共查询到18条相似文献，搜索用时 234 毫秒
1.
成层竖向排水井地基固结分析 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
实际工程中竖井地基具有成层性,有时竖井也并未完全打穿软土层。在竖井打设区满足竖井等应变固结理论、下卧层满足一维太沙基固结理论假设的基础上,将现有竖井地基固结理论推广到成层未打穿竖井地基情况。利用边界条件和竖直向连续条件,确定该系统的正交关系,并给出了其固结解答,该解具有广泛的适用性。通过对竖井打设区和下卧层层数的变化,即可获得现有关于简单未打穿竖井地基的固结解答。将该解答编制成应用程序,对一算例进行了分析。结果表明,平均固结度按孔压定义和按变形定义是不相同的,硬表层的存在会加快其下土层的固结。 相似文献
2.
3.
4.
循环荷载下黏弹性饱和土层的一维固结 总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4
针对单层黏弹性地基Merchant模型,运用Laplace变换,求得频域内单层黏弹性地基的一维固结解。通过Laplace逆变换,计算了单层黏弹性地基在任意循环荷载下的有效应力及平均固结度。此外,结合工程实例,研究了Merchant模型各参数对循环荷载下黏弹性地基固结的影响。结果表明,在黏弹性地基的固结过程中,有效应力和沉降的发展速率是不一致的,黏壶的存在使地基固结初期的有效应力增长加快,而使固结后期的有效应力增长减慢,同时使变形的发展滞后于有效应力的发展。研究结果亦表明,循环荷载下土体的固结对独立弹簧模量的变化要比Kelvin体中弹簧模量的变化敏感。 相似文献
5.
6.
根据浙江沿海地区滩涂围垦中的淤泥基础海堤工程设计经验,认为软土工程中竖井地基固结计算需考虑井阻随时间的影响,基于竖井渗透系数随时间指数衰减关系假定,利用竖井地基径向固结理论和等应变假设,并考虑多级线性加载及循环荷载等复杂荷载作用,重新推导了考虑井阻非线性影响下竖井地基固结解析解,通过与TANG X W等(2000)、Zhu G等（2004）恒定井阻地基固结理论的对比,验证了本文理论的正确性。根据本文理论,通过对比分析,认为线性加载时间越长,竖井地基前期固结速率越慢,与骤加恒载工况差异越显著。在循环荷载作用下,地基固结速率一般介于荷载最大值和荷载最小值的恒载情况之间;且固结度随外荷载的波动而相应地滞后性震荡,竖井渗透系数衰减越快,其震荡越明显,最终趋向于稳定震荡。 相似文献
7.
未打穿散体材料桩复合地基固结简化解研究 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
利用平均固结度普遍解,将未打穿散体材料桩复合地基转化为等效双层地基,推导出未打穿散体材料桩复合地基固结简化解,给出其平均固结度计算简化公式。根据简化解、现有解和有限单元法编制程序,绘制考虑贯入比、桩体渗透系数、土体扰动区渗透系数和土体扰动区影响因子等因素对固结的影响曲线图,分析了各因素对未打穿散体材料桩复合地基固结性状的影响,并对3种计算方法所求出的平均固结度进行了比较研究,进而探讨了简化解的适用性。研究结果表明,无论是在单面排水还是在双面排水条件下,简化解求出的平均固结度总体上是介于现有解和有限单元法二者之间,尤其在固结过程的“中后期”（即固结度≥50%时）。从实用角度来看,简化解的计算结果具有足够精度,且简便、实用;在各种影响因素中,散体材料桩长度和桩体渗透系数对固结过程的影响最大。 相似文献
8.
9.
10.
为探讨未打穿砂井地基的固结特性,基于三维固结理论和叠加原理,考虑变荷载条件,将砂井打设区和下卧层土体的固结均视为三维问题,分别导出了单级线性加载条件下砂井打设区和下卧层土体的固结度解析解,由此给出了地基整体的平均固结度计算式,并引入fzero函数基于Matlab编制了相应的计算程序。算例对比分析结果表明,受加载历时影响,砂井打设区和下卧层土体的固结度都较瞬时加载有所减小,且减幅随加载历时延长而增大。同时,将下卧层土体的固结视为三维要比一维更能合理考虑径向渗流,使得地基固结度计算值与模型试验推算值吻合较好 相似文献
11.
在软基处理工程中,经常出现竖井打设变密而地基固结效率降低的现象。鉴于此,建立了重叠涂抹区内土体水平向渗透系数的分布函数,给出了涂抹区重叠时竖井地基超静孔压和平均固结度的解析解。通过分析不同工况下竖井地基固结度随竖井间距的变化情况,探究了竖井间距减小而地基固结效率不增反减的成因。最后,探讨了涂抹作用和井阻作用对竖井最小临界间距的影响。结果表明：相邻竖井涂抹区重叠是竖井地基中出现竖井最小临界间距的根本原因。涂抹作用越大,则竖井最小临界间距越大;具体表现为当地基扰动程度增大时或涂抹区半径增大时,竖井最小临界间距随之增大。井阻作用越大,则竖井最小临界间距越小;具体表现为当竖井渗透系数减小时、竖井长度增大时或竖井半径减小时,竖井最小临界间距随之减小。 相似文献
12.
The coefficient of consolidation is one of the most important parameters that control the rate of consolidation. Conventional consolidation theories assume that the coefficient of consolidation is constant during the whole consolidation process. In the case of sensitive clay, the coefficient of consolidation is strongly dependent on the level of effective stress of clay. With the dissipation of pore water pressure and the increase of effective stress, the soil structure of the upper subsoil is gradually destroyed downwards and its coefficient of consolidation becomes smaller. At the same time, the coefficient of permeability of the vertical drains drops down because of the kinking or bending effect. The destructured upper subsoil and the kinking of the vertical drain hinder the dissipation of the pore pressure in the lower subsoil. This paper presents a model to describe the above important phenomena during the consolidation of sensitive clay with vertical drain. The solution for proposed model can be obtained by extending the closed‐form solution of the consolidation of double‐layered ground with vertical drain by the interactive method introducing the concept of the moving boundary and the reduction of discharge capacity of vertical drain. The numerical results obtained from the finite element method package PLAXIS (Ver. 7.2) are adopted to compare those obtained from the present algorithm. Moreover, the rationality of the moving boundary is explained by the distributions of the excess pore water pressure in natural soil zone along the radial direction. Wenzhou airport project is taken as a case study in this paper. The results for the sensitive soil with decaying sand drain agree very well with the in situ measured data. The calculated results can properly explain two general phenomena observed in the consolidation of soft sensitive soil ground with vertical drains: one is that the time to achieve the same consolidation degree is much longer under heavy loading than that under light loading; the other is that the consolidation speed is much slower in the lower subsoil than in the upper subsoil. Finally, it is indicated that the vertical drains can decrease the hindrance effect of the destructured subsoil. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 相似文献
13.
A new simplified Hypothesis B method for calculating the consolidation settlement of ground improved by vertical drains 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 Vertical drains are widely used in soft ground improvements to accelerate the consolidation process. This paper develops a new simplified Hypothesis B method for calculating the consolidation settlement of a soil layer improved by vertical drains under the instant and ramp loadings. As a comparison, the traditional Hypothesis A method is also used to calculate the settlement. Then, a fully coupled finite element consolidation analysis is utilized to examine and verify this simplified method and Hypothesis A method. For the instant loading, Carrillo‐Barron method and Zhu‐Yin method are used to obtain the average degree of consolidation for vertical drain system. Typical parameters, such as over‐consolidation ratio (OCR), smear zone, and space ratio of vertical drains, are considered. It is found that the calculation results from the new simplified method in this study agree well with finite element simulations, and relative errors are in the range of 0.1% to 12.3%. Comparatively, there are obvious differences between the calculated results from Hypothesis A method and finite element results. Carrillo‐Olson method and Zhu‐Yin method are utilized to obtain the average degree of consolidation for the vertical drain system to consider the ramp loading. Equivalent time is determined from half of the construction period to calculate the creep compression under the ramp loading. The accuracy of this simplified Hypothesis B method using both Carrillo‐Olson method and Zhu‐Yin method is acceptable with the relative errors less than 9.4%. 相似文献
14.
一种竖井地基竖墙化等效计算方法 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
考虑井阻作用,推导了等应变条件下竖墙地基水平向固结解析解,并与等应变条件下的竖井地基径向固结解析解进行比较,得到竖墙地基平面应变问题和竖井地基轴对称问题之间的等效方法。该方法转换公式简单,且能保证两种情形下同一深度处平均孔压在任一时刻相等,确保了转换为平面应变有限元分析的准确性。 相似文献
15.
This paper presents a general solution to the consolidation system of viscoelastic soil by vertical drains incorporating a fractional-derivative model and arbitrary time-dependent loading. The fractional-derivative Merchant model is introduced to describe the viscoelastic behavior of saturated soil around the vertical drains. Based on this model, the governing partial differential equation of a consolidation system incorporating vertical and horizontal drainage is obtained for the equal strain condition. Then, a general solution to the consolidation system involving arbitrary time-dependent loading is derived using the Laplace transform technique and eigenfunction expansion method. Further, two comparisons are presented to verify the exactness of the proposed solution, and the consolidation behavior involving four time-dependent loadings is illustrated and discussed. 相似文献
16.
软土固结过程中展现出明显的非线性压缩和渗透特性,同时竖井的淤堵效应常导致井阻在固结过程中随深度和时间不断演化,但目前能考虑井阻随时空演化的竖井地基非线性固结解析解还很鲜见。通过引入孔隙比与有效应力及孔隙比与渗透系数间的半对数模型描述了土体的非线性固结特性,建立了能同时考虑井阻随时空变化和涂抹影响的竖井地基非线性固结模型,并采用分离变量法获得了固结模型的解析解。将特定参数下固结解的计算结果与实测数据、已有的竖井地基固结解答进行了对比分析以验证其可靠性。最后,对竖井地基的非线性固结性状开展了大量计算分析。结果表明：竖井渗透系数随深度线性衰减越明显则地基固结速率越慢;外荷载一定时,随着软土压缩指数cc与渗透率指数ck之比的增大,竖井地基固结速度减慢;在cc /ck值不变的情况下,外荷载增加,地基固结速率加快。在涂抹区的3种径向渗透系数变化模式中,抛物线变化模式下的地基固结速度最快,线性变化模式下的地基固结速度次之,恒定模式下的地基固结速度最慢,且这种性状并不因为考虑井阻变化或土体非线性固结特性而发生改变。 相似文献
17.
针对新技术热排水固结法,采用非等温管道流模拟竖井中U型导热管的传热过程,考虑温度对竖井扰动区和未扰动区渗透性的影响,在COMSOL Multiphysics有限元软件中进行二次开发,建立了竖井地基热排水固结法的有限元模型。以热排水固结软基处理原型试验为例,重点分析了模型耦合、部分耦合和不耦合情况下软土地基的固结度。结果表明,相对于传统排水固结法的不耦合模型,部分耦合模型下因温度产生的孔压增量延缓了地基固结的发展,固结速率有所减慢;耦合模型下温度虽也产生一定的孔压增量,但温度有效地改善了竖井涂抹区土的渗透特性,地基的固结速率加快,固结周期缩短,与试验结果一致。 相似文献
18.
This paper presents a finite element procedure for the analysis of consolidation of layered soils with vertical drain using general one‐dimensional (1‐D) constitutive models. In formulating the finite element procedure, a Newton–Cotes‐type integration formula is used to avoid the unsymmetry of the stiffness matrix for a Newton (Modified Newton) iteration scheme. The proposed procedure is then applied for the consolidation analysis of a number of typical problems using both linear and non‐linear soil models. Results from this simplified method are compared with those from a fully coupled consolidation analysis using a well‐known finite element package. The average degree of consolidation, excess porewater pressure and average vertical effective stress are almost the same as those from the fully coupled analysis for both the linear and non‐linear cases studied. The differences in vertical effective stresses are tolerable except for the values near the vertical drain boundaries. The consolidation behaviour of soils below a certain depth of the bottom of vertical drain is actually one‐dimensional for the partially penetrating case. Therefore, there are not much differences in whether one uses a one‐dimensional model or a three‐dimensional model in this region. The average degree of consolidation has good normalized feature with respect to the ratio of well radius to external drainage boundary for the cases of fully penetrating vertical drain using a normalized time even in the non‐linear case. Numerical results clearly demonstrate that the proposed simplified finite element procedure is efficient for the consolidation analysis of soils with vertical drain and it has better numerical stability characteristics. This simplified method can easily account for layered systems, time‐dependent loading, well‐resistance, smear effects and inelastic stress–strain behaviour. This method is also very suitable for the design of vertical drain, since it greatly reduces the unknown variables in the calculation and the 1‐D soil model parameters can be more easily determined. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 相似文献