共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 171 毫秒
1.
构建区域介质三维速度模型并以之获得准确的区域震相走时,是提高区域地震定位精度的重要手段之一.为充分利用已有的一维模型、GT事件、地质资料等实现三维模型构建,尝试基于目标区域内已有的部分局部一维模型,通过克里金空间插值建立初始三维模型,然后利用GT事件走时数据并参考其它地震地质资料对其不断进行修正,使得其走时偏差图与GT事件走时偏差图一致,进而获得能够提高区域地震定位精度的三维模型.使用不同模型进行的地震定位实验表明,以此方法建立的三维模型的定位偏差较初始模型减少约20％,较好地起到了减小区域震相走时残差,提高区域地震定位精度的作用. 相似文献
2.
利用地震走时数据,采用联合反演方法获取了江苏地区的一维P波速度模型。与仅采用初至波走时的传统天然地震走时获取方法相比,该方法充分利用了大量存在的续至波参与反演,能有效改进中下地壳的反演能力。针对地震震相目录中常存在震相标识错误的问题,采用的自动判别筛选震相方法能最大限度提高数据走时的精度,可以对不同震相进行有效区分。与其他常用一维速度模型相比,本文反演的模型对Pg、Pn震相走时拟合效果最佳,残差最小。当所用走时数据拥有较高定位精度时,该反演方法能为研究区三维速度结构成像和地震定位提供较可靠的一维速度模型。 相似文献
3.
通过福建及台湾海峡地区的新一维速度模型与现有华南速度模型的对比,讨论了新一维速度模型在福建地震观测台网的适用性。理论走时分析结果表明,尽管两个速度模型差异明显,但震中距在0—100 km范围内的震相理论走时相差较小,一定程度上说明两速度模型所给出的本区域地壳平均速度差异较小。对利用18次人工定点爆破记录的地震定位结果的分析表明:当震源深度不受约束时,应用华南速度模型的定位结果精度稍优于新一维速度模型;将震源深度固定为0 km后,应用新一维速度模型的定位结果精度则明显优于华南模型。对19个仙游震群序列事件进行定位的结果显示,由于华南地区速度结构的横向变化较小,应用两模型的地震定位精度结果基本相当,但新一维速度模型定位的发震时刻较华南速度模型普遍早0.61 s左右,因此使得事件定位残差显著增大。 相似文献
4.
本文以陕西地震台网2009年1月—2014年4月地震观测报告数据为基础,并在前人对该区域地壳速度模型研究成果的基础上,依据地震、爆破及塌陷的震相速度拟合曲线与折合走时曲线等结果,确定初始模型及扰动范围。再采用Hyposat定位程序对地震资料进行“试错”,最终确定了可供台网日常使用的地壳速度模型及各层的波速比结果,最后对模型进行了对比检验。结果表明:2015模型比1985模型的定位走时残差小,震中位置偏差减小,确定的实测爆破地震位置参数更准确。2015模型较1985模型更符合陕西地区的地质构造特征。 相似文献
5.
依托大庆城市活动断层探测项目,开展大庆区域地震活动性研究。筛选黑龙江省及周边662个地震事件的震相到时,修订研究区域走时模型。对研究区148个地震运用交切法和双差法重新定位,对比发现,双差定位后地震定位精度显著提高,地震空间分布更加集中,条带状更为明显,震源深度表明,研究区孕震层基本位于地壳中上部。利用震源机制解资料,对工作区现代构造应力场进行分析,认为本区域构造应力场主压应力方向为NE向,以水平走滑作用为主。 相似文献
6.
华南地区近震走时表（速度模型）的精度检验 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
利用１６６次地震资料，通过３种地壳速度模型的对比，按照规定的评判原则，对《华南地区近震走时表》（速度模型）对福建及其邻区的地震定位精度进行了检验．结果表明，华南地区地壳模型（走时表）比Ｊ－Ｂ模型（走时表）更适合于本区地震的定位． 相似文献
7.
利用2017年8月1日至2017年12月31日四川地震台网和甘肃地震台网记录到的发生在青藏高原东缘的731个地震事件的9 284条Pg震相到时数据,首先反演了该地区的“最小一维速度模型”,并将该模型和选取的速度模型建立对比模型,以九寨沟地震序列为研究目标,定量讨论了两种速度模型分别在绝对定位和相对定位方法中对定位结果的影响。所得定位结果表明:反演获得的“最小一维速度模型”在重定位中可以有效地减小地震走时均方根残差;绝对定位比相对定位更加依赖于一维速度模型,一维速度模型会直接影响绝对定位结果中的震源分布形态,但在相对定位结果中仅起到调整地震事件相对位置的作用;在地震绝对定位中,震级越大的地震对于速度模型越敏感,而这一特点在相对定位中表现得并不明显。通过本项研究可知,在地震定位研究中,联合采用绝对定位和相对定位方法是最佳策略。 相似文献
8.
9.
10.
长期地震观测发现,北京地震台实际地震记录的震相走时与全球地震走时表IASP91之间存在走时偏差。结合北京地震台及周边地下40km精细速度结构的研究成果和AK135模型,构建其地震走时表的计算模型。通过对该地震台2003--2008年NCDSN地震观测实际走时比对,对模型结构进行修正,最终建立北京地震台地震走时表。 相似文献
11.
Application of 3-D Crustal and Upper Mantle Velocity Model of North America for Location of Regional Seismic Events 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
—?Seismic event locations based on regional 1-D velocity-depth sections can have bias errors caused by travel-time variations within different tectonic provinces and due to ray-paths crossing boundaries between tectonic provinces with different crustal and upper mantle velocity structures. Seismic event locations based on 3-D velocity models have the potential to overcome these limitations. This paper summarizes preliminary results for calibration of IMS for North America using 3-D velocity model. A 3-D modeling software was used to compute Source-Station Specific Corrections (SSSCs(3-D)) for Pn travel times utilizing 3-D crustal and upper mantle velocity model for the region. This research was performed within the framework of the United States/Russian Federation Joint Program of Seismic Calibration of the International Monitoring System (IMS) in Northern Eurasia and North America.¶An initial 3-D velocity model for North America was derived by combining and interpolating 1-D velocity-depth sections for different tectonic units. In areas where no information on 1-D velocity-depth sections was available, tectonic regionalization was used to extrapolate or interpolate. A Moho depth map was integrated. This approach combines the information obtained from refraction profiles with information derived from local and regional network data. The initial 3-D velocity model was tested against maps of Pn travel-time residuals for eight calibration explosions; corrections to the 3-D model were made to fit the observed residuals. Our goal was to find a 3-D crustal and upper mantle velocity model capable predicting Pn travel times with an accuracy of 1.0–1.5 seconds (r.m.s.).¶The 3-D velocity model for North America that gave the best fit to the observed travel times, was used to produce maps of SSSCs(3-D) for seismic stations. The computed SSSCs(3-D) vary approximately from +5 seconds to ?5 seconds for the western USA and the Pre-Cambrian platform, respectively. These SSSCs(3-D) along with estimated modeling and measurement errors were used to relocate, using regional data, an independent set of large chemical explosions (with known locations and origin times) detonated within various tectonic provinces of North America. Utilization of the 3-D velocity model through application of the computed SSSCs(3-D) resulted in a substantial improvement in seismic event location accuracy and in a significant decrease of error ellipse area for all events analyzed in comparison both with locations based on the IASPEI91 travel times and locations based on 1-D regional velocity models. 相似文献
12.
Accurate location of weak seismic events is crucial for monitoring clandestine nuclear tests, for studying local seismic structures, and for assessing possible seismic hazards. Outside of a few regions with dense seismic networks, weak seismic events (with magnitude less than 4) are usually sparsely recorded at epicentral distances less than 20°. Because of lateral variations in crustal and upper mantle structures, observed travel times of seismic phases deviate significantly from predictions based on 1-dimensional (1D) seismic models. Accurately locating weak seismic events remains a difficult task for modern seismology. Perhaps the most promising solution to this problem is the use of a 3-dimensional (3D) model of the Earth. Here we present the results of a validation test in which, using the 3D model SR2002 of the crust and upper mantle and regional phase data alone, we relocate 200 earthquakes and nuclear explosions in Eurasia. The 3D model is constructed using surface wave dispersion data. The event locations using the 3D model are compared with so-called Ground Truth data, either known by non-seismic means or validated by cluster analysis, with location accuracy mostly 5 km or better. Typically, the 3D model reduces the location errors to about half the values attained with the 1D model; i.e., 18 km location errors are reduced to about 9 km. This test indicates that the location of regional events can be significantly improved by using a global 3D model. 相似文献
13.
Slopes of an airborne electromagnetic resistivity model interpolated jointly with borehole data for 3D geological modelling 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 P.‐A. Reninger G. Martelet J. Perrin J. Deparis Y. Chen 《Geophysical Prospecting》2017,65(4):1085-1096
We investigate a novel way to introduce resistivity models deriving from airborne electromagnetic surveys into regional geological modelling. Standard geometrical geological modelling can be strengthened using geophysical data. Here, we propose to extract information contained in a resistivity model in the form of local slopes that constrain the modelling of geological interfaces. The proposed method is illustrated on an airborne electromagnetic survey conducted in the region of Courtenay in France. First, a resistivity contrast corresponding to the clay/chalk interface was interpreted confronting the electromagnetic soundings to boreholes. Slopes were then sampled on this geophysical model and jointly interpolated with the clay/chalk interface documented in boreholes using an implicit 3D potential‐field method. In order to evaluate this new joint geophysical–geological model, its accuracy was compared with that of both pure geological and pure geophysical models for various borehole configurations. The proposed joint modelling yields the most accurate clay/chalk interface whatever the number and location of boreholes taken into account for modelling and validation. Compared with standard geological modelling, the approach introduces in between boreholes geometrical information derived from geophysical results. Compared with conventional resistivity interpretation of the geophysical model, it reduces drift effects and honours the boreholes. The method therefore improves what is commonly obtained with geological or geophysical data separately, making it very attractive for robust 3D geological modelling of the subsurface. 相似文献
14.
微地震事件的空间分布可以用来监测水力压裂过程中裂缝的发育情况。因此,震源定位是微震监测中重要的环节。震源定位依赖准确的速度模型,而震源位置和速度模型的耦合易导致线性迭代的同时反演方法陷入局部极小值。邻近算法作为一种非线性全局优化算法,能够最大程度地避免陷入局部最优解。本文将邻近算法应用于单井监测的微震定位和一维速度模型同时反演,首先利用邻近算法搜索一维速度模型,再使用网格搜索方法进行震源定位,并根据定位的走时残差产生新的速度模型,最后通过若干次迭代使其收敛到最优解。理论和实际数据结果均表明该方法能够避免局部最优解,得到较为可靠的震源位置和一维速度模型。 相似文献
15.
—?The IASPEI91 global travel-time curves are used as the default for event location at the Prototype International Data Center (PIDC). In order to improve event location, a 1-D Baltic travel-time model was implemented at the PIDC in 1997 for locating events using regional phases from Fennoscandian stations. Where a single model is insufficient for characterizing the regional geology, path-dependent corrections, or Source Specific Station Corrections (SSSCs), are more appropriate for event locations. We have developed SSSCs for regional phases at the Fennoscandian stations by interpolating travel times through different 1-D models. SSSCs for stations NRIS and SPITS are also derived, given the fact that paths from both stations to high latitude events are within the Fennoscandia regionalization as Baltic.¶Validation testing of the SSSCs demonstrates that using SSSCs in event location is superior to not using SSSCs, a nd, in most cases, to using the 1-D model directly when locating events. For a ground-truth data set which includes events in the Baltic Shield with location accuracy better than 2?km, the average improvement in location due to SSSCs is 9?km, and the median coverage ellipse is reduced by 2710?km2 (from 3830 to 1120?km2). These results are similar to those obtained using the 1-D Baltic model. For a CEB (Calibration Event Bulletin) data set which includes events along the North Atlantic oceanic ridge and in central/southern Europe, using SSSCs the ridge events move closer to the ridge axis, and the European events move closer to CEB locations than 1-D Baltic locations. For a constrained JHD (Joint Hypocenter Determination) data set of events in the Novaya Zemlya region, when using SSSCs or the 1-D Baltic model, relative to the JHD locations mislocations are less or similar to those without SSSCs. All coverage ellipses are smaller but sti ll contain the JHD solutions.¶Our SSSCs are strongly dependent on the 1-D regional models and regionalization. Future development in 1-D velocity models and travel-time curves should improve such SSSCs, event locations, and uncertainties. It is hoped that the implementation and demonstration of SSSCs in the PIDC software will encourage these further developments. These SSSCs were implemented at the PIDC for Reviewed Event Bulletin (REB) location in April 1999. 相似文献
16.
炮点和海底地震仪(ocean bottom seismometer,OBS)位置校正是三维地震数据处理的基本环节,也是获取高精度三维速度结构的关键所在.本文基于南海洋陆转换带(Continental-Oceanic-Transition zone,COT)IODP367/368钻探区开展的三维OBS深地震探测数据,开展了炮点及OBS位置校正研究,新的校正方法主要体现在三个方面:(1)利用连续三个炮点的平均航向对中间炮点进行位置校正,更真实地反映气枪枪阵与船体之间的软连接状态;(2)根据"滑动窗口"思想将海水声学速度阈值划分成N等份,通过循环测试获得全局最优的OBS位置校正结果,改进了前人方法只能获得局部最优解的问题;(3)针对单条测线穿过的OBS,通过加入其临近测线的直达水波走时,构成视双测线OBS位置校正法,提高了校正精度.49台OBS位置校正结果表明,除3台单测线法校正的OBS在垂直测线方向存在较大不确定性外,其余误差范围均为35m左右.本文改进的OBS位置校正方法,不仅提高了单条测线穿过的OBS位置校正精度,保证后续三维地震结构研究的可靠性,而且为今后类似的OBS位置校正提供了经验和借鉴. 相似文献
17.
C.A. Finn G.D. Kraft M.S. Sibol R.L. Jones M.E. Pulaski 《Pure and Applied Geophysics》2001,158(1-2):105-116
—?An important requirement for a comprehensive seismic monitoring system is the capability to accurately locate small seismic events worldwide. Accurate event location can improve the probability of determining whether or not a small event, recorded predominantly by local and regional stations, is a nuclear explosion. For those portions of the earth where crustal velocities are not well established, reference event calibration techniques offer a method of increased locational accuracy and reduced locational bias.¶In this study, data from a set of mining events with good ground-truth data in the Powder River Basin region of eastern Wyoming are used to investigate the potential of event calibration techniques in the area. Results of this study are compared with locations published in the prototype International Data Center's Reviewed Event Bulletin (REB). A Joint Hypocenter Determination (JHD) method was applied to a s et of 23 events. Four of those events with superior ground-truth control (mining company report or Global Positioning System data) were used as JHD reference events. Nineteen (83%) of the solutions converged and the resulting set of station-phase travel-time corrections from the JHD results was then tested. When those travel-time corrections were applied individually to the four events with good ground-truth control, the average locational error reduced the original REB location error from 16.1?km to 5.7?km (65% improvement). The JHD locations indicated reduced locational bias and all of the individual error ellipses enclosed the actual known event locations.¶Given a set of well-recorded calibration events, it appears that the JHD methodology is a viable technique for improving locational accuracy of future small events where the location depends on arrival times from predominantly local and/or regional stations. In this specific case, the International Associ ation of Seismology and the Physics of the Earth's Interior (IASPEI) travel-time tables, coupled with JHD-derived travel-time corrections, may obviate the need for an accurately known regional velocity structure in the Powder River Basin region. 相似文献
18.
收集了1978～2003年位于渤海湾盆地及其邻近地区（大体位于东经112°～122°，北纬34°～44°之间）所记录到的的总计10534个地震或人工爆破事件的Pn、Pg以及P波到时数据，运用GT5准则，从中挑选出相对精确和可信度较高，且具有代表性的的10个地震事件，使用Messy GA算法，分别反演了这10个地震事件所对应的一维地壳P波速度模型.反演的局部地壳模型与已知结果对应较好，基本反映了震中区的地壳速度结构特征.该方法原理简单，计算方便，可用于确定局部和区域的地壳速度模型. 相似文献
19.
本研究利用国家地震台网131个地震台站2009—2016年记录的1 749次近震的初至P波和S波走时数据,与采用快速行进方法正演计算得到的华北地区4个三维地壳速度模型对应的走时数据进行对比,通过统计分析的方法,评价这4个速度模型与真实地下结构的近似程度。结果表明:4个速度模型在大范围内存在较高的一致性,在整个研究区内（111°E—119.5°E,37°N—42°N）,Shen等的模型（简称“S模型”）相对优于Fang等的模型（简称“F模型”）和Duan等的模型（简称“D模型”）,Laske等的Crust1.0模型（简称“C模型”）相对较差。我们认为该结果与上述几个模型所使用的数据及其分辨率有关。对于研究区域内的构造单元,D模型在燕山褶皱带西南部、太行山山前构造带西北部和沧县隆起区表现较好,F模型在太行山隆起区中部、沧县隆起北部、黄骅凹陷区和燕山褶皱带表现较好,S模型在西部地块、山西凹陷区、太行山山前构造带和冀中凹陷区表现较好,C模型无明显连片表现较好区域。 相似文献