共查询到17条相似文献，搜索用时 140 毫秒
1.
通过分析海空重力测量系统误差的形成机理,我们发现海空重力仪格值标定误差是引起系统性测量偏差的主要因素之一.本文简要介绍了重力仪格值的标定方法,分析论证了格值标定的精度要求,提出了利用东西正反向重复测线检测校正海空重力仪格值的计算模型和补偿方法,分析讨论了该方法的校正精度及其适用条件,利用航空重力实际观测网数据对该方法的合理性和有效性进行了数值验证,证明该方法对消除海空重力测量系统性偏差具有显著作用. 相似文献
2.
在地表重力观测过程中,CG-5重力仪的格值系数会随着时间推移而发生变化.选用河北测区内2015—2017年相对重力观测数据,基于重力差法对两台编号为C859、C873的CG-5相对重力仪进行格值系数的误差计算及修正,研究其变化特征,并对修正前后不同时间尺度的重力场变化进行对比分析.结果表明:两台CG-5相对重力仪的格值系数在3年内存在不同程度的变化,均呈现整体上升的趋势,累计变化量分别为0.028％,0.034％;采用修正后的格值系数可得到点值精度更高的平差结果;不同时间尺度上的重力场变化相比修正前也出现明显差异,2017年河北大城ML3.6级地震发生在格值系数修正后0.5 a期重力变化零值线附近,这些结果表明了对CG-5重力仪进行格值系数修正的正确性和必要性. 相似文献
3.
随着对重力测量精度要求的逐步提高,对各种误差的研究日渐深入,正确了解重力测量结果中各类误差的性质、来源、量级以及如何加以改正都是十分重要的问题。许多文献表明,当前各类误差中第一类半系统误差数值最大,它主要是由重力仪格值的误差引起的。而重力仪格值的误差在格值测定时就存在,这是由于重力仪自身的性能以及受外界因素的影响,使仪器格值发生波动和改变,从而增大了格值的误差。目前,我们还没有办法解决由重力仪自身性能所造成的仪器格值的改变,但受外界因素的影响,可通过一定的方法加以改善,现就温度变化对重力仪格值的影响作一简述。 相似文献
4.
5.
石英弹簧重力仪是我国地震系统目前进行野外重力重复观测的主要仪器。由于仪器格值及测量精度受环境温度影响较大,直接影响观测成果,迫切需要解决仪器恒温系统的配置。我所石英弹簧重力仪恒温装制研制组的同志根据 相似文献
6.
格值随温度变化而改变是目前我国地震系统所使用的重力仪的主要问题,特别是对CG-2型重力仪尤为显著。本文对国家地震局物探队1983—1984年在华北南部测得的重力资料进行了温度格值改正,并对该地区出现的重力变化原因进行了讨论。 相似文献
7.
8.
形变标定格值计算软件 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
为提高地壳形变观测仪器格值标定的真实性、准确性和可靠性,根据《地震前兆台网运行管理办法》和《地震前兆台网形变观测与运行工作细则》,针对不同测项、不同仪器标定的规范要求及特点,应用Visual Basic语言编制了格值计算软件。本文主要介绍了软件的使用、格值计算、误差检查方法,结果以全国形变台网中心推荐的Word格式保存。对水管仪、水平摆、垂直摆仪直接从原始文件读取数据,提高了标定精度,实现了格值标定的半自动化。本软件已应用于河北省地震前兆数字化台站工作。 相似文献
9.
10.
11.
Calibration shift seriously influences gravity values measured using Scintrex CG‐3M gravimeters. We calibrated three Scintrex CG‐3M gravimeters three times (1999, 2003 and 2006) over eight years, using a calibration line with a gravity difference of 1.38 Gal. The scale factor correction coefficients (calibration factors) obtained here range from 0.9998–1.0005. The calibration factors vary with time by 89 ppm, ?102 ppm and ?126 ppm between the 1999–2003 surveys. The calibration shifts of two of the three gravimeters decreased to about 20 ppm or less in the second interval, the other remained about the same (142 ppm). The results indicate that they shifted at rates on the order of 10 ppm/year even several years after manufacturing. The large shift in calibration factors indicates that they must be corrected using calibrations done before and after the measurements to perform microgravity measurements when gravity differences between a reference gravity site and survey sites are on the order of a hundred milligals (mGal) or more. The results also indicate that the calibration factors change gradually with time, so their interpolation provides a good practical approximation for a specific survey time. We applied the time‐dependent calibration factors to microgravity monitoring at the Iwo‐tou caldera, Japan, where the gravity difference between the base site on the island and the reference site on Honshu (the mainland of Japan) is about 870 mGal mainly due to the 11° latitude difference. Gravity surveys were conducted every two years from 1998–2006. The correction of scale factors estimated from the repeated calibration surveys leads to satisfactory measurements, in which the average of the absolute differences between two Scintrex CG‐3M instruments in five surveys is reduced from 207μGal to 19μGal; for three of those surveys, it is less than 10 μGal. This result demonstrates the importance of repeated calibration surveys. 相似文献
12.
13.
Over the past two decades, superconducting gravimeters (SGs) have been a key tool to investigate a number of geophysical processes leading to time-variable gravity changes. As SGs are relative meters, even though they are the most sensitive and stable devices currently available, they need to be accurately calibrated. Each branch of Earth sciences that benefits from high-precision gravity monitoring demands calibration of gravity sensors to accuracy of better than 0.1%. This research deals with a calibration experiment performed at the Strasbourg (France) SG site by means of two FG5 (#206 and #211) absolute gravimeters (AGs) and new-generation spring meters (Scintrex Ltd. Autograv CG-3M and CG5 and Microg-LaCoste gPhone). Our goal is to try to use the newest generation of spring mechanical gravimeters (MGs) for calibrating SGs. We discuss the results in terms of precision and accuracy of the SG calibration by means of different metrological and methodological approaches. With the FG5 #211 we derive scale factors for the SG-GWR C026 located in Strasbourg in agreement with those routinely obtained since 1997 by means of the FG5 #206. This confirms that the estimation of the scale factors is independent of the AG sensor. From a moving-window regression analysis between the synthetic body tides and both the SG and MG gravity records we detect significant fluctuations of the SG scale factors over time due to the instability of the instrumental sensitivity of the MGs. Our main results demonstrate that, owing to the time variability of their sensitivity, the used spring meters, even if well calibrated, cannot be used as a stable reference for SGs. As a result, MGs are not suitable to replace AGs for SG calibration, and we conclude that currently the method using parallel recording with absolute gravity meters is still the most feasible calibration approach for SGs. 相似文献
14.
The gravity method is one of the geophysical tools used for engineering and environmental investigations where the detection of cavities, karst phenomena, subsoil irregularities, or landfills is essential. In many cases, deep or small-scale heterogeneities generating low-amplitude anomalies have to be detected and the reliability of further interpretation requires highly accurate measurements, carefully corrected for any quantifiable disturbing effects. The purpose of this study is to investigate the factors likely to limit measurement quality and how to make improvements.Calibrations of a Scintrex gravimeter were made between French relative and absolute base stations, and the relative uncertainties on the calibration factors were estimated for these links. Ranging from 10−3, for calibration on an old gravity net, to 10−4, for a high amplitude absolute base line, this accuracy will be generally sufficient for microgravity surveys.Continuous gravity recordings of Scintrex gravimeters, installed at the same stable site, enabled the estimation of the stability and accuracy of the instruments and revealed that some of the time variations of g measurements, such as instrumental drift, tidal effects and seismic noise, are not entirely removed by standard processing procedures. The accuracy of corrected gravity measurements is mainly limited by inadequate corrections of tidal effects and by a poor estimation of ocean loading effects. In comparison with residual defaults in tidal corrections, instrumental and seismic noises are taken more properly into account by statistical data processing.In field operation, residual tidal effects are generally integrated into an experimental terrain drift estimated on the basis of frequent repeated measurements. A differential gravity approach, based on a fixed gravimeter reference whose recordings are used to correct measurements made with a mobile gravimeter, has also been investigated at a test site. Compared to standard processing, this method can help improve repeatability of gravity measurements.Microgravity surveys in the urban environment require effective and accurate consideration of the effects of infrastructures, nearby buildings and basements, as well as those of topography, in the vicinity of a gravity station. Correction procedures, applied at the same experimental site, where gravity points are located close to buildings, walls and basement slope, appear to have almost totally eliminated these disturbances. 相似文献
15.
Significant hysteresis effects after transport in the upright position are found during measurement for the purpose of calibration of Scintrex CG‐3M gravimeters serial numbers 4372 and 4373. The effects amount to 0.60 and 0.15 μms?2 during the first 10 minutes and an additional 0.35 and 0.10 μms?2 during the next 10 minutes after transport for gravimeters 4372 and 4373, respectively. Such significant and not completely homogenous effects do not completely cancel out when forming gravity differences. An iterative MATLAB algorithm has been developed that models hysteresis effects using exponential functions that account for shifts in time and eliminates the hysteresis effects from the measurements. The method facilitates determination of an exponential function of hysteresis from multiple observation series with different unknown offsets and significant noise that prevents the application of conventional methods. Hysteresis elimination from measurements for the purpose of calibration resulted in (mostly significant) increases in the precision of adjusted calibration constants for both gravimeters. It is shown that, in order to obtain reasonable results, modelling the hysteresis effects should be based on approximately 30 minutes of readings. Finally, one can conclude that hysteresis effects surely do build up during transport, contrary to statements by Scintrex. 相似文献
16.
17.
针对地震仪器分段标定方法以及按分段标定方法设计的标定仪器的不足，设计整机系统一次标定的短周期地地义标定器。新型的地震仪标定器，采用８０３１单片机为ＣＰＵ，程序控制数模转换产生各种标定信号，程控衰减电路实现信号的定量输出，恒流变换电路实现标定信号的恒流输出和地震仪的恒流标定，采用系统标定方法和相应的标定器将提高地震仪器的标定精度。 相似文献