首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 140 毫秒
1.
微地震信号到时自动拾取方法   总被引:12,自引:4,他引:8       下载免费PDF全文
本文讨论了用于微地震信号到时自动拾取的几种方法的原理及特点,包括长短时均值比(STA/LTA)方法、AIC方法、基于高阶统计量偏斜度和峰度的PAI-S/K方法等,提出了移动时窗峰度的快速算法和改进的峰度拾取初至方法.对我国西部某地观测到的13359个微地震记录,采用两种时窗进行了初至到时拾取,并与人工拾取的结果进行了对比.为使所研究的方法达到最佳效果,采用DE全局搜索方法,以人工拾取的初至作为参照,以时差在0.3 s以内的记录所占百分比作为目标函数,自动搜索最佳的拾取参数.结果显示,在拾取时窗选为P波初至前3 s至S波初至位置时,AIC方法的结果最佳,时差在0.3 s以内的记录占比达到93.6%;在拾取时窗选为包含S波到时的时窗时,改进的峰度法效果最佳,时差在0.3 s以内的记录占比83.8%.  相似文献   

2.
基于特征值分解方法,本文讨论了一种适用于地方震事件S波震相到时拾取的自动处理算法。该算法计算参数少、简便快捷、易于实现,通过选用七个不同长度的时间窗,有效地减小了窗长选择不合理所引起的震相拾取误差。利用福建地震台网记录的9 855条三分向波形记录进行测试,结果表明:本文方法的S波平均拾取偏差为(0.003±1.34) s,其中79.6%的记录拾取偏差小于0.5 s,4.1%的记录拾取偏差超过2.0 s,说明本文方法能够满足日常工作基本需求。综上分析认为,波形记录质量是影响拾取算法结果精度的最主要因素,信噪比较高的记录,其S波到时拾取偏差显著优于信噪比较低的记录,对信噪比较低的部分记录进行带通滤波预处理后,S波震相拾取精度也有所提升。   相似文献   

3.
地震P波、S波到时是精确分析地震水平位置、深度与速度结构等的重要参数,如何准确拾取P波和S波到时是地震学的一项重要的基础工作.大数据量与强噪声环境给地震到时的自动拾取带来了很大挑战.在频率域中可将信号与噪声分离,但会造成震相的偏移.针对上述问题,本文在STA/LTA、AIC方法的基础上,引入了标准时频变换(Normal Time-Frequency Transform,NTFT),结合信号时间域与频率域特征,提出了基于NTFT的STA/LTA方法,以及基于NTFT的AIC方法来拾取P波和S波的到时.基于NTFT的STA/LTA方法通过构建即时频率约束的特征函数,以增强地震信号振幅响应的变化特征.基于NTFT的AIC方法则根据NTFT的变换系数定位即时频率-时间基准点,通过滑动窗口直接对标准时频谱进行AIC处理拾取最佳到时.本文采用了不同强度噪声的60组合成数据和105组实测地震数据对方法的可靠性进行检验.以人工拾取到时为参考,实测数据中NTFT-STA/LTA方法拾取P波、S波到时的均方根误差分别为0.36 s和0.56 s;NTFT-AIC方法拾取P波、S波到时的均方根误差分别为0.25 s和0.35 s.相比于STA/LTA、AIC方法,NTFT改进后的方法提高了P波和S波到时的拾取准确率,为强噪声环境下的地震波形到时拾取提供了新思路.  相似文献   

4.
STA/LTA—AIC算法对地震P波震相拾取稳定性影响   总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0  
选取区域地震台网记录的地震波形数据,使用STA/LTA算法与STA/LTA—AIC算法,进行地震P波震相初至到时自动拾取,对地方震及震中距较大的震相进行P波震相拾取效果分析,发现:STA/LTA算法对于地方震P波震相识别精度较高,与STA/LTA—AIC算法拾取的P波震相初至到时相差不大;震中距变大后,STA/LTA算法对P波拾取位置相对于最佳位置向后延迟,STA/LTA—AIC算法有效矫正了STA/LTA算法拾取位置的延迟问题,与人工拾取位置差别可忽略不计。  相似文献   

5.
基于粘滞性单自由度振动器响应下的能量转换理论,提出利用阻尼能量作为目标函数的P波震相到时拾取方法——SDOF Picker算法。使用该方法对江苏及邻区2010—2016年实际记录的9 607组P波初至进行到时自动拾取测试,以地震编目中人工拾取到时为基准,与利用AIC算法自动抬取的结果进行了系统性对比分析,结果显示:SDOF Picker算法和AIC算法自动拾取P波初至的准确率分别为97.1%、91.8%,中值偏差分别为(0.02±0.61)s、(0.05±0.77)s,方差分别为0.37 s2、0.60 s2,这表明SDOF Picker算法的在准确率和拾取精度方面均优于AIC算法。  相似文献   

6.
微地震(MS)波初始到时的自动拾取是MS监测数据处理的关键技术之一,也是实现MS震源自动定位的技术难点.本文在MS震源定位结果反演与推断的研究基础上,对不同类型MS波的到时点特征进行了分析与描述,并对不同时窗长度下能量特征值的变化规律进行了研究,提出了控制时窗移动范围和确定时窗长度自适应参数的具体方法,利用建立的MS波初始到时点特征的模式识别库,对拾取的到时进行模式归类、定量评价和匹配,提高了自动拾取结果的可靠性.研究结果表明,对典型的信噪比高的MS波,到时自动拾取的结果与手工拾取的结果基本一致;对无量纲大振幅的MS波,到时自动拾取结果的可靠性要高于手工拾取,对信噪比低和到时点不清晰的MS波自动拾取的可靠性较低.  相似文献   

7.
章宇成  华卫 《地震》2023,(1):137-151
近年来深度学习技术广泛应用于震相拾取与地震定位研究,采用深度神经网络搭建的EQTransformer模型对白鹤滩水库库区34个数字地震台站2016—2018年记录的连续数据进行P、 S波震相拾取,并通过REAL进行震相关联和初步定位,然后使用VELEST和hypoDD地震定位算法优化地震位置。研究表明,基于深度学习的震相拾取,与白鹤滩水库地区传统的人工处理方法相比显示出更高的效率,EQTransformer模型可拾取与人工拾取相当的P、 S波震相到时,其时间差的均值分别为0.03 s和0.07 s,符合正态分布。REAL初步定位后的地震个数(13815个)接近常规目录(7862个)的2倍,最终通过hypoDD获得了7108个高精度定位地震。估算的震级比常规目录中的震级平均低0.27,震级差值集中在0.7以内,最小完备震级由常规目录的ML1.4更改为ML0.6+0.27,填补了部分常规目录的震级空白,丰富了研究区域内的中小型地震。  相似文献   

8.
面对海量地震资料,自动准确地拾取震相并确定其到时的需求非常迫切.基于支持向量机技术,本文提出了使用两个分类器SSD和SPS自动识别地震体波震相并自动拾取其到时的方法.相比于传统的自动拾取方法,本文方法能够更准确地识别震相并区分P波和S波.进一步地,我们提出了利用台阵资料辅助识别震相的方案,有效地提高了地震震相拾取的准确率.  相似文献   

9.
赵明  陈石 《地震》2021,41(1):166-179
将识别地震的深度学习算法PhaseNet应用于四川台网和首都圈台网, 对该模型的泛化能力进行了测试和评估。 首先利用2010年1月至2018年10月首都圈台网199个地震台站记录的29328个事件(ML0~ML4)所对应的126761段事件波形, 以及 2019年4—9月四川及邻省部分台网227个地震台站记录的16595个事件(ML0~ML6.0)所对应的120233段事件波形分别建立了SC和CA测试数据集, 并用预训练好的PhaseNet模型进行P、 S震相自动识别和到时拾取, 并将拾取结果与人工拾取结果在不同误差阈值下进行对比。 测试结果表明, PhaseNet在两个数据集上具有良好的震相检测能力(误差阈值为0.5 s), 其P、 S震相检测的F1值都超过0.75, 具有比较稳定的准确拾取P波到时能力(误差阈值0.1 s), 其检测F1值均超过0.6, 而S波到时拾取的F1值分别为0.33(SC)和0.53(CA)。 进一步分析了测试结果与震中距、 震级、 信噪比、 台站所处地域之间的关系, 为下一步继续训练更优化的模型指明了方向。 研究结果表明, PhaseNet算法在区域台网地震自动检测和到时拾取方面有很大的应用潜力和提升空间, 可以为区域台网的自动编目工作提供辅助。  相似文献   

10.
利用密集台阵对水力压裂微地震进行监测将有助于优化储层压裂、揭示断层活化.为满足密集台阵海量采集数据的处理需求,本文建立了一种综合运用多种机器学习方法和台阵相关性的、无需人工干预的自动处理流程,从而能够快速得到高质量的密集台阵震相到时目录.该综合策略包括:(1)利用迁移学习在连续波形中快速检测地震事件;(2)利用U型神经网络PhaseNet自动拾取P波、S波震相;(3)利用三重线性剔除法,结合密集台阵到时相关性剔除异常到时数据和地震事件;(4)利用K-means和SVM两类机器学习算法,进一步区分发震时刻接近的多个地震事件,减小事件漏拾率.通过将该流程应用于四川盆地长宁—昭通页岩气开发区微地震监测数据,并将自动处理结果与人工拾取结果进行比对发现,二者在震级测定、定位以及走时成像结果等方面具有很好的一致性,表明本文处理流程结果精度可达到手动处理精度.本文结果为密集台阵地震监测数据的高效、高精度处理提供了新思路.  相似文献   

11.
Current popular deep learning seismic phase pickers like PhaseNet and EQTransformer suffer from performance drop in China. To mitigate this problem, we build a unified set of customized seismic phase pickers for different levels of use in China. We first train a base picker with the recently released DiTing dataset using the same U-Net architecture as PhaseNet. This base picker significantly outperforms the original PhaseNet and is generally suitable for entire China. Then, using different subsets of the DiTing data, we fine-tune the base picker to better adapt to different regions. In total, we provide 5 pickers for major tectonic blocks in China, 33 pickers for provincial-level administrative regions, and 2 special pickers for the Capital area and the China Seismic Experimental Site. These pickers show improved performance in respective regions which they are customized for. They can be either directly integrated into national or regional seismic network operation or used as base models for further refinement for specific datasets. We anticipate that this picker set will facilitate earthquake monitoring in China.  相似文献   

12.
Reliable automatic procedure for locating earthquake in quasi-real time is strongly needed for seismic warning system, earthquake preparedness, and producing shaking maps. The reliability of an automatic location algorithm is influenced by several factors such as errors in picking seismic phases, network geometry, and velocity model uncertainties. The main purpose of this work is to investigate the performances of different automatic procedures to choose the most suitable one to be applied for the quasi-real-time earthquake locations in northwestern Italy. The reliability of two automatic-picking algorithms (one based on the Characteristic Function (CF) analysis, CF picker, and the other one based on the Akaike’s information criterion (AIC), AIC picker) and two location methods (“Hypoellipse” and “NonLinLoc” codes) is analysed by comparing the automatically determined hypocentral coordinates with reference ones. Reference locations are computed by the “Hypoellipse” code considering manually revised data and tested using quarry blasts. The comparison is made on a dataset composed by 575 seismic events for the period 2000–2007 as recorded by the Regional Seismic network of Northwestern Italy. For P phases, similar results, in terms of both amount of detected picks and magnitude of travel time differences with respect to manual picks, are obtained applying the AIC and the CF picker; on the contrary, for S phases, the AIC picker seems to provide a significant greater number of readings than the CF picker. Furthermore, the “NonLinLoc” software (applied to a 3D velocity model) is proved to be more reliable than the “Hypoellipse” code (applied to layered 1D velocity models), leading to more reliable automatic locations also when outliers (wrong picks) are present.  相似文献   

13.
P phase arrival picking of weak signals is still challenging in seismology. A wavelet denoising is proposed to enhance seismic P phase arrival picking, and the kurtosis picker is applied on the wavelet-denoised signal to identify P phase arrival. It has been called the WD-K picker. The WD-K picker, which is different from those traditional wavelet-based pickers on the basis of a single wavelet component or certain main wavelet components, takes full advantage of the reconstruction of main detail wavelet components and the approximate wavelet component. The proposed WD-K picker considers more wavelet components and presents a better P phase arrival feature. The WD-K picker has been evaluated on 500 micro-seismic signals recorded in the Chinese Yongshaba mine. The comparison between the WD-K pickings and manual pickings shows the good picking accuracy of the WD-K picker. Furthermore, the WD-K picking performance has been compared with the main detail wavelet component combining-based kurtosis (WDC-K) picker, the single wavelet component-based kurtosis (SW-K) picker, and certain main wavelet component-based maximum kurtosis (MMW-K) picker. The comparison has demonstrated that the WD-K picker has better picking accuracy than the other three-wavelet and kurtosis-based pickers, thus showing the enhanced ability of wavelet denoising.  相似文献   

14.
We present a robust method for the automatic detection and picking of microseismic events that consists of two steps. The first step provides accurate single-trace picks using three automatic phase pickers adapted from earthquake seismology. In the second step, a multi-channel strategy is implemented to associate (or not) the previous picks with actual microseismic signals by taking into account their expected alignment in all the available channels, thus reducing the false positive rate. As a result, the method provides the number of declared microseismic events, a confidence indicator associated with each of them, and the corresponding traveltime picks. Results using two field noisy data records demonstrate that the automatic detection and picking of microseismic events can be carried out with a relatively high confidence level and accuracy.  相似文献   

15.
For years, severe rockburst problems at the Lucky Friday mine in northern Idaho have been a persistent safety hazard and an impediment to production. An MP250 based microseismic monitoring system, which uses simple voltage threshold picking of first arrivals, has been used in this mine since 1973 to provide source locations and energy estimates of seismic events. Recently, interest has been expressed in developing a whole waveform microseismic monitoring system for the mine to provide more accurate source locations and information about source characteristics. For this study, we have developed a prototype whole-waveform microseismic monitoring system based on a 80386 computer equipped with a 50 kHz analog-digital convertor board. The software developed includes a data collection program, a data analysis program, and an event detection program. Whole-waveform data collected and analyzed using this system during a three-day test have been employed to investigate sources of error in the hypocenter location process and to develop an automatic phase picker appropriate for microseismic events.Comparison of hypocenter estimates produced by the MP250 system to those produced by the whole-waveform system shows that significant timing errors are common in the MP250 system and that these errors caused a large part of the scatter evident in the daily activity plots produced at the mine. Simulations and analysis of blast data show that analytical control over the solutions is strongly influenced by the array geometry. Within the geophone array, large errors in the velocity model or moderate timing errors may result in small changes in the solution, but outside the array, the solution is very sensitive to small changes in the data.Our whole-waveform detection program picks event onset times and determines event durations by analysis of a segmented envelope function (SEF) derived from the microseismic signal. The detection program has been tested by comparing its arrival time picks to those generated by human analysis of the data set. The program picked 87% of the channels that were picked by hand with a standard error of 0.75 milliseconds. Source locations calculated using times provided by our entire waveform detection program were similar to those calculated using hand-picked arrival times. In particular, they show far less scatter than source locations calculated using arrival times based on simple voltage threshold picking of first arrivals.  相似文献   

16.
基于深度学习到时拾取自动构建长宁地震前震目录   总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3       下载免费PDF全文
将深度学习到时拾取、震相关联技术与传统定位方法联系起来,构建一套连续波形自动化处理与地震目录自动构建流程,对于高效充分利用地震资料,提升微震检测能力具有十分重要的意义.我们应用最新发展的迁移学习震相识别技术、震相自动关联技术,对长宁M S6.0地震震中附近21个台站震前半个月(6月1日—6月17日)的连续记录波形进行P、S震相识别、震相自动关联和初步定位,并应用传统绝对定位和相对定位技术得到了长宁地震震前微震活动的绝对和相对定位目录.其中绝对定位目录能在较小的误差范围匹配85%的人工处理目录,其发震时刻平均误差为0.36±0.07 s,震级平均误差为0.15±0.024级,水平定位平均误差为1.45±0.028 km,其识别的1.0级以下微震数目是人工的8倍以上,将长宁地震震前微震目录的检测下限提升至M L-1左右,证明了基于深度学习到时识取和REAL(Rapid Earthquake Association and Location,快速震相关联和定位技术)震相自动关联来构建微震目录具有较好的实用性.我们的自动地震目录揭示了长宁M S6.0主震所发生的区域震前异常频繁的微震活动,以及与区域内盐矿注水井的关联性,更好地描绘了这些微震活动的时空演化特征,其空间活动性分布特征与长宁M S6.0余震序列的分布一致.  相似文献   

17.
杨旭  李永华 《地震学报》2020,42(2):121-134
本文利用中国数字测震台网和流动台站的地震资料,基于参数优化的AICD自动拾取算法和质量评估方案得到了高质量的震相到时,并在此基础上使用一维、三维定位方法对腾冲地区的799次地震事件进行了重新定位。定位结果显示:水平方向上,一维、三维重定位结果相差较小;深度方向上,三维定位的震源成丛分布比一维定位结果更加密集,地震主要位于地壳内低速层之上。分别利用一维、三维定位方法对典型地震、人工震源进行定位,结果表明,三维定位的精度明显优于一维定位,其在水平、深度方向上的平均绝对定位误差分别为0.7 km和1.3 km。   相似文献   

18.
为监测东祁连山北缘断裂带附近的地震活动性,布设包含240台短周期地震仪的面状密集台阵,进行约30 d的连续观测。首先使用基于深度学习的多台站地震事件检测算法(CNNDetector)进行地震事件检测,然后使用震相拾取网络(PhaseNet)对地震事件进行P波和S波到时拾取,其次使用震相关联算法(REAL)进行震相关联及初定位,最后使用双差定位(hypoDD)进行地震重定位,最终的精定位地震目录中共有517个地震。在密集台阵观测期间,中国地震台网正式地震目录中共有39个位于台阵内的地震事件,相比而言,密集台阵检测到大量小于0级的地震。因此通过布设密集台阵,可提高活动断裂微地震活动性的监测能力。与历史地震空间分布相比,密集台阵地震精定位分布具有较好的一致性,表现出更明显的线性分布特征。基于地震分布,发现研究区域存在与地表断层迹线走向不同的隐伏活跃断裂。  相似文献   

19.
精确获取震相到时是地震定位和地震走时成像等研究的重要基础.近年来,随着地震台站的不断加密,地震台网监测到的地震数量成倍增长,发展快速、准确、适用性强的震相到时自动拾取算法是地震行业的迫切需求.本文在前人工作基础上,发展了Pg、Sg震相自动识别与到时拾取的U网络算法(Unet_cea),使用汶川余震和首都圈地震台网记录的89344个不同震级、不同信噪比的样本进行训练和测试.研究表明,U网络能够较好地识别Pg、Sg震相类型和拾取到时,Pg、Sg震相的正确识别率分别为81%和79.1%,与人工标注到时的均方根误差分别为0.41 s和0.54 s.U网络在命中率、均方根误差等性能指标上均明显优于STA/LTA和峰度分析自动拾取方法.研究获得的最优模型可以为区域地震台网的自动处理提供辅助.  相似文献   

20.
Locations and velocities were calculated for microseisms occurring in samples of rock subjected to triaxial loading and injection of pore fluid. This was accomplished by analyzing arrival times of acoustic emission using an automatic first arrival picker. Apparent velocity anomalies were observed prior to both failure of intact samples and violent slip in samples containing saw cuts. Further analysis revealed that these fluctuations in calculated velocity were not due to changes in the true seismie velocity. Instead, variations in calculated velocity are shown to be related to sampling errors in picking first arrivals. The systematic picking of late first arrivals for small magnitude events was found to be a persistent bias resulting in low calculated velocities. This has encouraged the reexamination of earthquake records to determine how important sampling biases are in contributing to reported velocity anomalies.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号