PCV和z-offset参数估计方法,精化了BDS-2 IGSO/MEO卫星B1I/B3I无电离层组合PCC模型。数值验证结果表明：相比北斗官方发布的PCO地面标定值,本文精化的PCC模型使得精密轨道SLR残差的STD减小了0.6~2.4 cm,改善百分比为8.6%~33.3%;基于本文精化的BDS-2和已有BDS-3卫星精化的PCC模型使得精密定位浮点解在高程方向显著提升了9.5 mm（37.2%）。 相似文献
10.
Krzysztof Sośnica Lars Prange Kamil Kaźmierski Grzegorz Bury Mateusz Drożdżewski Radosław Zajdel Tomasz Hadas 《Journal of Geodesy》2018,92(2):131-148
The space segment of the European Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Galileo consists of In-Orbit Validation (IOV) and Full Operational Capability (FOC) spacecraft. The first pair of FOC satellites was launched into an incorrect, highly eccentric orbital plane with a lower than nominal inclination angle. All Galileo satellites are equipped with satellite laser ranging (SLR) retroreflectors which allow, for example, for the assessment of the orbit quality or for the SLR–GNSS co-location in space. The number of SLR observations to Galileo satellites has been continuously increasing thanks to a series of intensive campaigns devoted to SLR tracking of GNSS satellites initiated by the International Laser Ranging Service. This paper assesses systematic effects and quality of Galileo orbits using SLR data with a main focus on Galileo satellites launched into incorrect orbits. We compare the SLR observations with respect to microwave-based Galileo orbits generated by the Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE) in the framework of the International GNSS Service Multi-GNSS Experiment for the period 2014.0–2016.5. We analyze the SLR signature effect, which is characterized by the dependency of SLR residuals with respect to various incidence angles of laser beams for stations equipped with single-photon and multi-photon detectors. Surprisingly, the CODE orbit quality of satellites in the incorrect orbital planes is not worse than that of nominal FOC and IOV orbits. The RMS of SLR residuals is even lower by 5.0 and 1.5 mm for satellites in the incorrect orbital planes than for FOC and IOV satellites, respectively. The mean SLR offsets equal \(-44.9, -35.0\), and \(-22.4\) mm for IOV, FOC, and satellites in the incorrect orbital plane. Finally, we found that the empirical orbit models, which were originally designed for precise orbit determination of GNSS satellites in circular orbits, provide fully appropriate results also for highly eccentric orbits with variable linear and angular velocities. 相似文献
11.
The technique of Evaluating CHAMP satellite orbit with SLR measurements is presented. As an independent evaluation of the orbit solution, SLR data observed from January 1 to 16, 2002 are processed to compute the residuals after fixing the GFZ's post science orbits solutions. The SLR residuals are computed as the differences of the SLR measurements minus the corresponding distances between the SLR station and the GPS-derived orbit positions. On the basis of the SLR residuals analysis, it is found that the accuracy of GFZ' s spost science orbits is better than 10 cm and that there is no systematic error in GFZ's post science orbits. 相似文献
12.
GNSS是实时定位导航最重要的方法,精密卫星轨道钟差产品是GNSS高精度服务的前提。国际GNSS服务中心(IGS)及其分析中心长期致力于GNSS数据处理的研究及高精度轨道和钟差产品的提供。GFZ作为分析中心之一,提供GBM多系统快速产品。本文基于2015—2021年GBM提供的精密轨道产品,阐述了数据处理策略,分析了轨道的精度,介绍了非差模糊度固定的原理和对精密定轨的影响。结果表明:GBM快速产品中的GPS轨道精度与IGS后处理精密轨道相比的精度约为11~13 mm,轨道6 h预报精度约为6 cm;GLONASS预报精度约为12 cm,Galileo在该时期的精度均值为10 cm,但是在2016年底以后精度提升到5 cm左右;北斗系统的中轨卫星(medium earth orbit,MEO)在2020年以后预报精度约为10 cm;北斗的静止轨道卫星(geostationary earth orbit,GEO)卫星和QZSS卫星的预报精度在米级;卫星激光测距检核表明,Galileo、GLONASS、BDS-3 MEO卫星轨道精度分别为23、41、47 mm;此外,采用150 d观测值的试验结果表明,采用非差模糊度固定能显著改善MEO卫星轨道精度,对GPS、GLONASS、Galileo、BDS-2和BDS-3的MEO卫星的6 h时预报精度改善率分别为9%~15%、15%~18%、11%~13%、6%~17%和14%~25%。 相似文献
13.
不同卫星天线参数对BDS定轨定位精度的影响 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
论证了BDS精密单点定位时卫星天线参数与卫星轨道、钟差产品保持一致的必要性。基于4组不同卫星天线参数BDS精密定轨RTN 3方向内符合精度，GEO卫星均在9.3、18.6、11.5 cm左右，IGSO卫星均在1.7、4.2、2.7 cm左右，MEO卫星均在2.1、5.1、4.8 cm左右，在R方向的差异小于5 mm，在TN方向的差异最大为2.4 cm；定轨结果与GFZ的事后精密产品比较，RTN 3方向外符合精度差异较明显，排除GEO卫星因定轨策略与GFZ差异较大的因素，IGSO和MEO外符合精度ESA和WHU相近，RTN 3方向均在10 cm以内，各分量上优于IGS和EST 1~10 cm，其中TN方向差异最显著。在保持BDS PPP使用的卫星天线参数与卫星轨道、钟差产品一致的前提下，4组卫星天线参数定位精度相近，其中静态定位最后一个历元水平和高程方向坐标偏差均在5 cm以内，动态定位收敛后坐标偏差RMS水平方向在10 cm以内、高程方向在15 cm以内；使用ESA和WHU天线参数动态定位平均收敛时间在46 min左右，IGS和EST天线参数动态定位平均收敛时间在56 min左右，略差于基于GFZ事后产品的收敛时间，其平均收敛时间在34 min左右。 相似文献
14.
北斗三号卫星之间及卫星与锚固站之间在Ka频段的伪距测量为其提供了一种不依赖于地面监测站的独立定轨和时间同步能力。本文针对星间链路分时测量的特点,采用分段一次多项式对卫星钟差进行建模,直接利用原始的星地和星间单程Ka伪距实现一体化定轨和时间同步并同时解算锚固站设备硬件时延。利用北斗三号8颗卫星和2个锚固站的实测Ka伪距数据进行验证,结果表明:在利用导航电文的预报钟速信息进行修正的情况下,星间Ka伪距残差RMS为0.052 m;R方向卫星轨道确定和预报精度(RMS)分别为0.016、0.033 m;卫星钟差估计和预报精度(95%)分别为0.038、0.992 ns;解算得到的锚固站收发设备时延之和的稳定性优于0.5 ns。试验还展示了该方法的适应能力:在没有预报钟速信息的极端情况下,虽然星间Ka伪距残差RMS增大了242%,但R方向轨道确定和预报精度仍分别达到0.021、0.041 m,钟差估计和预报精度分别达到0.040、1.092 ns。 相似文献
15.
针对系统地评估我国北斗卫星导航系统广播星历精度与保障实时导航定位服务的需求,对BDS广播星历提供的卫星轨道、钟差以及用户测距误差(URE)的精度性能进行分析,统计了2015年连续4周全部BDS在轨健康卫星的广播星历各项精度指标值。分析结果表明:BDS的MEO和IGSO卫星轨道精度优于GEO卫星结果,且径向精度优于法向和切向精度;BDS搭载的国产星载铷钟卫星钟差序列相对比较稳定,其均方根误差优于4ns;GEO/IGSO卫星的用户距离误差(URE)在6m以内,MEO的URE优于20m。研究结果对北斗系统的建设、后期的发展和用户市场的拓展,都具有重要的参考价值。 相似文献
16.
Evaluation of CHAMP satellite orbit with SLR measurements 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
QIN Xianping YANG Yuanxi 《地球空间信息科学学报》2005,8(3):209-213
The technique of Evaluating CHAMP satellite orbit with SLR measurements iS presented. As an independent evaluation of the orbit solution, SLR data observed from January 1 to 16, 2002 are processed to compute the residuals after fixing the GFZ＇s post science orbits solutions. The SLR residuals are computed as the differences of the SLR measurements minus the corresponding distances between the SLR station and the GPS-derived orbit positions. On the basis of the SLR residuals analysis, it is found that the accuracy of GFZ＇ s post science orbits is better than 10 cm and that there is no systematic error in GFZ＇s post science orbits. 相似文献
17.
北斗卫星导航系统单星授时精度分析 总被引：2，自引：1，他引：1
为研究北斗卫星导航系统单星授时精度，本文基于GPS单星授时原理，结合北斗卫星多种类型星座特点，编写了BDS单星授时软件。利用iGMAS站数据进行了试验，在对原始数据进行监测并将异常信息剔除后，将授时结果与中国测绘科学研究院北斗分析中心（CGS）钟差文件进行比对，分析了BDS不同轨道卫星（GEO/IGSO/MEO）下的BDS单星授时精度。结果表明，GEO卫星的授时精度为27.39 ns，IGSO卫星的授时精度为18.37 ns，MEO卫星的授时精度为18.62 ns。 相似文献
18.
Chinese BeiDou navigation satellite system is in official service as a regional constellation with five geostationary earth orbit (GEO) satellites, five inclined geosynchronous satellite orbit (IGSO) satellites and four medium earth orbit (MEO) satellites. There are mainly two methods for precise orbit determination of the BeiDou constellation found in the current literatures. One is the independent single-system method, where only BeiDou observations are used without help from other GNSS systems. The other is the two-step GPS-assisted method where in the first step, GPS data are used to resolve some common parameters, such as station coordinates, receiver clocks and zenith tropospheric delay parameters, which are then introduced as known quantities in BeiDou processing in the second step. We conduct a thorough performance comparison between the two methods. Observations from the BeiDou experimental tracking stations and the IGS Multi-GNSS Experiment network from January 1 to March 31, 2013, are processed with the Positioning and Navigation Data Analyst (PANDA) software. The results show that for BeiDou IGSO and MEO satellites, the two-step GPS-assisted method outperforms the independent single-system method in both internal orbit overlap precision and external satellite laser ranging validation. For BeiDou GEO satellites, the two methods show close performances. Zenith tropospheric delays estimated from the first method are very close to those estimated from GPS precise point positioning in the second method, with differences of several millimeters. Satellite clock estimates from the two methods show similar performances when assessing the stability of the BeiDou on board clocks. 相似文献
19.
20.
采用2015年5月24日—30日的Swarm星载GPS双频观测数据,基于Melbourne-Wübbena(MW)和消电离层线性组合,在精密单点定位技术的基础上,采用批处理最小二乘估计法对不同轨道高度的Swarm系列卫星进行非差运动学精密定轨。利用星载GPS相位观测值残差、与欧空局发布的简化动力学轨道对比,以及SLR检核3种方法对Swarm系列卫星非差运动学定轨结果进行精度评估。结果表明:①Swarm系列卫星星载GPS相位观测值残差RMS为6~7 mm;②与欧空局发布的简化动力学轨道进行求差,径向、切向及法向轨道差值RMS为2~4 cm;③与欧空局发布的运动学轨道进行求差,径向、切向及法向轨道差值RMS为1~2 cm;④SLR检核结果表明Swarm-A/B/C卫星轨道精度为3~4 cm。因此,采用非差运动学定轨方法与本文提供的定轨策略进行Swarm系列卫星精密定轨是切实可行的,定轨精度为厘米级。 相似文献