共查询到18条相似文献，搜索用时 140 毫秒
1.
非齐次隐马尔可夫降尺度方法对江淮流域夏季逐日降水的模拟及其评估 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
引入非齐次隐马尔可夫模型(Nonhomogeneous hidden Markov model,NHMM)统计降尺度方法,利用1961—2002年江淮流域夏季逐日降水资料、欧洲中期天气预报中心(ECMWF)的ERA-40再分析资料建立模型,检验其对东部季风区(以江淮流域为代表)夏季日降水的模拟能力,并对比BCC-CSM1.1(m)模式NHMM降尺度前后的模拟效果。结果表明,NHMM降尺度方法通过建立降水概率分布态间转移参数与大尺度环流变量的联系,对江淮流域逐日降水量具有较好的降尺度效果。模拟的各站日降水量概率分布函数(PDF)曲线与观测非常接近,布赖尔评分(Brier Score,S_B)均小于0.11%,显著性评分(Significance Score,Ss)均大于0.84;夏季总降水量、降水日数、中雨日数、降水强度和95%分位降水量指数的多年平均场偏差百分率绝对值低于10%,前3个指数的空间相关系数高于0.9;该方法对各降水指数的年际变率也有一定的模拟能力,模拟得到的各指数的区域平均年际序列与观测序列的相关系数为0.62—0.87。对BCC-CSM1.1(m)模式的模拟结果进行降尺度后,SB较降尺度前平均减小0.57%,Ss平均增大0.23,皆表明降尺度后的概率分布函数曲线更接近于观测;各降水指数在多数台站的偏差百分率绝对值由大于40%降至10%以内,空间相关系数普遍提高至0.8以上。NHMM降尺度方法能够有效提高BCC-CSM1.1(m)模式对江淮流域夏季日降水的模拟能力,相对气候模式具有显著的"增值",未来可进一步利用该方法进行气候变暖背景下的日降水变化预估。 相似文献
2.
基于统计降尺度模型的江淮流域极端气候的模拟与预估 总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4
利用江淮流域29个代表站点1961--2000年逐日最高温度、最低温度和逐日降水资料,以及NCEP逐日大尺度环流场资料,引入基于多元线性回归与随机天气发生器相结合的统计降尺度模型SDSM（statistical downscalingmodel）,通过对每个站点建模,确立SDSM参数,并将该模型应用于SRESA2排放情景下HadCM3和cGcM3模式,得到了江淮流域各代表台站21世纪的逐日最高、最低温度和降水序列以及热浪、霜冻、强降水等极端气候指数。结果表明,当前气候下,统计降尺度方法模拟的极端温度指数与观测值有很好的一致性,能有效纠正耦合模式的“冷偏差”,如SDSM对江淮平均的冬季最高、最低温度的模拟偏差较CGCM3模式分别减少3℃和4．5℃。对于极端降水则能显著纠正耦合模式模拟的降水强度偏低的问题,如CGCM3对江淮流域夏季降水强度的模拟偏差为-60．6％,但降尺度后SDSM—CGCM3的偏差仅为-6％,说明降尺度模型SDSM的确有“增加值”的作用。21世纪末期在未来SRESA2情景下,对于极端温度,无论Had．CM3还是CGCM3模式驱动统计模型,江淮流域所有代表台站,各个季节的最高、最低温度都显著增加,且以夏季最为显著,增幅在2—4℃;与之相应霜冻天数将大幅减少,热浪天数大幅增多,各站点冬季霜冻天数减少幅度为5—25d,夏季热浪天数增加幅度为4～14d;对于极端降水指数,在两个不同耦合模式HadCM3和CGCM3驱动下的变化尤其是变化幅度的一致性比温度差,但大部分站点各个季节极端强降水事件将增多,强度增强,SDSM—HadCM3和SDSM-CGCM3预估的夏季极端降水贡献率将分别增加26％和27％。 相似文献
3.
利用1961—1990年江淮流域逐日降水资料、NCEP/NCAR再分析资料和HadCM3 SRES A1B情景下模式预估资料,采用典型相关分析统计降尺度方法,评估降尺度模型对当前极端降水指数的模拟能力,并对21世纪中期和末期的极端降水变化进行预估。结果表明：通过降尺度能够有效改善HadCM3对区域气候特征的模拟能力,极端降水指数气候平均态相对误差降低了30%～100%,但降尺度结果仍然在冬季存在湿偏差、夏季存在干偏差;在SRES A1B排放情景下,该区域大部分站点的极端强降水事件将增多,强度增大,极端强降水指数的变化幅度高于平均降水指数,且夏季增幅高于冬季;冬季极端降水贡献率（R95t）在21世纪中期和末期的平均增幅分别为14%和25%,夏季则分别增加24%和32%。 相似文献
4.
百分位统计降尺度方法及在GCMs日降水订正中的应用 总被引：9，自引：0，他引：9
在格点观测的逐日降水量数据基础上,采用百分位统计降尺度方法对全球气候模式(GCM)输出的日降水量进行了订正处理。5种订正方案的比较结果表明,取12个百分位数进行日降水量订正是合理的。观测资料与3个GCMs订正前后全国平均年、季降水量空间分布以及主要流域平均年、月和日降水序列多年平均、变化趋势及概率密度的对比分析表明:(1)统计降尺度处理可在一定程度上降低GCMs模拟的降水量偏差,特别是中国中部、长江以南和东北部分地区,对德国马普研究所的海气耦合模式(MPI/ECHAM5)模拟的降水量订正效果最显著;(2)GCMs统计降尺度处理的降水量季节分布特征与观测更为接近,所有流域MPI/ECHAM5订正的降水量优于或接近直接输出结果;(3)与GCM直接输出的降水相比,部分流域经统计降尺度处理后降水量变化趋势与观测的一致性有所增加,但不明显;(4)当日降水量<30mm时,订正的降水量与观测的偏差明显减小;当日降水量>30mm时,部分流域由负偏差转为正偏差。由于GCMs结构和降尺度方法的局限性,在用于具体流域未来气候变化预估及气候变化影响评估时,应选择尽可能多的、模拟能力强的GCMs数据,以包含尽可能多的模拟气候情景。 相似文献
5.
21世纪前期长江中下游流域极端降水预估及不确定性分析 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
在全球变暖背景下,极端降水的频率、强度以及持续时间均在显著增加,尤其是对于气候变化敏感的长江中下游流域。由于模式本身、温室气体排放情景以及自然变率存在较大的不确定性,因此未来预估变化的不确定性一直备受关注。为了能够得到对于未来极端降水更为准确的预估结果,使用NEX-GDDP（NASA Earth Exchange Global Daily Downscaled Projections）提供的19个CMIP5降尺度高分辨率数据（0.25°×0.25°）,给出21世纪前期（2016—2035年）长江中下游流域极端降水的可能变化。根据长江中下游流域178个气象站1981—2005年的逐日降水量数据,计算了能够代表极端降水不同特征的指数,在评估模拟能力的基础上给出了21世纪前期RCP4.5情景下极端降水的变化。结果表明,降尺度结果对长江中下游流域极端降水有很好的模拟能力,除R90N外,所有模式模拟其余指数的空间结构与观测的相关系数均超过了0.6。其中所有模式模拟PRCPTOT和R10的相关系数均超过0.95。21世纪前期,长江中下游地区降水趋于极端化,尤其是在流域的西部地区。极端降水日数的变化在减少,表明对于极端降水的贡献主要来自于极端降水日的较大日降水量,而非极端降水日数。未来预估不确定性的大值区主要位于流域的南部地区,流域的西部地区不确定性较低,西部地区极端降水的增加应该受到更多的重视。 相似文献
6.
为了提高湖南极端降水的模拟能力,利用转移累计概率分布(CDF-t)统计降尺度方法及基于第5次国际耦合模式比较计划(CMIP5)中的24个耦合模式数据,结合3个极端降水指数,从空间特征和年际变率两方面评估降尺度前后CMIP5模式对湖南极端降水的模拟能力。结果表明,较低空间分辨率的CM IP5气候模式无法细致反映区域极端降水变化特征,且由于各模式结果差异较大,多模式集合的模拟效果差。CDF-t统计降尺度通过建立大尺度变量的CDF与区域尺度相同变量的CDF之间的函数关系,对CMIP5模拟湖南极端降水变化特征有一定的改善能力。就空间结构而言,该方法对于模式模拟大雨日数(R10)和连续5天最大降水量(R5d)的空间结构能力都有很大改善,且模式之间表现出较高的一致性,尤其是R10改善效果最显著,与观测相比,湖南地区空间平均绝对误差达到2. 18天,较降尺度前绝对误差降低了45. 46%。就时间变率而言,该方法对于模式模拟R90P和R5d的时间变率能力都有很大改善,降尺度后IVS值分别由降尺度前的2. 2和1. 5降低至0. 3和0. 6。 相似文献
7.
利用1986—2005年中国地面气象台站观测的格点化逐日降水数据(CN05.1)评估了NASA高分辨率降尺度逐日数据集NEX-GDDP中21个全球气候模式在0.25?(约25 km×25 km)分辨率下对中国极端降水的模拟能力.选取年最大日降水量(RX1D)、年最大5 d降水量(RX5D)、湿日总降水量(PRCPTOT... 相似文献
8.
RSM模式对中国东部夏季降水模拟能力的检验 总被引：4，自引：4，他引：0
本文利用美国国家环境预报中心NCEP(National Centers for Environmental Prediction)区域谱模式RSM(Regional Spectral Model)对中国东部地区夏季降水进行了为期20 a(1984—2003年)、水平分辨率为30 km的高精度模拟,并对模拟所得降水的气候态、年际变率、逐日变化以及极端事件进行了检验,和对造成降水偏差的大气环流特征进行了分析。结果表明RSM模拟所得夏季降水的空间分布、时间变率,以及降水量值都与实况相近,也基本可以再现夏季降水的年际变率分布情况,但是模拟所得的雨带存在偏南且偏弱的特点。对于逐日降水特征,RSM模拟所得季节内逐日降水变化与实况的走势基本一致,再现了夏季降水主要集中于东部和南部的特点,模拟出了江淮地区6月日降水区随时间北抬的特点。对于极端事件,模拟和实测的夏季不同雨强的天数分布对比表明模拟与实况基本接近,但是模拟的降水日大值中心较实况偏北;极端降水指数的计算结果也表明RSM模拟的极端降水情况与实况基本一致。综上,RSM模式对中国东部地区降水有着较好的模拟能力,可以用于中国东部地区的夏季降水气候特征研究。 相似文献
9.
广义线性统计降尺度方法模拟日降水量的应用研究 总被引：3，自引：2，他引：1
利用1960—2010年青藏高原23个台站和长江下游25个台站的日降水量观测资料及NCEP再分析资料,采用广义线性模型的统计降尺度方法模拟台站日降水量,并评估了广义线性模型对日降水量的模拟能力。在建模期(1960—2005年)广义线性模型对日降水量表现出良好的模拟能力,两区域模拟结果与观测值1月平均相关系数0.75左右,7月也均超过0.5。模拟结果大部分台站日降水偏大,但偏大的量值较小;模拟的无降水准确率较高,最高值在高原区域,1月平均达85.2%。检验期(2006—2010年)广义线性模型模拟的日降水与建模期具有较好的一致性。此外,对两区域代表站的分析显示,广义线性模型模拟降水极值和降水0值的效果较好,且较好地还原了主要降水过程。总之,广义线性模型对日降水量的降尺度效果良好,适合应用于气候领域的相关研究。 相似文献
10.
基于6个CMIP6模式的日降水量数据,采用降尺度方法将其统一分辨率到0.25°×0.25°,选取5个极端降水指数从降水气候态、极端性、季节性三个角度对新疆区域1961—2014年历史期降水模拟效果评估。结果表明,降尺度CMIP6模式能较好再现新疆区域降水的空间分布特征,最大年均降水量误差小于30 mm,夏季降水模拟效果最佳相关系数均高于0.8。模式在春秋季对降水的模拟效果差异较小,标准差比值均在1.00 ~ 1.25之间,ACCESS-CM2模拟效果最佳。模式集合均值能模拟出观测降水增多趋势,但低估了降水的年际变率,模拟结果提示新疆80年代的降水转折可能与人类活动有关。在降水极端性和季节性方面,降尺度数据对新疆的极端降水和季节性降水均有较好的模拟性能,降尺度数据对季节性降水的模拟能力（与观测均值误差小于0.001）比原始分辨率的数据（与观测误差大于0.005）效果更好。 相似文献
11.
Projected Climate Change in the Northwestern Arid Regions of China: An Ensemble of Regional Climate Model Simulations 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 The projected temperature and precipitationchange under different emissions scenarios using Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 models over the northwestern arid regions of China(NWAC) were analyzed using the ensemble of three high-resolution dynamical downscaling simulations: the simulation of the Regional Climate Model version 4.0(Reg CM4) forced by the Beijing Climate Center Climate System Model version 1.1(BCC_CSM1.1); the Hadley Centre Global Environmental Model version 3 regional climate model(Had GEM3-RA) forced by the Atmosphere-Ocean coupled Had GEM version 2(Had GEM2-AO); and the Weather Research and Forecasting(WRF) model forced by the Norwegian community Earth System Model(Nor ESM1-M). Model validation indicated that the multimodel simulations reproduce the spatial and temporal distribution of temperature and precipitation well. The temperature is projected to increase over NWAC under both the 4.5 and 8.5 Representative Concentration Pathways scenarios(RCP4.5 and RCP8.5, respectively) in the middle of the 21 st century, but the warming trend is larger under the RCP8.5 scenario. Precipitation shows a significant increasing trend in spring and winter under both RCP4.5 and RCP8.5; but in summer, precipitation is projected to decrease in the Tarim Basin and Junggar Basin. The regional averaged temperature and precipitation show increasing trends in the future over NWAC; meanwhile, the large variability of the winter mean temperature and precipitation may induce more extreme cold events and intense snowfall events in these regions in the future. 相似文献
12.
Emmanouil Flaounas Philippe Drobinski Mathieu Vrac Sophie Bastin Cindy Lebeaupin-Brossier Marc Stéfanon Marco Borga Jean-Christophe Calvet 《Climate Dynamics》2013,40(11-12):2687-2705
This study evaluates how statistical and dynamical downscaling models as well as combined approach perform in retrieving the space–time variability of near-surface temperature and rainfall, as well as their extremes, over the whole Mediterranean region. The dynamical downscaling model used in this study is the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model with varying land-surface models and resolutions (20 and 50 km) and the statistical tool is the Cumulative Distribution Function-transform (CDF-t). To achieve a spatially resolved downscaling over the Mediterranean basin, the European Climate Assessment and Dataset (ECA&D) gridded dataset is used for calibration and evaluation of the downscaling models. In the frame of HyMeX and MED-CORDEX international programs, the downscaling is performed on ERA-I reanalysis over the 1989–2008 period. The results show that despite local calibration, CDF-t produces more accurate spatial variability of near-surface temperature and rainfall with respect to ECA&D than WRF which solves the three-dimensional equation of conservation. This first suggests that at 20–50 km resolutions, these three-dimensional processes only weakly contribute to the local value of temperature and precipitation with respect to local one-dimensional processes. Calibration of CDF-t at each individual grid point is thus sufficient to reproduce accurately the spatial pattern. A second explanation is the use of gridded data such as ECA&D which smoothes in part the horizontal variability after data interpolation and damps the added value of dynamical downscaling. This explains partly the absence of added-value of the 2-stage downscaling approach which combines statistical and dynamical downscaling models. The temporal variability of statistically downscaled temperature and rainfall is finally strongly driven by the temporal variability of its forcing (here ERA-Interim or WRF simulations). CDF-t is thus efficient as a bias correction tool but does not show any added-value regarding the time variability of the downscaled field. Finally, the quality of the reference observation dataset is a key issue. Comparison of CDF-t calibrated with ECA&D dataset and WRF simulations to local measurements from weather stations not assimilated in ECA&D, shows that the temporal variability of the downscaled data with respect to the local observations is closer to the local measurements than to ECA&D data. This highlights the strong added-value of dynamical downscaling which improves the temporal variability of the atmospheric dynamics with regard to the driving model. This article highlights the benefits and inconveniences emerging from the use of both downscaling techniques for climate research. Our goal is to contribute to the discussion on the use of downscaling tools to assess the impact of climate change on regional scales. 相似文献
13.
利用基于BCC-CSM1.1m模式建立的第2代季节预测模式系统1984—2019年历史回算数据,客观评估该模式对1月和4月欧亚积雪覆盖率（snow cover fraction,SCF）气候态和年际变化的预测技巧,分析模式预测偏差产生的可能原因。结果表明:BCC-CSM1.1m模式在超前0~2个月对欧亚大陆SCF具有一定预测技巧,对4月SCF的预测能力明显高于1月,1月预测技巧在欧洲西部地区最高,4月在西西伯利亚地区最高。SCF的预测结果在除青藏高原外的大范围地区表现为系统性偏低,预测偏差在1月随着起报时间的增长没有明显变化,而在4月随着起报时间的增长,关键区偏差由负转正并逐渐增大。分析表明,SCF预测偏差与模式中近地面气温的预测偏差有直接关系。除此之外,SCF的预测偏差部分源于模式本身的系统性偏差,模式分辨率以及参数化方案可能是预测结果在积雪覆盖率接近100%的高纬度地区明显偏低的原因。 相似文献
14.
Uncertainty analysis of statistical downscaling models using Hadley Centre Coupled Model 总被引：2，自引：2，他引：0
S. Samadi Catherine A. M. E. Wilson Hamid Moradkhani 《Theoretical and Applied Climatology》2013,114(3-4):673-690
Regression-based statistical downscaling is a method broadly used to resolve the coarse spatial resolution of general circulation models. Nevertheless, the assessment of uncertainties linked with climatic variables is essential to climate impact studies. This study presents a procedure to characterize the uncertainty in regression-based statistical downscaling of daily precipitation and temperature over a highly vulnerable area (semiarid catchment) in the west of Iran, based on two downscaling models: a statistical downscaling model (SDSM) and an artificial neural network (ANN) model. Biases in mean, variance, and wet/dry spells are estimated for downscaled data using vigorous statistical tests for 30 years of observed and downscaled daily precipitation and temperature data taken from the National Center for Environmental Prediction reanalysis predictors for the years of 1961 to 1990. In the case of daily temperature, uncertainty is estimated by comparing monthly mean and variance of downscaled and observed daily data at a 95 % confidence level. In daily precipitation, downscaling uncertainties were evaluated from comparing monthly mean dry and wet spell lengths and their confidence intervals, cumulative frequency distributions of monthly mean of daily precipitation, and the distributions of monthly wet and dry days for observed and modeled daily precipitation. Results showed that uncertainty in downscaled precipitation is high, but simulation of daily temperature can reproduce extreme events accurately. Finally, this study shows that the SDSM is the most proficient model at reproducing various statistical characteristics of observed data at a 95 % confidence level, while the ANN model is the least capable in this respect. This study attempts to test uncertainties of regression-based statistical downscaling techniques in a semiarid area and therefore contributes to an improvement of the quality of predictions of climate change impact assessment in regions of this type. 相似文献
15.
Joint variable spatial downscaling 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
Joint Variable Spatial Downscaling (JVSD), a new statistical technique for downscaling gridded climatic variables, is developed to generate high resolution gridded datasets for regional watershed modeling and assessments. The proposed approach differs from previous statistical downscaling methods in that multiple climatic variables are downscaled simultaneously and consistently to produce realistic climate projections. In the bias correction step, JVSD uses a differencing process to create stationary joint cumulative frequency statistics of the variables being downscaled. The functional relationship between these statistics and those of the historical observation period is subsequently used to remove GCM bias. The original variables are recovered through summation of bias corrected differenced sequences. In the spatial disaggregation step, JVSD uses a historical analogue approach, with historical analogues identified simultaneously for all atmospheric fields and over all areas of the basin under study. Analysis and comparisons are performed for 20th Century Climate in Coupled Models (20C3M), broadly available for most GCMs. The results show that the proposed downscaling method is able to reproduce the sub-grid climatic features as well as their temporal/spatial variability in the historical periods. Comparisons are also performed for precipitation and temperature with other statistical and dynamic downscaling methods over the southeastern US and show that JVSD performs favorably. The downscaled sequences are used to assess the implications of GCM scenarios for the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint river basin as part of a comprehensive climate change impact assessment. 相似文献
16.
Statistical downscaling is a technique widely used to overcome the spatial resolution problem of General Circulation Models (GCMs). Nevertheless, the evaluation of uncertainties linked with downscaled temperature and precipitation variables is essential to climate impact studies. This paper shows the potential of a statistical downscaling technique (in this case SDSM) using predictors from three different GCMs (GCGM3, GFDL and MRI) over a highly heterogeneous area in the central Andes. Biases in median and variance are estimated for downscaled temperature and precipitation using robust statistical tests, respectively Mann?CWhitney and Brown?CForsythe's tests. In addition, the ability of the downscaled variables to reproduce extreme events is tested using a frequency analysis. Results show that uncertainties in downscaled precipitations are high and that simulated precipitation variables failed to reproduce extreme events accurately. Nevertheless, a greater confidence remains in downscaled temperatures variables for the area. GCMs performed differently for temperature and precipitation as well as for the different test. In general, this study shows that statistical downscaling is able to simulate with accuracy temperature variables. More inhomogeneities are detected for precipitation variables. This first attempt to test uncertainties of statistical downscaling techniques in the heterogeneous arid central Andes contributes therefore to an improvement of the quality of predictions of climate impact studies in this area. 相似文献
17.
Jack Katzfey Kim Nguyen John McGregor Peter Hoffmann Suppiah Ramasamy Hiep Van Nguyen Mai Van Khiem Thang Van Nguyen Kien Ba Truong Thang Van Vu Hien Thuan Nguyen Tran Thuc Doan Ha Phong Bang Thanh Nguyen Tan Phan-Van Trung Nguyen-Quang Thanh Ngo-Duc Long Trinh-Tuan 《Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences》2016,52(2):91-106
To assist the government of Vietnam in its efforts to better understand the impacts of climate change and prioritise its adaptation measures, dynamically downscaled climate change projections were produced across Vietnam. Two Regional Climate Models (RCMs) were used: CSIRO’s variable-resolution Conformal-Cubic Atmospheric Model (CCAM) and the limited-area model Regional Climate Model system version 4.2 (RegCM4.2). First, global CCAM simulations were completed using bias- and variance-corrected sea surface temperatures as well as sea ice concentrations from six Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) global climate models. This approach is different from other downscaling approaches as it does not use any atmospheric fields from the GCMs. The global CCAM simulations were then further downscaled to 10 km using CCAM and to 20 km using RegCM4.2. Evaluations of temperature and precipitation for the current climate (1980-2000) were completed using station data as well as various gridded observational datasets. The RCMs were able to reproduce reasonably well most of the important characteristics of observed spatial patterns and annual cycles of temperature. Average and minimum temperatures were well simulated (biases generally less than 1oC), while maximum temperatures had biases of around 1oC. For precipitation, although the RCMs captured the annual cycle, RegCM4.2 was too dry in Oct.-Nov. (-60% bias), while CCAM was too wet in Dec.- Mar. (130% bias). Both models were too dry in summer and too wet in winter (especially in northern Vietnam). The ability of the ensemble simulations to capture current climate increases confidence in the simulations of future climate. 相似文献
18.
Haiqin Li Masao Kanamitsu Song-You Hong Kei Yoshimura Daniel R. Cayan Vasubandhu Misra Liqiang Sun 《Climatic change》2014,122(4):609-619
This study examines a future climate change scenario over California in a 10-km coupled regional downscaling system of the Regional Spectral Model for the atmosphere and the Regional Ocean Modeling System for the ocean forced by the global Community Climate System Model version 3.0 (CCSM3). In summer, the coupled and uncoupled downscaled experiments capture the warming trend of surface air temperature, consistent with the driving CCSM3 forcing. However, the surface warming change along the California coast is weaker in the coupled downscaled experiment than it is in the uncoupled downscaling. Atmospheric cooling due to upwelling along the coast commonly appears in both the present and future climates, but the effect of upwelling is not fully compensated for by the projected large-scale warming in the coupled downscaling experiment. The projected change of extreme warm events is quite different between the coupled and uncoupled downscaling experiments, with the former projecting a more moderate change. The projected future change in precipitation is not significantly different between coupled and uncoupled downscaling. Both the coupled and uncoupled downscaling integrations predict increased onshore sea breeze change in summer daytime and reduced offshore land breeze change in summer nighttime along the coast from the Bay area to Point Conception. Compared to the simulation of present climate, the coupled and uncoupled downscaling experiments predict 17.5 % and 27.5 % fewer Catalina eddy hours in future climate respectively. 相似文献