共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 46 毫秒
1.
2013年7月22日,在甘肃岷县漳县交界处发生MS6.6地震,地震震中位置靠近临潭—宕昌断裂.本文通过构建有限断层模型,利用国家强震动台网中心提供的12条强地面运动三分量资料,通过波形反演方法来研究这次地震的震源破裂过程.结果显示这次地震是发生在甘东南地区岷县—宕昌断裂带东段附近的一次MW6.1级逆冲兼具左旋走滑破裂事件,最大滑动量约为80cm.发震断层走向及滑动性质与岷县—宕昌断裂吻合,推断本次地震与东昆仑断裂向北的扩展和推挤密切相关,是岷县—宕昌断裂进一步活动的结果. 相似文献
2.
COSEISMIC DISPLACEMENT AND FAULT SLIP OF THE MW6.1 NAPA EARTHQUAKE IN AMERICA REVEALED BY SENTINEL-1A INSAR DATA 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 ZUO Rong-hu QU Chun-yan ZHANG Guo-hong SHAN Xin-jian SONG Xiao-gang WEN Shao-yan XU Xiao-bo 《地震地质》2016,38(2):278-289
We achieved the coseismic displacements of the Napa MW6.1 earthquake located in California US occurring on 24 August 2014 by using InSAR data from the newly launched ESA's Sentinel-1A satellite. The 30m×30m ASTER GDEM was used to remove the terrain effect, and phase unwrapping method of branch-cut algorithm was adopted. In order to obtain a better coseismic displacement field, we also tested 90m×90m SRTM data to remove the terrain effect and Minimum Cost Flow algorithm to unwrap the phase. Results showed that the earthquake caused a significant ground displacement with maximum uplift and subsidence of 0.1m and -0.09m in the satellite light of sight(LOS). Based on the Sentinel-1A dataset and sensitivity based iterative fitting(SBIF) method of restrictive least-squares algorithm, we obtained coseismic fault slip distribution and part of the earthquake source parameters. Inversion results show that the strike angle is 341.3°, the dip angle is 80°, rupture is given right-lateral fault, average rake angle is -176.38°, and the maximum slip is ~0.8m at a depth of 4.43km. The accumulative seismic moment is up to 1.6×1018N·m, equivalent to a magnitude of MW6.14. 相似文献
3.
2003年7月7日发生在西藏与青海交界处的班戈MS6.1地震, 由于缺乏余震分布等可靠资料, 其发震构造及其活动性质等问题一直认识不清。 几家机构利用远场波动资料给出的震源机制解差异很大。 本文利用ENVISAT卫星ASAR数据和D-InSAR技术, 计算获得了该地震LOS方向的同震形变场图像, 并以此为约束反演获得了该地震的断层几何参数和同震滑动分布。 结果表明, 班戈MS6.1地震的发震构造为控制唐古拉山西边界的波涛湖—土门断裂, 其发震断层为走向161°的高角度右旋斜滑正断层, 破裂长度约10 km, 滑动量主要集中在3~7 km深度范围, 最大滑动量0.26 m, 矩震级MW5.6。 相似文献
4.
2015年4月25日尼泊尔爆发MW7.9地震,继而引发5月12日MW7.3级余震,GPS、InSAR监测到震源区及周边大范围同震形变.本文以国内外的GPS和InSAR同震形变为约束,考虑喜马拉雅断裂带岩石圈垂向分层和横向差异的影响,反演主喜马拉雅逆冲断裂在这次主震和余震中破裂面形状和滑动分布.结果显示,主震从USGS确定的震中位置向东偏南延伸100km以上,破裂地面迹线与主前缘逆冲断裂迹线基本一致.破裂面倾角约7°~11°,大部分破裂集中在深度8~20km,同余震分布深度一致.主震最大滑动量约6.0~6.6m,位于14km深处.余震破裂集中在震中附近30km范围内,填补了主震东部破裂空区,最大滑动约3.6~4.6 m,位于13km深.深度20km以下基本没有破裂.地壳介质不均匀性对破裂滑动分布的影响较大,介质不均匀模型的观测值不符值比各向同性弹性半空间模型降低10%以上.本文地震破裂模型特征与地震反射剖面、以及根据震间期大地测量数据反演的喜马拉雅深部蠕滑剖面极其相似.跨喜马拉雅断裂剖面的震间形变量与地震破裂滑移量直接相关.以此推算,尼泊尔中部大震原地复发周期在300年以上. 相似文献
5.
为了深入认识2016年4月15日日本熊本地震破裂的复杂性，利用远场体波资料和同震InSAR资料联合反演了此次地震的震源破裂时空过程. 联合反演结果表明:熊本地震的震源破裂持续时间约为25 s，整个破裂过程释放的总标量矩为6.03×1019 N·m，对应于矩震级MW7.1；同震滑动主要集中分布于浅部，破裂以右旋走滑为主，但在沿倾向0—5 km范围内，破裂呈较强的正断特征；此次地震破裂的最大同震滑动量约为4.9 m，且最大同震位错区位于背离断层走向上、距离起始破裂点约5—10 km的区域；破裂前期（0—7 s），在倾向上向浅表发生破裂，在走向上向东北和西南两侧扩展；大约7 s后，破裂背离断层走向主要向东北方向扩展. 根据有限断层联合反演结果推测，此次熊本地震破裂可能出露至地表. 相似文献
6.
收集了覆盖监测区域的Sentinel-1卫星雷达影像,利用短基线集干涉测量技术提取了2017年伊朗萨波尔扎哈布MW7.3地震后283天的地表时序形变,通过二步法反演得到其震后余滑分布,之后采用差分干涉技术获取了2018年发生于同一地区的贾万鲁德MW6.0地震的同震形变场,并将反演所得的发震断层参数作为应力计算的接收断层参数,来分析2017年MW7.3强震及其震后活动对2018年贾万鲁德MW6.0地震的触发影响。结果表明:萨波尔扎哈布地震的震后形变主要由孕震断层面的余滑运动所致,震后283天余滑模型的累积滑移量达到0.7 m;2018年贾万鲁德地震的发震断层走向为355.6°,倾角为89.4°,同震断层破裂以右旋走滑为主,兼具部分正断层运动。本文所得的贾万鲁德地震断层平面上的库仑应力变化表明,2017年MW7.3主震及其震后余滑对2018年MW6.0地震的发生具有一定的触发效应,MW6.0地震的发生可能与区域板块的活动性相关。 相似文献
7.
2016年4月15日16时25分（UTC），日本熊本县发生MW7.1强烈地震，给当地人员、建筑及经济造成严重灾难和巨大损失.日本地震观测网F-net给出的震源机制解显示此次地震的震源位置为130.7630°E，32.7545°N，深度12.45 km，节面Ⅰ：走向N131°E、倾角53°、滑动角-7°；节面Ⅱ：走向N226°E、倾角84°、滑动角-142°.与此同时，余震的震中分布及其震源机制结果显示主震的震源机制在破裂过程中有可能发生了变化，单一的震源机制不足以充分解释观测数据.本文依据GNSS和InSAR地表形变反演结果为约束，并结合活动构造资料为参考，构建了震源机制变化的有限断层模型，采用水平层状介质模型，利用日本强震观测台网K-NET和KiK-net的近场加速度观测记录，通过多时间窗线性波形反演方法反演了此次地震的震源破裂过程.研究结果显示，这是一次沿Futagawa-Hinagu断层带发生的右旋走滑破裂事件，发震断层分为南北两段，其中北段走向N235°E、倾角60°，南段走向N205°E、倾角72°，断层深度范围和余震深度分布基本一致，断层面上滑动主要集中于断层北段，最大滑动量约7.9 m，整个断层的破裂过程持续约18 s，释放地震矩5.47×1019 N·m（MW7.1）. 相似文献
8.
2014年8月3日云南鲁甸（MW6.1,MS6.5）地震是一次规模不大、但灾害严重的走滑型地震事件.受走滑型地震辐射图型的影响,远震地震资料在特定方位上信噪比不高,给此次地震发震断层面的确定造成了一些干扰.本文概述了鲁甸地震发生后2.4小时发布的作为地震应急响应的破裂过程快速反演工作,以及随后对反演结果的修订工作.修订结果中,两个双力偶节面的反演都显示破裂方向朝地表和走向方向扩展.结合现有的烈度分布和余震精确定位结果,根据破裂方向和烈度与余震分布的优势方向的一致性,确定鲁甸地震是发生在走向162°,倾角86°的近乎垂直于地面的以左旋走滑为主的断层面上的一次破裂事件.根据破裂过程反演得到的震源时间函数,大部分地震矩在破裂开始后2~5 s内集中释放. 比较集中的地震矩释放过程可能是此次地震面波震级明显高于矩震级,且造成严重地震灾害的原因之一. 相似文献
9.
利用远震资料、近场强震资料和合成孔径雷达干涉同震形变资料确定了2017年8月9日精河MS6.6地震的断层面参数及震源破裂细节。为得到可靠的断层几何参数,发展了一套基于InSAR数据滑动分布反演的三维格点搜索流程,对本次地震断层面的走向、倾角和震源深度进行了格点搜索。结果显示,地震断层面走向为95°,倾角为47°,震源深度为14 km。基于搜索得到的断层模型进行破裂过程联合反演的结果显示:精河MS6.6地震为一次单侧破裂事件,最大滑动量约为0.8 m,滑动区域集中在断层面上震源以西5—15 km,沿倾向15—25 km,破裂主要发生在10 km深度以下区域。断层面上的平均滑动角为106°。整个破裂过程释放的标量地震矩为3.6×1018 N·m,对应矩震级为MW6.3。破裂过程持续约9 s,期间的破裂速度约为2.1—2.6 km/s。由于地震破裂主要集中在10 km以下,未来可能需要关注该区域0—10 km发生潜在地震的可能性。 相似文献
10.
MECHANISM OF THE 2015 PISHAN,XINJIANG, MS6.5 MAINSHOCK AND RELOCATION OF ITS AFTERSHOCK SEQUENCES 下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 Using the digital broadband seismic data recorded by Xinjiang network stations, we obtained focal mechanism of the July 3 Pishan, Xinjiang, MS6.5 earthquake with generalized Cut and Paste(gCAP)inversion method. The strike, dip and rake of first nodal plane are 97°, 27°, 51°, and the second nodal plane are 318°, 70°, 107°. The centroid depth and moment magnitude are calculated to be 12km and 6.4. Combining with the distribution of aftershocks, we conclude that the first nodal plane is the seismogenic fault, and the main shock presents a thrust earthquake at low angle. We relocated 1014 earthquakes using the double-difference algorithm, and finally obtained 937 relocated events. Our results show that the earthquake sequences clearly demonstrate a unilateral extension about 50km nearly in NWW direction, and are mainly located above 25km depth, especially the small earthquakes are predominately located at the shallow parts. Furthermore, the focal depth profile shows a southwestward dipping fault plane at the main shock position, suggesting listric thrust faulting, which is consistent with the dip of the mainshock rupture plane. The spatial distribution of aftershocks represents that the Tarim block was thrust under the West Kunlun orogenic belt. In addition, the dip angle of the fault plane gradually increases along the NWW direction, possibly suggesting a gradual increase of strike-slip component during the NWW rupturing process. From above, we conclude that the Pishan MS6.5 earthquake is the result of Tibet plateau pushing onto the Tarim block from south to north, which further confirms that the continuous collision of India plate and Eurasia plate has strong influence on the seismic activity in and around the Tibet plateau. 相似文献
11.
2006年7月4日,在距离北京100 km左右的文安地区,发生了Mw=5.1级地震,引起了北京地区的强烈震感.为了更好的认识区域构造,我们利用近震及远震波形反演的方法得到了此次文安地震的震源机制.选择了北京数字地震台网的9个地震台,震中距小于600 km,台站的方位角覆盖较好.为了更好地利用信号相对较弱的P波信号,对于一个地震记录,本文分别截取出P波和面波两个部分,分别给予不同的权重进行反演,结合格点搜索的方法,得到了与记录P波及面波三分量对应较好的地震的方位角、倾角和滑移角.同时考虑到北京西北地区地壳较厚,本文在利用F-K方法计算近震理论波形的时候,对不同的方位角,采用了不同的地壳速度模型.随后结合远震信号中的直达P、pP、sP波形得到了分辨率较高的地震震源深度.反演结果表明,此次文安地震是一个较为典型的走滑型地震,方位角为210°,倾角80°,滑移角-150°,地震的深度为14~15 km,地震的震级为(Mw=5.1).反演结果与断层的几何分布、余震分布及北京地区北北东向应力场有很好的一致性. 相似文献
12.
FOCAL MECHANISM AND SEISMOGENIC STRUCTURE OF THE M5.0 YUEXI EARTHQUAKE ON 1 OCT. 2014, SOUTHWESTERN CHINA 下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 The Oct.1,2014 M5.0 Yuexi earthquake occurred on the Daliang Shan fault zone where only several historical moderate earthquakes were recorded.Based on the waveform data from Sichuan regional seismic network,we calculated the focal mechanism solution and centroid depth of the M5.0 Yuexi earthquake by CAP (Cut and Paste) waveform inversion method,and preliminarily analyzed the seismogenic structure.We also calculated the apparent stress values of the M5.0 earthquake and other 14 ML≥4.0 events along the Shimian-Qiaojia fault segment of the eastern boundary of the Sichuan-Yunnan block.The result indicates that the parameters of the focal mechanism solution are with a strike of 256°,dip of 62°,and slip of 167° for the nodal plane Ⅰ,and strike of 352°,dip of 79°,and slip of 29° for the nodal plane Ⅱ.The azimuth of the P axis is 121° with dip angle of 11°,the azimuth of T axis is 217° with dip angle of 28°,and the centroid depth is about 11km,and moment magnitude is MW5.1.According to the focal mechanism solution and the fault geometry near the epicenter,we infer that the seismogenic fault is a branch fault,i.e.,the Puxiong Fault,along the central segment of the Daliang Shan fault zone.Thus,the nodal plane Ⅱ was interpreted as the coseismic rupture plane.The M5.0 Yuexi earthquake is a strike-slip faulting event with an oblique component.The above findings reveal the M5.0 Yuexi earthquake resulted from the left-lateral strike-slip faulting of the NNW Dalang Shan fault zone under the nearly horizontal principal compressive stress regime in an NWW-SEE direction.The apparent stress value of the Yuexi earthquake is 0.99MPa,higher than those of the ML ≥ 4.0 earthquakes along the eastern boundary of the Sichuan-Yunnan block since 2008 Wenchuan M8.0 earthquake,implying a relatively high stress level on the seismogenic area and greater potential for the moderate and strong earthquake occurrence.It may also reflect the current increasing stress level of the entire area along the eastern boundary,and therefore,posing the risk of strong earthquakes there. 相似文献
13.
2014年8月24日,在美国加州旧金山海湾北部的纳帕地区发生了MW6.1地震.发震断层是西纳帕断裂系统中的一部分,但是该断层之前并未被足够重视.本文利用欧洲空间局最近发射成功并刚刚投入使用的Sentinel-1A卫星获取的第一对同震干涉像对(20140807-20140831),得到了该地震的地表同震形变场,结合震后24h内区域GPS同震形变资料作为约束条件,反演了纳帕地震的断层几何参数以及滑动分布.Sentinel-1A干涉结果表明,此次地震造成了明显的地面形变,视线向最大抬升和最大沉降量均达到了10cm.联合反演结果表明,该发震断层的走向为344°,倾角为80°.主要破裂以右旋走滑为主,平均倾滑角为-146.5°,最大倾滑量达到了1.1m,位于地表下约4km,存在明显的滑动亏损现象.此次地震,累计释放地震矩达1.5×1018 N·m,约合矩震级MW6.1.该结果略小于InSAR单独约束结果,可能与Sentinel-1A像对中包含的快速震后形变分量有关. 相似文献
14.
2001年昆仑山口西MS8.1地震经历了一个复杂的破裂过程,其破裂长、幅度大、破裂速度多变,成为大陆型地震研究的典型地震。本文融合近场高精度大地测量观测（4幅InSAR影像,34个GPS点位同震位移）和高信噪比远震波形记录,基于有限断层反演理论,联合反演得到该地震同震破裂时空过程的统一模型;同时,基于欧洲区域台网波形数据,利用反投影方法获得高频破裂的时空展布。联合反演结果表明,破裂自西向东传播的过程中走向有所变化,破裂尺度达400km,最大滑移量达8m,地震矩大小为6.1×1020Nm,对应的矩震级MW为7.78。主断层破裂经历了3个阶段,其中,超剪切破裂阶段对应最大位错区域,破裂到达西大滩段与昆仑山口断层交叉处时,破裂速度与尺度迅速下降。反投影结果同样显示破裂的3个阶段空间上对应大地测量反演的3个最大破裂区,最大破裂区的扩展速度达6km/s,但超剪切破裂终止在断层交叉口东部约30km处断层走向发生转变的位置。 相似文献
15.
2016年5月22日,在西藏定结县发生四次MW4~5地震,研究本序列地震的发震断层几何和运动特征对于认识周边活动断裂性质具有重要意义.由于发震地区偏远,且观测台网分布稀疏,本研究采用星载雷达干涉测量(DInSAR)技术进行了同震形变场重建,但是定结地震震级较小,单干涉像对获取的形变场受相位噪声影响较大.为了解决这一问题,本研究基于时间序列Sentinel-1A干涉数据生成多期同震与非同震干涉图,并利用叠加平均法对本次定结地震同震形变场进行重建,提取了定结2016年5月22日多次地震产生的同震累计整体形变场.基于InSAR同震形变场和区域地质特征,研究进行了滑动分布反演,确定其主要贡献的发震断层几何参数及滑动分布:断层走向为188°,倾角为43°,平均滑动角为78°,发震断层的运动性质以正断为主兼具少量左旋走滑分量,滑动主要集中在断层垂直深度0~9km处,最大滑动量约为25cm,位于断层倾向深度3km处,反演得到的矩震级为MW5.58.本研究结果表明采用星载InSAR叠加平均技术可以较好地压制相位噪声,有效提取此类中小型浅源地震同震微弱形变场.最后,我们认为本次定结地震与藏南拆离断层与申扎-定结断层的活动密切相关. 相似文献
16.
The slip distribution and seismic moment of the 2010 and 1960 Chilean earthquakes were estimated from tsunami and coastal geodetic data. These two earthquakes generated transoceanic tsunamis, and the waveforms were recorded around the Pacific Ocean. In addition, coseismic coastal uplift and subsidence were measured around the source areas. For the 27 February 2010 Maule earthquake, inversion of the tsunami waveforms recorded at nearby coastal tide gauge and Deep Ocean Assessment and Reporting of Tsunamis (DART) stations combined with coastal geodetic data suggest two asperities: a northern one beneath the coast of Constitucion and a southern one around the Arauco Peninsula. The total fault length is approximately 400 km with seismic moment of 1.7 × 1022 Nm (Mw 8.8). The offshore DART tsunami waveforms require fault slips beneath the coasts, but the exact locations are better estimated by coastal geodetic data. The 22 May 1960 earthquake produced very large, ~30 m, slip off Valdivia. Joint inversion of tsunami waveforms, at tide gauge stations in South America, with coastal geodetic and leveling data shows total fault length of ~800 km and seismic moment of 7.2 × 1022 Nm (Mw 9.2). The seismic moment estimated from tsunami or joint inversion is similar to previous estimates from geodetic data, but much smaller than the results from seismic data analysis. 相似文献
17.
Based on the phase report of Xinjiang Seismic Network, the Hutubi MS6.2 earthquake sequence ML ≥ 1.0 was relocated by the HypoDD method. The results show that the aftershocks were distributed along NE and NW direction. The aftershocks were in the depths of 5~15km. In addition, by using the digital waveforms of Xinjiang Seismic Network, the best double-couple focal mechanism of the main shock and some aftershocks of MS ≥ 3.8 were determined by the CAP method. Based on the above studies, the source depth, focal mechanism and aftershock distribution of the Hutubi MS6.2 earthquake were analyzed and the seismogenic structure was discussed. The nodal plane parameters of the best double-couple focal mechanism are strike 144°, dip 26°, rake 118°, and strike 293°, dip 67°, rake 77°, respectively. The moment magnitude MW is about 5.9, with centroid depth of 15.2km. These show that the main shock was a thrust type. Most focal mechanism solutions of the aftershocks were shown as a thrust type, which are similar to the main shock. It is speculated that the possible seismogenic fault of this earthquake is the Huorgosi-Manas-Tugulu Fault. 相似文献
18.
2015年7月3日在新疆皮山县发生了MS6.5地震, 该地震使当地遭受了巨大的经济损失。 本文利用欧空局提供的Sentinel-1A卫星差分干涉数据对该地震的震源机制情况进行了反演研究, 首先运用两轨法对卫星雷达影像进行差分干涉处理, 获取了覆盖皮山地震震区的同震形变场, 然后利用弹性半空间的均匀滑动模型反演获取了发震断层的几何参数, 并对原始观测数据进行降采样处理, 在此基础上运用分布式滑动模型反演获取了更为精细的断层滑动分布, 结果显示分布式滑动模型与观测结果有很高的拟合度。 反演结果表明发震断层是一个以逆冲为主兼有极少量左旋走滑的盲断层, 此次地震断层面的同震活动分布主要集中在7~15 km深度范围内, 同震的地震矩为6.28×1018N·m, 矩震级为MW6.46, 与前人的研究结果非常一致。 相似文献
19.
THE SOURCE PARAMETERS AND RUPTURE PROCESS OF THE MW7.0 EARTHQUAKE IN ALASKA,USA ON DECEMBER 1, 2018 下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 XU Zhi-guo ZHANG Huai ZHOU Yuan-ze LIANG Shan-shan SU Zhe SHI Jian-yu ZHAO-Bo 《地震地质》2019,41(5):1223-1238
A magnitude MW7.0 earthquake struck north of Anchorage, Alaska, USA on 1 December 2018. This earthquake occurred in the Alaska-Aleutian subduction zone, on a fault within the subducting Pacific slab rather than on the shallower boundary between the Pacific and North American plates. In order to better understand the earthquake source characteristics and slip distribution of source rupture process as well as to explore the effect of tectonic environment on dynamic triggering of earthquake, the faulting geometry, slip distribution, seismic moment, source time function are estimated from broadband waveforms downloaded from IRIS Data Management Center. We use the regional broadband waveforms to infer the source parameters with ISOLA package and the teleseismic body wave recorded by stations of the Global Seismic Network is employed to conduct slip distribution inversion with iterative deconvolution method. The focal mechanism solution indicates that the Alaska earthquake occurred as the result of tensile-type normal faulting, the estimated centroid depth from waveform inversion shows that the earthquake occurred at the depth of 56.5km, and the centroid location is 10km far away in northeast direction relative to the location of initial epicenter. We use the aftershock distribution to constrain the fault-plane strike of a normal fault to set up the finite fault model, the finite fault inversion shows that the earthquake slip distribution is concentrated mainly on a rectangular area with 30km×20km, and the maximum slip is up to 3.6m. In addition, the slip distribution shows an asymmetrical distribution and the range of possible rupture direction, the direction of rupture extends to the northeast direction, which is same as that of aftershock distribution for a period of ten days after the mainshock. It is interesting to note that a seismic gap appears in the southwest of the seismogenic fault, we initially determined that the earthquake was a typical normal fault-type earthquake that occurred in the back-arc extensional environment of the subduction collision zone between the Pacific plate and the North American plate, this earthquake was not related to tectonic movement of faults near the Earth's surface. Due to the influence of high temperature and pressure during the subduction of the Pacific plate toward to the north, the subduction angle of the Pacific plate becomes steep, causing consequently the backward bending deformation, thus forming to a tensile environment at the trailing edge of the collision zone and generating the MW7.0 earthquake in Alaska. 相似文献
20.
本文首先对Envisat/ASAR数据进行干涉处理, 获取2011年日本东北MW9.0地震的地表InSAR同震形变场; 然后通过对InSAR同震形变数据重采样方法的深入分析, 选择条纹率法结合干涉图的空间相干性对InSAR同震形变数据进行重采样; 最后基于弹性半空间位错模型, 联合InSAR与GPS形变数据, 采用最小二乘法反演发震断层的滑动分布. 研究结果表明: 考虑相干性的条纹率重采样方法, 更适用于形变场中存在除断层外的有限边界、 且形变场范围较大的InSAR数据重采样处理; 断层滑动主要发生在地表以下50 km范围内, 最大滑动量为49.9 m, 矩张量为4.89×1022 N·m, 所对应的矩震级为MW9.1, 与地震学反演的结果比较吻合. 相似文献