共查询到18条相似文献，搜索用时 187 毫秒
1.
《武汉大学学报(信息科学版)》2016,(2)
差分码偏差(differential code bias,DCB)又称硬件延迟,是影响用户导航定位授时(pointing navigation timing,PNT)服务的主要误差源之一。GPS卫星的硬件延迟通常是在电离层建模过程中和电离层模型系数一起解得的,但是北斗系统目前仅是一个区域导航定位系统,无法通过单系统获得高精度的硬件延迟解。提出通过联合GPS和北斗卫星观测数据用低阶球谐模型建模的方式确定北斗卫星和接收机的DCB。实验数据表明在现有条件下采用该方式解算北斗卫星的DCB的精度在0.3ns左右,稳定性较好,且北斗地球静止轨道卫星(GEO)、倾斜同步轨道(IGSO)卫星DCB稳定性好于中轨道(MEO)卫星,北斗卫星DCB的稳定性要优于接收机。 相似文献
2.
全球导航卫星系统（Global Navigation Satellite System,GNSS）探测大气电离层需要精确处理由接收机差分码偏差（differential cade bias,DCB）引起的系统误差。准确掌握接收机DCB的多时间尺度精细变化等特性是联合美国GPS、中国北斗卫星导航系统（BeiDou navigation satellite system,BDS）和欧盟Galileo等多GNSS技术监测电离层所面临的主要科学问题之一。为此,提出了基于零基线精密估计站间单差接收机DCB的方法,并对站间单差接收机DCB的日加权平均值进行了分析。基于4台多模接收机采集于2013年的双频观测值,揭示了站间单差接收机DCB的变化可能受3种因素的影响,即接收机内置软件的版本升级（实验中引起了约3 ns的显著增加）、拆卸个别接收机所导致的观测条件改变（实验中引起了约1.3 ns的显著减少）和估计方法的误差（引起了与导航系统卫星几何结构重复性相一致的周期性变化）等。 相似文献
3.
提出一种使用非差非组合精密单点定位(PPP)估计和分析接收机DCB短时时变特征的方法。首先利用非差非组合PPP得到包含接收机DCB的重构电离层参数估值;然后通过IGS电离层GIMs格网模型内插剥离各历元站星斜向电离层距离延迟;最后通过最小二乘约束得到各历元接收机DCB解。由于格网本身精度(2～8 TECU)和插值精度限制,解算出来的接收机DCB并不能真实反映其短期时变特征。为此,提出利用站间单差或者历元间差分的方法还原其真实的变化态势。实验结果表明,所提出的方法能够正确估计接收机DCB,并能真实还原其短期时变特征,具有良好的适用性。 相似文献
4.
研究了联合BDS/GPS观测数据基于球冠谐函数的中国区域电离层建模,并精确估计了北斗卫星和接收机DCB。联合解算得到的GPS卫星DCB相对CODE精度优于0.2 ns,GPS接收机DCB相对CODE精度优于1 ns;联合解算得到的中国区域上空VTEC相对CODE事后产品的精度可达2~3 TECU。 相似文献
5.
《武汉大学学报(信息科学版)》2016,(12)
差分码偏差(DCB)是电离层总电子含量(TEC)监测和建模的主要系统误差,卫星DCB也是卫星导航系统导航电文的重要参数。研究了卫星DCB的估计算法,推导了不同基准下DCB的转换公式,利用北斗观测实验网解算了2013年北斗卫星的DCB。在同一基准下分析了北斗卫星DCB的稳定性,并与MGEX发布的DCB产品进行了比较分析。实验结果表明,该方法解算的北斗卫星B1-B2DCB在-9~17ns之间,北斗卫星DCB的稳定性优于0.4ns;北斗倾斜地球同步轨道卫星(IGSO)卫星稳定性优于地球静止轨道卫星(GEO)和中圆地球轨道卫星(MEO);利用北斗观测实验网解算的北斗卫星DCB与MGEX解算结果存在最大约1.7ns的系统偏差,可能由于测距码的不一致性所致;接收机硬件材质的不同是导致接收机DCB差异的主要影响因素。 相似文献
6.
差分码偏差(differential code bias,DCB)是指由全球导航卫星系统(global navigation satellite system, GNSS)信号接收和发射硬件导致的频率相关的偏差项,对电离层估计有显著的影响,在利用GNSS观测数据提取电离层总电子含量时需要被精确修正,研究利用低轨卫星的星载GNSS观测数据估计DCB尤为重要。使用Swarm星座3颗卫星GPS接收机2016年1月的双频观测值,设计了独立估计和联合估计两种估计方案,采用附加限制条件的间接平差方法对GPS卫星以及星载接收机的DCB进行估计。以中国科学院和德国宇航中心的DCB产品作为参考,分析了两种估计方案的精度和稳定性,相较于独立估计方案,联合估计方案得到的GPS卫星DCB的稳定性较独立估计方案提高了16.6%,且与参考DCB具有更好的一致性。 相似文献
7.
在传统多系统非差非组合精密单点定位（precise point positioning，PPP）模型中，电离层延迟会吸收部分接收机码硬件延迟，其估计值可能为负数。提出了一种估计接收机差分码偏差（differential code bias，DCB）参数的GPS（Global Positioning System）/BDS（BeiDou Navigation Satellite System）非组合PPP模型，将每个系统第1个频率上的接收机码硬件延迟约束为零，对接收机DCB进行参数估计，达到了分离电离层延迟和接收机码硬件延迟的目的，降低了接收机钟差和电离层延迟的相关程度。利用4个多星座实验（multi-GNSS experiment，MGEX）跟踪站的GPS/BDS数据进行了静态和动态PPP试验，结果表明，与不估计DCB参数的PPP模型相比，采用估计DCB参数PPP模型后，静态模式下定位精度和收敛速度平均提高了29.3%和29.8%，动态模式下定位精度和收敛速度平均提高了15.7%和21.6%。 相似文献
8.
在利用多站GPS数据建立电离层延迟模型时,将卫星硬件延迟和接收机硬件延迟作为整体参数求解并剔除会产生与实际不符的情况,因此将二者分离是十分必要,笔者给出了最优信息扩散估计与广义逆结合分离硬件延迟的基本方法,并结合实例对该方法进行了探讨. 相似文献
9.
在全球定位系统(Global Positioning System，GPS)中，接收机硬件延迟引起的码偏差和相位偏差是影响精密授时、电离层建模以及非差模糊度解算的重要因素。利用GPS对电离层总电子含量进行估计和建模时，通常假定GPS接收机硬件延迟偏差是稳定不变的量，对其可能存在的波动及影响因素考虑不充分。因此，对GPS接收机硬件延迟偏差的时变特性进行分析，有助于提高电离层电子含量估值的准确性和可靠性。分析了GPS接收机差分码偏差(differential code bias，DCB)和差分相位偏差(differential phase bias，DPB)单历元及单天解的时间变化特性，并对温度变化与接收机DCB、DPB变化之间的相关性进行了实验探究。结果表明，接收机重启前后其DCB值会发生突变，重启之后接收机DCB和DPB大约需要25 min才能趋于稳定。接收机DCB和DPB并不能长期保持稳定，实验数据显示，在2~3 h内，DCB的变化量可以达到0.8 m左右，DPB的变化量可以达到4 mm左右，接收机DCB和DPB的波动与周围环境温度的变化具有较强相关性。 相似文献
10.
接收机端伪距偏差是指非理想的卫星导航信号在接收机前端带宽和相关器间隔不同时产生的伪距测量系统性偏差。研究表明,北斗二号、GPS和Galileo系统均存在与接收机类型相关的伪距偏差,影响基于混合类型接收机站网的精密数据处理。本文基于iGMAS网和MGEX网观测数据,采用MW组合、伪距残差和伪距无几何距离无电离层组合3种方法分析北斗三号接收机端伪距偏差特性。试验结果表明,北斗三号同样存在与接收机类型相关的伪距偏差,且无电离层组合的伪距偏差可以达到6 ns。根据偏差特性,按接收机类型建立了8类伪距偏差改正模型。将上述模型应用于卫星差分码偏差(DCB)估计与单频伪距单点定位,结果表明,模型改正后可以显著提升不同接收机类型估计的卫星DCB一致性,其中基于iGMAS网和MGEX网两个不同接收机站网估计得到的北斗三号C2I-C6I、C1P-C5P和C2I-C7D DCB差值分别平均降低了91.6%、64.7%和71.9%;模型改正后单频伪距单点定位水平方向和高程方向精度分别提升了13.9%和11.0%。 相似文献
11.
GIM和不同约束条件相结合的BDS差分码偏差估计 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
现阶段BDS卫星和地面跟踪站数量较少,用BDS单系统获取的DCB精度有限,针对此问题,本文基于CODE GIM,采用两种不同的"零均值"基准约束方案(分别称为约束1和约束2),选取2015年(DOY002-090)MGEX的BDS数据,求解BDS的DCB,并对其进行精度评估。结果表明,两种约束方案下,卫星DCB差值整体趋势一致,DCBC2I-C7I、DCBC2I-C6I的系统性偏差分别约为-3.3ns和1.2ns,接收机DCB的系统性偏差与卫星DCB大小相同,符号相反。相对于约束1,施加约束2后,IGSO和MEO卫星DCB估值更加稳定(DCBC2I-C7ISTD最大改善21%,DCBC2I-C6ISTD最大改善13%),IGSO和MEO卫星的稳定性(分别在0.1ns和0.2ns左右)优于GEO卫星(0.150.32ns)。约束2的DCB估值效果不仅与CAS/DLR产品有较好的一致性(Bias:-0.40.2ns),而且顾及了BDS卫星DCB间的稳定性差异。两种约束方案下,BDS接收机DCB的STD无明显变化,说明约束的选择对BDS接收机DCB的稳定性无明显影响。BDS接收机DCB稳定性整体上优于1ns,中高纬度区域较好(STD 0.4ns左右),低纬度区域稍差(STD 0.81ns)。 相似文献
12.
M_DCB: Matlab code for estimating GNSS satellite and receiver differential code biases 总被引：6，自引：4，他引：2
Global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) have been widely used to monitor variations in the earth’s ionosphere by estimating total electron content (TEC) using dual-frequency observations. Differential code biases (DCBs) are one of the important error sources in estimating precise TEC from GNSS data. The International GNSS Service (IGS) Analysis Centers have routinely provided DCB estimates for GNSS satellites and IGS ground receivers, but the DCBs for regional and local network receivers are not provided. Furthermore, the DCB values of GNSS satellites or receivers are assumed to be constant over 1?day or 1?month, which is not always the case. We describe Matlab code to estimate GNSS satellite and receiver DCBs for time intervals from hours to days; the software is called M_DCB. The DCBs of GNSS satellites and ground receivers are tested and evaluated using data from the IGS GNSS network. The estimates from M_DCB show good agreement with the IGS Analysis Centers with a mean difference of less than 0.7?ns and an RMS of less than 0.4?ns, even for a single station DCB estimate. 相似文献
13.
GPS Differential Code Biases (DCBs) computation is usually based on ground networks of permanent stations. The drawback of the classical methods is the need for the ionospheric delay so that any error in this quantity will map into the solution. Nowadays, many low-orbiting satellites are equipped with GPS receivers which are initially used for precise orbitography. Considering spacecrafts at an altitude above the ionosphere, the ionized contribution comes from the plasmasphere, which is less variable in time and space. Based on GPS data collected onboard JASON-2 spacecraft, we present a methodology which computes in the same adjustment the satellite and receiver DCBs in addition to the plasmaspheric vertical total electron content (VTEC) above the satellite, the average satellite bias being set to zero. Results show that GPS satellite DCB solutions are very close to those of the IGS analysis centers using ground measurements. However, the receiver DCB and VTEC are closely correlated, and their value remains sensitive to the choice of the plasmaspheric parametrization. 相似文献
14.
Maxim Keshin 《GPS Solutions》2012,16(3):283-292
A new algorithm for single receiver DCB estimation using GIM vertical TEC gridded values is proposed. It estimates receiver DCB and vertical residual ionospheric delays using the least squares approach with linear constraints. The performance of the proposed algorithm was assessed by comparing estimated receiver DCBs with those provided by the IGS. The same comparisons were done using two other algorithms for receiver DCB estimation. It is demonstrated that the proposed algorithm is capable of reproducing IGS DCB values at the level of 0.1?C0.3?ns, which is better than the level of agreement observed for the other two algorithms. For our tests, we considered data from more than 100 IGS stations, daily, such that all major regions of the world were covered. Besides, both ionospherically quiet and disturbed days were considered. It provides some evidence that the aforementioned level of agreement with IGS receiver DCB values does not significantly dependent on geographical region and the state of the ionosphere. The algorithm is easy to implement and can be considered for online use. 相似文献
15.
Jaume Sanz J. Miguel Juan Adrià Rovira-Garcia Guillermo González-Casado 《GPS Solutions》2017,21(4):1549-1561
16.
差分码偏差(DCB)是电离层建模与导航定位授时的主要误差源,北斗多频多通道信号衍生出一系列新的DCB。本文首先分析了北斗三号卫星的码观测值组合及可估的DCB类型,建立了北斗三号卫星多频码偏差估计的数学模型,利用IGS实测数据首次估计得到了22种不同类型的北斗DCB。在此基础上,全面比较分析了各类DCB的内符合精度、外符合精度及月稳定度。结果表明,北斗三号卫星各类DCB的闭合差基本都在0.2 ns以内,具有较好的内符合精度;估计结果与中科院(CAS)、德国宇航中心(DLR)提供的DCB产品具有一致性,与CAS的6种DCB偏差基本在0.1 ns以内,与DLR的4种DCB偏差基本在0.2 ns以内;由于误差传递的影响,通过线性转换得到DCB值的精度和可靠性不及DCB直接估计量;北斗三号卫星各类DCB的月平均标准差为0.083 ns,具有较好的中长期稳定性;相较于北斗二号卫星,北斗三号卫星的DCB稳定性相对更优。 相似文献
17.
Estimation and analysis of Galileo differential code biases 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
Min Li Yunbin Yuan Ningbo Wang Zishen Li Ying Li Xingliang Huo 《Journal of Geodesy》2017,91(3):279-293
When sensing the Earth’s ionosphere using dual-frequency pseudorange observations of global navigation satellite systems (GNSS), the satellite and receiver differential code biases (DCBs) account for one of the main sources of error. For the Galileo system, limited knowledge is available about the determination and characteristic analysis of the satellite and receiver DCBs. To better understand the characteristics of satellite and receiver DCBs of Galileo, the IGGDCB (IGG, Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, Wuhan, China) method is extended to estimate the satellite and receiver DCBs of Galileo, with the combined use of GPS and Galileo observations. The experimental data were collected from the Multi-GNSS Experiment network, covering the period of 2013–2015. The stability of both Galileo satellite and receiver DCBs over a time period of 36 months was thereby analyzed for the current state of the Galileo system. Good agreement of Galileo satellite DCBs is found between the IGGDCB-based DCB estimates and those from the German Aerospace Center (DLR), at the level of 0.22 ns. Moreover, high-level stability of the Galileo satellite DCB estimates is obtained over the selected time span (less than 0.25 ns in terms of standard deviation) by both IGGDCB and DLR algorithms. The Galileo receiver DCB estimates are also relatively stable for the case in which the receiver hardware device stays unchanged. It can also be concluded that the receiver DCB estimates are rather sensitive to the change of the firmware version and that the receiver antenna type has no great impact on receiver DCBs. 相似文献
18.
Compensation for differential code bias (DCB) is necessary because it is the major source of errors in total electron content (TEC) measurements. The DCB estimation performance is degraded when only the regional GPS network is used. Because DCB estimation is highly correlated with ionospheric modeling, this degradation is particularly evident for measurements concentrated in an area of high TEC concentration. This study proposes a DCB estimation method that uses the long-term stability of the DCB to improve the estimation performance of the regional GPS network. We estimate satellite DCBs by assuming their constancy over seven months. This extended period increases the number of measurements used in DCB estimation and changes the local time distribution of collected measurements. As a result, the unbalanced distribution of specific ionospheric conditions disappears. Tests are performed using both global and regional networks, and the estimation performance is evaluated based on the position error and pseudorange residuals. First, the difference between the global and regional networks when using the conventional method is analyzed. Second, proposed methods are applied to regional networks. The proposed method can improve the DCB estimation performance, and the results are similar to those obtained using one-day global network data. 相似文献