排序方式： 共有3条查询结果，搜索用时 93 毫秒
1
1.
Mathematical Geosciences - Customary and routine practice of geostatistical modeling assumes that inter-point distances are a Euclidean metric (i.e., as the crow flies) when characterizing spatial... 相似文献
2.
Mathematical Geosciences - The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake in equation 9. 相似文献
3.
On the Use of Non-Euclidean Distance Measures in Geostatistics 总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4
Frank C. Curriero 《Mathematical Geology》2006,38(8):907-926
In many scientific disciplines, straight line, Euclidean distances may not accurately describe proximity relationships among
spatial data. However, non-Euclidean distance measures must be used with caution in geostatistical applications. A simple
example is provided to demonstrate there are no guarantees that existing covariance and variogram functions remain valid (i.e.
positive definite or conditionally negative definite) when used with a non-Euclidean distance measure. There are certain distance
measures that when used with existing covariance and variogram functions remain valid, an issue that is explored. The concept
of isometric embedding is introduced and linked to the concepts of positive and conditionally negative definiteness to demonstrate
classes of valid norm dependent isotropic covariance and variogram functions, results many of which have yet to appear in
the mainstream geostatistical literature or application. These classes of functions extend the well known classes by adding
a parameter to define the distance norm. In practice, this distance parameter can be set a priori to represent, for example,
the Euclidean distance, or kept as a parameter to allow the data to choose the metric. A simulated application of the latter
is provided for demonstration. Simulation results are also presented comparing kriged predictions based on Euclidean distance
to those based on using a water metric. 相似文献
1