共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
J. Nouri B. Maghsoudlou Z. Aboushahab 《International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology》2013,10(3):443-454
This study was conducted to determine some important factors of site selection for Esfahan 4th new town-Iran, with quantification of importance index for each factor and the effect of selected criteria in determination of the prioritized location for urban development. The study followed an explanatory analytical method based on field studies, analytical hierarchy process and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution model. This means that after defining the criteria and the significant parameters using Delphi technique and filling out the questionnaires by experts in environmental sciences and urban constructions, the rate of effectiveness of each factor and also the significant criteria in site priority and environmental decision making for new towns were determined by analytical hierarchy process model and “Expert choice” software. The results revealed that among the main defined criteria (i.e. physical, biological, economical-social, political and pollution dispersion) and sub-criteria selected by the experts for location of Esfahan 4th new town, the physical criteria with a weight of 0.453 designated nearly 45 % of the importance index to itself, standing at the first priority. Accordingly, the economical-social and pollution dispersion criteria were ranked at the second and the third place with weights of 0.307 and 0.116, respectively. The technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution model, which is one of the methods for multi-criteria decision making, was then used to determine the best location scenario. Comparing the three proposed locations, alternative 1 was found to be more suitable as it was well-fitted to the defined criteria. 相似文献
2.
Risk identification on hydropower project using the IAHP and extension of TOPSIS methods under interval-valued fuzzy environment 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
Risk identification on hydropower project, the first step of risk management process, is an extremely complex issue and has a significant impact on the efficiency of the following risk assessment and control. On the other hand, finding out some more possible risk factors among many risk ones is a multi-criteria decision making problem. This paper develops an evaluation model based on the interval analytic hierarchy process (IAHP) and extension of technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), to identify exactly the more possible risk factors under a complex and fuzzy environment. In this paper, the IAHP is used to analyze the structure of risk identification problems in hydropower project and to determine weights of the criteria and decision makers, and extension of TOPSIS method with interval data is used to obtain final ranking of potential risk factors in hydropower project. Risk identification on an earth dam is conducted to illustrate the utilization of the model proposed in this paper. The application could be interpreted as demonstrating the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed model. 相似文献
3.
Application of fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making to select and to rank the post-mining land-use 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
Isa Masoumi Saeed Naraghi Farshad Rashidi-nejad Shiba Masoumi 《Environmental Earth Sciences》2014,72(1):221-231
The selection of an optimal reclamation method is one of the most important portions of the surface mining design. There are many factors in this problem which seriously influence decision-making. The fuzzy set theory was applied due to the effect of uncertain parameters involved in the decision-making process. Therefore, the fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making method was proposed. The aim of this study is to use the fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution method for ranking the optimal post-mining land-use and the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process method in order to determine the weights of each criterion. This approach is applied to the surface coal mine by employing 28 criteria which influence the decision-making procedure. The TOPSIS and AHP methods have been the most used methods of mining decision-making and demonstrated their ability to make critical decisions. By evaluating the alternatives and considering effective criteria with proposed methods, agriculture is the optimal post-mining land-use. 相似文献
4.
With the increasing occurrence frequency of emergency events, emergency management (EM) has been a very important issue in management science. One of the major activities of EM is to evaluate and select the most desirable emergency alternative(s). This paper proposes a new framework combining the analytic network process (ANP) method, the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) technique, and 2-tuple linguistic technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TL-TOPSIS) method to solve the emergency alternative evaluation and selection problem. This study has been done in three stages. In the first stage, we use DEMATEL technique to obtain the network relation map (NRM) among emergency alternative evaluation criteria or sub-criteria. In the second stage, we use ANP method to calculate the global weight of each sub-criterion based on the NRM among emergency alternative evaluation sub-criteria. In the third stage, the ratings of emergency alternative with respect to each sub-criterion are described by linguistic items, and the TL-TOPSIS method is used to rank the emergency alternative. Finally, a practical example of urban fire emergency alternative selection is given to illustrate the application of the proposed framework.
相似文献5.
With the increasing occurrence frequency of emergency events, emergency management (EM) has been a very important issue in management science. One of the major activities of EM is to evaluate and select the most desirable emergency alternative(s). This paper proposes a new framework combining the analytic network process (ANP) method, the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) technique, and 2-tuple linguistic technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TL-TOPSIS) method to solve the emergency alternative evaluation and selection problem. This study has been done in three stages. In the first stage, we use DEMATEL technique to obtain the network relation map (NRM) among emergency alternative evaluation criteria or sub-criteria. In the second stage, we use ANP method to calculate the global weight of each sub-criterion based on the NRM among emergency alternative evaluation sub-criteria. In the third stage, the ratings of emergency alternative with respect to each sub-criterion are described by linguistic items, and the TL-TOPSIS method is used to rank the emergency alternative. Finally, a practical example of urban fire emergency alternative selection is given to illustrate the application of the proposed framework. 相似文献
6.
Disaster mitigation as a pre-disaster measure within the scope of disaster risk management is significant in the sense of reducing the adverse effects of earthquakes in the context of earthquake-sensitive risk planning. In the urban planning context, the existence of numerous decision makers and alternatives, which are depending on many criteria, makes decision-making process difficult. This difficulty was overcomed through geographical information systems (GIS). In the context of GIS-based multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) analysis, we used analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) to determine earthquake-risky areas in Yalova City Center. First, AHP analysis related to geological and superstructure/infrastructure criteria was conducted and two separate AHP maps were obtained. Then, we conducted TOPSIS analysis to consider both criteria in the sense of earthquake risk-sensitive planning. Then, overall earthquake risk map obtained which could be used as an input for disaster mitigation processes.
相似文献7.
近年来极端天气事件频发,尤其洪水灾害日趋频繁并且影响深远。在众多易损性概念基础上,进一步明确了城市易损性的内涵,并构建了城市洪水灾害易损性的评价指标体系。针对传统多属性决策方法——逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS)不能比较正、负理想解中垂线上点的问题,采用Kullback-Leibler距离计算评价对象与正理想解的贴近度,建立了KL-TOPSIS模型,应用该模型对哈尔滨市2005~2009年洪水灾害易损性进行了动态评价,得出其易损性先升后降的结论,并通过横向比较发现哈尔滨市的洪水灾害易损性要小于同时期的沈阳市、武汉市和上海市。 相似文献
8.
G. Tuzkaya 《International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology》2013,10(3):423-432
Supplier evaluation problems deal with selecting appropriate suppliers considering multiple criteria, which may be related with qualitative and quantitative aspects. Traditional supplier selection criteria contain criteria such as cost, capacity, delivery reliability, flexibility, and responsiveness, etc. However, due to the increasing level of environmental problems, it is a necessity to take environmental criteria into account together with the traditional decision criteria in the supplier evaluation processes of companies. Considering this necessity, this paper proposes a decision making methodology for environmental criteria integrated supplier evaluation processes. A methodology based on intuitionistic fuzzy Choquet integral operator is utilized to take into account vagueness of the decision environment and the interactions among the criteria. This methodology also provides the consideration of the satisfaction and dissatisfaction degrees of alternatives for each criterion with the help of intuitionistic fuzzy values. In addition, the effects of the criteria weights to the final ranking of suppliers are analyzed via sensitivity analyses. 相似文献
9.
10.
Tailing dam is one of the most important mining operations interface with surrounding environment even as long as many years
after ore reserve exhausted. Therefore, appropriate design and management respect to future limitations of environmental regulations
is required. Recently, effect of multiple criteria on tailing impoundment site selection makes it complex as the conventional
procedures unable to answer. The systematic approach of multi attribute decision-making helps decision-makers select the most
preferable decision and provide the basis of a decision support system. This paper developed new strategy based on fuzzy multi
attribute group decision-making methods including: technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution and analytical
hierarchy process in fuzzy group environment. A hypothetical case is processed to demonstrate the strategy’s efficiency and
results are compared and ranked so that the most preferable option is identified. 相似文献
11.
Natural Hazards - This study is aimed at producing an improved ranking method by coupling the technique for the order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and Mahalanobis distance... 相似文献
12.
Landfill site selection using integrated fuzzy logic and analytic network process (F-ANP) 总被引：2，自引：2，他引：0
Locating a suitable place to dispose the municipal solid wastes hygienically (sanitary landfill) is one of the fundamental subjects relating the environmental stability of cities and, in general, the human settlements. This final stage of solid waste management requires observance of a series of principles and criteria mainly including environmental, social, economical, and general acceptance criteria. The set of these criteria along with their sub-criteria causes some complexities in decision making for landfill site selection. Considering effective parameters and criteria, we developed an integrated fuzzy logic and analytic network process (i.e. F-ANP) to locate a suitable location for landfilling municipal solid wastes generated in Kahak Town, Qom, Iran. Our findings revealed that integration of fuzzy logic and ANP can give better idea compared with other models like AHP, fuzzy logic, and ANP (individually). Therefore, this model can be applied in site selection for landfill of other similar places. 相似文献
13.
红层泥岩是一种典型侏罗系沉积岩,其含有微量黏土矿物,易遇水软化、失水崩解,具有一定膨胀性,是引起兰新高速铁路路基持续上拱变形的一个重要因素,故重新判定该种土体膨胀性对高速铁路无砟轨道设计和施工具有重要意义。为此,选取等效蒙脱石含量、阳离子交换量、自由膨胀率和液限为泥岩膨胀性判别指标,通过兰新高速铁路上拱地段大量钻孔实测资料,提出了泥岩膨胀等级分级标准,采用改进层次分析法、基尼系数法和直觉模糊理论确定了判别指标组合权重,基于逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS法)建立了泥岩膨胀性直觉模糊综合评价模型。结果表明：直觉模糊综合评价模型将泥岩膨胀性进行了定量化,克服了同一试样不同指标属于不同等级判别缺陷;室内膨胀量试验验证了膨胀等级分级标准和直觉模糊综合评价模型对兰新高铁地基泥岩适用性和准确性。研究成果对地基红层泥岩高速铁路路基长期持续上拱变形风险评估和工程控制措施提供技术支撑。 相似文献
14.
Jing Dai Jing Qi Jingjing Chi Shaoqing Chen Jin Yang Liping Ju Bin Chen 《Frontiers of Earth Science》2010,4(3):357-362
Security evaluation has become a hot topic in the research field of water resource management. In this paper, we established
a novel water resource security indicator system based on the Pressure-Status-Response (PSR) framework using gray relation
analysis (GRA) and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). A case study of Beijing from 1996
to 2007 was conducted to verify the evaluation system. Results showed that the gray relative closeness degrees of water resource
security to the positive ideal solution were low, with the least one of 0.360 in 1999 and the largest one of 0.527 in 2007,
implying that Beijing was facing severer challenges with water resources during the concerned time. Also, the analysis of
water resource security indicated that the pressure of water resource was constantly increasing. Finally, factor analysis
was employed to calculate the gray relation degrees of evaluating indices with the ideal solutions so as to reveal the relativity
of water resource security of Beijing, which may contribute to a better understanding of the urban water resource management
and regulation. 相似文献
15.
Landfill site selection by decision-making tools based on fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making method 总被引：2，自引：2，他引：0
Abdolhadi Nazari Mohammad Mehdi Salarirad Abbas Aghajani Bazzazi 《Environmental Earth Sciences》2012,65(6):1631-1642
Landfill site selection is a complex and time-consuming process, which requires evaluation of several factors where many different
attributes are taken into account. Decision makers always have some difficulties in making the right decision in the multiple
attribute environments. After identifying candidate sites, these sites should be ranked using decision-making methods. This
study applies Chang’s fuzzy AHP-based multiple attribute decision-making (MADM) method for selection of the best site of landfills
based on a set of decision criteria. The Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) was designed to make pairwise comparisons
of selected criteria by domain experts for assigning weights to the decision criteria. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is
used to make pairwise comparisons and assign weights to the decision criteria. It is easier for a decision maker to describe
a value for an alternative by using linguistic terms and fuzzy numbers. In the fuzzy-based AHP method, the rating of each
alternative was described using the expression of triangular fuzzy membership functions. Once the global weights of the criteria
is calculated by AHP, they are incorporated into the decision matrices composed by decision maker and passed to fuzzy-AHP
method which is used to determine preference order of siting alternatives. In this study, a computer program based on the
Chang’s fuzzy method was also developed in MATLAB environment for ranking and selecting the landfill site. As an example of
the proposed methodology, four different hypothetical areas were chosen and implemented to demonstrate the effectiveness of
the program. By using this program, the precision was improved in comparison with traditional methods and computational time
required for ranking and selecting the suitable landfill site was significantly reduced. 相似文献
16.
Mahfuzur Rahman Ningsheng Chen Md Monirul Islam Ashraf Dewan Hamid Reza Pourghasemi Rana Muhammad Ali Washakh Nirdesh Nepal Shufeng Tian Hamid Faiz Mehtab Alam Naveed Ahmed 《地学前缘(英文版)》2021,12(3):101095
This work developed models to identify optimal spatial distribution of emergency evacuation centers(EECs) such as schools, colleges, hospitals, and fire stations to improve flood emergency planning in the Sylhet region of northeastern Bangladesh.The use of location-allocation models(LAMs) for evacuation in regard to flood victims is essential to minimize disaster risk.In the first step, flood susceptibility maps were developed using machine learning models(MLMs), including: Levenberg–Marquardt back propagation(LM-BP) neural network and decision trees(DT) and multi-criteria decision making(MCDM) method.Performance of the MLMs and MCDM techniques were assessed considering the area under the receiver operating characteristic(AUROC) curve.Mathematical approaches in a geographic information system(GIS) for four well-known LAM problems affecting emergency rescue time are proposed: maximal covering location problem(MCLP), the maximize attendance(MA), p-median problem(PMP), and the location set covering problem(LSCP).The results showed that existing EECs were not optimally distributed, and that some areas were not adequately served by EECs(i.e., not all demand points could be reached within a 60-min travel time).We concluded that the proposed models can be used to improve planning of the distribution of EECs, and that application of the models could contribute to reducing human casualties, property losses, and improve emergency operation. 相似文献
17.
Mohsen Safari Reza Kakaei Mohammad Ataei Mohammad Karamoozian 《Arabian Journal of Geosciences》2011,5(5):1011-1019
Site selection for the mineral processing is the most important decision made by owner that has a significant impact on the efficiency of the whole process. This is a critical decision which involves considering a number of criteria and finding the best location among feasible alternatives. Therefore, a multicriteria decision-making method is necessary to apply site-selection process to find the best location that meet desired conditions set by the selection criteria. This paper presents an application of TOPSIS method based on fuzzy sets (fuzzy TOPSIS), which is one of the broader multicriteria decision making means, used to select an appropriate site for mineral processing plant for Sangan iron ore mine (phase 2). For this purpose, at first considering the geological, technical, economical, and environmental factors, three feasible alternatives were selected for the processing plant using Geographical Information System. Then, based on the technical and experimental experiences and through judgment of the decision makers and experts, 14 criteria were established and these alternatives were evaluated. Finally, the alternatives were ranked and the best location was recommended. 相似文献
18.
Zhengyin Zhou Xiaoling Wang Ruirui Sun Xuefei Ao Xiaopei Sun Mingrui Song 《Natural Hazards》2014,72(2):675-700
The present model and methodology described in Part I of this work are applied to perform a comprehensive risk analysis of the dam-break flood of five reservoirs in the Haihe River Basin, China. The results indicate that the three-dimensional numerical simulation considering complex terrain can reflect the characteristics of flood routing and the three-dimensional phenomena. Based on the simulation results, it can be concluded that the risk grades of the consequences induced by a gradual or instantaneous dam break of the Dongwushi reservoir are extremely serious, as determined through the attribute synthetic approach. The results obtained from ranking the risk by the technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution method are that the Dongwushi reservoir has the most serious consequences when the dam breaks followed by the Lincheng reservoir, the Miaogong reservoir and the Yunzhou reservoir, and the Youyi reservoir has the least severe consequences. Though the ranking of the relatively comprehensive risk coincides with that of the consequences, the dam safety measured by the dam failure probability plays an important role in ranking the risk. A sensitivity analysis is performed by individually increasing the weight of each criterion by 20 %, and the ranking order is not changed, suggesting that the evaluation model is reasonable, stable and reliable. 相似文献
19.
An appropriate multiple criteria decision making method for solving electricity planning problems, addressing sustainability issue 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
N. Bagheri Moghaddam M. Nasiri S. M. Mousavi 《International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology》2011,8(3):605-620
In the past, decision making within the energy sector, especially in Iran, was limited to economic analysis. Lately, multiple criteria decision making has gained great popularity. However, this is not enough to make a right decision by considering sustainability. This paper deals with designing an appropriate multiple criteria decision making method to address the multifaceted nature of such problems. This task is the second precondition to make a decision which meets the sustainability criterion. This is done by revealing new facts about quantitative and qualitative data and the degree of compensation between the criteria. Moreover, this paper illustrates the capability of different methods with regard to sustainable energy planning and management in two steps: 1) comparison of two main approaches in the strategic energy planning context; 2) evaluation of multi attribute decision making methods and combining them. Combining four methods including Analytical hierarchy process, Preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation II, geometric mean and weighted sum seems to result in designing an appropriate method which meets the sustainability criterion. These contributions are proposed for comparing the renewable energy technologies with non-renewable ones. Nevertheless, these seem to be applicable in any comparison between discrete alternatives in the energy sector. 相似文献
20.
Ranking desertification indicators using TOPSIS algorithm 总被引：2，自引：1，他引：1
Desertification is the result of natural and anthropogenic processes, leading to degradation or loss of the land’s productivity and complexity. To assess the desertification status, integrated set of indicators must be identified. Indicators must provide synthetic information on threshold levels, status and evolution of relevant physical, chemical, biological and anthropogenic processes. Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) is a collection of methodologies to compare, select, or rank multiple alternatives that involve incommensurate attributes. Technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method is a multiple criteria method to identify solutions from a finite set. TOPSIS is an algorithm for determining the most preferable choices among the possible indicators that can be developed. The aim of this paper is to introduce TOPSIS as a decision-making method for the selection and integration of desertification indicators. The simulation case study presented here is related to the selection of the best set of indicators to monitor land degradation by remote sensing in three different countries (Brazil, Mozambique and Portugal), within the framework defined by the DesertWatch Extension project. 相似文献