共查询到18条相似文献，搜索用时 123 毫秒
1.
燕山地区土城子组分布广泛,顶底清晰,是本区最具特色的岩石地层单位之一。区域地质对比研究表明,燕山西部土城子组与燕山中东部土城子组在地层、时代上有较大的不同,西部盆地中髫髻山组火山岩不发育或很少发育,土城子组在地层划分上常包含九龙山组或髫髻山期火山岩,时代为中晚侏罗世(J2—J3);东部盆地普遍发育髫髻山组火山岩浆或火山-沉积地层,土城子组划分与层型剖面一致。古生物化石和同位素年龄研究表明:土城子组时限在156~139Ma之间,属于晚侏罗世—早白垩世。土城子期盆地沉积的不对称性,相分布特征,古水流等指示其形成在一个挤压作用下的陆内火山-沉积盆地环境。 相似文献
2.
3.
辽西地区义县组昆虫化石及其生物地层、古生态学意义 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
作为热河昆虫群的重要组成部分,辽西地区义县组昆虫化石内容独特、丰富,共有49科83属,明显区别于同属热河昆虫群的大北沟组和九佛堂组,生物地层单位称为Epheeropsis trisetalis-Sinaeschnidia cancellosa组合,时代为晚侏罗世晚期-早白垩世早期.昆虫群反映了当时温暖而潮湿的气候环境及因地形不同引起的小气候的存在. 相似文献
4.
新疆准噶尔盆地中、晚侏罗世多重地层研究 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
对新疆维吾尔自治区沙湾县玛纳斯河红沟侏罗系剖面开展了生物地层学、同位素年代地层学、旋回地层学和磁性地层学等的综合研究。研究结果表明,头屯河组的时代为中侏罗世中晚期到晚侏罗世早期,包括巴通阶的最顶部、卡洛维阶和牛津阶的中下部;其底界年龄约为166.2 Ma,顶界线年龄约为160.8 Ma,沉积时间约5.4 Ma。齐古组顶部年龄值为155.3 Ma,沉积时间约5.5 Ma,包括了牛津阶的上部和基默里奇阶的中下部,其顶部与东部冀北、辽西地区髫髻山组顶部大体相当,比土城子组层位低。喀拉扎组的时代为晚侏罗世基默里奇期晚期,而其上覆地层吐谷鲁群的时代为早白垩世早期,两者之间存在一个相当大的不整合,缺失了晚侏罗世提塘期以及可能包括早白垩世最早期的地层,有超过了7 Ma的地层缺失量。侏罗系与白垩系的界线为此不整合面,侏罗纪/白垩纪之交的地层未保存。 相似文献
5.
本文通过对辽西朝阳地区含鸟化石层附近侏罗-白垩系蓝旗组、土城子组、义县组地层共1252块古地磁样吕的测试与分析，建立了以上沉积地层的磁极性序列，发现蓝旗组、土城子组地层的磁极性序列具有频繁的正、反极性、而义县组则为单一正极性，结合现有古生物和同位素年龄资料，对比国际中生代地磁极性年表，表明土城子组的磁极性序列相当于提塘期、基末里期、牛津期和卡洛期，其主体的地质时代应属晚侏罗世（J3），土城子组底部的地质时代应属中侏罗世（J2)；并且根据义县组含鸟化石层以上层位的磁性地层研究结果，认为义县组含鸟化石的正极性带可与M16正极性时相对应，义县组含鸟类化石层的时代应属早白垩世早期，辽西白垩系/侏罗系界线很有可能位于义县组/土城子组之间。 相似文献
6.
拉萨和羌塘地块拼合形成了青藏高原的核心,但迄今对两者的具体拼合时间仍存在激烈的争论。为进一步寻找约束两者碰撞时限的地质证据,对拉萨地块晚侏罗世—早白垩世地层的磁组构特征进行研究。结果显示:晚侏罗世地层磁组构特征显示其遭遇过较强的构造应力,吐卡日组地层磁化率主轴k_1方位与地层面斜交,但经地层校正后,k_1方位与区域褶皱方向一致,表明应力方位为北北东—南南西向;萨波直不勒组地层k_1方位在地层校正前平行于层面,指示了垂直于主压应力的方向,推断晚侏罗世地层磁组构记录了同一期应力,应力方向均为北北东—南南西向。早白垩世多尼组地层磁组构显示其后期遭受的构造应力场强度弱,且与晚侏罗世应力并非同一期。因此,通过对比晚侏罗世与早白垩世地层的磁组构特征,认为保吉地区晚侏罗世地层磁组构记录了北北东—南南西向较强的构造应力,推断该期应力来源于拉萨-羌塘地块的碰撞拼合事件,而多尼组地层并未受该期应力场的影响,仅记录了区域褶皱隆起时的应力场。 相似文献
7.
本文根据重新理清的辽西凌源牛营子盆地晚三叠世-中侏罗世地层层序及时代,讨论其区域地层对比.晚三叠世晚期的邓杖子组是一套崩滑流为主的碳酸盐角砾,其为区域印支期构造运动的造山记录,与京西、冀北杏石口组、辽西北票羊草沟组(坤头菠罗组)可以对比;早侏罗世水泉沟组与京西、冀北南大岭组、辽西北票兴隆沟组层位相当,且各组火山岩时代基本相同;中侏罗世早期郭家店组底部含煤段与京西上窑坡组、冀北下花园组中部、辽西北票组中上部植物组合面貌一致;中侏罗世中期郭家店组砾岩段是燕山期构造变形主幕的产物,北京西山龙门组、冀北下板城下花园组上部、辽西北票海房沟组都是该期的记录,层位相当;辽西中侏罗世中晚期蓝旗组底部的时代为158±1Ma,与京西、冀北髫髻山组安山岩的同位素年龄总体一致.这说明差异较大的燕山板内造山带三叠纪-中侏罗世盆地的沉积记录显示了相似的演化规律. 相似文献
8.
冀北承德盆地由晚侏罗世早期髫髻山组和晚侏罗世中期至早白垩世早期土城子组地层组成。盆地充填的土城子组沉积学特征显示盆地北区沉积过程受控于北部的丰宁—隆化断裂带的构造活动,盆地南区受南缘承德县断裂和吉余庆断裂的构造作用控制。土城子期承德盆地快速充填过程是该时期区域较强烈的一次板内变形幕的反映。这一陆内变形幕起始于土城子组,结束于土城子组沉积期末,并使承德盆地形成了一个不对称向斜褶皱。早白垩世张家口组底部火山岩下的不整合(135±1 Ma)制约了这一时代上限。 相似文献
9.
洛扎县幅地质调查新成果及主要进展 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
在拉康组中发现了早白垩世小型特化类型菊石生物群,为确定该组时代和喜马拉雅地层区划提供了依据.分析结果显示,晚侏罗世-早垩世早期亚(钙)碱性拉斑玄武岩系列火山岩和辉绿玢岩的岩石地球化学特征与大陆边缘裂谷型拉斑玄武岩相似,表明新特提斯洋在晚侏罗世晚期-早白垩世早期处于扩张阶段.初步确定晚白垩世宗卓组与下伏地层为不整合接触关系,为研究特提斯沉积盆地由被动陆缘盆地转变为“远缘前陆盆地“提供了依据,即沉积盆地性质转化的时间代表了新特提斯洋的闭合时代.在洛扎一带分布着以库拉抗日巨大岩基为代表的大量SP花岗岩,这些花岗岩是在喜马拉雅造山后碰撞作用阶段地壳快速降升和大规模伸展拆离背景下地壳熔融的产物. 相似文献
10.
文中简要介绍了华北北部土城子组区域分布、沉积特征和垂向充填序列。针对目前土城子组时代不定的现状,结合近些年来已发表的土城子组的同位素年代学数据,将土城子组年龄限定在154~137Ma。以往对土城子组进行的相关生物地层研究成果与土城子组时代一致。国际地层委员会(ICS)2013年提出将145Ma定为侏罗-白垩系界线年龄,这得到了特提斯喜马拉雅和安第斯地区最新侏罗-白垩系界线研究成果的支持,虽然最终确定这一界线还需更多高精度年代学的研究。再结合土城子组同位素年龄,提出土城子组时代为晚侏罗世—早白垩世,中国陆相侏罗-白垩系界线存在于土城子组内部。国际地层界线及对比,特别是国际J/K界线应通过研究海相生物地层来完成,中国陆相J/K界线的确立应优先服从海相地层及其生物演化所划分的标志与结果。 相似文献
11.
新疆准噶尔盆地侏罗系齐古组凝灰岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb年龄 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
报道了准噶尔盆地获得侏罗纪齐古组凝灰岩精确的SHRIMP锆石U-Pb年龄164.6 Ma±1.4 Ma（MSWD=1.3）。该年龄值几乎相当于国际地质年表中Callovian阶的底界年龄（164.7Ma±4.0Ma）。根据地层沉积速率推算,齐古组上界年龄值应为161.8Ma,接近Callovian阶的上界（161.2Ma±4.0Ma）;其上的喀拉扎组上界年龄大致在160.0 Ma左右,此年龄值应位于牛津阶（Oxfordian）的下部。另外,下白垩统下部清水河组的时代为早白垩世早期（Berriasian）。由此得出：齐古组的主体时代为中侏罗世卡洛期（Callovian）,其下部跨入了巴通期最晚期（late Late Bathonian）;喀拉扎组的时代可能仅为牛津期最早期（early Early Ox-fordian）,反映白垩系与侏罗系之间的不整合几乎缺失了整个上侏罗统,由此推断晚侏罗世曾发生过一次较强烈的构造运动。 相似文献
12.
运用流体包裹体确定鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界油气成藏期次和时期 总被引：25，自引：7，他引：18
对鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界68口井110块流体包裹体样品的荧光观察,60口井75块样品的显微测温、测盐等系统分析结果表明,该区上古生界砂岩储层发生过6期热流体活动,均与油气成藏有关,并以第2～6期的天然气成藏为主.结合埋藏史分析可知,油气成藏分别发生在距今220～190 Ma(T3中期-J1中期)、190～150 Ma(J1中期-J2中期)、150～130 Ma(J2中期-J2末期)、130～113 Ma(J2末期-K1中早期)、113～98 Ma(K1中早期-K1中晚期)、98～72 Ma(K1中晚期-K1末期),并认为早侏罗世中期-中侏罗世末期、中侏罗世末期-早白垩世末期是鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界天然气的主要成藏时期. 相似文献
13.
新疆准噶尔盆地侏罗系齐古组凝灰岩SHRIMP
锆石U-Pb年龄 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
报道了准噶尔盆地获得侏罗纪齐古组凝灰岩精确的SHRIMP锆石 U-Pb年龄164.6 Ma ± 1.4 Ma(MSWD=1.3)。该年龄值几乎相当于国际地质年表中Callovian阶的底界年龄(164.7Ma±4.0Ma)。根据地层沉积速率推算,齐古组上界年龄值应为161.8Ma,接近Callovian阶的上界(161.2Ma±4.0Ma);其上的喀拉扎组上界年龄大致在160.0 Ma左右,此年龄值应位于牛津阶(Oxfordian)的下部。另外,下白垩统下部清水河组的时代为早白垩世早期(Berriasian)。由此得出：齐古组的主体时代为中侏罗世卡洛期(Callovian), 其下部跨入了巴通期最晚期(late Late Bathonian);喀拉扎组的时代可能仅为牛津期最早期(early Early Oxfordian),反映白垩系与侏罗系之间的不整合几乎缺失了整个上侏罗统,由此推断晚侏罗世曾发生过一次较强烈的构造运动。 相似文献
14.
The closure of the western part of the Neotethys Ocean started in late Early Jurassic. The Middle to early Late Jurassic contraction
is documented in the Berchtesgaden Alps by the migration of trench-like basins formed in front of a propagating thrust belt.
Due to ophiolite obduction these basins propagated from the outer shelf area (=Hallstatt realm) to the interior continent
(=Hauptdolomit/Dachstein platform realm). The basins were separated by nappe fronts forming structural highs. This scenario
mirrors syn-orogenic erosion and deposition in an evolving thrust belt. Active basin formation and nappe thrusting ended around
the Oxfordian/Kimmeridgian boundary, followed by the onset of carbonate platforms on structural highs. Starved basins remained
between the platforms. Rapid deepening around the Early/Late Tithonian boundary was induced by extension due to mountain uplift
and resulted in the reconfiguration of the platforms and basins. Erosion of the uplifted nappe stack including obducted ophiolites
resulted in increased sediment supply into the basins and final drowning and demise of the platforms in the Berriasian. The
remaining Early Cretaceous foreland basins were filled up by sediments including siliciclastics. The described Jurassic to
Early Cretaceous history of the Northern Calcareous Alps accords with the history of the Western Carpathians, the Dinarides,
and the Albanides, where (1) age dating of the metamorphic soles prove late Early to Middle Jurassic inneroceanic thrusting
followed by late Middle to early Late Jurassic ophiolite obduction, (2) Kimmeridgian to Tithonian shallow-water platforms
formed on top of the obducted ophiolites, and (3) latest Jurassic to Early Cretaceous sediments show postorogenic character. 相似文献
15.
北京延庆千家店土城子组中的硅化木自发现以来,得到了众多学者的关注,但关于硅化木的赋存层位和形成时代一直未有定论,目前主流观点认为硅化木广泛发育于土城子组一段和二段的下部,关于其形成时代则自侏罗纪早期至白垩纪早期的论述均有,这种争论显然不利于木化石的保护、科普和进一步深化认识。在千家店土城子组进行的考察结果展现出与前人观点不同的线索。实地考察、剖面测量和年龄测试结果显示:原位埋藏硅化木形成时代应为晚侏罗世早期,赋存层位为土城子组一段下部,而土城子组二段下部的沉积特征反应出当时水位频繁升降,水体能量剧烈变化,火山活动暂时陷入沉寂的沉积环境,较难满足形成木化石的基本要求。 相似文献
16.
The most intense area of Mesozoic volcanism and main region of hydrothermal-type uranium deposits is located in Eastern China. From the northern to the southern part, it can be divided into seven volcanic belts of Great Xing’an Range, Lesser Xing’an-Zhangguangcai Ranges, Northern Hebei-Western Liaoning, the Lower Yangtze Region, Ganhang areas, Wuyi Mountain areas,the Southeast Coastal areas, five uranium metallogenic belts of Guyuan-Hongshanzi, Qinglong-Xingcheng, Luzong-Qixia, Ganhang, Wuyi Mountain, and Three uranium metallogenic perspective belts of Manzhouli-Erguna, Zhalantun, Yichun. The volcanism of all these volcanic belts can be subdivided into six stages: The Early Jurassic to early Middle Jurassic, late Middle Jurassic to early Late Jurassic, early Early Cretaceous, middle Early Cretaceous, late Early Cretaceous and early Late Cretaceous. High-K calc-alkaline rhyolite-alkali trachyte rock assemblage of the early Early Cretaceous has a close connection with the explored uranium deposits. High-K calc-alkaline rhyolites have high content of uranium, and can provide the epithermal ore forming system with uranium; Alkali trachyte associated with mantle-derived magmatism can provide alkaline ore-forming fluid of rich uranium for deep temperature mineralizing system or act as pioneers of alkaline ore-forming fluid of rich uranium. 相似文献
17.
《International Geology Review》2012,54(12):1528-1556
ABSTRACTThe intra-continental orogeny and tectonic evolution of the Mesozoic Yanshan fold-thrust belt (YFTB) in the northern North China Craton (NCC) have been strongly debated. Here, we focus on the Shangyi basin, located in the centre of the YFTB. An integrated analysis of sedimentary facies, palaeocurrents, clast compositions, and detrital zircon dating of sediments was adopted to determine the palaeogeography, provenance, basin evolution, and intra-continental orogenic process. The Shangyi basin comprises the well-exposed Early–early Middle Jurassic Xiahuayuan Formation and the Longmen Formation, and the Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous Tuchengzi Formation. Based on the 18 measured sections, five facies associations – including alluvial fan, fluvial, delta, lacustrine, and eolian facies – have been identified and described in detail. The onset of the Shangyi basin was filled with fluvial, deltaic, and lacustrine deposits controlled by the normal fault bounding the northern basin, corresponding to the pre-orogeny. In the Middle Jurassic, the cobble–boulder conglomerates of alluvial fan, as molasse deposits, were compatible with the syn-orogeny of the Yanshan movement, which played a critical role in northern North China and even East Asia. After the depositional break in the Middle–Late Jurassic, the Shangyi basin, controlled by the normal fault present in the north of the basin, re-subsided and quickly expanded southward with thick sedimentation, which is correlative with the post-orogeny. Combined with A-type granites, metamorphic core complexes, mafic dikes, and rift basins of the Late Jurassic–early Early Cretaceous present in the northern NCC and Mongolia, significant extension was widespread in the northern NCC and even in northeast Asia. Moreover, vertical changes of provenance indicate that the Taihang Mountain and the Inner Mongolia palaeo-uplift (IMPU) present at the west and north of the basin, respectively, experienced uplift twice in the Middle–Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous, resulting in a regional depositional break. 相似文献
18.
Qing-Bin Guan Bin Wang Xiong Wang Xing-An Wang Qiang Shi 《International Geology Review》2018,60(15):1883-1905
This study presents new zircon U–Pb geochronology, geochemistry, and zircon Hf isotopic data of volcanic and subvolcanic rocks that crop out in the Bayanhushuo area of the southern Great Xing’an Range (GXR) of NE China. These data provide insights into the tectonic evolution of this area during the late Mesozoic and constrain the evolution of the Mongol–Okhotsk Ocean. Combining these new ages with previously published data suggests that the late Mesozoic volcanism occurred in two distinct episodes: Early–Middle Jurassic (176–173 Ma) and Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous (151–138 Ma). The Early–Middle Jurassic dacite porphyry belongs to high-K calc-alkaline series, showing the features of I-type igneous rock. This unit has zircon εHf(t) values from +4.06 to +11.62 that yield two-stage model ages (TDM2) from 959 to 481 Ma. The geochemistry of the dacite porphyry is indicative of formation in a volcanic arc tectonic setting, and it is derived from a primary magma generated by the partial melting of juvenile mafic crustal material. The Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous volcanic rocks belong to high-K calc-alkaline or shoshonite series and have A2-type affinities. These volcanics have εHf(t) and TDM2 values from +5.00 to +8.93 and from 879 to 627 Ma, respectively. The geochemistry of these Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous volcanic rocks is indicative of formation in a post-collisional extensional environment, and they formed from primary magmas generated by the partial melting of juvenile mafic lower crust. The discovery of late Mesozoic volcanic and subvolcanic rocks within the southern GXR indicates that this region was in volcanic arc and extensional tectonic settings during the Early–Middle Jurassic and the Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous, respectively. This indicates that the Mongol–Okhotsk oceanic plate was undergoing subduction during the Early–Middle Jurassic, and this ocean adjacent to the GXR may have closed by the Late Middle Jurassic–Early Late Jurassic. 相似文献