共查询到18条相似文献，搜索用时 140 毫秒
1.
2.
介绍利用中国地壳运动观测网络基本网、基准网1998年和2000年GPS观测结果所获得的中国大陆地壳水平运动信息．简要介绍这两次GPS观测概况，以及用GAMIT / GLOBK软件对所获得GPS观测数据的处理及精度分析．基准网与基本网各年观测结果得到的网内点位精度、水平分量精度平均为2mm左右，高程分量精度平均为5mm 左右，由两期观测得到的水平位移分量的精度平均为3mm 左右．
得到的1998年9月初至2000年6月中旬基本网、基准网中的地壳运动，包括以位于东部的一组稳定点为基准的各观测站位移、网内各部分的应变及部分地区的旋转量．根据所获得的我国大陆较为完整而详细的地壳水平运动图象，分析了中国大陆现今地壳运动的主要特征．在所述观测期间，我国东部地区变形较小，相对较为稳定．相对位于东部的稳定点组，东北块体向北运动，位移量约10mm；华南块体向东南运动，位移量约9mm．相对东部地区，西北部新疆地区以北西向运动为主，位移量约26mm；西南西藏地区以向北运动为主，位移量约32mm；西藏东部与云南地区形成非常明显的顺时针旋转构造运动，旋转中心位于26.5N，95.5E，旋转量为0.0045，旋转位移平均为12mm 左右．我国中部南北地震带是一强烈而复杂的变形带．GPS测量结果表明，印度板块向北挤压是影响我国地壳运动的主要因素． 相似文献
3.
中国地壳运动观测网络基准网GPS连续观测，获得了2001年11月14日昆仑山8.1级大地震前后中国大陆，特别是西部地区的地壳水平运动信息．以东部长期相互间相对水平位移很小的几个站组成的一组稳定点作为基准， 据此获得水平位移分量时间序列．2000年11月上旬起中国西部的GPS基准站开始出现显著的异常位移，此后在云南及四川发生多次6级左右的地震．自2001年4月中旬开始，中国西部GPS基准站向北的水平位移速率明显减小，甚至反向，临震前及震后略有恢复，但震后向北的水平位移速率仍减小，并有明显的向西运动．近几年中国大陆西部（相对东部）的地壳运动过程表明，印度板块的向北挤压是昆仑山8.1级大地震的主要力源，大地震释放了大量的能量，印度板块对中国大陆的作用力明显降低，大震后至2002年底中国大陆的地震活动也明显降低． 相似文献
4.
介绍利用中国地壳运动观测网络区域网 (包括基本网与基准网 ) 1 999年与 2 0 0 1年两期GPS观测所获得的中国大陆地壳水平运动信息 .本文的主要特点是 :以位于东部的一组稳定点为基准 ,得到 1 999～ 2 0 0 1年区域网各观测站水平位移速率 .根据由此获得的我国大陆目前最为详细的地壳水平运动图象 ,研究了块体的划分、块体位移与块体变形 ,提出了分析块体水平变形强度的方法 ,分析了中国大陆现今地壳运动的基本特征及 2 0 0 1年 1 1月 1 4日昆仑山口西M8.1大地震前的地壳水平运动 . 相似文献
5.
印尼8.7级大震前后GPS观测站的地壳水平与垂直位移时间序列结果 总被引：8，自引：3，他引：5
利用IGS及中国地壳运动观测网络GPS连续观测站6年多时间的观测结果, 以中国大陆东部的稳定点组作为水平位移与垂直位移解的参考基准, 得到了2004年12月26日印尼苏门答腊8.7级与2005年3月28日8.5级大震前后GPS观测站的地壳水平及垂直位移时间序列的结果。 尽管所采用的GPS站点少, 且分布范围大, 但仍可看到在如此大的地震震前、 同震与震后地壳运动的特征, 为今后观测研究提供了十分有意义的结果。 文中所采用稳定点组基准有效消除水平位移场的平移与旋转, 而局部椭球面的不平性对计算区域地壳运动结果, 特别是对垂直位移的影响很小, 说明了位移解所描述的大范围区域位移场是合理的。 这两次地震的同震水平位移及震后的垂直位移影响量级达数厘米, 范围达远离8.7级地震震中4500 km之外, 甚至更远。 相似文献
6.
介绍了中国地壳运动观测网络1998～1999年基准站GPS观测概况,简要介绍了用伯尔尼（Bernese）软件对GPS观测数据的处理结果,详细介绍了所获取的1998年９月初～1999年７月初基准网地壳运动,包括各基准站位移与网内各部分的应变．在所述观测期间,我国东部地区较为稳定．相对东部地区,西南部地区以向北运动为主,位移量约17ｍｍ,受北北东向挤压为主;西北部地区以北西向运动为主,位移量约11ｍｍ;而云南地区以向南运动为主,位移量约14ｍｍ．我国中部南北地震带则是一强烈的剪切变形带．网内最大主应变量为2.910-8．观测结果表明,印度板块向北挤压依然是影响我国地壳运动的主要因素． 相似文献
7.
利用1998年9月至2004年3月上旬中国地壳运动观测网络基准站GPS连续观测结果所获得的垂直位移时间序列,讨论了基准的选择,分析了基准站垂直位移的特点。取中国东部一组垂直位移变化形态基本一致、年速率较小的6个基准站作为垂直位移时间序列的基准。计算结果表明,每周的垂直位移解的精度可达3mm。与基准站的水平位移年速率相比,垂直位移年速率普遍较低;而与基准站的水平位移时间序列相比,一些基准站的垂直位移时间序列有非常显著的年周期变化,幅度达20～50mm。中国大陆西部基准站的年周期变化与地球自转有明显的相关性,并且符合地球自转守恒。基准站垂直位移的变化值得多方面深入研究 相似文献
8.
9.
GPS观测得到的中国大陆地壳垂直运动 总被引：13，自引：1，他引：13
利用中国地壳运动观测网络基准站的GPS连续观测及基本站非连续GPS观测结果，分析了基准站垂直位移的年周期变化特点，讨论了获得中国大陆垂直位移长趋势速率的条件，说明由基本站（连同基准站）多期GPS观测得到的长趋势垂直位移速率是较为可靠的。由于不少GPS观测站有幅度达数cm的年周期变化及大部分区域站观测次数少，由1999年、2001年两期区域站GPS观测难以得到可靠的长趋势垂直构造运动速率。基本站的观测结果表明中国大陆长趋势垂直构造运动主要特点是，速率较低，北升，南降，东强，西弱，西部相对东部略有下降。 相似文献
10.
11.
Guohua Gu 《Pure and Applied Geophysics》2006,163(11-12):2575-2583
The general characteristics of the recent horizontal crustal movement in the Chinese Mainland and the horizontal crustal movements before the Kunlun Mountain earthquake of M8.1 on Nov. 14, 2001 and two earthquakes of M 8.0 and M 7.9 occurred in Sept. 2003 around the Chinese Mainland are analyzed with GPS data obtained in the Crustal Movement Observation Network of China (CMONOC). Relative vertical displacements observed in the last five years at fiducial stations show that there was a significant correlation between the length of day and the vertical displacements at most stations in western China. 相似文献
12.
Introduction The great Kunlun Mountain earthquake occurred on November 14, 2001 on the border be-tween Xinjiang and Qinghai in west China (36.2N, 90.9E). It was the largest earthquake oc-curred in Chinese mainland in the last 50 years. The Crustal Movement Observation Network of China (CMONOC) established in 1998 mainly for the purpose of earthquake prediction with only 25 fiducial stations for continuous GPS observations, has recorded the precious information of the crustal movement … 相似文献
13.
The continuous GPS observation at the fiducial stations in the Crustal Movement Observation Network of China (CMONOC) recorded the crustal movement of Chinese mainland before and after the great Kunlun Mountain earthquake of M=8.1 on November 14, 2001, especially the horizontal crustal movement in the western part of China. Based on the datum defined by a group of stable stations with small mutual horizontal displacements for a few years, the time series of horizontal displacements at fiducial stations were obtained. Significant anomalous horizontal displacements had appeared at the fiducial stations in the western part of China since early November 2000 and several earthquakes with the magnitudes about 6.0 had occurred in Yunnan and Sichuan Provinces. The northward components of the horizontal displacement at the fiducial stations in west China had decreased significantly and even changed in the opposite sense since mid April 2001. After the earthquake, the northward displacements still decreased and there were significant westward displacements. The process of the crustal movement in the western part of Chinese mainland (in reference to east China) suggests that the main force source for this earthquake came from the northward pushing of the Indian plate. The great earthquake released a large amount of energy, as a result, the action applied by the Indian plate to Chinese mainland diminished significantly and after the great earthquake, the seismic activity in Chinese mainland decreased considerably until the end of 2002. 相似文献
14.
The continuous GPS observation at the fiducial stations in the Crustal Movement Observation Network of China (CMONOC) recorded
the crustal movement of Chinese mainland before and after the great Kunlun Mountain earthquake of M=8.1 on November 14, 2001, especially the horizontal crustal movement in the western part of China. Based on the datum defined
by a group of stable stations with small mutual horizontal displacements for a few years, the time series of horizontal displacements
at fiducial stations were obtained. Significant anomalous horizontal displacements had appeared at the fiducial stations in
the western part of China since early November 2000 and several earthquakes with the magnitudes about 6.0 had occurred in
Yunnan and Sichuan Provinces. The northward components of the horizontal displacement at the fiducial stations in west China
had decreased significantly and even changed in the opposite sense since mid April 2001. After the earthquake, the northward
displacements still decreased and there were significant westward displacements. The process of the crustal movement in the
western part of Chinese mainland (in reference to east China) suggests that the main force source for this earthquake came
from the northward pushing of the Indian plate. The great earthquake released a large amount of energy, as a result, the action
applied by the Indian plate to Chinese mainland diminished significantly and after the great earthquake, the seismic activity
in Chinese mainland decreased considerably until the end of 2002.
Foundation item: The National Development and Programming Project for Key Basic Research (95-13-03-07). 相似文献
15.
Introduction In the Crustal Movement Observation Network of China (CMONOC) there are 25 fiducialstations, 56 basic stations and 1 000 regional stations. They are scattered on 10 major blocks inChinese mainland with high density of observation stations on the blocks of high seismic activityin the regional networks. 10 major blocks or regions (they will be referred to as blocks in the paper,a letter is used as a symbol for each block) were divided during the design of the regionalnetwo… 相似文献
16.
The paper introduces the horizontal crustal movement obtained from GPS observations in the regional networks (including the
basic network and the fiducial network) of the Crustal Movement Observation Network of China (CMONOC) carried out in 1999
and 2001. This paper is characterized by the acquisition of the horizontal displacement velocities during the period from
1999 to 2001 at the observation stations in the regional networks with datum definition of a group of stable stations with
small mutual displacements in east China. Based on the most detailed map of horizontal crustal movement in Chinese mainland,
the division of blocks, their displacements and deformations are studied. An approach to analysis of the intensity of the
horizontal crustal deformation is proposed. The general characteristics of the recent horizontal crustal movement in Chinese
mainland and that before the Kunlunshan earthquake of M=8.1 on November 14, 2001 are analyzed.
Foundation item: The National Development and Programming Project for Key Basic Research (95-13-03-07). 相似文献
17.
本文利用“中国地壳运动观测网络（二期）”多个GPS连续观测站观测数据处理结果,将2013年4月20日四川芦山MS7.0地震区域参考框架同震水平位移与全球参考框架同震水平位移进行比较,结果表明两组框架解一致,说明两种参考框架均可当作位错参考框架,也即全球参考框架同震水平位移也可视为区域参考框架同震水平位移．区域参考框架下GPS连续观测站地震前的水平位移和同震水平位移结果表明,震前数年,SCTQ站西侧的GPS站构造运动十分显著,而该站水平位移却很小,即出现反常的闭锁．但该站的同震水平位移使其弹性回跳至正常构造水平位移水平,因此SCTQ站震前的位移闭锁是水平位移空间分布中的异常,是芦山MS7.0地震的前兆．水平位移时空变化表明,该站震前和震时位移完全符合里德的弹性回跳理论．区域参考框架中位移时间系列和同震水平位移的综合研究有助于对芦山地震地壳运动前兆的认识和解释．尽管本文未能直接采用其它GPS连续观测站的资料,但结合本文和其它研究结果可以证实,震中附近其它站地震前后的变化与SCTQ站类似．基于芦山地震前水平位移和同震水平位移及其与前兆关系的研究,本文进一步讨论了GPS监测网的布设、 数据处理和分析等问题． 相似文献
18.
General characteristics of the recent horizontal crustal movement in Chinese mainland 总被引：5，自引：0，他引：5
1 Introduction of GPS observation dataThe Crustal Movement Observation Network of China (CMONOC) is a major scientific project in China organized by China Seismological Bureau and paticipated by the Bureau of Surveying and Mapping of the General Staff, the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the National Bureau of Surveying and Mapping. Based on the observation data of 25 fiducial stations and 56 basic stations in CMONOC (Figure 1 and Table 1), collected from August 26 to September… 相似文献