共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
2.
Iran is a mosaic of Ediacaran–Cambrian (Cadomian; 520–600 Ma) blocks, stitched together by Paleozoic and Mesozoic ophiolites. In this paper we summarize the Paleozoic ophiolites of Iran for the international geoscientific audience including field, chemical and geochronological data from the literature and our own unpublished data. We focus on the five best known examples of Middle to Late Paleozoic ophiolites which are remnants of Paleotethys, aligned in two main zones in northern Iran: Aghdarband, Mashhad and Rasht in the north and Jandagh–Anarak and Takab ophiolites to the south. Paleozoic ophiolites were emplaced when N-directed subduction resulted in collision of Gondwana fragment “Cimmeria” with Eurasia in Permo-Triassic time. Paleozoic ophiolites show both SSZ- and MORB-type mineralogical and geochemical signatures, perhaps reflecting formation in a marginal basin. Paleozoic ophiolites of Iran suggest a progression from oceanic crust formation above a subduction zone in Devonian time to accretionary convergence in Permian time. The Iranian Paleozoic ophiolites along with those of the Caucausus and Turkey in the west and Afghanistan, Turkmenistan and Tibet to the east, define a series of diachronous subduction-related marginal basins active from at least Early Devonian to Late Permian time. 相似文献
3.
北祁连早古生代洋盆是裂陷槽还是大洋盆,是一个有争论的问题。文中讨论了蛇绿岩中保存的代表大洋盆存在的印记。认为被夹持于华北地块和柴达木地块之间的北祁连早古生代造山带属于板块增生杂岩带,是由海洋岩石圈残片、消减杂岩、岛弧增生楔等组成的(或许还包括一部分残留陆块).指出北祁连蛇绿岩属于科迪勒拉型,暗示北祁连在早古生代时可能曾经是一个规模较大的洋盆,而非裂陷槽。华北地块和柴达木地块的规模很小,只不过是浩瀚海洋中散布的微小陆块而已。 相似文献
4.
5.
L.E. Ricou J. Dercourt J. Geyssant C. Grandjacquet C. Lepvrier B. Biju-Duval 《Tectonophysics》1986,123(1-4)
The geological data on the Mediterranean chains and basins are used to point out the constraints that they put on the location through time of oceanic versus continental lithosphere and on the successive relations between them. Emphasis is put on the rules and conventions which enable us to interpret the geological data in terms of plate tectonics and on the major disputed points for which a solution must be chosen.In the first part, the location of oceanic versus continental lithosphere is dealt with, using the data on the present-day basins, the ophiolites and the subduction processes. A Neogene age is retained for the Western Mediterranean and the surrounding continental blocks are considered to have been previously a part of Iberia. A Cretaceous age is retained for the Eastern Mediterranean; Apulia is considered as a part of the African plate except for this period. The Black Sea is considered as a back-arc basin formed mostly during the Upper Cretaceous. The ophiolites are used to locate the Mesozoic oceans; for the double ophiolitic belts of the Dinaro-Hellenides and the Taurides, the tectonic interpretations which minimise the number of oceanic basins have been retained. For the Kirsehir block of Turkey, the chosen solution locates a Jurassic ocean to the north and makes it disappear when a Cretaceous ocean opens to the south. Data on the subduction processes added to the information on these basins and led us to consider as oceanic the unknown basements of the Carpathian flysch and the Maghrebian flysch basins.The second part deals with the organisation of basins and platforms, emphasising the chronology of their formation and subsequent crushing. It furnished step by step constraints on the tectonic history of the system which is related to plate displacement.The general pattern derived from these data shows a wedge-shaped Tethyan ocean which disappeared mostly through repeated subduction below the eastern part of its northern margin. The Jurassic stage shows westward extension of the ocean between the Eurasian and African plates and ends with the Dinaro-Hellenic obduction; the Cretaceous stage shows a complete reorganisation including individual displacement of the Iberian, Apulian and Kirsehir sub-plates; the Tertiary stage shows the general collision between the renewed Eurasian and African plates and Neogene subduction of the basins which avoided collision. 相似文献
6.
An Early Aged Ophiolite in the Western Kunlun Mts., NW Tibetan Plateau and Its Tectonic Implications
XIAO Xuchang WANG Jun SU Li JI Wenhua SONG Shuguang Institute of Geology Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences Beijing Geological Lab Center China University of Geosciences 《《地质学报》英文版》2005,79(6):778-786
1 Introduction The Kuda ophiolite occurred in the western Kunlun Mountains, which lies about the intersection of longitude 77°10′ E and latitude 36°45′ N (Figs. 1, 2). The upper portion of the ophiolite mainly consists of a thick layer of basaltic pillow lavas, which was well exposed along the high way from Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region to the western Tibetan Plateau, and the middle-lower part, the mafic-ultramafic cumulates and upper mantle rocks occur at the top of the mountain n… 相似文献
7.
Geodynamic evolution of ophiolites from Albania and Greece (Dinaric-Hellenic belt): one, two, or more oceanic basins? 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
Valerio Bortolotti Marco Chiari Michele Marroni Luca Pandolfi Gianfranco Principi Emilio Saccani 《International Journal of Earth Sciences》2013,102(3):783-811
All the geological constraints for an exhaustive reconstruction of the Triassic to Tertiary tectonic history of the southern Dinaric-Hellenic belt can be found in Albania and Greece. This article aims to schematically reconstruct this long tectonic evolution primarily based on a detailed analysis of the tectonic setting, the stratigraphy, the geochemistry, and the age of the ophiolites. In contrast to what was previously reported in the literature, we propose a new subdivision on a regional scale of the ophiolite complexes cropping out in Albania and Greece. This new subdivision includes six types of ophiolite occurrences, each corresponding to different tectonic units derived from a single obducted sheet. These units are represented by: (1) sub-ophiolite mélange, (2) Triassic ocean-floor ophiolites, (3) metamorphic soles, (4) Jurassic fore-arc ophiolites, (5) Jurassic intra-oceanic-arc ophiolites, and (6) Jurassic back-arc basin ophiolites. The overall features of these ophiolites are coherent with the existence of a single, though composite, oceanic basin located east of the Adria/Pelagonian continental margin. This oceanic basin was originated during the Middle Triassic and was subsequently (Early Jurassic) affected by an east-dipping intra-oceanic subduction. This subduction was responsible for the birth of intra-oceanic-arc and back-arc oceanic basins separated by a continental volcanic arc during the Early to Middle Jurassic. From the uppermost Middle Jurassic to the Early Cretaceous, an obduction developed, during which the ophiolites were thrust westwards firstly onto the neighboring oceanic lithosphere and then onto the Adria margin. 相似文献
8.
Island arc elements and arc-related ophiolites 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
Evan C. Leitch 《Tectonophysics》1984,106(3-4)
All major structural elements in island arc systems, fore-arc, magmatic arc, back-arc basins and remnant arcs, are potential ophiolite sources, and those features that allegedly characterise ophiolites of ocean-ridge origin, sheeted dyke complexes, mantling pelagic rocks, hydrothermal metamorphism and associated mineralization, can also arise within arc settings. Age relations are critical in the interpretation of arc-related ophiolites. Remnants of oceanic lithosphere, identified by a pre-arc initiation age, are restricted to fore-arc, magmatic arc and remnant arc elements, as are ophiolite masses generated at the inception of underthrusting. The latter, apparently common in ancient fore-arc terrains, form in nascent arc systems in which the rate of role back of the subduction hinge exceeds the rate of convergence. Spreading occurs above a foundering slab resulting in some arc-like compositional features. In simple arc systems later ophiolitic rocks have formed either in the active back-arc basin or the magmatic arc. Only those ophiolites that have resided within or very close behind magmatic arcs should show calcalkaline or arc tholeiite magmatic affinities, or be intruded or overlain by these rocks. Volcanic-derived sediment or pelagic material may mantle ophiolites from all arc settings, but pelagic rocks will generally dominate in stratigraphic sequences above remnant arcs and on back-arc basin floors except adjacent to the magmatic arc. Ophiolites generated at major ocean ridges are unlikely to be immediately overlain by sediment with a significant volcanic component whereas such detritus may lie directly on arc-inception, arc and back-arc ophiolites. Some arc-derived ophiolites are preserved in their original tectonic position, others can be identified from their internal features, their relationship to other tectonic elements, and the nature of associated rocks. 相似文献
9.
10.
中国西北是古亚洲构造域和特提斯构造域共同作用的地区，南华纪—古生代时期经历了复杂的洋-陆演化过程，诸陆（地）块于三叠纪基本拼贴就位，奠定了中生代以来陆内盆山演化的基础。但对于西北地区南华纪—古生代时期古亚洲洋盆最终关闭的时限、位置，以及秦祁昆古生代造山带属于特提斯构造域还是古亚洲构造域等重大区域地质问题目前仍存在较大争议。文章在最新地质填图的基础上，通过对沉积建造、岩浆建造、变质变形等的综合分析，将西北地区南华纪—古生代的构造单元厘定为3个洋板块、4个弧盆系和2个陆（地）块群等9个二级、46个三级和112个四级构造单元，力图刻画消失的大洋盆地的残留组成和诸陆（地）块的边缘增生结构。结合古地磁、生物古地理研究成果，恢复了古生代不同时期西北洋-陆系统在全球的位置，讨论了洋盆消减、诸陆（地）块拼贴的过程。 相似文献
11.
LIU Xun YAO Peiyi FU Derong Institute of Geology Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences Beijing China 《Continental Dynamics》1999,(1)
１．ＩｎｔｒｏｄｕｃｔｉｏｎＡｎｉｍｐｏｒｔａｎｔａｓｐｅｃｔｏｆｔｈｅｓｔｕｄｙｏｆｔｈｅＧＧＴ（ｉ．ｅ．ＧｌｏｂａｌＧｅｏｓｃｉｅｎｃｅＴｒａｎｓｅｃｔ）ｉｓｔｏｒｅｃｏｎｓｔｒｕｃｔｔｈｅｈｉｓｔｏｒｙｏｆｔｈｅｔｅｒｒａｎｅｓｔｈａｔｔｈｅＧＧＴｒｕｎｓａｃｒｏｓｓ（Ｍｏｎｇｅｒｅｔａｌ．,１９８５）．Ｂｅｃａｕｓｅｔｈｅｓｅｄｉｍｅｎｔｓａｒｅｔｈｅｐｒｏｄｕｃｔｓｏｆｖａｒｉｏｕｓｇｅｏｌｏｇｉｃａｌｅｆｆｅｃｔｓｉｎｔｈｅｇｅｏｌｏｇｉｃａｌｈｉｓｔｏｒｙ,ｗｅｃａｎｒｅｃｏｎｓｔ… 相似文献
12.
贺西地区晚古生代早中期同沉积断层的发现及其意义 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
贺西地区处于北祁连加里东褶皱带、阿拉善地块与鄂尔多斯地块的交汇处,该区晚古生代早中期处于早古生代洋盆体制与中生代陆内盆地发育期的转换时期,其盆地性质及成因争议颇多。在贺兰山地区工作中,作者发现晚泥盆世、早石炭世同沉积断层,并详细追踪了上泥盆统、下石炭统与上下地层的接触关系;结合野外相关地质现象及前人的区域地质研究成果,对贺西地区晚古生代早期盆地的性质及其成因进行了讨论,认为该期盆地既非碰撞裂谷,也非前陆盆地,而是造山后伸展型上叠盆地,同时认为该伸展盆地的形成与古特提斯洋打开呈现同步性,具有一定的区域地质意义。 相似文献
13.
东天山古生代板块构造特点及其演化模式 总被引：20，自引：0，他引：20
东天山的古板块构造格局主要由塔里木陆壳板块、西伯利亚陆壳板块和哈萨克斯坦洋壳板块在古生代的活动所奠定的。在古生代，东天山的板块构造格局主要表现为多列岛弧及其间弧间盆地和弧后盆地的形式。自北而南依次发育：博格达－哈尔里克泥盆－石炭纪岛弧，吐哈弧间盆地，觉罗塔格泥盆－石炭纪岛弧，吐哈弧间盆地，觉罗塔格泥盆－石炭纪岛弧，中天山志留－石炭纪岛弧，南天山－红柳河弧后盆地和北山陆缘裂谷带。其主要成因是由于准噶尔洋壳板块向塔里木陆壳板块下俯冲，俯冲带不断后退所形成的。奥陶纪中后期，中天山由塔里木北缘分出，形成具有古老陆块基底的类似于现今日本列岛的中天山岛弧。在其后形成南天山－红柳河弧后盆地和北山陆缘裂谷带。泥盆纪早期，俯冲带后退至觉罗塔格北侧形成觉罗塔格岛弧。泥盆纪晚期，俯冲带后退至博格达－哈尔里克北缘，形成博格达－哈尔里克岛弧。中石炭世至早二叠世，博格达同准噶尔陆块碰撞造山，哈尔里克同麦钦乌拉岛弧碰撞造山。与此同时，南天山－红柳河弧后盆地和北山裂谷带也相继闭合，而吐哈弧间盆地则成为未被消减完的弧间盆地残留下来。东天山古生代板块演化可与现今印度尼西亚地区的板块演化相类比。 相似文献
14.
Suturing of the Proto- and Paleo-Tethys oceans in the western Kunlun (Xinjiang, China) 总被引：16，自引：0，他引：16
The Proto-Tethys Ocean between the North and South Kunlun began to form during the Sinian. Remnants of this ocean are preserved at the Oytag-Kudi suture. The presence of Paleozoic arc batholiths in the northern South Kunlun and their absence in the North Kunlun indicates southward subduction of the Proto-Tethys Ocean beneath the South Kunlun. Opposite subduction polarity can be demonstrated for the Late Paleozoic to mid-Mesozoic when the southerly located Paleo-Tethys Ocean was consumed beneath the South Kunlun and generated a Late Carboniferous to mid-Jurassic magmatic arc in the southern South Kunlun. Arc magmatism affected the southern South Kunlun and the large Kara-Kunlun accretionary prism (a suture sensu lato) which formed as a result of Paleo-Tethys’ consumption. The dextral shear sense of ductile faults which are located at the margins of the arc batholiths, and which parallel the South Kunlun/Kara-Kunlun boundary, suggests oblique plate convergence with a dextral component. Different lines of evidence encourage us to interpret the Proto-Tethys ophiolites of the Oytag-Kudi zone as at least partly derived from an oceanic back-arc basin. In contrast, we assume that Paleo-Tethys was a large ocean basin which was eliminated directly at the southern margin of the South Kunlun where no oceanic back-arc region existed. 相似文献
15.
S. A. Palandzhyan 《Geotectonics》2007,41(6):487-500
The specific features of the oceanic lithosphere (the petrography, the mineral composition, and the petrochemistry of igneous rocks and restites) that indicate its formation at different spreading rates, from the extremely slow to fast, are considered. This evidence may be used for solution of the inverse problem of estimating, at least qualitatively, the rate of paleospreading from the structure and composition of rocks pertaining to the ophiolitic association. The use of petrochemical data as the criteria of paleospreading rate is limited. The anomalous composition and structure of the oceanic crust may be due to factors unrelated to the spreading rate. The well-studied cases of ophiolites interpreted as fragments of the ancient oceanic lithosphere formed under conditions of fast, slow, and extremely slow spreading rates are discussed. It is concluded tentatively that the fast spreading is typical of the ophiolites obducted on passive margins (the Periarabian, Uralian, and Appalachian-Caledonian belts) as fragments of ensimatic suprasubduction basins formed at the final stages of the evolution of paleooceans (Tethys and Iapetus). Ophiolites as products of slow spreading are commonly localized in accretionary (subduction-related) orogens at the present-day and older active continental margins. 相似文献
16.
北祁连蛇绿岩的特征、形成环境及其构造意义 总被引：58，自引：1，他引：58
文中总结了北祁连蛇绿岩的特征，指出北祁连蛇绿岩大多具有ＭＯＲＢ的性质，有玻安岩产出，形成在弧后和岛弧环境。北祁连蛇绿岩大多侵位在岛弧增生楔或活动陆缘地体之上，蛇绿岩属于科迪勒拉型，早古生代的北祁连造山带属于科迪勒拉型造山带。部分蛇绿岩之上整合产出一套沉积－火山岩系，称为蛇绿岩的上覆岩系。指出蛇绿岩及其上覆岩系的枕状熔岩分别来自不同的源区，具有不同的构造意义。还讨论了北祁连早古生代板块构造格局，认为北祁连洋盆属于古亚洲洋的一部分，可能曾经是一个较大规模的洋盆。献中通常把它当成增生或俯冲杂岩带的一部分来看待〔１３，１６－１７〕；大岔大坂蛇绿岩带，其向两侧的延伸情况不清楚；九个泉（或塔墩沟）蛇绿岩带，向东可连到景泰县老虎山蛇绿岩，有人认为，向西可与榆树沟蛇绿岩相连〔２０〕。早先认为，北祁连存在新元古代、中寒武和早－中奥陶世三个时代的蛇绿岩〔２，１１〕，经过多年研究，目前大多数同意蛇绿岩主要是晚寒武－奥陶纪的〔１３，１６〕。图１北祁连早古生代蛇绿岩分布图１．前寒武纪基底；２．俯冲杂岩带；３．蛇绿岩。图中数字：１．九个泉；２．大岔大坂；３．边马沟；４．玉石沟；５．小八宝；６．百经寺；７．老虎山；８．榆树沟山２北祁连几 相似文献
17.
北补连蛇绿岩的特征,形成环境及其构造意义 总被引：23，自引：4，他引：23
文中总结了北祁连蛇绿岩的特征，指出北祁连蛇绿岩大多具有ＭＯＲＢ的性质，有玻安岩产生，形成在弧后和岛弧环境，北祁连蛇绿岩大多侵位在岛弧增生楔或活动陆缘地体之上，蛇绿岩属于科迪勒拉型，早古生代的北祁连造山带属于科迪勒拉型造山带，部分蛇绿岩之上整合产出一套沉积一火山岩系，称为蛇绿岩的上覆岩系，指出蛇绿岩及其上覆岩系的枕状熔岩分别来自不同的源区，具有不同的构造意义，还讨论了北祁连早古生代板块构造格局，认为 相似文献
18.
盆地和造山带之间的关系是当前大陆动力学探索的热门和前沿思想的生长点。大陆构造上最突出的和最基本的构造单元：一是盆地系统；二是造山带系统。这两个系统是地壳时空演化的一对孪生体。沉积盆地系统是把堆积空间和各类物源区作为一个有机的整体体系。盆地是地壳构造运动的产物，是地球动力学的响应，而盆地的发生和发展又与造山带是相辅相成的。盆地的性质、类型、演化和盆地性质转换的动力学分析，通过火山岩的性质、蛇绿岩和混染堆积或者是岛弧带的走向等判断，这些信息无疑是重要的因素。沉积地质学的发展所赋予新的研究内容是：通过不同物源堆积体的相互关系可以反馈盆地地球动力学性质和盆山转换的信息，盆地边界的构造要素、不同物源的充填堆积物的生长序列、堆积物的几何形态及其叠置关系等也具有与蛇绿岩同等的重要性。造山带是地壳构造活动和动力转换的记录，它代表陆块间的相互运动、消失的大洋、消失的陆块和大陆边缘盆地，所以造山带就是消失的大洋系统和消失的盆地系统，即盆地转为山系。这种“盆山转换”的耦合关系是当代沉积地质学和大地构造学交叉的前沿。本文提出“盆山转换”的新思路和研究的内涵，并讨论这一理论、方法的基本观点和思路：“板块构造控盆、盆转山和山控盆”。 相似文献
19.
20.
班公湖-怒江洋形成演化新视角:兼论西藏中部古-新特提斯转换 总被引：8，自引：7，他引：1
班公湖-怒江洋的形成演化是认识班公湖-怒江成矿带成矿地质背景的关键,近几年中国地质调查局在青藏高原部署了大量1∶50000区域地质调查工作,取得了很多重要发现。对班公湖-怒江结合带两侧关键性海陆沉积地层对比研究,认为南羌塘地块与拉萨地块晚古生代-晚三叠世地层沉积特征及岩石组合基本一致,二者在班公湖-怒江中生代洋盆形成以前是一个整体,为冈瓦纳大陆北缘被动陆缘环境。班公湖-怒江洋在早中侏罗世裂解形成,至中侏罗世趋于稳定且范围最大;向北俯冲消减作用始于中晚侏罗世,晚侏罗世-早白垩世演化为残留海,早白垩世中晚期出现短暂的裂解,致使海水重新灌入;晚白垩世班公湖-怒江洋盆进入闭合后的隆升造山阶段,发生了残留盆地迁移,形成了磨拉石建造。班公湖-怒江洋类似古加勒比海(现今墨西哥湾地区)的形成机制,并与大西洋、太平洋的形成过程关系密切。对于班公湖-怒江洋的闭合和冈底斯弧的形成,本文提出了另一种可能解释,即,新特提斯洋向北俯冲下,岩浆弧逐步南迁,在弧后形成了一系列伸展性质的弧后盆地,两者组成微陆块由北向南逐渐增生形成了现今的拉萨地体,持续向北俯冲也导致了班公湖-怒江洋最终闭合。 相似文献