共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 125 毫秒
1.
为深入认识对流可分辨模式对小尺度孤立地形区降水的预报性能,使用2017年暖季（5—9月）台站逐时降水观测数据,以小时尺度降水特征为指标,细致评估了千米尺度分辨率（3 km）的北京“睿图”短期数值预报子系统（RMAPS-ST）对泰山及其周边地区降水特征的预报能力,并对比了不同起报时次（北京时08时和20时）的预报差异。评估发现,RMAPS-ST可以再现泰山站的局地降水中心,但区域西南侧降水预报小于观测,而泰山站及其东北侧则相反。清晨和午后时段的降水预报与观测相比存在较大偏差。以泰山站为例,RMAPS-ST易于低估夜间至清晨时段的降水频率,这可能与模式对降水系统发展演变过程的预报偏差以及清晨泰山站弱降水事件的漏报有关;清晨泰山站降水强度的预报在不同起报时次的结果中存在差异,20时起报存在大幅度高估的问题,进而导致其暖季平均降水量预报大于观测,而08时起报对于清晨降水强度的高估不明显;08时起报易高估泰山站午后的降水频率,这与其午后短历时降水事件数预报偏多有关,模式对山区热动力场的预报偏差是午后降水空报的可能原因。小时尺度降水特征已应用于中国气象局区域数值预报模式的业务评估体系中,本研究结果也表明,此类评估有助于深入认识千米尺度数值预报模式对降水日内变化的预报能力,从而为精细化降水产品的订正提供更详实的科学依据。 相似文献
2.
应用多种常规和非常规观测气象资料以及再分析资料对2020年2月13日夜间至14日白天北京地区一次极端雨雪过程的成因进行了分析,并重点探讨了模式降水相态预报的误差及其原因。结果表明:（1）本次降水过程中,低涡系统深厚,强度异常强,移速慢,影响时间长,导致北京地区部分站点降水持续12 h左右。异常偏强的东南风急流向北京西部山前输送水汽,配合与急流相伴的较强低空风切变形成的对称不稳定,产生高降水率的斜升对流降水。较长的降水时间以及冬季夜间罕见的高降水率共同造成了此次极端日降水。（2）北京凌晨0℃层高度和地面气温下降缓慢,北京西部处于两股冷空气间的暖舌中,冷空气从东路入侵造成北京东部降温时间较西部早,且降温辐度较大,导致0℃层高度呈西高东低形势,故转雪时间东部早于西部。（3）模式预报的东路冷空气较观测偏强偏早,降水的对流性也显著弱于观测,导致其预报的凌晨地面气温较观测低,0℃层高度下降过快,从而过早预报转雪时间,高估了降雪量和积雪深度,利用非常规温度观测对模式温度廓线预报误差进行检验,可为订正模式相态转化时间预报偏差提供依据。 相似文献
3.
全球海气耦合模式（BCC_CM1.0）对江淮梅雨降水预报的检验 总被引：4，自引：1，他引：3
以国家气候中心全球大气-海洋耦合模式(BCC-CM1.0)20年的预报产品为基础,重点分析了该模式对中国江淮梅雨的预报能力以及梅雨预报中存在误差的可能原因.试验表明:BCC-CM1.0对江淮梅雨降水有一定的预报能力,模式基本上能够预报出气候态下梅雨降水的空间分布特征.尽管其方差贡献率和时间系数与观测相比有偏差,但模式还是能够预报出梅雨降水的主要模态.气候平均下,BCC-CM1.0模式预报的梅雨雨带位置偏北,因而预报的江淮流域长江以北降水偏多,而长江以南预报的降水偏少.同时发现模式对江淮流域梅雨期中等强度降水预报较好,雨强概率分布与观测结果基本一致,而对大雨强降水和小雨强降水预报相对较差.合成分析发现,江淮流域雨带偏北、降水偏少时,模式的预报能力较好;而江淮流域雨带偏南、降水偏多时,模式预报能力相对较差.BCC-CM1.0对高度场的预报普遍偏低,尤其是在青藏高原上空有一个虚假的低值中心,对副热带高压的预报也偏弱,这样使得东亚季风区气压梯度增加,从而导致预报的东亚夏季风偏强、向北推进的幅度加大,最终致使预报的梅雨雨带偏北.此外,比湿场预报的偏差也可能是造成梅雨雨带偏北的原因之一. 相似文献
4.
针对2019—2020年广东省开汛前后至季风爆发前的典型锋面暴雨过程,利用业务常用评分和空间检验指标对ECMWF模式进行检验评估,发现模式在降水中心位置、雨区面积以及平均(极值)雨量偏差分布均较为集中,对锋面过程的有较高的预报参考价值。另外,模式命中和漏报过程的降水预报演变特征及其对应的天气形势中,多数命中过程模式表现为强降水启动(结束)时间偏迟;多数的漏报过程表现为粤西有暴雨以上降水漏报,这通常与弱冷空气带来的偏北、偏东气流和南海北部的偏南气流在低层形成两广交界地区气旋式环流的加强有关,而模式对弱锋面低层对流触发的预报能力有限,易形成上述地区的暴雨降水的漏报发生。 相似文献
5.
应用面向降水过程的时空检验方法,评估了中国气象局广东快速更新同化数值预报系统(CMA-GD)、上海数值预报系统(CMA-SH9)和中尺度天气数值预报系统(CMA-MESO)的海南岛暖季(2019—2020年的4—9月)非台风降水日小时降水预报效果,结果表明:三家模式均能捕捉不同流场条件下的降水空间分布形态及降水日变化特征,但CMA-GD和CMASH9的降水频率和强度总体偏多偏强,其中CMA-GD降水频率偏多近10%,CMA-SH9平均小时雨强偏强近4 mm·h-1,CMA-MESO雨强在5 mm·h-1以上的降水多分布在西南部和中部山区,与实况空间分布差异较大。三家模式降水预报最易开始和降水峰值时间平均偏早1～3 h,而降水最易结束时间偏晚1～3 h;模式的大气层高层露点温度和不稳定能量预报值偏大,不稳定能量出现时间偏早,近地层逆温层特征预报失真,降水预报的开始时间倾向于提前、降水持续时间偏长。三家模式的昼间海南岛北部沿海的海陆风辐合带预报偏强,其中CMA-SH9尤为明显,与该模式降水强度明显偏强特征相一致;CMAGD的夜间南部沿海的海陆风辐... 相似文献
6.
北京“7.21”特大暴雨高分辨率模式分析场及预报分析 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
2012年7月21-22日,61年以来最强降水袭击北京,北京大部分地区出现大暴雨,局部特大暴雨,过程雨量大、雨势强、范围广,造成了严重影响。此次强降水配置较为典型,业务预报提前指示出了此次过程,但预报结果存在强度偏弱,峰值偏晚等偏差。在对此次大暴雨进行综合分析的基础上,利用中国自动气象站与NOAA气候预测中心卫星反演降水资料CMORPH(Climate Prediction Center Morphing Technique)产品融合的逐时降水量网格数据资料作为观测,着重对北京市气象局新的快速更新循环同化和预报系统(BJ-RUC v2.0)的3 km高分辨率模式分析场和预报场进行了检验与分析,以期通过对中尺度模式预报性能的了解,为暴雨可预报性问题提供进一步的参考。研究结果表明,此次特大暴雨过程水汽条件极佳,降水区域较为集中,呈现西南一东北走向的中尺度雨带特征。利用常规检验评分对预报降水的时间序列进行检验发现,预报降水在时间上滞后,降水强度偏弱,存在偏西南的位置误差,并且未能反映降水系统的线状特征。进一步利用检验连续降水区域定量降水预报的CRA(contiguous rain area)方法,对预报误差进行分解表明,整体降水(5 mm/h)的主要误差来自于位置和形状误差;而在暴雨(20 mm/h)的预报中,降水强度的偏差占误差的主要部分。最后结合对预报场大尺度环流和物理量的诊断(水汽条件和不稳定条件),分析探讨了此次极端暴雨预报不佳的原因。 相似文献
7.
2015年5月19—20日,华南出现一次暴雨过程。检验表明欧洲中期天气预报中心全球确定性预报模式(以下简称EC模式)预报的20日强降水落区在广东境内较实况明显偏北,高估了天气尺度系统附近的降水强度,漏报了其南侧暖区内中尺度对流系统(mesoscale convective system,MCS)造成的降水,华东中尺度模式预报明显优于EC模式。利用高分辨率中尺度天气研究预报模式(以下简称WRF模式)对该暴雨过程进行了模拟,对比EC模式降水物理过程,初步探索了EC模式降水预报误差的成因,结果表明:20日位于广东暖区内的对流组织发展成MCS,并造成明显的低层冷池出流和中高层潜热加热,二者共同作用使得中低层气旋式环流在广东中东部发展,配合其南侧的强西南风水汽输送,在气旋式切变附近不断触发新的对流并南移使得广东中南部暖区内出现强降水,WRF模式能较好地模拟出该过程,而EC模式未能预报出暖区对流及其反馈,从而导致其漏报了广东中南部的强降水;EC模式预报的降水与天气尺度环流之间的正反馈进一步加大了降水的预报偏差。EC模式预报的20日白天的强降水主要位于华南北部切变线附近,且以层状云降水为主,降水产生的潜热使得对流层低层切变线附近减压更明显,预报的切变线辐合较分析场明显偏强,使得其预报的切变线附近降水较实况偏强。 相似文献
8.
GRAPES-GFS模式暴雨预报天气学检验特征 总被引：5，自引：4，他引：1
本文采用天气学检验方法,对2016年度国家气象中心GRAPES全球数值预报系统(GRAPES-GFS)业务预报暴雨过程及2013-2015年部分回算个例进行了检验,并结合对比欧洲中期天气预报中心确定性预报模式(EC模式)和国家气象中心全球谱模式T639L60(T639模式)降水预报,梳理总结业务GRAPES-GFS模式预报性能优势和系统性偏差特征。被检验暴雨过程共38次,其中南方暴雨过程20次,北方暴雨过程6次,热带扰动或台风降水过程12次。依靠预报员主观天气学检验分析,从降水预报效果检验出发,结合主要影响天气系统和示踪物理量检验,梳理总结模式预报系统性偏差,以期全面发掘该业务预报模式性能。结果表明对短期时效内的降水预报,GRAPES-GFS模式预报稳定性较好,整体明显优于T639模式。但还存在诸如对对流性降水预报较实况偏北或对主雨带南侧暖区降水预报不足的偏差特征;另对弱高空波动背景下的对流性降水预报偏弱;而在降水预报强度大致正确的情况下,对降水系统南侧偏南气流控制区域预报湿度偏大,对副热带地区的低涡系统预报偏强。 相似文献
9.
为了对比T639和ECMWF模式预报产品性能的优劣,提高预报员使用其产品的能力,针对2012年5~8月四川盆地降水天气过程,根据不同的影响天气系统,分别对T639和ECMWF细网格模式96h降水预报进行检验对比。结果表明:(1) EC模式对不同系统降水的预报效果都优于T639,预报指示意义大,且两家模式对高原涡和西南涡降水预报效果均优于模式对其它系统降水预报。(2) T639模式对主雨带强度和降水中心强度预报易偏弱,主雨带范围预报易偏小,漏报可能性大;EC模式对主雨带强度、降水中心强度预报也易偏弱,但主雨带范围预报易偏大。(3) T639和EC模式在预报主雨带落区、降水中心位置和实况不一致时,预报易偏西、偏南,雨带的移速偏慢。 相似文献
10.
利用CMAP逐月降水资料和欧洲天气预报中心ERA-interim的再分析资料,分析了CESM模式对东亚地区降水及夏季环流的模拟性能。结果表明:(1)CESM可以模拟出东亚地区大气环流、地表温度、水汽输送及降水随季节南北进退等主要特征。(2)该模式降水模拟结果与CMAP资料的对比显示,冬季降水的空间偏差主要表现为青藏高原南侧模拟降水偏多,而青藏高原西北部和日本海附近降水模拟偏少。夏季降水的空间偏差主要表现为陆地偏多,偏差最显著的区域位于青藏高原南侧,而海洋上偏少。降水偏差在季节变化上主要体现为低纬度地区雨带出现时间偏早,中高纬度地区出现时间偏晚且持续时间偏长。(3)模式模拟的夏季地表温度与ERA再分析资料相比在陆地模拟的结果明显偏低,在海洋上模拟的偏高。模式模拟的夏季500 h Pa西太副高较ERA再分析结果异常偏西至我国的江淮地区且强度偏强,这与模式模拟的夏季江淮地区降水较CMAP结果偏少密切相关。(4)夏季经向垂直环流的对比显示,模式模拟结果与ERA再分析结果的主要差异出现在青藏高原及其附近地区,模拟结果在高原的南北侧均出现明显的异常垂直环流,南侧的异常垂直环流伸展高度高,范围狭窄,这与模式模拟的夏季降水在高原南侧明显偏多有关。 相似文献
11.
The heaviest rainfall over 61 yr hit Beijing during 21-22 July 2012.Characterized by great rainfall amount and intensity,wide range,and high impact,this record-breaking heavy rainfall caused dozens of deaths and extensive damage.Despite favorable synoptic conditions,operational forecasts underestimated the precipitation amount and were late at predicting the rainfall start time.To gain a better understanding of the performance of mesoscale models,verification of high-resolution forecasts and analyses from the WRFbased BJ-RUCv2.0 model with a horizontal grid spacing of 3 km is carried out.The results show that water vapor is very rich and a quasi-linear precipitation system produces a rather concentrated rain area.Moreover,model forecasts are first verified statistically using equitable threat score and BIAS score.The BJ-RUCv2.0forecasts under-predict the rainfall with southwestward displacement error and time delay of the extreme precipitation.Further quantitative analysis based on the contiguous rain area method indicates that major errors for total precipitation( 5 mm h~(-1)) are due to inaccurate precipitation location and pattern,while forecast errors for heavy rainfall( 20 mm h~(-1)) mainly come from precipitation intensity.Finally,the possible causes for the poor model performance are discussed through diagnosing large-scale circulation and physical parameters(water vapor flux and instability conditions) of the BJ-RUCv2.0 model output. 相似文献
12.
Analysis of a Heavy Rainfall Event over Beijing During 21-22 July 2012 Based on High Resolution Model Analyses and Forecasts 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 JIANG Xiaoman YUAN Huiling XUE Ming CHEN Xi TAN Xiaoguang 《Acta Meteorologica Sinica》2014,28(2):199-212
The heaviest rainfall over 61 yr hit Beijing during 21-22 July 2012.Characterized by great rainfall amount and intensity,wide range,and high impact,this record-breaking heavy rainfall caused dozens of deaths and extensive damage.Despite favorable synoptic conditions,operational forecasts underestimated the precipitation amount and were late at predicting the rainfall start time.To gain a better understanding of the performance of mesoscale models,verification of high-resolution forecasts and analyses from the WRFbased BJ-RUCv2.0 model with a horizontal grid spacing of 3 km is carried out.The results show that water vapor is very rich and a quasi-linear precipitation system produces a rather concentrated rain area.Moreover,model forecasts are first verified statistically using equitable threat score and BIAS score.The BJ-RUCv2.0forecasts under-predict the rainfall with southwestward displacement error and time delay of the extreme precipitation.Further quantitative analysis based on the contiguous rain area method indicates that major errors for total precipitation（〉 5 mm h~（-1）） are due to inaccurate precipitation location and pattern,while forecast errors for heavy rainfall（〉 20 mm h~（-1）） mainly come from precipitation intensity.Finally,the possible causes for the poor model performance are discussed through diagnosing large-scale circulation and physical parameters（water vapor flux and instability conditions） of the BJ-RUCv2.0 model output. 相似文献
13.
Diurnal Variations of Summer Precipitation in the Beijing Area and the Possible Effect of Topography and Urbanization 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
The present study examined the diurnal variations of summer precipitation in the Beijing area by using subdaily precipitation and wind observations. A combined effect of topography and urbanization on the characteristics of diurnal variations was suggested. It was shown that stations located in the plain areaexhibited typical night rain peaks, whereas those in the mountainous area exhibited clear afternoon peaks ofprecipitation diurnal variations. The precipitation peaks were associated with wind fields around the Beijing area, which were found to be highly modulated by mountain-valley circulation and urban-country circulation.The lower-tropospheric wind exhibited a clear diurnal shift in its direction from north at 0800 LST to southat 2000 LST, which reflected mountain-valley circulation. The transitions from valley to mountain windand the opposite generally happened after sunset and sunrise, respectively, and both occurred earlier for thestations located closer to mountains. By comparing the diurnal variations of precipitation at stations in anortheast suburb, an urban area, and a southwest suburb, it was revealed that the northeast suburb grouphad the highest normalized rainfall frequency, but the southwest group had the lowest from late afternoon tolate evening. On the contrary, in the early morning from about 0200 to 1000 LST, the southwest group andurban group had the highest normalized rainfall frequency. This pattern might originate from the combined effects of mountain-valley topography and urbanization. 相似文献
14.
利用北京地区20个国家站1980～2020年的长期逐时降水资料,分析了北京夏季降水的基本气候特征和日变化时空分布特征。结果表明:（1）北京地区夏季40年平均降水量分布具有西北山区小,平原大,山区向平原过渡区的迎风坡最大的特点;降水频率则相反,平原降水频率整体小于山区;降水强度整体表现为西北弱,东部强,城区与南部居中的特点。北京夏季降水的强度和极端性较强,致灾风险高。（2）北京夏季平均降水量日变化主体呈单峰型,降水频次为双峰型,降水强度为多峰型,三者同时在22时（北京时,下同）达到最大,在12时最小。（3）降水的峰值时间随月份依次后推,6月最早,7月次之,8月最晚;峰值雨量7月最大,8月次之,6月最小。（4）降水量、降水频率和降水强度的日峰值空间分布具有较强的一致性,西北山区四站出现在20时以前,其余16站出现在20时及以后。使用K均值聚类算法将20站划分为两个区域,结果显示两个区域的降水量、降水频率和强度的日变化具有完全不同的分布特点。（5）近40年北京地区的降水结构在不断调整,短持续时间降水主导期和长持续时间降水主导期交替出现。2000年以前以小于6小时的短持续性降水为主,近15年大于6小时的长持续性降水明显增多。 相似文献
15.
Areal differences in diurnal variations in summer precipitation over Beijing metropolitan region 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
Using hourly rain-gauge measurements for the period 2004?C2007, differences in diurnal variation in summer (June?CAugust) precipitation are investigated in four distinct areas of Beijing: the urban area (UA), suburban area (SA), north mountainous area (NMA), and south mountainous area (SMA), which are distinguished empirically based on underlying surface conditions and verified with a statistical rotated empirical orthogonal function. The diurnal cycles and spatial patterns in seasonal mean precipitation amount, intensity, and frequency in the four areas are compared. Results show that the four areas have distinct diurnal variation patterns in precipitation amounts, with a single peak observed in UA and NMA in the late afternoon, which are 80?% and 121?% higher than their daily average, respectively, and two peaks in SA during the late afternoon and early morning with magnitudes exceeding the daily mean by 76?% and 29?%, respectively. There are also two peaks in SMA: a weaker nocturnal diurnal peak and an afternoon peak. The minimum amounts of rainfall observed in the forenoon in UA, SA, and SMA are 53?%, 47?%, and 57?% lower than the daily mean in each area, respectively, and that observed in the early morning in NMA is 50?% lower than the daily mean. The diurnal variations in precipitation intensities resemble those for precipitation amount in all four areas, but more intense precipitation is observed in SA (2.4?mm/h) than in UA (2.2?mm/h). The lowest frequency for the whole day is observed in UA, whereas the highest frequency occurs in the mountainous areas in the daytime, especially in the late afternoon in SMA. Diurnal variations in surface air temperature and divergence fields in the four areas are further investigated to interpret the physical mechanisms that underlie the spatial and temporal differences in summer diurnal precipitation, and the results indicate the possible dominance of the local circulation arising from mountain?Cvalley wind and the differences in underlying surface heating between the urban, suburban, and mountainous areas of Beijing. 相似文献
16.
Leticia Hernández-Díaz René Laprise Laxmi Sushama Andrey Martynov Katja Winger Bernard Dugas 《Climate Dynamics》2013,40(5-6):1415-1433
The new fifth-generation Regional Climate Model (CRCM5) was driven by ERA reanalyses for the period 1984–2008 over the African continent following the CORDEX experimental protocol. Overall the model succeeds in reproducing the main features of the geographical distribution and seasonal cycle of temperature and precipitation, the diurnal cycle of precipitation, and the West African Monsoon (WAM). Biases in surface temperature and precipitation are discussed in relation with some circulation defects noted in the simulation. In the African regions near the equator, the model successfully reproduces the double peak of rainfall due to the double passage of the tropical rainbelt, although it better simulates the magnitude and timing of the second peak of precipitation. CRCM5 captures the timing of the monsoon onset for the Sahel region but underestimates the magnitude of precipitation. The simulated diurnal cycle is quite well simulated for all of the regions, but is always somewhat in advance for the timing of rainfall peak. In boreal summer the CRCM5 simulation exhibits a weak cold bias over the Sahara and the maximum temperature is located too far south, resulting in a southward bias in the position of the Saharan Heat Low. The region of maximum ascent in the deep meridional circulation of the Hadley cell is well located in the CRCM5 simulation, but it is somewhat too narrow. The core of the African Easterly Jet is of the right strength and almost at the right height, but it is displayed slightly southward, as a consequence of the southward bias in the position of the Saharan Heat Low and the thermal wind relationship. These biases appear to be germane to the WAM rainfall band being narrower and not moving far enough northward, resulting in a dry bias in the Sahel. 相似文献
17.
Heavy rainfall events often occur in Beijing during summer but rarely in autumn. However,during 3-5 September2015, an exceptionally heavy rainfall event occurred in Beijing. Based on the reanalysis data and the Weather Research and Forecasting(WRF) model simulations, the main contributing factors and the predictability of this heavy rainfall event were examined through comprehensive analyses of vorticity advection and water vapor transport/budget. The results indicate that a "high-in-the-east-low-in-the-west" pattern of 500-hPa geopotential height over the Beijing area played an important role. The 850-hPa low-level jet(LLJ) provided a mechanism for rising motion and transported abundant water vapor into the Beijing area. Two-way nested hindcast experiments using WRF well reproduced the atmospheric circulation and LLJ. Quantitative analysis indicates that the WRF model with the rapid update cycle(RUC) land surface scheme and the single-moment 6-class(WSM6) microphysics scheme exhibited the best skill, and the model performance improved with a higher resolution. Further analysis indicates that the bias in the precipitation forecast was caused by the bias in water vapor transport. 相似文献
18.
19.
Heavy rainfall events often occur in Beijing during summer but rarely in autumn. However, during 3–5 September 2015, an exceptionally heavy rainfall event occurred in Beijing. Based on the reanalysis data and the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model simulations, the main contributing factors and the predictability of this heavy rainfall event were examined through comprehensive analyses of vorticity advection and water vapor transport/ budget. The results indicate that a “high-in-the-east–low-in-the-west” pattern of 500-hPa geopotential height over the Beijing area played an important role. The 850-hPa low-level jet (LLJ) provided a mechanism for rising motion and transported abundant water vapor into the Beijing area. Two-way nested hindcast experiments using WRF well reproduced the atmospheric circulation and LLJ. Quantitative analysis indicates that the WRF model with the rapid update cycle (RUC) land surface scheme and the single-moment 6-class (WSM6) microphysics scheme exhibited the best skill, and the model performance improved with a higher resolution. Further analysis indicates that the bias in the precipitation forecast was caused by the bias in water vapor transport. 相似文献