排序方式： 共有72条查询结果，搜索用时 36 毫秒
1.
A. A. Tretyakov K. E. Degtyarev E. B. Sal’nikova K. N. Shatagin A. B. Kotov A. V. Ryazantsev A. V. Pilitsyna S. Z. Yakovleva E. V. Tolmacheva Yu. V. Plotkina 《Doklady Earth Sciences》2016,466(1):14-19
The basement of the Zheltav sialic massif (Southern Kazakhstan) is composed of different metamorphic rocks united into the Anrakhai Complex. In the southeastern part of the massif, these rocks form a large antiform with the core represented by amphibole and clinopyroxene gneissic granite varieties. By their chemical composition, dominant amphibole (hastingsite) gneissic granites correspond to subalkaline granites, while their petroand geochemical properties make them close to A-type granites. The U–Pb geochronological study of accessory zircons yielded an age of 1841 ± 6 Ma, which corresponds to the crystallization age of melts parental for protoliths of amphibole gneissic granites of the Zheltav Massif. Thus, the structural–geological and geochronological data make it possible to define the Paleoproterozoic (Staterian) stage of anorogenic magmatism in the Precambrian history of the Zheltav Massif. The combined Sm–Nd isotopic—geochronological data and age estimates obtained for detrital zircons indicate the significant role of the Paleoproterozoic tectono-magmatic stage in the formation of the Precambrian continental crust of sialic massifs in Kazakhstan and northern Tien Shan. 相似文献
2.
T. V. Donskaya D. P. Gladkochub E. V. Sklyarov A. B. Kotov A. M. Larin A. E. Starikova A. M. Mazukabzov E. V. Tolmacheva S. D. Velikoslavinskii 《Petrology》2018,26(1):47-64
We studied the petrography, mineralogy, and geochemistry of the Paleoproterozoic (2.06 Ga) granites of the Katugin massif (Stanovoy suture zone), which hosts the combined rare-metal Katugin deposit. Three groups of granites were distinguished: (1) biotite (Bt) and biotite–riebeckite (Bt–Rbk) granites of the western block of the massif; (2) biotite–arfvedsonite (Bt–Arf) granites of the eastern block; and (3) arfvedsonite (Arf), aegirine–arfvedsonite (Aeg–Arf), and aegirine (Aeg) granites of the eastern block. The Bt and Bt–Rbk granites of the first group are mainly metaluminous and peraluminous rocks with rather high CaO contents and the minimum F contents among the granites described here. It was suggested that the granites of this group could be derived from a source dominated by crustal rocks with a small addition of mantle materials. These granites probably crystallized from a metaluminous–peraluminous melt with elevated CaO and moderate F contents. Melts of such compositions are least favorable for the crystallization of ore minerals. The Bt–Arf granites of the second group are mainly peralkaline and show high contents of CaO and Y and low contents of Na2O and F. A mixed mantle–crust source was proposed for the Bt–Arf granites. The initial melt of the Bt–Arf granites could have a peralkaline composition with elevated CaO content and moderate to high F content. The Arf, Aeg–Arf, and Aeg granites of the third group are enriched in ore mineral and were classified as peralkaline granites with very low CaO contents, elevated Na2O and F contents, and usually very high contents of Zr, Hf, Nb, and Ta. Based on the geochemical and isotopic data, it was supposed that the source of the granites of the third group could be derivatives of basaltic magmas produced in an OIB-type source with a minor addition of crustal material to the magma generation zone. It was suggested that the primary melt of this granite group could be a peralkaline CaO-poor and F-rich silicic melt, which is most favorable for the crystallization of ore minerals. Based on the analysis of the geochemical characteristics of the three granite groups and their relationships within the Katugin massif, a qualitative model of its formation was proposed. According to this model, the Bt and Bt–Rbk granites of the western block crystallized first, followed by the Bt–Arf granites of the eastern block and, eventually, the Arf, Aeg–Arf, and Aeg granites enriched in ore minerals. 相似文献
3.
Rytsk E. Yu. Tolmacheva E. V. Velikoslavinsky S. D. Kuznetsov A. B. Rodionov N. V. Andreev A. A. Fedoseenko A. M. 《Doklady Earth Sciences》2021,496(2):146-150
Doklady Earth Sciences - The results of U–Pb geochronological (SIMS) study of zircons from granitoids of the Konstantinovskii Stock located 6 km from the Sukhoi Log gold deposit are reported.... 相似文献
4.
V. P. Kovach A. V. Ryazantsev A. A. Tretyakov K. E. Degtyarev E. V. Tolmacheva Kuo-Lun Wang A. B. Kotov Sun-Lin Chun Bor-Min Jahn 《Doklady Earth Sciences》2014,455(1):254-258
A typical feature of the Precambrian complexes of the Kokshetau, Ishkeolmess, Erementau-Niyaz, and Aktau-Dzhungaria massifs of Northern and Central Kazakhstan is the presence of the end Mesoproterozoic-beginning of the Neoproterozoic quartzite-schist sequences in these sections. The lower and upper parts of these sequences are mostly composed of schists with interlayers of quartzites and marbles and of quartzitic sandstones, respectively. It is suggested that the quartzite-schist sequences represent the sub-platform cover of a large continental block and were formed in the regressive basin with widely abundant facies of submarine deltas and a littoral shoal. The presence of horizons and the lenses enriched in zircon-rutile heavy concentrate with the amount of accessory minerals of 10-70% characterizes the quartzite-schist sections of the Kokshetau and Erementau-Niyaz massifs. The U-Pb age of zircons from one such locality in the central part of the Erementau-Niyaz massif was analyzed by LA-ICP-MS. The Concordia ages of zircons are in the intervals 1041 ± 13-1519 ± 14, 1623 ± 14-1931 ± 14, and 2691 ± 14-2746 ± 14 Ma. One age was 2850 ± 14 Ma. The age distribution is characterized by clear peaks of 1.08, 1.20. 1.34, 1.46, 1.65, 1.89, and 2.70 Ga and weak peaks of 1.13 and 1.68 Ga. The age of the majority of zircons ranges from 1309 ± 14 to 1519 ± 14 Ma. Our data indicate that mostly Neoproterozoic rocks with a subordinate role of Paleoproterozoic and Neoarchean complexes served the feeding sources for the quartzite-schist sequence of the Erementau-Niyaz massif. The Mesoproterozoic and Paleoproterozoic events identified for the detrital zircons of the Erementau-Niyaz massif are completely manifested only in Laurentia. In the first approximation, these events coincide with the assembly and breakup of the Columbia/Nuna supercontinent (～1650–1580 and 1450–1380 Ma) and assembly of the Rodinia supercontinent (1300–900 Ma). 相似文献
5.
6.
Danukalova M. K. Kuzmichev A. B. Bagaeva A. A. Tolmacheva T. Yu. 《Lithology and Mineral Resources》2022,57(1):44-61
Lithology and Mineral Resources - Sedimentological features of the Upper Cambrian–Middle Ordovician rocks exposed in eastern Taimyr in the Faddey Gulf area are discussed. The studied sections... 相似文献
7.
8.
S. D. Velikoslavinskii A. B. Kotov E. B. Salnikova A. M. Larin A. A. Sorokin A. P. Sorokin V. P. Kovach E. V. Tolmacheva S. Z. Yakovleva I. V. Anisimova 《Doklady Earth Sciences》2012,444(2):661-665
According to the results of U-Pb geochronological investigations, the age of the amphibolite protoliths (metabasalts) in the Ust??-Gilyui sequence within the Stanovoi Complex of the Amazar-Gilyui structural and formational zone in the Selenga-Stanovoi Superterrain of the Central Asian fold belt can be estimated at 193 ± 1 Ma. The Nd model age of the Ust??-Gilyui metasedimentary rocks is in the interval of t Nd(DM) = 1.1?C3.1 Ga. This information along with the previously obtained geochronological data are indicative of the fact that the Ust??-Gilyui sequence consists of metasedimentary and metavolcanic rocks of various ages: (1) volcanic rocks with the age of 193 ± 1 Ma; (2) metasedimentary and metavolcanic rocks broken through by the Paleozoic granitoids dated to 370 Ma and characterized by minimum estimations of t Nd(DM) = 1.1 Ga, i.e., rocks with an age of 1.1?C0.4 Ga. In addition, it is quite possible that this sequence also includes more ancient rocks. The SSS Amazar-Gilyui structural and formational zone is likely to be a tectonic mélange composed of the metasedimentary and metavolcanic rocks of the Mesozoic and, probably, Paleozoic and Early Precambrian ages. The studied zone was formed in the Mesozoic, most likely, in the course of the collision processes initiated by the closing up of the Mongol-Okhotsk Ocean. 相似文献
9.
10.