共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 102 毫秒
1.
基于新疆区域数字地震台网震相观测报告, 采用双差定位方法对2019年新疆疏附MS5.1地震序列ML≥1.0地震进行重定位, 采用CAP波形反演方法, 获得了主震的震源机制解和震源矩心深度, 进而综合分析了本次地震可能的发震构造。 结果表明, 疏附5.1级地震震源位置为39.59°N, 75.57°E, 初始破裂深度为18 km, 震源矩心深度为18 km。 重定位后的地震序列呈两个优势方向展布, 分别为NEE向和NE向分支, NEE向为主要的余震优势分布区域, 呈长约13 km窄带状分布在喀什断裂附近。 另一条优势分布为沿NE向长度约9 km, 这可能与喀什断裂阶区有关。 深度剖面显示, 地震震源深度主要集中分布在8~20 km。 沿NEE走向深度剖面显示, 疏附5.1级地震破裂于深部, 余震沿优势分布的震源深度自SWW向NEE呈现逐渐加深的变化特征。 垂直于震中优势分布的深度剖面显示, 本次地震发震断层面倾向为N倾。 震源机制解显示本次地震断错类型为逆冲型, 结合震源深度剖面特征推断节面Ⅰ为本次地震的发震断层面。 综合地震序列空间分布特征、 震源机制以及震源区地质资料, 推测此次地震的发震构造可能为喀什断裂, 余震向浅部扩展。 相似文献
2.
3.
定义了“P轴分布集中度”用以研究中强地震前中小地震震源机制变化。利用祁连山中东段地区布设的中法微震数字监测台网多年的监测资料和甘肃数字监测台网的资料,使用P波和S波初动和振幅比联合反演方法反演了两次中等地震前震源区附近地区中小地震震源机制解和发震应力场;利用“P轴分布集中度”这一参数分析研究了这两次中等地震前中小地震震源机制和发震应力场的时间变化。结果表明,震前1~2年中小地震震源机制解P轴开始集中,在震前集中到大约与主震震源机制的发震应力场一致。 相似文献
4.
本文用多种数字地震学方法研究了2012年7月20日江苏高邮Ms4.9级地震的震源机制解和震源深度.首先用CAP方法反演了江苏高邮Ms4.9级地震的震源机制解和震源深度,最佳解节面Ⅰ走向角为109°,倾角85°,滑动角18°;节面Ⅱ走向角17°,倾角72°,滑动角175°;矩震级Mw为4.82;优势震源深度为10 km.为验证研究结果的可靠性,我们一方面用Snoke方法反演了高邮地震的震源机制解,反演结果与CAP方法反演的结果相差不大;另一方面,使用近震深度震相到时差的测量和对远震波形拟合的方法进一步研究震源深度,结果均表明江苏高邮Ms4.9级地震的震源深度在9～10 km左右,与CAP方法的结果一致.多种方法研究结果的一致性可以充分说明本文研究结果比较可靠.结合前人地质资料的研究成果和本文对高邮地震震源机制解的研究,我们认为滁河断裂很可能是江苏高邮Ms4.9级地震的发震构造. 相似文献
5.
6.
利用匹配定位方法对2020年5月18日云南巧家M_S5.0地震震后24h震源附近台站记录的连续波形进行遗漏地震扫描和定位,共识别出327个地震事件,约为台网目录的2.4倍,最小完整震级由最初的M_L1.9降至M_L1.1。随后,依据最新目录计算了震后震源区的b值,并结合余震展布形态,初步分析此次地震发震构造。研究结果显示,余震序列在平面上显示出NNW-SSE优势展布方向,长度约14km,震源优势深度集中在3～15km;深度剖面展示出主震的发震断层面较陡,并且具有向西倾的趋势。综合主震震源机制解、余震展布形态和周边地质构造背景,认为巧家M_S5.0地震发震断层可能为NNW-SSE向走滑性质的断裂,与2014年鲁甸MS6.5地震的发震构造密切相关。 相似文献
7.
8.
为了更好地确定2017年8月8日九寨沟M_(S )7.0地震震源深度其发震机理,利用四川、甘肃和青海区域地震台网的观测波形数据,采用多种方法研究了此次地震的震源深度。首先,采用gCAP方法反演了九寨沟M_(S )7.0地震的震源机制解和矩心深度,结果显示,节面Ⅰ走向243°/倾角87°/滑动角-158°,节面Ⅱ走向151°/倾角68°/滑动角-3°,矩震级为M_(W )6.5,矩心深度为8 km;然后,采用ISOLA近震全波形方法反演了此次地震的震源机制解,反演结果与gCAP方法结果相差不大,矩心深度为7 km;最后,通过sPn震相与Pn震相之间的走时差测定此次地震初始破裂震源深度,结果显示深度约为12 km。研究表明,九寨沟M_(S )7.0地震的矩心深度为7—8 km,初始破裂深度约为12 km。 相似文献
9.
10.
杨贵 《地震地磁观测与研究》2011,32(6):17-21
对比福建数字地震台网测定的中国台湾中深源地震目录与中国台湾中央气象局公布的相应中深源地震目录,分析震源位置和发震时刻的差别情况,基本认为:福建台网测定中国台湾中深源地震的结果,在震中位置上,纬度偏大,即偏北;经度偏小,即偏向台网方向;采用单纯型方法定位的结果,发震时刻略偏小,震源深度偏小较多;用Locsat方法定位的结... 相似文献
11.
Two kinds of methods for determining seismic parameters are presented,that is,the potential seismic source zoning method and grid-spatially smoothing method. The Gaussian smoothing method and the modified Gaussian smoothing method are described in detail, and a comprehensive analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of these methods is made. Then,we take central China as the study region,and use the Gaussian smoothing method and potential seismic source zoning method to build seismic models to calculate the mean annual seismic rate. Seismic hazard is calculated using the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis method to construct the ground motion acceleration zoning maps. The differences between the maps and these models are discussed and the causes are investigated. The results show that the spatial smoothing method is suitable for estimating the seismic hazard over the moderate and low seismicity regions or the hazard caused by background seismicity; while the potential seismic source zoning method is suitable for estimating the seismic hazard in well-defined seismotectonics. Combining the spatial smoothing method and the potential seismic source zoning method with an integrated account of the seismicity and known seismotectonics is a feasible approach to estimate the seismic hazard in moderate and low seismicity regions. 相似文献
12.
Any calculation of seismic wave propagation comprising the seismic source, the travel path, and the receiver site in a single finite-difference (FD) model requires a considerable amount of computer time and memory. Moreover, the methods currently available for including point sources in the 2D FD calculations are far-field approximations only. Therefore we have developed a new hybrid method for treating the seismic wave fields at localized 2D near-surface structures embedded in a 1D background medium, and excited by a point source. The source radiation and propagation in the background model is solved by the discrete-wave number (DW) method, while the propagation in the local 2D structure is calculated by the FD method. The coupling between the two sets of calculations is performed on a rectangular excitation box surrounding the local structure. We show the usefulness of the method in ground-motion studies where both near-field source effects and local site effects are important. Technical problems connected with the inconsistency between the 3D source radiation and the 2D FD calculation are minor for the relatively distant in-plane point explosive sources, but are more serious for the in-plane dislocation sources. 相似文献
13.
大多数地震破裂面源检测方法都是通过简化地震震源,将地震震源表示成线源或者点源,无法有效描述地震带地震破裂面源产状和大小,不适用地震震级较大的情况下地震危险性检测。因此提出基于数学建模的潜在地震破裂面源检测方法,在地震震级较大时仍能检测出地震危险性概率。选取适宜的地震基岩水平峰值加速度衰减关系,分析地震震级、破裂长度、破裂宽度相互关系,确定地震引起的潜在地震破裂面源大小,计算给定地震动小于在场点处产生地震动的概率,将该概率同地震动加速度衰减关系结合,得到地震动年超越概率,分析地震危险性。经过实验检测发现,所提方法检测出的年超越概率与峰值加速度、最大震级有关,该概率能精准表示地震带地震破裂面源产状和大小,说明该方法检测地震危险性是合理的。 相似文献
14.
当参考场地震源距小于研究场地震源距时,传统谱比法低估了场地放大效应,且参考场地与研究场地震源距相差越大,低估程度越大;当参考场地震源距大于研究场地震源距时,传统谱比法高估了场地放大效应,且参考场地与研究场地震源距相差越大,高估程度越大,计算结果依赖参考场地的选择。上述问题存在的原因是传统谱比法估计场地放大效应时未考虑地震波传播过程中介质的吸收衰减作用,故传统谱比法适用于参考场地与研究场地地质构造类似且震源距相差较小的情况,为此本文通过考虑介质对地震波的吸收衰减作用,提出改进谱比法,可适用于地质构造类似、任意震源距的情况。本文分别采用未改进方法和改进方法估计汶川地震中渭河盆地多个台站场地反应,证实了传统谱比法存在的上述问题。采用改进谱比法估计的场地放大倍数均在2 Hz以下出现1个峰值,且这些峰值多为最大值;采用未改进谱比法估计的场地放大倍数峰值出现的频率多大于2 Hz;改进谱比法可信度较高。 相似文献
15.
建立包含震源、沉积盆地和表层低速沉积层的二维模型,采用交错网格有限差分/伪谱混合方法求解地震波传播,讨论沉积层厚度和速度对地震地面运动的作用。结果表明:沉积层内产生的地震波的多重反射以及转换会引起地面运动持续时间的延长,它们的相干叠加会造成地面运动峰值的放大;随着沉积层速度的增加,多重反射与转换波的能量减小,地面运动持续时间减小,但是不同速度或者不同厚度的低速层模型均显示出一致的地面运动峰值放大特征。结果说明,在包含震源、沉积盆地和沉积层的模型中,沉积层对地面运动的作用机理更复杂。在实际应用中有必要同时考虑这些因素的综合作用。 相似文献
16.
本文提出解调包络方法来重构地震记录中缺失的低频信号,同时该方法能够降低全波形反演的非线性程度;提出伴随状态震源函数反演方法来得到精确的震源函数,并推导了梯度计算公式;解调包络方法结合低通滤波技术,实现了从低频到高频的多尺度反演策略,有效缓解了全波形反演的周波跳跃问题.数值算例证明了解调包络、伴随状态震源函数反演方法和低通滤波多尺度反演策略的可行性及优越性.震源函数反演精度测试结果表明:即使观测记录在缺失低频信息的情况下,也能反演得到精确的震源函数.缺失低频测试和抗噪能力测试结果表明:即使地震数据中缺失9Hz以下的低频信号或者信噪比极低的情况下,利用反演得到的精确震源函数进行解调包络多尺度全波形反演,同样可以得到高精度的全波形反演结果.与Hilbert包络全波形反演对比结果表明:解调包络在重构低频和降低伴随震源主频方面具有一定优势. 相似文献
17.
A detailed numerical simulation of the ground motion and a site response analysis for two towns in the Marche Region (Treia
and Cagli) is carried out on the basis of structural models deduced from available geological and geophysical data. In both
cases, the reference event is an M = 5.7 earthquake associated with a normal fault located beneath each town. The ground motion is computed using the 2D spectral
element method (SPEM 2D). The method solves the propagation of the seismic field through complex geological structures and
enables an estimate of the effects of deep crustal structure, superficial geology, and topography on ground motion. Numerical
simulations of the seismic field are performed along 2D vertical planes containing the seismic source. Strong ground motion
has not been yet recorded in the two towns; therefore, the numerical simulation of ground motion represents a way to overcome
the lack of instrumental data. The simulations carried out for Treia show that ground motion is influenced by both source
mechanism and effects due to propagation through the geological structure, while ground motion in Cagli features strong local
effects, caused by the presence of alluvial deposits under a large area of the town. 相似文献
18.
Petr Kolář 《Pure and Applied Geophysics》1994,143(4):655-671
Summary It is necessary to know the source mechanism for the determination of the seismic energy of seismic waves from the seismogram recorded at one station. For sparse data (selected events of the 1985/86 Western-Bohemia earthquake swarm) the source mechanisms cannot be determined fromP-wave first motions. Therefore, a new method of determining the source mechanism simultaneously with the energy calculated from observations at two stations has been developed. The method is described and tested. Advantages, disadvantages and the stability of the method are discussed. 相似文献
19.
Using the double-difference earthquake location algorithm, the deterministic method (PTD method) and the CAP seismic moment tensor inversion method, the paper selects the primary waveform data of 78 earthquakes recorded by the "China Earthquake Science Array Probe Project in the Northern Part of North South Seismic Belt", the "China Earthquake Scientific Exploration Array Data Center" of Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, and the Inner Mongolia Digital Seismic Network to calculate the focal depths of the mainshock and the seismic sequence of the MS5.8 Alxa Left Banner earthquake in Inner Mongolia. The results show that the focal depth of the main shock is 20.6km, determined by the double-difference earthquake location method, 18.1km by the PTD method, and 19.2km by the CAP method. The focal depth of the earthquake sequence calculated by the double-difference location method is larger. The deterministic method (PTD method) and double-difference location method are the methods that fit the tectonic characteristics of the seismic source area, and the CAP method is suitable for larger earthquakes. 相似文献