共查询到18条相似文献，搜索用时 484 毫秒
1.
小数周偏差可用于精密单点定位的模糊度固定,其时变特性对于FCB的播发间隔、数据总量有着重要影响。当前北斗应用进入成熟期,对北斗FCB时变特性及其变化进行研究,有利于推广北斗PPP模糊度固定应用。本文基于单差FCB的生成方法,对2017年和2019年的北斗FCB时变特性展开研究,并改进了IGSO卫星窄巷FCB的播发间隔,通过已知测站固定解PPP解算,验证了改进后的北斗FCB产品。试验表明：2019年北斗FCB的稳定性相比2017年大幅提高;IGSO卫星可每天播发一组窄巷FCB,相比原有播发间隔减小73.4%的数据总量;改进后FCB可有效应用于北斗固定解PPP,收敛速度相比浮点解提升43.1%。 相似文献
2.
模糊度固定能够显著提高精密单点定位(PPP)的精度和收敛速度,是国内外卫星导航定位领域的研究热点．本文通过最小二乘法分离接收机端和卫星端小数周偏差(FCB),恢复非差模糊度的整数特性,将得到的卫星端FCB提供给用户,能够实现非差模糊度固定的PPP．采用全球IGS跟踪站的观测数据进行非差FCB解算,实验结果表明,宽巷FCB的稳定性较好,一周内变化小于0.1周,而窄巷FCB一天内变化较大．将获得的FCB用于模糊度固定PPP实验,E、N、U三个方向的定位精度分别为0.7 cm、0.8 cm和2.1 cm,与浮点解PPP相比,分别提高68％、51％和37％,验证了本文估计的FCB用于模糊度固定PPP的定位性能 相似文献
3.
卫星钟差解算及其星间单差模糊度固定 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
整数相位模糊度解算可以显著提高GNSS精密单点定位（PPP）的精度。本文提出一种解算卫星钟差的方法,通过固定星间单差模糊度恢复出能够支持单台接收机进行整数模糊度解算的卫星钟差,即所谓的“整数”钟差。为了实现星间单差模糊度固定,分别通过卫星端宽巷FCB解算和模糊度基准的选择与固定恢复出宽巷和窄巷模糊度的整数性质。为了证明本文方法的可行性,采用IGS测站的GPS数据进行卫星钟差解算试验。结果表明,在解算钟差时,星间单差模糊度固定的平均成功率为73%。得到的卫星钟差与IGS最终钟差产品相比,平均的RMS和STD分别为0.170和0.012 ns。448个IGS测站的星间单差宽巷和窄巷模糊度小数部分的分布表明本文得到的卫星钟差和FCB产品具备支持PPP用户进行模糊度固定的能力。基于以上产品开展了模拟动态PPP定位试验,结果表明模糊度固定之后,N、E、U和3D的定位精度（RMS）分别达到0.009、0.010、0.023和0.027 m,与不固定模糊度或采用IGS钟差的结果相比,分别提高了30.8%、61.5%、23.3%和37.2%。 相似文献
4.
针对BDS星间单差伪距单点定位精度以及接收机钟误差影响定位精度的问题,该文分析了BDS非差、GPS星间单差、BDS星间单差的伪距单点定位的解算模型,研究了3种定位模式在观测时段内的卫星数、PDOP值以及伪距单点定位精度的差异,并对不同定位模式在同一时段内的定位结果与真值进行比较。实验结果表明:BDS星间单差定位结果的稳定与BDS非差结果相当,并且都略高于GPS星间单差的稳定性;从精度而言,BDS星间单差在E、N方向上精度相比其他两种定位模式得到了一定程度的提高,在U方向上精度介于其他两种定位方式之间。 相似文献
5.
星间单差精密单点定位部分模糊度固定方法 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
针对传统的精密单点定位(PPP)技术由于收敛速度慢、获取高精度位置信息所需时间较长而无法满足用户对于快速高精度定位的需求的问题,该文采用了单差小数周偏差(FCB)产品固定模糊度的方法,以及部分模糊度固定的固定策略,来达到最优化使用固定解的PPP.通过对测站的数据的静态和仿动态实验分析验证,结果表明,进行部分模糊度固定的固定解定位精度要优于使用模糊度浮点解进行PPP得到的实数解的定位精度,收敛速度也有提升;而且相比于全模糊度固定策略,部分模糊度固定策略可以提升模糊度的历元固定率,使更多的固定模糊度的卫星可以参与定位,提升了定位的精度和收敛速度. 相似文献
6.
7.
《测绘科学技术学报》2018,(5)
非差模糊度固定能够有效提高精密单点定位(PPP)的定位精度和收敛速度,是国内外卫星导航定位领域的研究热点。基于整数钟实现了PPP非差模糊度固定,在非差模糊度逐级固定中分别估计接收机宽巷偏差和窄巷偏差;对宽巷和窄巷模糊度进行改正,从而消除了接收机硬件延迟对模糊度的影响;同时采用取整成功率检验和ratio值检验,保证模糊度固定的可靠性。将以上方法应用到动态精密单点定位中,实验结果表明:仿动态条件下,模糊度正确固定后,东、北向定位精度达到mm级、天向定位精度优于5 cm;动态解算条件下,采用1 s采样间隔数据16 min左右即可实现模糊度的首次固定。PPP固定解在东、北、天3个方向的定位精度分别为1.5、2.7和1.3 cm,相比于浮点解分别提升了61%、40%和38%。 相似文献
8.
广播星历SSR改正的实时精密单点定位及精度分析 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
本文分析了利用广播星历和SSR改正信息获取实时精密星历和卫星钟差的方法,并对生成的实时产品进行了精度评估:利用IGS分析中心提供的实时NTRIP数据流SSR改正信息,基于广播星历改正RTPPP模型实现了实时静态和动态精密单点定位,并分别进行了精度分析。结果表明:将广播星历SSR改正获得的实时产品与IGS最终产品相比较,卫星轨道互差RMS值为4cm~7cm、卫星钟差互差RMS值优于0.3ns;实时静态PPP在观测时段6h以上的情况下,可实现水平方向2cm、高程方向4cm的定位精度,24h单天解的平面及高程方向精度均优于2cm;实时动态PPP的定位精度可达cm级,收敛至亚dm级精度的时间与事后PPP在不固定非差模糊度情况下所需的时间相当。 相似文献
9.
窄巷波长相对较短,受观测数据质量和未模型化误差的影响较大,导致参考站计算的窄巷FCB估值的互差较大,窄巷FCB稳定性较差。针对窄巷FCB估值出现较大偏差的参考站,本文提出了基于抗差初值的窄巷FCB抗差估计方法,该方法取当前历元所有参考站窄巷FCB估值的中位数作为抗差初值,采用IGGⅢ方案降低了有偏差的窄巷FCB估值的权比。采用IGS全球跟踪站网的数据进行验证,改进的方法提高了窄巷FCB的精度和稳定性,采用每天估计的一组卫星端的窄巷FCB即可满足窄巷模糊度固定的精度要求。同时,采用本文改进方法估计的窄巷FCB,可以提高用户端仿动态单天解的窄巷模糊度固定成功率和定位精度。 相似文献
10.
文中在GPS精密单点定位（PPP）理论与方法的基础上,给出了多系统组合的精密单点定位技术观测模型,采用GPS、GLONASS、GALILEO、BDS 四大卫星导航定位系统的实测数据,研究并分析了四系统组合PPP的定位性能。结果表明,多系统PPP精度较单系统有很大提高,GPS+GLONASS+GALILEO+BDS四系统组合动态PPP在三个方向平均偏差约为0.7 cm、0.6 cm和1.7 cm,收敛时间为15～20 min左右,并且多系统PPP在截止高度角增大时,依然有充足的卫星数量,当截止高度角达到30°时,依然能达到cm级定位精度,对机载动态数据进行PPP解算结果显示,四系统组合解算的结果与利用GrafMov的解算结果符合得最好,优于其他双系统和单系统PPP的精度。 相似文献
11.
随着北斗卫星导航系统(BeiDou navigation satellite system, BDS)的建设和完善,更多的北斗在轨卫星开始提供全球性的定位、导航、授时服务。为了验证北斗系统整体精密单点定位-模糊度固定(precise point positioning-ambiguity resolution, PPP-AR)的效果,基于全球分布的测站2020-08-01—2020-08-31共31 d的观测数据进行GPS、BDS双系统相位小数周偏差(fractional cycle bi?as, FCB)估计, 并对其中BDS-3卫星FCB产品时变特性进行分析。结果表明,大部分BDS-3卫星宽巷FCB在31 d内保持相对稳定,变化小于0.2周, 窄巷FCB在1 d之内的变化小于0.1周。利用估计的FCB产品进行动态和静态PPP-AR解算。单BDS-3静态PPP?-AR的历元固定率可以达到89.8%,东、北、天3个方向的均方根误差（root mean square error,RMSE）分别为0.94 cm、0.73 cm和1.39 cm,动态PPP-AR的历元固定率为83.9%,东、北、天3个方向的RMSE分别为1.99 ?cm、1.70 cm和3.28 cm。 相似文献
12.
Generating GPS satellite fractional cycle bias for ambiguity-fixed precise point positioning 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
With the development of precise point positioning (PPP), the School of Geodesy and Geomatics (SGG) at Wuhan University is now routinely producing GPS satellite fractional cycle bias (FCB) products with open access for worldwide PPP users to conduct ambiguity-fixed PPP solution. We provide a brief theoretical background of PPP and present the strategies and models to compute the FCB products. The practical realization of the two-step (wide-lane and narrow-lane) FCB estimation scheme is described in detail. With GPS measurements taken in various situations, i.e., static, dynamic, and on low earth orbit (LEO) satellites, the quality of FCB estimation and the effectiveness of PPP ambiguity resolution (AR) are evaluated. The comparison with CNES FCBs indicated that our FCBs had a good consistency with the CNES ones. For wide-lane FCB, almost all the differences of the two products were within ±0.05 cycles. For narrow-lane FCB, 87.8 % of the differences were located between ±0.05 cycles, and 97.4 % of them were located between ±0.075 cycles. The experimental results showed that, compared with conventional ambiguity-float PPP, the averaged position RMS of static PPP can be improved from (3.6, 1.4, 3.6) to (2.0, 1.0, 2.7) centimeters for ambiguity-fixed PPP. The average accuracy improvement in the east, north, and up components reached 44.4, 28.6, and 25.0 %, respectively. A kinematic, ambiguity-fixed PPP test with observation of 80 min achieved a position accuracy of better than 5 cm at the one-sigma level in all three coordinate components. Compared with the results of ambiguity-float, kinematic PPP, the positioning biases of ambiguity-fixed PPP were improved by about 78.2, 20.8, and 65.1 % in east, north, and up. The RMS of LEO PPP test was improved by about 23.0, 37.0, and 43.0 % for GRACE-A and GRACE-B in radial, tangential, and normal directions when AR was applied to the same data set. These results demonstrated that the SGG FCB products can be produced with high quality for users anywhere around the world to carry out ambiguity-fixed PPP solutions. 相似文献
13.
在复杂艰险地区的铁路沿线上全球卫星导航系统(GNSS)基准站相对较少且稀疏,如何获得该场景下测站点的高精度位置信息是亟待解决的重大问题. 论文以GPS系统为例,利用铁路沿线上7个GNSS测站点(14个观测时段)分别开展了卫星跟踪数和位置精度因子(PDOP)评估,观测数据的可靠性、高精度性验证以及固定解精密单点定位(PPP)技术研究. 试验结果表明:1) 在所有时间段内卫星平均跟踪数约分布在5.14～9.07颗,PDOP平均值约分布在2.19～5.72 cm,具有较高地定位可用性;2) 模糊度固定的PPP可进一步改善铁路环境下的单点定位精度. 当观测时间约为90 min时,其在水平方向和高程方向上可分别实现优于10 cm和15 cm的解算精度,且相对于浮点解,三维方向上的定位精度可提升约35.43%. 该研究可为复杂铁路场景下的勘测和施工阶段提供高精度的测站位置信息. 相似文献
14.
Ambiguity resolved precise point positioning with GPS and BeiDou 总被引：2，自引：1，他引：1
This paper focuses on the contribution of the global positioning system (GPS) and BeiDou navigation satellite system (BDS) observations to precise point positioning (PPP) ambiguity resolution (AR). A GPS + BDS fractional cycle bias (FCB) estimation method and a PPP AR model were developed using integrated GPS and BDS observations. For FCB estimation, the GPS + BDS combined PPP float solutions of the globally distributed IGS MGEX were first performed. When integrating GPS observations, the BDS ambiguities can be precisely estimated with less than four tracked BDS satellites. The FCBs of both GPS and BDS satellites can then be estimated from these precise ambiguities. For the GPS + BDS combined AR, one GPS and one BDS IGSO or MEO satellite were first chosen as the reference satellite for GPS and BDS, respectively, to form inner-system single-differenced ambiguities. The single-differenced GPS and BDS ambiguities were then fused by partial ambiguity resolution to increase the possibility of fixing a subset of decorrelated ambiguities with high confidence. To verify the correctness of the FCB estimation and the effectiveness of the GPS + BDS PPP AR, data recorded from about 75 IGS MGEX stations during the period of DOY 123-151 (May 3 to May 31) in 2015 were used for validation. Data were processed with three strategies: BDS-only AR, GPS-only AR and GPS + BDS AR. Numerous experimental results show that the time to first fix (TTFF) is longer than 6 h for the BDS AR in general and that the fixing rate is usually less than 35 % for both static and kinematic PPP. An average TTFF of 21.7 min and 33.6 min together with a fixing rate of 98.6 and 97.0 % in static and kinematic PPP, respectively, can be achieved for GPS-only ambiguity fixing. For the combined GPS + BDS AR, the average TTFF can be shortened to 16.9 min and 24.6 min and the fixing rate can be increased to 99.5 and 99.0 % in static and kinematic PPP, respectively. Results also show that GPS + BDS PPP AR outperforms single-system PPP AR in terms of convergence time and position accuracy. 相似文献
15.
通过2018年1月多全球卫星导航系统（GNSS）实验(MGEX)的十个测站数据,采用无电离层模型和非差非组合模型,对单系统、双系统和四系统精密单点定位（PPP）进行定位性能分析,定位性能包括收敛时间和定位精度. 实验结果表明,两种PPP模型定位性能相当,但优于单频PPP,在E、N和U方向收敛时间缩短20 min左右,定位精度提高1.6 cm左右;联合多系统能够增加卫星数,改善卫星间几何构型,提升PPP的定位性能. 对GLONASS伪距频间偏差（IFB）采用估计每颗GLONASS卫星的伪距IFB模型和伪距IFB为频率二次多项式模型提升PPP的定位性能,结果表明估计每颗GLONASS卫星的伪距IFB模型要优于伪距IFB为频率二次多项式模型,估计伪距IFB相比忽略伪距IFB在PPP定位性能上有不同程度的提升. 相似文献
16.
针对GNSS多系统组合进行PPP定位的问题,推导了基于UofC模型的多系统组合PPP的函数模型和随机模型。最后采用IGS观测站30 d的部分观测数据对不同组合模式的PPP进行了解算。试验分析结果表明：GNSS多系统组合PPP收敛时间与GPS单系统相比可以缩短30%~50%。对于定位精度,在观测时长较短时（如0.5 h）,GNSS多系统组合PPP整体上具有较优的定位精度,N、E方向偏差和标准差分别为0.3、0.5 cm和1.9、4.3 cm,短时间内由于对流层参数与垂直方向的强相关性,使得U方向精度稍差。此外,在卫星高度截止角大于40°的条件下,单系统可见卫星数不足从而导致无法进行连续定位,但多系统组合具有更多的可视卫星,仍能获得较好的定位精度,使其在建筑物密集区、山区和卫星遮挡较为严重的恶劣条件下具有实际应用价值。 相似文献
17.
Double-differenced (DD) ambiguities between overlapping frequencies from different GNSS constellations can be fixed to integers if the associated differential inter-system biases (DISBs) are well known. In this case, only one common pivot satellite is sufficient for inter-system ambiguity resolution. This will be beneficial to ambiguity resolution (AR) and real-time kinematic (RTK) positioning especially when only a few satellites are observed. However, for GPS and current operational BDS-2, there are no overlapping frequencies. Due to the influence of different frequencies, the inter-system DD ambiguities still cannot be fixed to integers even if the DISBs are precisely known. In this contribution, we present an inter-system differencing model for combined GPS and BDS single-frequency RTK positioning through real-time estimation of DISBs. The stability of GPS L1 and BDS B1 DISBs is analyzed with different receiver types. Along with parameterization and using the short-term stability of DISBs, the DD ambiguities between GPS and BDS pivot satellites and the between-receiver single-difference ambiguity of the GPS pivot satellite can be estimable jointly with the differential phase DISB term from epoch to epoch. Then the inter-system differencing model can benefit from the near time-constant DISB parameters and thus has better multi-epoch positioning performance than the classical intra-system differencing model. The combined GPS and BDS single-frequency RTK positioning performance is evaluated with various simulated satellite visibilities. It will be shown that compared with the classical intra-system differencing model, the proposed model can effectively improve the positioning accuracy and reliability, especially for severely obstructed situations with only a few satellites observed. 相似文献
18.
北斗二号卫星导航系统主要由GEO和IGSO星座卫星构成,其整体星座的几何结构变化缓慢,导致应用于精密单点定位（PPP）时需要较长收敛时间。而北斗三号卫星导航系统的建成将有利于缓解上述问题,获得更优的定位效果。为了探究北斗三号对北斗二号PPP的增强效果,本文选取10个位于亚太区域内的iGMAS测站3 d的观测数据,首先分析3家IGS分析中心对北斗三号卫星精密产品的支持情况;然后分别对静态和模拟动态两种模式的定位性能进行展开分析。结果表明：①亚太区域内北斗三号卫星数量达到9颗。②加入北斗三号卫星后,静态PPP的收敛时间缩短了40%,收敛后的精度提高了46.5%;模拟动态PPP的收敛时间缩短了42.8%,收敛后的精度提高了45.7%。 相似文献