http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987112001223     

B.P.Singh 《地学前缘(英文版)》2013,4(2):199-212

The Paleogene succession of the Himalayan foreland basin is immensely important as it preserves evidence of India-Asia collision and related records of the Himalayan orogenesis. In this paper, the depositional regime of the Paleogene succession of the Himalayan foreland basin and variations in composition of the hinterland at different stages of the basin developments are presented. The Paleogene succession of the western Himalayan foreland basin developed in two stages, i.e. syn-collisional stage and post-collisional stage. At the onset, chert breccia containing fragments derived from the hanging walls of faults and reworked bauxite developed as a result of erosion of the forebulge. The overlying early Eocene succession possibly deposited in a coastal system, where carbonates represent barriers and shales represent lagoons. Up-section, the middle Eocene marl beds likely deposited on a tidal flat. The late Eocene/Oligocene basal Murree beds, containing tidal bundles, indicate that a mixed or semi-diurnal tidal system deposited the sediments and the sedimentation took place in a tide-dominated estuary. In the higher-up, the succession likely deposited in a river-dominated estuary or in meandering rivers. In the beginning of the basin evolution, the sediments were derived from the Precambrian basement or from the metasediments/volcanic rocks possessing terrains of the south. The early and middle Eocene (54.7–41.3 Ma) succession of the embryonic foreland possibly developed from the sediments derived from the Trans-Himalayan schists and phyllites and Indus ophiolite of the north during syn-collisional stage. The detrital minerals especially the lithic fragments and the heavy minerals suggest the provenance for the late Eocene/Oligocene sequences to be from the recycled orogenic belt of the Higher Himalaya, Tethyan Himalaya and the Indus-suture zone from the north during post-collisional stage. This is also supported by the paleocurrent measurements those suggest main flows directed towards southeast, south and east with minor variations. This implies that the river system stabilized later than 41 Ma and the Higher Himalaya attained sufficient height around this time. The chemical composition of the sandstones and mudstones occurring in the early foreland basin sequences are intermediate between the active and passive continental margins and/or same as the passive continental margins. The sedimentary succession of this basin has sustained a temperature of about 200 °C and undergone a burial depth of about 6 km.  相似文献   

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987111000855     

Jozef Michalík  Daniela Reháková 《地学前缘(英文版)》2011,2(4):475-490

During the last decades, several integrated studies of Tethyan Jurassic/Cretaceous boundary sections from different countries were published with the objective to indicate problems for the selection of biological, chemical or physical markers suitable for identification of the Jurassic/Cretaceous boundary e the only system boundary within the Phanerozoic still not fixed by GSSP. Drawing the boundary between the Jurassic and Cretaceous systems is a matter of global scale discussions. The problem of proposing possible J/K boundary stratotypes results from lack of a global index fossils, global sea level drop, paleogeographic changes causing development of isolated facies areas, as well as from the effect of Late Cimmerian Orogeny. This contribution summarizes and comments data on J/K boundary interval obtained from several important Tethyan sections and shows still existing problems and discrepancies in its determination.  相似文献   

藏北美羌塘地块的归属问题     

纪云龙 《地学前缘》2000,7(4):370-370

  相似文献   

华南古特提斯东延问题的探讨   总被引：10，自引：0，他引：10  

丘元禧  张伯友 《中国区域地质》2000,19(2):175-180

通过有关古特提斯洋的建造记录和后期构造变位分析,认为古特提斯洋东段的位置仍应在现今的青藏－滇西三江往南沿碧土、昌宁－孟连、程逸至马来半岛的文冬－功勿、加里曼丹（古晋）、巴拉望经吕宋－台湾至日本一线,现今古特提斯洋古缝合带呈Ｕ字形是由于受到印度板块向北推挤、南海扩展以及菲律宾板块向西推挤扭曲履行而成。复原其在白垩纪末至新生代初期的展布方向应是近东西向的。现今的华南从桂西经桂东南、粤西、赣中至闽浙,也  相似文献   

古特提斯东昆仑活动陆缘及其区域成矿   总被引：6，自引：0，他引：6  

钱壮志  胡正国  刘继庆  李厚民 《大地构造与成矿学》2000,24(2):134-139

东昆仑地质构造特征、石炭—三叠系火山 -沉积建造及区域岩浆作用研究显示 ,海西 -印支期 ,该区属于古特提斯北侧活动陆缘的组成部分。活动陆缘区特殊的沉积环境、区域岩浆活动及构造变形动力等作用 ,构成了区域矿产形成的主要背景和控制因素 ,从而使不同类型和元素组成的矿床得以形成 ,并表现区域成矿的总体分带规律。  相似文献   

喜马拉雅造山带变泥质岩系及其地球化学特征   总被引：9，自引：7，他引：2  

曾令森  梁凤华  许志琴  戚学祥 《岩石学报》2008,24(7)

高喜马拉雅结晶岩系和北喜马拉雅穹隆都发育高角闪岩相-麻粒岩相变泥质岩,岩石组合以富铝质片麻岩类为主,伴生钾质花岗片麻岩、大理岩及基性麻粒岩等.元素地球化学特征表明,其原岩主要为较富铝的长石质砂岩和石英岩质砂岩及少量粘土岩,形成于大陆边缘浅海相沉积环境.这些变泥质岩具有相似的微量元素和稀土元素地球化学特征,表现为大离子亲石元素相对高场强元素较富集,轻稀土较重稀土富集,稀土总量较高,具有较显著的Eu负异常.在变质矿物组合、元素地球化学特征及锆石组成等特征上,它们与青藏高原北缘的康西瓦和阿尔金孔兹岩系相似,可能是来源于冈瓦纳大陆边缘的同一套岩石.  相似文献   

滇西特提斯的演化及主要金属矿床成矿作用   总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2  

罗君烈 《云南地质》1991,10(1):1-10

  相似文献   

东特提斯造山带研究述评     

周祖翼 《地质科技情报》1990,9(3):1-8

本文首先概述了特提斯造山带的研究历史及其研究现状,然后对中国和东南亚的特提斯造山带研究进行重点介绍,认为这一地区的特提斯造山带无论是其造山带作用方式还是其造山体的来源均有别于其它地区的特提斯造山带.  相似文献   

中国的全球构造位置和地球动力系统   总被引：8，自引：0，他引：8  

任纪舜  赵磊  徐芹芹  朱俊宾 《地质学报》2016,90(9):2100-2108

现今之中国位于亚洲大陆东南部,西太平洋活动带中段;在全球板块构造图上,中国位于欧亚板块的东南部,南为印度板块,东为太平洋板块和菲律宾海板块。地质历史上,以中朝、扬子、塔里木等小克拉通为标志的中国主体属于冈瓦纳和西伯利亚两个大陆之间的转换(互换)构造域:古生代时期,位于古亚洲洋之南,属冈瓦纳结构复杂的大陆边缘;中生代阶段,位于特提斯之北,属劳亚大陆的一部分。显生宙中国大地构造演化依次受古亚洲洋、特提斯-古太平洋、太平洋-印度洋三大动力体系之控制,形成古亚洲洋、特提斯和太平洋三大构造域。不论古亚洲洋,还是特提斯,都不是结构简单的大洋盆地,而是由一系列海底裂谷带(小洋盆带)和众多微陆块组合而成的结构复杂的洋盆体系。加之中、新生代的太平洋构造域和特提斯构造域叠加在古生代的古亚洲洋构造域之上,使中国地质构造图像在二维平面上呈现镶嵌构造,在三维空间上呈现立交桥式结构,使中国不仅是亚洲,也是全球构造最复杂的一个区域。不同阶段的地球动力体系在中国的叠加、复合,使多旋回构造-岩浆和成矿作用成为中国地质最突出的特征。因而中国的造山带大多是多旋回复合造山带,成矿(区)带大多是多旋回复合成矿(区)带,大型含油气盆地大多是多旋回叠合盆地。  相似文献   

缅甸中部抹谷早白垩世构造岩浆作用及对特提斯演化的启示     

陈希节  许志琴  Kyaing Sein  孟元库  蔡志慧 《地质学报》2016,90(11):3060-3080

本文系统报道了缅甸抹谷变质带中部Yinmabin花岗闪长岩体及其基性岩墙的主量元素、微量元素及锆石U-Pb年龄和Lu-Hf同位素组成,重点讨论了花岗闪长岩和基性岩墙的岩石成因、物质来源及其地质意义。抹谷Yinmabin花岗闪长岩体主量元素显示富钠(N2O/K2O=1.5~1.75)、准铝(ACNK=0.94~0.97)和钙碱性岩石系列的地球化学特征。样品富集轻稀土(LREE)元素、大离子亲石元素(LILE),相对亏损高场强元素(HFSE)。岩体的主、微量元素地球化学特征均显示其具有活动陆缘I型花岗岩的地球化学属性。抹谷Yinmabin花岗闪长岩的锆石U-Pb年龄为131~135 Ma,其εHf(t)值在-15.66~-2.99之间,平均值为-8.77,单阶段模式年龄(tDM)为795~1569 Ma;而后期侵位的辉绿岩的锆石U-Pb年龄为120~118 Ma,其εHf(t)值在-13.72~+5.82之间,平均值为-2.72,单阶段模式年龄(tDM)为570~1341 Ma,表明这些岩石可能主要来源于古老下地壳部分熔融但同时也受到地幔物质的加入混染。与滇西以及北拉萨岩浆带的Lu-Hf同位素特征十分相近,暗示抹谷-毛淡棉地块早白垩世岩浆岩带与波密-察隅-高黎贡-拉萨岩浆岩带形成环境相似,可能是腾冲岩浆岩带向南延伸的一部分。结合岩石成因、源区性质和区域构造演化,认为抹谷花岗闪长岩体及基性岩墙的形成与中特提斯洋板块的俯冲作用密切相关,同时俯冲-碰撞转换的时限应该在120 Ma左右。这对于研究抹谷地体在中生代期间中特提斯洋俯冲碰撞过程具有重要的地质意义。  相似文献