排序方式： 共有6条查询结果，搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
地方坐标到2000国家大地坐标转换方法研究 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
我国自2008年7月1日起启用2000国家大地坐标系作为我国测绘生产和GIS系统建设新的坐标系。由于早期测绘生产没有采用统一的坐标系,坐标系统的不一致是GIS系统开发、数据建库和多源数据集成经常碰到的问题。回顾常用的坐标转换方法,并探讨数学模型转换方法的参数计算步骤与提高参数准确性的方法,利用厦门地方坐标系和2000国家大地坐标系下两套不同的公共控制点,计算转换参数,通过编写程序,完成了多种文件格式的测绘数据在两种坐标系之间的相互转换,取得了较好的效果。 相似文献
2.
3.
By using field-survey hydrological data of the related control stations in Dongting Lake and the Yangtze River mainstream in 1951–2010, the evolution characters of water exchange abilities between the two water bodies and their response to the operation of the Three Gorges Reservoir(TGR) from different time scales are analyzed based on their hydraulic relations. The results are shown as follows. Firstly, during July-September, the replenishment ability of Three Outlets to Dongting Lake is stronger, and in January-March, the replenishment ability of Dongting Lake to Yangtze River is stronger. Secondly, there has been an obvious inter-decadal wave on the water exchange coefficient between Dongting Lake and Yangtze River. In 1951–1958 and 1959–1968, the replenishment ability of Three Outlets to Dongting Lake was stronger, but in 2003–2010, the replenishment ability of Dongting Lake to Yangtze River has been strengthened. Thirdly, the spill-division ability of Three Outlets weakens, and the water of Dongting Lake coming from Three Outlets decreases either in typical years or under different dispatching modes of the TGR after the operation of the Three Gorges Reservoir. Furthermore, the water of Dongting Lake coming from Four Rivers takes the dominant position, which obviously enhances the replenishment ability of Dongting Lake to Yangtze River. Fourthly, if the effect of the runoff fluctuation in the basin is not considered, the evolution characters of the exchange capacities and the exchange process between Dongting Lake and Yangtze River in different time scales are generally changed with the variation of the water exchange amount between them, although the factors influencing the water exchange capacities between them is very complex. These show that there is an in-line growth or decline relation between the river-lake water exchange ability and the river-lake water exchange amount. 相似文献
4.
洞庭湖与长江水体交换能力演变及对三峡水库运行的响应 总被引：6，自引：0，他引：6
运用洞庭湖区与长江干流相关控制站1951-2010 年实测水文数据, 在分析江湖水力关系的基础上, 从不同时间尺度分析江湖水体交换能力的演变特征及其对三峡水库运行的响应。结果表明:① 7-9 月长江荆南三口对洞庭湖的补给能力较强, 1-3 月洞庭湖对长江的补给能力较强;② 江湖水体交换系数具有明显的年代际波动, 其中1951-1958 年、1959-1968 年荆南三口对湖泊的补给能力较强, 而2003-2010 年湖泊对长江的补给能力增强;③ 三峡水库运行后无论是典型年还是在水库不同调度方式运行期, 三口分泄能力减弱, 入湖水量减少, 而因四水入湖水量占绝对优势, 湖泊对长江的补给能力明显增强;④ 尽管影响江湖水体交换能力的因素极为复杂, 但从总体上讲, 除受流域降水波动影响外, 江湖水体交换能力在不同时间尺度上的演变特征及其过程均随着江湖水体交换量的变化而变化, 说明江湖水体交换能力强度与江湖水体交换量之间存在着彼此消长的关系。 相似文献
5.
典型年三峡水库不同调度方式对洞庭湖区水情的影响研究(英文) 总被引：4，自引：1，他引：3
Based on the field-survey prototype hydrology data in typical years,the effect dur-ing the running periods of different dispatch modes of the Three Gorges Reservoir on the water regimes in Dongting Lake area is comparatively analyzed.The results are shown as follows.(1) The influence periods are from 25 May to 10 June,from 1 July to 31 August,from 15 September to 31 October and from December to the next April,among which the influence of the water-supplement dispatch in the dry season is not very sensitive.(2) During the period under the pre-discharge dispatch,the runoff volume slightly increases as well as both the average water level and the highest water level rise in the usual year.While in the wet and dry years,the average increase in the runoff volume is 40.25×108 m3 and the average rises of the average water level and the highest water level are both 1.06 m.(3) As for the flood-storage dispatch,the flood volume increases slightly,in the dry and wet years,the flood volume,the average water level and the highest water level averagely reduce by 444.02×108 m3,2.64 m and 1.42 m respectively.(4) Under the water-storage dispatch,the runoff volume slightly in-creases and the water level heightens in a sort in the usual year.And in the dry and wet years,the average decreases in the runoff volume,the average water level and the highest water levels are respectively 185.27×108 m3,3.13 m and 2.14 m.(5) During the period under the water-supplement dispatch,the runoff volume,the average water level and the highest water levels averagely decline by 337.7×108 m3,1.89 m and 2.39 m respectively in the usual and wet years.However,in the dry year,the runoff volume increases as well as the average and highest water levels slightly go up. 相似文献
6.
三峡水库不同调度方式运行期洞庭湖区的水情响应 总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4
运用1951-2002 年典型年实测原型水文资料,对比分析2003-2010 年三峡水库不同调度方式运行期对洞庭湖区水情的影响,结果表明：(1) 影响时间为每年5 月25 日-6 月10 日、7 月1 日-8月31 日、9 月15 日-10 月31 日、12 月-次年4 月,其中枯期补水调度的影响不很敏感;(2) 预泄调度,平水年径流有所增加,平均水位、最高水位均有上升。丰、枯年影响期径流增加平均值40.25 ×108 m3;平均水位抬高平均值1.06 m,最高水位壅高平均值1.06 m;(3) 蓄洪调度,平水年洪水量稍有上涨,枯、丰年影响期洪水减少平均值444.02 × 108 m3,平均洪水位降低平均值2.64 m,最高洪水位降低平均值1.42 m;(4) 蓄水调度,除平水年影响期径流增加、水位稍有壅高外,枯、丰年影响期径流减少平均值185.27 × 108 m3,平均水位降低平均值3.13 m,最高水位降低平均值2.14 m;(5) 补水调度,平、丰年影响期径流减少平均值337.7 × 108 m3,平均水位降低平均值1.89 m,最高水位降低平均值2.39 m,但枯水年影响期径流量增加、平均水位与最高水位稍有抬高。关键词：长江三峡水库;调度方式;洞庭湖区;水情变化 相似文献
1