排序方式： 共有9条查询结果，搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
我国东部沿海省区城镇化水平影响因素的空间差异 总被引：3，自引：2，他引：3
本文利用2000年截面数据,用因子分析法考察了我国东部沿海省区人口城镇化影响因素的差异、特征和类型。分析结果表明,沿海省区的城镇化水平受到多种因素不同程度的影响,各省区城镇化水平的影响因素及其影响作用呈现出明显的差异化特征,既有明显受到转型期要素流动影响的省份如广东省;也有综合经济实力提高推动城镇化的区域如沪苏和浙江省;还有表现为典型的工业化带动城镇化的传统模式的省份如山东省等。省区间差异化的城镇化影响因素表明,我国沿海省区的城镇化具有明显的个性化特征。 相似文献
2.
China＇s economic development stage and its spatiotemporal evolution： A prefectural-level analysis 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
As important mechanisms of regional strategy and policy,prefecture-level regions have played an increasingly significant role in the development of China’s economy.However,little research has grasped the essence of the economic development stage and the spatio-temporal evolution process at the prefecture level;this may lead to biased policies and their ineffective implementations.Based on Chenery’s economic development theory,this paper identifies China’s economic development stages at both national and prefectural levels.Both the Global Moran I index and the Getis-Ord Gi* index are employed to investigate the spatio-temporal evolution of China’s economic development from 1990 to 2010.Major conclusions can be drawn as follows.(1) China’s economic development is generally in the state of agglomeration.It entered the Primary Production Stage in 1990,and the Middle Industrialized Stage in 2010,with a ’balanced-unbalanced-gradually rebalanced’ pattern in the process.(2) China’s rapid economic growth experienced a spatial shift from the coastal areas to the the inland areas.Most advanced cities in mid-western China can be roughly categorized into regional hub cities and resource-dependent cities.(3) Hot spots in China’s economy moved northward and westward.The interactions between cities and prefectures became weaker in Eastern China,while cities and prefectures in Central and Western China were still at the stage of individual development,with limited effect on the surrounding cities.(4) While the overall growth rate of China’s economy has gradually slowed down during the past two decades,the growth rate of cities and prefectures in Central and Western China was much faster than those in coastal areas.(5) Areas rich in resources,such as Xinjiang and Inner Mongolia,have become the new hot spots of economic growth in recent years.For these regions,however,more attention needs to be paid to their unbalanced industrial structures and the lagging social development against the backdrop of the rapid economic growth,driven predominantly by the exploitation of resources. 相似文献
3.
中国流动人口空间格局演变机制及城镇化效应——基于2000和2010年人口普查分县数据的分析 总被引：46，自引：12，他引：34
基于2000和2010年全国人口普查分县数据,对中国流动人口空间格局的演变特征、形成机制及其城镇化效应进行了系统分析。研究发现,流动人口分布的空间格局具有较强的稳定性,长三角、珠三角和京津冀等沿海城市群仍然是其主要集中地,且沿海集中区有连绵化的趋势,但在城市群内部的空间分布模式差异显著。流动人口向内陆地区的省会等特大城市集中趋势明显,其分布重心出现了明显的北移。省内县际的流动人口规模已接近于省际流动,且有更高的意愿和更强的能力永久居留城镇,省内县际的永久性迁移将成为未来中国人口城镇化的主导模式。中国流动人口迁入地的选择受到政府和市场双重力量的影响,后者的影响力更强。远距离流入东部地区的人口在务工之外,对享受城市生活也开始有所考虑;而中西部地区政府力量在引导人口流动中仍起到重要作用。大规模的人口流动对流出地和流入地的城镇化水平提高均有显著贡献,同时在很大程度上重构了中国城镇体系的等级规模结构和空间布局模式。 相似文献
4.
近50年来山东城市体系的演化过程--基于城市中心性的分析 总被引：15，自引：4，他引：11
在前人工作的基础上,在简单讨论已有的相对中心性测度方法的基础上,根据研究目的对Tietz公式进行了一定的补充。利用1955年私营商业调查,1982年和2000年人口普查数据,通过NegF法和SumF法分析了近50年山东省中心城市的分布,及其紧密腹地、松散腹地的变动,勾勒出了1955年到2000年山东城市体系的动态演化过程。认识到山东省城市体系的发展是一个逐步复杂化、有序化的过程,由分别以青岛和济南为中心城市的两个子体系逐步演化至以青岛为中心城市的单一共同体系。在这一过程中,中心城市的等级性逐渐显化。 相似文献
5.
6.
China has witnessed unprecedented urbanization over the past decades.The rapid expansion of urban population has been dominantly contributed by the floating population from rural areas,of which the spatiotemporal patterns,driving forces,and multidimensional effects are scrutinized and evaluated in this study by using the latest national censuses conducted in 2000 and 2010.Analysis based on the county-level data comes to conclusions as follows.The spatial pattern of floating population has remained stable over the first decade of the new century.The top 1%cities with the largest floating population received 45.5% of all migrants in China.As the rapid development of mega-city regions,the coastal concentration areas of floating population tended to geographically united as a whole,whereas the spatial distribution of migrants within each region varied significantly.The migrant concentration area in the Yangtze River Delta was the largest and its expansion was also the most salient.However,the floating population has growingly moved into provincial capitals and other big cities in the inland regions and its gravity center has moved northward for around 110 km during the study period.The spatial pattern of floating population has been formed jointly by the state and market forces in transitional China and the impacts of state forces have been surpassed by those of market forces in the country as a whole.The attractiveness of coastal cities and counties to the floating population comes mainly from the nonagricultural employment opportunities and public services,reflecting that long-distance and long-term migrants have moved coastward not only to gain employment but also to enjoy city life.By contrast,in the central and western regions,places with a higher economic development level and at a higher administrative level are more attractive to floating populations,demonstrating that the state remains to play an important role in allocating economic resources and promoting regional development in inland China.As the main body of new urban residents,the floating population has contributed substantially to the elevation of the urbanization levels of migrant-sending and-receiving places,by 20.0% nd 49.5% respectively.Compared with extensively investigated interprovincial migrants,intra-provincial migrants have higher intention and ability to permanently live in cities and thus might become the main force of China’s urbanization in the coming decades.The internal migration has also reshaped China’s urban system in terms of its hierarchical organization and spatial structure. 相似文献
7.
中国经济发展阶段及其时空格局演变特征 总被引：9，自引：3，他引：6
地级行政单元在中国经济发展中扮演着越来越重要的角色,是落实区域发展战略和相关政策的重要空间依托。现有研究中缺乏针对中国地级行政单元经济发展阶段及其时空格局演变的实证研究。本文在对经济发展阶段划分标准进行辨析的基础上,从全国和地级两个层面对中国经济发展的阶段性及其时空特征进行系统分析,并通过Global Moran’s I指数和Getis-Ord Gi*指数探讨了中国经济发展的空间演变规律。研究发现:①总体而言,中国经济发展一直处于相对的集聚状态,自1990年到2010年由初级产品生产阶段进入工业化的中期阶段,经济发展格局呈现出"均衡—不均衡—逐步均衡"的演变特征。②中国经济发展呈现出明显的由沿海向内陆地区推进的总体趋势,中西部发展水平较高的城市主要是区域性中心城市和资源富集型城市两种类型。③中国经济发展的热点区域呈现出"北移西进"的态势,东部沿海地区空间联动发展的效应有所减弱,呈现出"南上北下"的趋势,中西部地区城市仍以单体式发展为主,区域带动效应较弱,联动发展态势不明显。④从时间趋势来看,虽然全国经济发展出现了放缓的趋势,但中西部地区的经济增速却快速提高,已经明显高于沿海地区。⑤资源富集地区是中西部经济增长的热点地区,采用人均GDP单一指标测算的部分资源富集地区的经济发展阶段存在"虚高化"的特征,资源大规模集中开发带动经济总量迅速膨胀的同时,却掩盖了背后的经济结构失调和社会发展滞后等诸多问题,应引起决策者和学术界的持续关注。 相似文献
8.
国家节点战略的实施路径及其经济效应评价 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
以试点改革为特色、依托关键节点逐步推进是改革开放以来中国区域开发的重要经验。在对改革开放以来中国区域政策演进的过程与特征梳理的基础上,本文将围绕重要节点的区域开发战略界定为国家节点战略,系统阐述了其理论基础与基本内涵,并以改革开放不同时期的深圳特区、上海浦东新区和天津滨海新区为例,定量考察了国家节点战略对中国区域经济格局演变的影响。研究发现,中国区域政策大体上经历了以经济特区为龙头的探索阶段、以开发区为主导的推广阶段和以国家级新区与国家综合配套改革试验区为载体的优化阶段等三个阶段,其中国家节点战略发挥了重要的示范与引领作用,推动了中国区域政策由点及面的螺旋式演进,在此过程中政府的角色也发生了相应的转变。作为增长极理论在中国转型时期的创新性应用与发展,国家节点战略不仅是区域发展“引擎”和重要增长极,也是转型期中国制度创新的重要载体;国家节点战略地区与区域发展实现了良性耦合,形成了梯次区域开发模式。实证研究表明,国家节点战略是政府引导与调控区域发展的重要手段,其经济效应呈明显的复杂多元特征及阶段性和尺度差异特征。 相似文献
9.
东亚高速铁路网络的发展演化与地理效应评价 总被引：8，自引：2，他引：6
经济全球化和区域一体化进程的不断推进,促使东亚在世界经济中的地位不断提升。高速铁路作为促进经济一体化和区域发展的重要手段和基础,其快速发展势必会对东亚地区的区域发展、空间结构、人口流动和一体化产生重大影响。在分析东亚高速铁路网络发展历程及服务水平的基础上,评价与对比了高速铁路建设对城市交通圈和可达性的影响,及一体化高速铁路潜在的空间效应,以期为东亚一体化高速铁路构建提供指导。结果表明：东亚高速铁路网络扩张整体上呈现出“核心—核心”到网络化的发展历程;高速铁路网络在中国东中部、日本和韩国等地区具有较高的人口和产业服务水平,但国土面积覆盖率相对较低;高速铁路的建设促使核心城市交通圈格局不断扩展与强化,可实现当日往返城市对数量明显增加,主要分布在中国长三角、珠三角,日本东京和韩国首尔周边;中国大陆、日本和韩国的加权平均旅行时间分别呈现出以郑州、东京和首尔为中心的“核心—边缘”结构,且圈层结构逐渐向高速铁路沿线延伸;高速铁路的建设促使城市人口服务水平和可达性的空间格局均呈现出明显的“廊道效应”。 相似文献
1