共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 98 毫秒
1.
利用P波、SV波、SH波初动及其振幅比联合反演震源机制解的方法,计算了2009年7月9日发生在云南姚安6.0级地震余震序列的震源机制解,同时结合地震序列的空间分布,对姚安6.0级地震的发震断层性质和震区应力场特征进行综合分析。结果分析表明：（1）姚安6.0级地震发震断层为NWW—SEE向的直立右旋走滑断层,与美国哈佛大学的主震CMT解节面基本一致,也与余震优势方向分布一致,证明结果可靠;（2）震区主压应力场优势方向为NNW—SSE向,与其现今区域构造应力场主压应力NNW—SSE向一致,表明主震应力场主要受到现今区域构造应力场的控制,同时还有一些小的余震与主震应力场不同,表明震区应力场的多样性和复杂性;（3）结合本次地震序列的空间分布、震源机制解特征、震区断裂构造特征综合分析,综合判定姚安6.0级地震的发震构造属于马尾箐断裂。 相似文献
2.
2001年云南永胜6．0级地震余震序列震源机制解与震源区应力场分析 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
利用垂直向的Pg和Sg波的最大振幅比计算方法,计算了2001年云南永胜6.0级地震余震序列的震源机制解.通过统计方法和系统聚类分析方法,结合余震序列的震中分布,对永胜6.0级地震的震源机制解和震源区应力场的特征进行了综合分析.结果表明:(1)所得发震断层为NWW向直立右旋走滑断层,与美国哈佛大学的主震CMT解的节面一致,也与余震分布一致,证明结果比较可靠;(2)震区主压应力场方向为NNW-SSE,与其现今区域构造应力场主压应力方向(NNW向)一致,表明余震的应力场主要受主震震源应力场的控制. 相似文献
3.
本文基于云南地震台网数据，对2021年6月10日云南双柏地震序列进行重新定位，并对序列中4次MS≥3.5地震的震源机制解和震源区构造应力场进行了反演，研究了双柏地震序列时空分布特征和发震构造.地震重定位结果显示，双柏地震序列空间上呈NNE-SSW向优势分布，发震断层较为陡立，震源深度集中分布于5～15 km范围内，震源深度表现为南浅北深的特征.MS5.1地震后余震序列在时空上呈现出不对称的双侧发展模式，MS4.6地震前后余震沿SSW向存在往返迁移现象.反演得到的序列震源机制解类型均为走滑型，都具有与序列优势分布一致的NNE走向、高倾角SEE倾向节面.构造应力场反演表明震源区受到NNW向水平挤压和NEE向水平拉张的构造应力作用.结合重定位结果和序列震源机制分析认为，双柏地震序列与附近的楚雄—建水断裂等无关，其发震构造为一条NNE走向、SEE倾向的高倾角左旋走滑断裂，构造形成受控于川滇菱形块体SSE向整体运动产生的NNW向挤压构造应力作用. 相似文献
4.
2000年1月15日姚安6.5级地震的震源断层与震源应力场 总被引：8，自引：1，他引：8
用姚安地震序列前震、主震和余震的 78个震源机制解 ,分析了序列震源断层和震源应力场特征。结果表明 ,姚安地震序列的主破裂面是走向N5 0°W、倾角陡立的构造断裂 ,主震、前震和绝大多数余震都发生在主破裂面上。此外 ,NNE NE向构造断裂在序列发展过程中也参与了活动。序列震源应力场以SSE方位、接近水平的主压应力为主 ,与区域构造应力场一致。在序列发展中 ,震源区应力场出现多方位和多作用方式共存的复杂状态 ,震源破裂出现多方向和多表现形式的复杂性特征 相似文献
5.
6.
1989年大同-阳高地震震源机制及发震模式研究 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
本文应用Pnl及SH波理论地震图方法求得了大同-阳高地震前、主、余震的震源机制解,并结合发震区的地质构造,推断了这次地震的发震过程及发震构造。结果表明:前、主、余震发生在同一断层上,前、主震发生在浅层,余震发生在深层;发震断层为一具有右旋走滑分量的正断层,走向201°,倾向NW,浅层倾角75°左右,深层倾角58°左右;前、主震断层运动主要为平移运动,滑动角为—169°,余震断层运动的平移与下滑分量几乎相等,滑动角为—138°。发震区的应力场为北60°东水平向挤压,与华北地区统一应力场一致,深部应力场的P轴俯角较大,体现了发震区局部应力场的特征,并与此区域较大的形变沉降相符合。由华北地区的地震活动性,我们还推测这次地震实际上是此区域的应力场沿桑干河断裂带释放能量的结果。此外,文中还讨论了这次地震与一般地堑地震的异同点。 相似文献
7.
本文使用2009年7月9日—12月23日2009年姚安MS6.0地震序列中ML≥1.0地震的震相数据, 采用双差定位法对该序列进行重定位, 共得到643次地震的精定位结果; 利用P波初动和振幅比法获取了20次ML≥3.0地震的震源机制解; 在此基础上采用滑动拟合法得到姚安MS6.0地震序列的震源区应力场． 研究结果表明: ① 2009年姚安MS6.0地震序列的发震断层为NW走向、 NE倾向的高角度右旋走滑断层; ② 该序列的余震条带延伸方向与2000年姚安MS6.5地震序列一致, 两次主震震源机制解一致且两个地震序列均发生在马尾箐断裂上, 2009年姚安MS6.0地震序列是马尾箐断裂向NW方向的延伸; ③ 姚安MS6.0地震震源区的最大主应力方向为NNW--SSE向, 接近水平, 与区域应力场方向一致; ④ 2009年姚安MS6.0地震序列是在区域应力增强的背景下, 位于高低速过渡带高速一侧的震源区应力高度积累, 使得马尾箐断裂向NW方向破裂扩展的结果． 相似文献
8.
宁洱地震序列的震源机制解分析 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
利用云南数字地震台网资料得到宁洱地震序列的主震、5.1级强余震和52个余震震源机制解.分析表明,该地震序列的发震断裂呈NW走向,倾角陡立.在接近水平的近南北向压应力作用下,断裂具有右旋走滑的错动性质.主震、强余震和众多的余震都发生在同一发震断裂上.大量的余震震源机制解结果与主震一致,是地震序列的主要破裂类型,但还存在与主要类型不一致的倾向滑动类型,这可能与余震破裂起始点的微构造控制作用有关,但是它们呈水平向的应力轴与主震的主应力轴一致.NW向断层作右旋走向错动,滑动断层推挤的象限都是逆冲类型的余震,而拉张的象限都是正断层类型的地震.宁洱地震序列的震源机制和周围4次5级以上地震的震源机制相同,表明震源区应力场和区域应力场完全一致,宁洱地震的孕育和发生受区域应力场的控制. 相似文献
9.
基于云南数字地震台网和腾冲火山台网宽频带波形记录,采用CAP方法反演了2011年盈江Ms5.8地震序列主震及Ms≥4.0前震、余震的震源机制解.结果显示:主震震源深度为9 km,与该事件的定位结果相一致;震源机制解的节面之一走向248.,倾角77.,滑动角19..结合余震、烈度分布以及震区的活动构造,判定该节面代表了主震的发震断层面,相应的发震断层应是震区附近的北东向大盈江断裂.主震主压力轴方位为20.,除Ms4.7余震为正断型地震外,其他7次地震都为纯走滑型地震,都具有NNE-SSW向近水平的P轴,与该区历史地震震源机制主压应力优势方向一致.综合应力场及构造分析表明,盈江Ms5.8地震的发震动力学环境是:受印度板块向欧亚板块北东向挤压和缅甸弧对保山—腾冲地块北东向俯冲的双重作用,保山—腾冲地块呈现北东向水平运动,导致的大盈江断裂带左旋走滑错动的结果. 相似文献
10.
基于中国国家和四川区域数字地震台网记录,采用HypoDD方法精确定位了四川芦山ML2.0级以上地震序列的震源位置,采用CAP方法反演了36次ML4.0级以上地震的最佳双力偶震源机制解,并利用小震分布和区域应力场拟合了可能存在的发震断层面参数,从而综合分析了芦山地震序列的震源深度、震源机制和震源破裂面特征,探讨可能的发震构造.结果显示,7.0级主震的震源位置为30.30°N、102.97°E,初始破裂深度为15 km左右,震源矩心深度为14 km左右,最佳双力偶震源机制解的两组节面分别为走向209°/倾角46°/滑动角94°和走向23°/倾角44°/滑动角86°,可视为纯逆冲型地震破裂,绝大多数ML4.0级以上余震的震源机制也表现出与主震类似的逆冲破裂特征.ML2.0级以上余震序列发生在主震两侧,集中分布的长轴为30 km左右,震源深度主要集中在5～27 km,ML3.5级以上较大余震则集中分布在9～25 km的深度上,并揭示出发震断层倾向北西的特征.利用小震分布和区域应力场拟合得到发震断层参数为走向207°/倾角50°/滑动角92°,绝大多数余震发生在断层面附近10 km左右的区域.综合地震序列分布特征、主震震源深度和已有破裂过程研究结果,可以推测主震破裂过程自初始点沿断层的两侧扩展破裂,南侧破裂比北侧稍长,滑动量主要集中在初始破裂点附近,可能没有破裂到地表.综合本文研究成果、地震烈度分布和现有的科学考察结果,初步推测发震构造为龙门山山前断裂,也不排除主震震中东侧还存在一条未知的基底断裂发震的可能性. 相似文献
11.
12.
基于新疆区域数字地震台网记录,采用CAP（Cut and Paste）方法反演了2015年7月3日皮山6.5级主震和部分MS3.6以上余震的震源机制解和震源深度;采用HypoDD方法重新定位了序列中ML2.5以上地震序列的震源位置,并利用小震分布和区域应力场拟合了可能存在的发震断层面参数.基于上述研究,综合分析了皮山6.5级地震序列的震源深度、震源机制和震源破裂面特征,探讨可能的发震构造.结果显示,利用CAP方法得到的最佳双力偶机制解节面I：走向280°/倾角60°/滑动角90°;节面Ⅱ：走向100°/倾角30°/滑动角90°,矩心深度19 km,表明该地震为一次逆冲型地震事件.大部分MS3.6以上余震震源机制与主震具有一定的相似性.双差定位结果显示,ML2.5以上的余震序列主要分布在主震的西南方向,深度主要分布在0～15 km范围内,余震分布显示出与发震构造泽普隐伏断裂一致的倾向南西的特征.利用小震分布和区域应力场拟合得到发震断层参数为走向104°/倾角34°/滑动角94°,该结果与主震震源机制解中节面Ⅱ的滑动角较为接近,绝大多数余震发生在断层面附近10 km左右的区域.根据本研究得到的震源机制、精定位结果以及利用小震分布和区域应力场拟合得到的断层面的参数,结合震源区地质构造情况,初步给出了此次皮山6.5级地震的发震模式. 相似文献
13.
对2017年九寨沟MS7.0地震序列的横波分裂的时空变化特征进行了分析.通过横波窗内S波质点运动图的分析，从九寨沟地震震源区各个地震台站的近震横波记录中提取了横波分裂的快波偏振方向和慢波延迟时间.观测结果显示，震源区各台站的上地壳各向异性在空间上存在分区特征，时间上有随时间的趋势性变化特征.空间上，位于震源区北部余震区内的3个台站中，发震断层东面的台站L5112和L5111只有一个突出的快波偏振优势方向（NNE向），而西面的L6202台有两个快波偏振优势方向（除了NNE向，还有一个近EW向），体现了余震区剧烈调整的地壳应力和构造复杂断裂的综合作用；余震区外的3个台站中，震源区东部靠近塔藏断裂（东）附近的JZG台的快波偏振优势方向为NW向，与塔藏断裂（东）的走向一致，南部的台站L5110和L5113的快波偏振优势方向为近EW向，与区域主压应力方向一致；余震区内各台站的平均慢波延迟时间大于余震区外各台站，反映了九寨沟地震孕育过程中余震区的应力积累强于其周边区域.时间上，快波偏振方向在主震后前期离散度较大，随着时间的推移，离散度在后期有逐渐变小的趋势；慢波延迟时间在主震后较大，但随着时间的推移，也表现出逐渐减小，趋于稳定.横波分裂随时间逐渐减小和趋于稳定的变化特征反映了九寨沟地震在孕震中积累的应力，随着主震和余震的发生而导致的应力释放和调整，应力大小和调整幅度逐渐减小，后期趋于稳定. 相似文献
14.
FOCAL MECHANISM SOLUTIONS AND STRESS FIELD OF THE 2019 CHANGNING,SICHUAN MAINSHOCK AND ITS MODERATE-STRONG AFTERSHOCKS(MS≥4.0) 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 LIANG Shan-shan XU Zhi-guo SHENG Shu-zhong ZHANG Guang-wei ZHAO-Bo ZOU Li-ye 《地震地质》1979,42(3):547-561
A MS6.0 earthquake with shallow focal depth of 16km struck Changning County, Yibin City, Sichuan Province at 22:55: 43(Beijing Time)on 17 June 2019. Although the magnitude of the earthquake is moderate, it caused heavy casualties and property losses to Changning County and its surrounding areas. In the following week, a series of aftershocks with MS≥4.0 occurred in the epicentral area successively. In order to better understand and analyze the seismotectonic structure and generation mechanism of these earthquakes, in this paper, absolute earthquake location by HYPOINVERSE 2000 method is conducted to relocate the main shock of MS6.0 in Changning using the seismic phase observation data provided by Sichuan Earthquake Administration, and focal mechanism solutions for Changning MS6.0 main shock and MS≥4.0 aftershocks are inferred using the gCAP method with the local and regional broadband station waveforms recorded by the regional seismic networks of Sichuan Province, Yunnan Province, Chongqing Municipality, and Guizhou Province. The absolute relocation results show that the epicenter of the main shock is located at 28.35°N, 104.88°E, and it occurred at an unusual shallow depth about only 6.98km, which could be one of the most significant reasons for the heavier damage in the Changning and adjoining areas. The focal plane solution of the Changning MS6.0 earthquake indicates that the main shock occurred at a thrust fault with a left-lateral strike-slip component. The full moment tensor solution provided by gCAP shows that it contains a certain percentage of non-double couple components. After the occurrence of the main shock, a series of medium and strong aftershocks with MS≥4.0 occurred continuously along the northwestern direction, the fault plane solutions for those aftershocks show mostly strike-slip and thrust fault-type. It is found that the mode of focal mechanism has an obvious characteristic of segmentation in space, which reflects the complexity of the dislocation process of the seismogenic fault. It also shows that the Changning earthquake sequences occurred in the shallow part of the upper crust. Combining with the results from the seismic sounding profile in Changning anticline, which is the main structure in the focal area, this study finds that the existence of several steep secondary faults in the core of Changning anticline is an important reason for the diversity of focal mechanism of aftershock sequences. The characteristics of regional stress field is estimated using the STRESSINVERSE method by the information of focal mechanism solutions from our study, and the results show that the Changning area is subject to a NEE oriented maximum principal stress field with a very shallow dipping and near-vertical minimum principal stress, which is not associated with the results derived from other stress indicators. Compared with the direction of the maximum principal compressive stress axis in the whole region, the direction of the stress field in the focal area rotates from the NWW direction to the NEE direction. The Changning MS6.0 earthquake locates in the area with complex geological structure, where there are a large number of small staggered fault zones with unstable geological structure. Combining with the direction of aftershocks distribution in Changning area, we infer that the Changning MS6.0 earthquake is generated by rupturing of the pre-existing fault in the Changning anticline under the action of the overall large stress field, and the seismogenic fault is a high dip-angle thrust fault with left-lateral strike-slip component, trending NW. 相似文献
15.
采用双差重定位和W震相波形反演方法分析 “地震编目系统” 和中国地震台网中心提供的地震观测报告及区域地震波形数据，对2019年四川长宁地震序列进行了重定位，反演获取了M＞4.5地震的震源机制解。地震序列重定位结果显示，长宁地震序列沿NW优势方向呈条带状分布，集中分布于5—10 km深度范围，且发震断层面呈高倾角。震源机制反演结果表明，2019年6月17日四川长宁MS6.0主震的两个可能发震断层面参数分别为:节面Ⅰ走向12°，倾角50°，滑动角139°；节面Ⅱ走向131°，倾角59°，滑动角48°，最优矩心深度为7.5 km，矩震级MW5.74。此外几个M＞4.5余震的震源机制也基本与主震类似，均为以逆断为主外加少量走滑的地震破裂事件。综合分析长宁地震序列的重定位、震源机制反演结果以及震中和附近区域的地质构造背景信息推断，本次长宁主震的发震破裂面呈NW?SE走向，发震断层为长宁—双河背斜东北翼发育的逆冲断层。 相似文献
16.
山西大同-阳高地震的震源机制及发震模式 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
根据全国地震台网的记录资料及前人对山西大同-阳高地震的研究结果，通过对大同-阳高地震震源机制及大同遥测地震台网的单（多）台小震综合断层面解的研究，结合当地地质构造条件，推断出大同-阳高地震的震源应力场及前震、主震、最大余震的发震断层。通过对大同-阳高地震中余震随时间分布、烈度等震线分布和构造裂缝的研究，给出了大同-阳高地震中几次主要地震的破裂方向、破裂长度等。 相似文献
17.
2014年4月20日安徽省霍山发生MS4.3地震,是霍山地区41年以来发生的最大地震. 本文首先基于安徽省及周边省份的地震台站资料,采用Hypo2000、 CAP和PTD方法反演得到该地震的震源深度为8 km; 然后采用Hypo2000和HypoDD方法联合对主震和余震序列进行重新定位,结果显示该地震序列呈北东向分布,绝大部分余震分布在主震的西南侧; 最后分别采用FOCMEC方法和CAP方法反演该地震的震源机制解,获得的反演结果非常接近,节面Ⅰ与节面Ⅱ的走向、 倾角、 滑动角分别为135°/70°/-30°与230°/60°/-160°. 此外该地震的椭圆等烈度线呈北东向展布,结合该地区的历史地震和地震构造,认为该地震与北东向的落儿岭—土地岭断裂活动有关. 已有震源机制解资料表明该地区构造应力场最大主压应力轴的方位角为267°,倾角为5°,最小主压应力轴的方位角为358°,倾角为4°,结合震源机制解和发震构造,认为该地震是在区域应力场作用下,落儿岭—土地岭断裂发生的一次右旋张性地震. 相似文献
18.
19.
Based on the digital waveforms of Xinjiang Seismic Network, the Hutubi MS6.2 earthquake sequence (ML ≥ 1.0) was relocated precisely by HypoDD.The best double-couple focal mechanisms of the main shock and aftershocks of ML ≥ 4.0 were determined by the CAP method. We analyzed the characteristics of spatial distribution, focal mechanisms and the seismogenic structure of earthquake sequence. The results show that the main shock is located at 43.775 9°N, 86.363 4°E; the depth of the initial rupture and centriod is about 15.388km and 17km. The earthquake sequence extends unilaterally along NWW direction with an extension length of about 15km and a depth ranging 5~15km. The characteristics of the depth profiles show that the seismogenic fault plane dips northward and the faulting is dominated by thrusting. The nodal planes parameters of the best double-couple focal mechanisms are:strike 292°, dip 62° and rake 80° for nodal plane I, and strike 132°, dip 30° and rake 108° for nodal plane Ⅱ, indicating that the main shock is of thrust faulting. The dip of nodal planeⅠis consistent with the dip of the depth profile, which is inferred to be the fault plane of seismogenic fault of this earthquake. According to the comprehensive analysis of the relocation results, the focal mechanism and geological structure in the source region, it is preliminarily inferred that the seismogenic structure of the Hutubi MS6.2 earthquake may be a backthrust on the deeper concealed thrust slope at the south of Qigu anticline. The earthquake is a "folding" earthquake taking place under the stress field of Tianshan expanding towards the Junggar Basin. 相似文献
20.
On 16th September 2013, an M5.1 earthquake occurred in Badong County, Hubei Province, which is the biggest one since the first water impounding in 2003 in the head region of the Three Gorges Reservoir area. The crustal velocity information is needed to determine the earthquake location and focal mechanism. By comparison, the 1-D velocity structure model from Zhao was adopted in this study. Double difference location method was applied to determine the precise locations of the M5.1 earthquake sequence. Relocation results show that the dominant distribution of this sequence is along NEE direction. In order to understand its seismogenic structure, focal depth profiles were made. Profile AA' was along the sequence distribution, and the earthquake sequence extended about 12km. Focal depth of mainshock is deeper than that of aftershocks, and earthquake rupture propagated laterally southwestward. The seismic profile BB' and CC' were perpendicular to profile AA', which represent the dip direction. Both profiles show that the focal depth becomes deeper toward southeast, and dip angle is about 50°. It means that the possible seismogenic fault strikes NEE and dips southeast. Focal mechanism could provide more information for judging the seismogenic structures. Many methods could obtain the focal mechanism, such as P-wave first motion method, CAP method, and some other moment tensor methods. In this paper, moment tensor inversion program made by Yagi Y is adopted. 12 regional seismic stations ranging from 100~400km are picked up, and before the inversion, we removed the mean and trend. The seismic waveforms were band pass filtered between 0.05 and 0.2Hz, and then integrated into displacement. Green's functions were calculated using the discrete wavenumber method developed by Kohketsu. The focal mechanism of the M5.1 mainshock manifests that the NEE-striking fault plane probably is the possible seismogenic fault, which is consistent with the analysis of focal depth profiles. The focal mechanisms of the ML≥2.0 aftershocks are retrieved by P-wave first motion method, and the nodal plane I is in accordance with the earthquake sequence distribution and the fault plane of the mainshock. FMSI program was adopted to inverse the stress field in the earthquake area, and the results show that the earthquake sequence is under the control of the regional stress field. The earthquake sequence occurred on the stage of slow water unloading, and ETAS model was introduced to testify the influences of water level fluctuations on earthquakes. The results denote that the reservoir played a triggering role in the earthquake, however, the NEE-striking seismogenic fault is the controlling factor. 相似文献