共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 173 毫秒
1.
2.
选取1999年7月——2005年4月云南省数字地震台网记录到的中小地震数字化波形资料， 在假设中小地震震源位移谱符合omega;2模型的基础上，利用震源位移谱低频水平与拐角频率计算得到了1 020次中小地震的视应力值. 研究发现，在云南地区，地震视应力具有较好的预测意义， 中小地震的视应力值超过0.9 MPa, 可以作为预测该地区未来可能发生中强地震的一个参考指标. 其相应的地震预报能力评分R值具有较高的置信度. 相似文献
3.
在假设震源位移谱符合omega;平方模型的基础上,得到了利用震源位移谱低频水平与拐角频率来计算中小地震视应力值的数学表达式.采用数字化速度波形记录,通过校正仪器响应、介质衰减与吸收效应、台站场地响应等影响因素后,计算得到了云南地区4个地震序列共823次中小地震的视应力值.结果表明,地震视应力在云南地区的这4个地震序列中有很好的前兆特征表现,即:地震序列中只要发生了视应力值超过1MPa的中小地震,其后就一定会有中强震发生;如果序列中中强地震发生后再没有发生视应力值超过1MPa的中小地震,则该序列就不会有强余震发生.同时研究表明,4个地震序列所在地区的平均视应力值为0.8MPa,地震视应力值与地震震级没有显著相关关系. 相似文献
4.
2011年3月11日, 一个 MW9.1地震袭击了日本本州地区, 为了分析这次地震前后主震破裂区内应力时空变化, 我们选取1996年1月~2016年6月期间发生在破裂区内的563个5.0≤MS≤6.9地震, 研究了视应力随时间的变化和空间分布。 日本MW9.1地震前从2002年中起视应力开始呈趋势性上升变化, 到2009年初以0.18 MPa/a的速率从0.6 MPa上升到1.76 MPa, 相差约3倍, 直到地震发生前夕一直保持在1.5 MPa之上。 地震发生之后, 直到2016年6月在破裂区内视应力呈缓慢下降变化, 但仍保持在1.5 MPa之上较高水平。 视应力在地面上和断层面上的分布显示, 1996—2005年间破裂区仅存在个别视应力高值, 从2006年到2011年2月, 破裂区大面积出现视应力高值。 在日本MW9.1地震发生之后的近3个月内, 破裂区视应力整体处于高值水平, 之后在较高的水平上缓慢减弱。 视应力是地震断层面上平均应力的下限, 视应力的高低在一定程度上反映的是震源断层面上平均应力的高低。 在日本MW9.1地震前, 发生在破裂区内的地震, 其断层面上的平均应力经历了大约8.5年的趋势上升变化过程。 这次大地震前破裂区所在的地壳应力逐渐增加, 最后导致断层面错动发生日本MW9.1地震。 相似文献
5.
运用走滑地震造成的地震前后应力方向偏转和地震应力降Δτ推导得到地震震源处偏应力量值τ的解析表达式为τ=［Δτcos2(φ′[KG-*2]P-E)］/sin2(φ′[KG-*2]P-φP)(其中，φ\-P和φ′[KG-*2]P分别为地震前后的统计P轴走向，E为地震断层走向.).当震前P轴与震后P轴与断层走向夹角为45°时，该公式失效.对偏应力值与应力降比值随应力场主压应力轴与断层走向夹角及应力场主压应力轴偏转的变化进行分析表明，相同应力降造成的应力轴偏转越大，地下偏应力越小; 断层走向越接近主压应力轴方向，地震应力降场对偏应力场的贡献越小.将该方法运用于Landers地震震源区，求得了该地震Homestead Valley段的偏应力量值为10MPa. 相似文献
6.
构造应力场往往对地震活动性具有控制作用，应力快速集中的地方常常是地震频繁发生的地方.本文以巴颜喀拉块体及其边界断裂带近20年来的7次中强震为例，结合区域历史地震震源信息、地质背景及GPS等观测数据，利用Monte Carlo方法和库仑-摩尔破裂准则为计算依据，反演该块体的震前初始构造应力场.通过将初始应力场反演中不确定部分限定在一个合理的上下限范围内进行独立的重复性随机试验，并运用统计学方法得到了巴颜喀拉块体1997年玛尼MW7.5地震震前区域初始应力场.计算结果显示：（1）巴颜喀拉块体10 km深度处最大水平主应力方向自西向东呈顺时针旋转趋势，由NS向转变为近EW向，与浅部实测地应力数据、历史地震类型和板块运动方向吻合较好.（2）最大/最小水平主应力和二者差值自西向东均逐渐增加，最大水平主压应力值~400 MPa，最小水平主压应力值~250 MPa.差应力在昆仑山断裂带与阿尔金断裂带交汇处及甘孜—玉树断裂带西段较低（~150 MPa）；在昆仑山断裂带东端和甘孜—玉树断裂带的东南段局部地区较高（~220 MPa）. 相似文献
7.
利用290个ML ≥ 2.5的景谷6.6级地震序列事件的数字波形资料，计算得到其震源参数。结果显示，地震矩M0数值范围为1012~1016 N·m；拐角频率fc为3~16 Hz；视应力数值范围为0~15 MPa，平均值是2.14 MPa，中位数为1.39 MPa。同时，各个震源参数之间均存在一定的相关关系；景谷地震序列余震空间分布可分为北段、中段与南段，其视应力高低分布依次为：南段 > 中段 > 北段；表明主震发生后，震源区南段区域的应力水平最高，这可能是后续5.8级\，5.9级强余震均发生在南段的根本原因。在视应力时间变化特征方面，5.8级、5.9级强余震的发生前，震中所在的南段视应力数值存在"逐渐变大-维持稳定"的特点。而后续未发生强余震的北段和中段，其视应力时间变化为早期快速调整，后续逐渐变化到各自区域的视应力均值水平；这类变化表明对于震源区南段，在强余震发生前的短时间内，南段区域首先出现局部应力不断挤压增强，并随后维持相对高值应力水平的"闭锁"状态，直到强余震的发生。因而，震后震源区余震视应力的空间分布对强余震可能产生地点判定有指示作用，其时间变化特征与地震序列中较强地震的发生存在一定的相关性。余震视应力的时空变化对序列后续地震活动的判定有重要指示作用，可为强余震的时空判定提供相应参考。 相似文献
8.
1982年10月19日,在唐山余震区的东北端卢龙,发生了一次ML=6.2(按北京电信传输台网的目录)的地震(3957'N,11904'E).为了监视卢龙地震前后小震震源参数的变化,本文考察了唐山-卢龙地区自1980年1月至1984年6月的情况.利用P波初动半周期,测定了160次ML=2.7——4.3的地震的震源参数.在所研究的震级范围内,初动半周期和震源半径不随ML而增大,应力降则随ML而增大.应力降的数值在0.1——50MPa的范围内变化,且主要集中在1MPa和5MPa之间.因此本文认为,对此地区,5MPa以上为高应力降,1MPa.以下为低应力降.该地区地震的空间分布表明,高应力降事件与随后发生的ML5的地震有明显的关系.在卢龙地震前一年多里,整个地区内的高应力降事件减少,低应力降事件增多;但在卢龙地震的震中附近发生了两次高应力降事件. 相似文献
9.
本文采用双差定位方法对2017年西藏米林MS6.9地震的余震序列进行重定位，获得了较准确的余震空间分布。在此基础上，计算了米林地震震源区的b值空间分布，并结合前人资料研究了米林地震前后的b值变化。重定位结果显示:米林地震余震序列呈NW?SE向分布，主要分布在雅鲁藏布江大拐弯缝合带和比鲁构造岩片的北东边界，震源深度集中于3—20 km范围内。b值时间分布显示:米林地震震前震源区的b值降低，表明震前震源区存在较强的应力积累；地震后震源区的b值呈现跳跃式上升，反映出震源区应力释放，同时随时间的推移，b值逐渐趋于稳定。米林地震震源区的b值在0.52—1.35范围内变化，15 km深度以上b值在东、西方向上存在差异，15 km以下在东北、南西方向上存在差异，由此推测不同的b值分布与地下的结构特征有关，浅层的b值变化与震源区的破裂程度相关，深部变化则反映了不同构造单元的岩性差异。 相似文献
10.
Keisuke Yoshida Akira Hasegawa Tomomi Okada Takeshi Iinuma Yoshihiro Ito Youichi Asano 洪启宇 《国际地震动态》2012,(4)
通过反演震源机制数据,得到了东日本大地震前后日本东部内陆地区的应力场.地震前,在东北部(Tohoku),σ1轴呈EW方向,但在关东-东部(Kanto-Chubu)地区则呈NW-SE方向.地震后,在Tohoku北部和靠近磐城市(Iwaki City)的Tohoku东南部,应力场发生了变化,主应力取向大致等同于与地震相关的静应力变化取向.这说明地震前这些地区的差应力值小于1 MPa.在Tohoku中部,虽然地震后加载的应力取向几乎逆转,但其应力场没有发生变化,说明那里的差应力值大大超过1MPa.在KantoChubu,地震后加载了与背景应力方向近乎相同的应力,且应力场没有发生预期的变化.这可能就是Kanto-Chubu地区高地震活动水平的诱因. 相似文献
11.
陈学忠 《地震学报(英文版)》2005,18(6)
Introduction A great earthquake of M=8.1 occurred at 17h26min14.7s (Beijing time) on November 14, 2001 on the eastern Kunlun fault, near Bukadaban mountain peak with an elevation of about 6 866 m in the Qinghai-Xizang (Tibetan) Plateau of western China. The micro-epicenter is at a site of 36.2°N, 90.9°E, and the macro-epicenter is at a site of 35.6°N, 94.1° E, about 300 km west to the Kunlun Mountain Pass.This event is the largest one since 1951 in China, and yet the first su-per-st… 相似文献
12.
Chen Xue-zhong 《地震科学（英文版）》2005,18(6):651-655
A method estimating the stress level in the focal region of an earthquake is proposed here. Taking the 2001 M=8.1 Western Kunlun Mountain Pass earthquake as an example, we estimate its stress level in the focal region before and after it by this method. The results show that the stress level in the focal region just prior to the initiation of this event is approximately 6.3–8 MPa, and about 5–6.7 MPa remained in the focal region after its occurrence. The stress in the focal region decreased by roughly twenty percent after this event. 相似文献
13.
Chen Xue-zhong 《地震学报(英文版)》2005,18(6):651-655
A method estimating the stress level in the focal region of an earthquake is proposed here. Taking the 2001 M=8.1 Western Kunlun Mountain Pass earthquake as an example, we estimate its stress level in the focal region before and after
it by this method. The results show that the stress level in the focal region just prior to the initiation of this event is
approximately 6.3–8 MPa, and about 5–6.7 MPa remained in the focal region after its occurrence. The stress in the focal region
decreased by roughly twenty percent after this event.
Contribution No. 05FE3026, Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration. 相似文献
14.
2008年5月12日四川汶川发生MS8.0地震发生之后, 先后于2013年4月20日和2014年11月22日分别在汶川MS8.0地震震中西南约80 km的芦山县和约178 km的康定县发生了MS7.0和MS6.3地震。 芦山地震位于龙门山前主边界处, 康定地震位于鲜水河断裂带上。 芦山地震发生前有几位作者先后计算了汶川MS8.0地震引起的库仑破裂应力, 分析了其对周围断层的影响。 本文对这些研究结果进行了简要回顾, 并根据芦山地震和康定地震的实际发震断层面参数, 计算了汶川MS8.0地震在芦山地震和康定地震震源深度处的水平面上以及其发震断层面上产生的库仑破裂应力, 还给出了其震中处库仑破裂应力随深度的变化。 结果表明, 汶川MS8.0地震发生使芦山地震震源断层面上有利于其错动发震的应力大面积增加而使康定地震震源断层面上有利于其错动发震的应力大面积减小。 在芦山地震初始破裂点处引起的库仑破裂应力达0.245 MPa, 在康定地震初始破裂点处引起的库仑破裂应力为-0.00063 MPa。 因此, 汶川MS8.0地震的发生对芦山地震具有明显的促进作用, 而对康定地震的作用不明显。 在目标断层面参数已知的情况下, 根据库仑破裂应力在目标断层面上的分布, 可能为未来地震发生的地点提供线索, 进而对地震发生的危险性进行预测。 若一次地震的发生使目标断层面上有利于其错动发震的应力大面积显著增加, 这种情况下库仑破裂应力对未来地震具有预测意义。 相似文献
15.
THE SOURCE PARAMETERS AND SEISMOTECTONIC IMPLICATIONS OF THE SEPTEMBER 4, 2017 ML4.4 LINCHENG EARTHQUAKE 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 LI He XIE Zu-jun WANG Yi-xi WANG Xiao-shan DONG Yi-bing ZHANG Hui PENG Zhao LIU Wen-bing GAO Ye WANG Li-xia 《地震地质》2019,41(3):670-689
At 3:05, September 4, 2017, an ML4.4 earthquake occurred in Lincheng County, Xingtai City, Hebei Province, which was felt obviously by surrounding areas. Approximately 60km away from the hypocenter of Xingtai MS7.2 earthquake in 1966, this event is the most noticeable earthquake in this area in recent years. On the one hand, people are still shocked by the 1966 Xingtai earthquake that caused huge disaster, on the other hand, Lincheng County is lack of strong earthquakes. Therefore, this quake has aroused widespread concerns by the government, society and seismologists. It is necessary to clarify whether the seismogenic structure of this event is consistent with the previous seismicity and whether it has any new implications for the seismic activity and seismic hazard in this region. Therefore, it is of great significance to study its seismogenic mechanism for understanding the earthquake activity in Xingtai region where a MS7.2 earthquake had occurred in 1966.
In this study, the Lincheng earthquake and its aftershocks are relocated using the multi-step locating method, and the focal mechanism and focal depth are determined by the "generalized Cut and Paste"(gCAP)method. The reliability of the results is analyzed based on the data of Hebei regional seismic network. In order to better constrain the focal depth, the depth phase sPL fitting method is applied to the relocation of focal depth. The inversion and constraint results show that aftershocks are mainly distributed along NE direction and dip to SE direction as revealed by depth profiles. Focal depths of aftershocks are concentrated in the depths of 6.5~8.2km with an average of about 7km. The best double-couple solution of the mainshock is 276°, 69° and -40° for strike, dip and slip angle for nodal plane I and 23°, 53° and -153° for nodal plane Ⅱ, respectively, revealing that it is a strike-slip event with a small amount of normal-fault component. The initial rupture depth of mainshock is about 7.5km obtained by the relocation while the centroid depth is 6km derived from gCAP method which was also verified by the seismic depth phase sPL observed by several stations, indicating the earthquake is ruptured from deep to shallow. Combined with the research results on regional geological structure and the seismic sequence relocation results, it is concluded that the nodal plane Ⅱ is the seismogenic fault plane of this earthquake.
There are several active faults around the hypocenter of Lincheng earthquake sequence, however, none of the known faults on the current understanding is completely consistent with the seismogenic fault. To determine the seismogenic mechanism, the lucubrated research of the MS7.2 Xingtai earthquake in 1966 could provide a powerful reference. The seismic tectonic characteristics of the 1966 Xingtai earthquake sequence could be summarized as follows:There are tensional fault in the shallow crust and steep dip hidden fault in the middle and lower crust, however, the two faults are not connected but separated by the shear slip surfaces which are widely distributed in the middle crust; the seismic source is located between the hidden fault in the lower crust and the extensional fault in the upper crust; the earthquake began to rupture in the deep dip fault in the mid-lower crust and then ruptured upward to the extensional fault in the shallow crust, and the two fault systems were broken successively. From the earthquake rupture revealed by the seismic sequence location, the Lincheng earthquake also has the semblable feature of rupturing from deep to shallow. However, due to the much smaller magnitude of this event than that of the 1966 earthquake, the accumulated stress was not high enough to tear the fracture of the detachment surface whose existence in Lincheng region was confirmed clearly by the results of Lincheng-Julu deep reflection seismology and reach to the shallower fault. Therefore, by the revelation of the seismogenic mechanism of the 1966 Xingtai earthquake, the seismogenic fault of Lincheng earthquake is presumed to be a concealed fault possessing a potential of both strike-slip and small normal faulting component and located below the detachment surface in Lincheng area. The tectonic significance indicated by this earthquake is that the event was a stress adjustment of the deep fault and did not lead to the rupture of the shallow fault. Therefore, this area still has potential seismic hazard to a certain extent. 相似文献
16.
RELOCATION OF THE 23 NOVEMBER 2017 WULONG MS5.0 EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCE AND ANALYSIS OF ITS SEISMOGENIC FAULT 下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 LI Cui-ping TANG Mao-yun GUO Wei-ying HUANG Shi-yuan WANG Xiao-long GAO Jian 《地震地质》2019,41(3):603-618
The Wulong MS5.0 earthquake on 23 November 2017, located in the Wolong sap between Wenfu, Furong and Mawu faults, is the biggest instrumentally recorded earthquake in the southeastern Chongqing. It occurred unexpectedly in a weak earthquake background with no knowledge of dramatically active faults. The complete earthquake sequences offered a significant source information example for focal mechanism solution, seismotectonics and seismogenic mechanism, which is helpful for the estimation of potential seismic sources and level of the future seismic risk in the region. In this study, we firstly calculated the focal mechanism solutions of the main shock using CAP waveform inversion method and then relocated the main shock and aftershocks by the method of double-difference algorithm. Secondly, we determined the seismogenic fault responsible for the MS5.0 Wulong earthquake based on these calculated results. Finally, we explored the seismogenic mechanism of the Wulong earthquake and future potential seismic risk level of the region.
The results show the parameters of the focal mechanism solution, which are:strike24°, dip 16°, and rake -108° for the nodal plane Ⅰ, and strike223°, dip 75°, and rake -85° for the nodal plane Ⅱ. The calculations are supported by the results of different agencies and other methods. Additionally, the relocated results show that the Wulong MS5.0 earthquake sequence is within a rectangular strip with 4.7km in length and 2.4km in width, which is approximately consistent with the scales by empirical relationship of Wells and Coppersmith(1994). Most of the relocated aftershocks are distributed in the southwest of the mainshock. The NW-SE cross sections show that the predominant focal depth is 5~8km. The earthquake sequences suggest the occurrence features of the fault that dips northwest with dip angle of 63° by the least square method, which is largely consistent with nodal planeⅡof the focal mechanism solution. Coincidentally, the field outcrop survey results show that the Wenfu Fault is a normal fault striking southwest and dipping 60°~73° by previous studies. According to the above data, we infer that the Wenfu Fault is the seismogenic structure responsible for Wulong MS5.0 earthquake.
We also propose two preliminary genetic mechanisms of "local stress adjustment" and "fluid activation effect". The "local stress adjustment" model is that several strong earthquakes in Sichuan, such as M8.0 Wenchuan earthquake, M7.0 Luzhou earthquake and M7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake, have changed the stress regime of the eastern margin of the Sichuan Basin by stress transference. Within the changed stress regime, a minor local stress adjustment has the possibility of making a notable earthquake event. In contract, the "fluid activation effect" model is mainly supported by the three evidences as follows:1)the maximum principle stress axial azimuth is against the regional stress field, which reflects NWW-SEE direction thrusting type; 2)the Wujiang River crosscuts the pre-existing Wenfu normal fault and offers the fluid source; and 3)fractures along the Wenfu Fault formed by karst dissolution offer the important fluid flow channels. 相似文献
17.
基于甘肃强震固定台和流动观测记录的汶川8.0级地震主震及余震加速度资料,选用三分向记录均完整的87次地震(震级范围为3.0~8.0级),根据用位错理论二维断裂模式推导的震源峰值加速度与环境剪应力关系式计算汶川地震序列的环境剪应力值,探讨其环境剪应力场特征。结果表明,环境剪应力和矩震级有较好的相关性,3~5级地震对应的应力值多在3~6 MPa,5~6级多在6~9 MPa,6~7级多在9MPa以上,且环境剪应力对震源深度也有较强的依赖性。 相似文献
18.
1974年12月22日辽宁参窝水库区发生5.2级(M_L)地震,本文通过分析5.2级地震在海城7.3级地震前区域地震活动中的地位、测定地震序列在各台的P、S波振幅此以及P波初动半周期等地震学参量,认为该地震序列中最大地震发生前后,参窝地区构造应力作用形式及应力集中程度基本上没有变化,只在海城大震后才发生显著改变。作者认为,在监视大范围地震活动时空变化的同时,如果一次中等地震序列中的最大地震发生前后,某些诸如振幅比(反映构造应力作用形式)和P波初动半周期(反映地震应力降及应力集中程度)等地震学参量没有发生显著变化,则可能表明,不久将在附近地区发生更大地震。 相似文献
19.
2003年伽师6.8级地震序列特征和震源机制的初步研究 总被引：14，自引：0，他引：14
在位于1997-1998年新疆伽师9次6级地震分布区域的东南端，2003年2月24日又发生6．8级地震。结合伽师6．8级地震序列震源机制解结果，对该地震序列的基本特征和震源区应力降等进行了对比分析。结果表明，6．8级地震断层是在北西向的区域应力场挤压作用下产生的倾滑逆断层，震源以单侧破裂为主，破裂方向与极震区走向，以及北西向的主压应力方向一致。震前震源区应力显著增强，震后应力释放较为彻底。中强余震震源机制解与主震有明显差异，表现出震源区应力场处于不稳定的调整阶段，余震震源机制的差异为震后地震趋势的判定提供了依据。 相似文献