首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到17条相似文献,搜索用时 140 毫秒
1.
北京时间2022年6月10日1时28分四川阿坝州马尔康市(32.25°N,101.82°E)发生6.0级地震。中国地震台网中心于震后3min发布自动速报结果、震后约7min发布正式速报结果,同时联合多家单位启动地震应急产品产出工作,共产出震源参数、历史地震、地质构造、震源机制、余震精定位、推测烈度和震源破裂过程等9类应急产品,对于发震断层的孕震构造给出了初步约束。结果显示,本次地震发生在松岗断裂附近,位于青藏高原巴颜喀拉块体东部的阿坝次级地块;震源机制解表明该地震是一次走滑型事件,余震与主震性质整体一致。余震烈度速报推测极震区烈度达Ⅸ度,区域面积约70km2;Ⅷ度及以上区域面积约734km2,涉及7个乡。  相似文献   

2.
北京时间2023年8月6日2时33分山东德州市平原县(37.16°N,116.34°E)发生5.5级地震,中国地震台网中心部署的预警试运行系统于震后7.5s产出首报预警结果。中国地震台网中心于震后2min发布自动速报结果,于震后10min发布正式速报结果,同时联合多家单位启动地震应急产品产出工作,共产出震源参数、历史地震、地震构造、震源机制、余震精定位、推测烈度和震源破裂过程等9类应急产品。结果显示,本次地震发生在林南断裂附近,震源机制解表明该地震为一次走滑型事件; 余震精定位结果显示余震展布呈近NEE向,与震中附近断裂方向一致; 烈度速报推测极震区烈度达Ⅷ度,区域面积约528km2,Ⅶ度及以上区域总面积约1694km2。  相似文献   

3.
北京时间2022年1月8日1时45分青海海北州门源县(37.77°N,101.26°E)发生6.9级地震,中国地震台网中心部署的测试预警系统于震后5.3s产出首报预警结果,震后13min中国地震台网中心发布正式速报结果,同时联合多家单位启动地震应急产品产出工作,共产出震源参数、历史地震、地震构造、震源机制、余震定位、推测烈度等9类16种数据产品。产品结果显示,本次地震发生在青藏高原东北缘,位于柴达木-祁连地块、阿拉善地块和鄂尔多斯地块交汇处,震中位于冷龙岭断裂西段和托莱山北缘断裂交接部位。震源机制解表明该地震为一次走滑型事件,余震精定位结果显示主震西侧余震展布呈近EW向,主震东侧呈NW-SE向,与震中区域断裂走向基本一致,烈度速报推测极震区烈度达到Ⅸ度,区域面积约175km2,Ⅷ度及以上区域总面积约1442km2,涉及四乡一镇。  相似文献   

4.
北京时间2022年9月5日12时52分四川甘孜州泸定县(29.59°N,102.08°E)发生6.8级地震,中国地震预警网于震后6.1s产出首报预警结果;中国地震台网中心于震后3min发布自动速报结果,震后11min发布正式速报结果,同时联合中国地震局地球物理研究所、地质研究所、地震预测研究所和应急管理部国家自然灾害防治研究院启动地震应急产品产出工作,共产出震源基本参数、历史地震、地震构造、地震矩张量、余震精定位、地震烈度和震源破裂过程等9类应急产品。结合上述应急产品,对本次地震进行了研究,初步刻画了地震的构造环境、震源特征、断层形态和受灾区域,并分析了地震成因。结果表明,本次地震是发生在鲜水河断裂带南东段雪门坎—磨西断裂上的一次倾角近直立的走滑型事件,自起始破裂点向南东破裂,破裂长度约20km,最大滑移点深度约6km。余震精定位结果显示余震呈NW—SE向展布,长度约50km,深度主要集中在3~14km,展布方向与震中区域断裂走向基本一致,主震震中处断层倾角近乎垂直,与震源机制揭示的特征一致。烈度速报推测与地震烈度图显示极震区烈度达Ⅸ度,区域面积约280km2,Ⅷ度及以上区域总面积约505km2,涉及17个乡镇。认为本次地震是青藏高原隆升和高原上地壳物质向南东挤出,导致鲜水河断裂南东段雪门坎—磨西断裂上积累的应力的一次快速释放过程。  相似文献   

5.
北京时间2024年1月23日2时9分,新疆阿克苏地区乌什县(41.26°N,78.63°E)发生7.1级地震。中国地震预警网于震后12.2 s产出首报预警信息,中国地震台网中心于震后3 min发布自动速报结果,震后13 min发布正式速报结果,同时联合多家单位启动地震应急产品产出工作,产出震源参数、地震构造、历史地震、余震精定位、震源机制和震源破裂过程等应急产品。结果显示,本次地震是一次发生在青藏高原西缘的逆冲型地震事件,余震展布呈NEE向; 主震破裂持续时间约15 s,主要能量约在震后8 s释放,最大位移量约2.3 m,破裂长度约32 km; 极震区推测烈度达Ⅷ度,区域涉及乌什县、阿合奇县,面积约4614 km2; 震中附近多个台站峰值加速度值大于该区设防标准,存在造成部分房屋和道路损坏的可能,经对比,与实际震害调查结果相吻合。  相似文献   

6.
2021年5月21日21时48分(北京时间)云南大理州漾濞县发生MS6.4地震。中国地震台网中心在震后8min发布正式速报结果,随后联合多家单位启动地震相关产品的应急产出工作,共产出地震基本参数、历史地震、地震构造、震源机制、仪器地震烈度和余震精定位等9类14种数据产品。产品结果显示,本次地震发生在川滇地块滇西地区,位于维西-乔后-巍山断裂地震带附近,震源机制解表明该地震为一次走滑型事件,断层呈SE走向,余震主要沿主震SE方向拓展约20km,深度主要集中在10km及以浅范围。该地震极震区推测烈度达到Ⅷ度,区域涉及太平乡、富恒乡、漾江镇和苍山西镇4个乡镇,面积约227km2。距震中9km处的强震台站记录到的三分量峰值加速度值均大于该地区的设防标准,表示该地震可能造成震中附近漾濞县的人员伤亡以及房屋破损,与灾情调查结果吻合。  相似文献   

7.
孙昭杰  李金  黄瑜  桂荣 《中国地震》2018,34(1):71-82
利用新疆区域数字地震台网波形资料,采用CAP方法反演了2015年7月3日新疆皮山6.5级地震主震及部分MS≥3.6余震的震源机制解和距心深度。研究结果显示,皮山6.5级地震主震最佳双力偶解节面I:走向290°/倾角55°/滑动角96°;节面Ⅱ:走向101°/倾角35°/滑动角82°,最佳矩心深度16km,表明该地震是一次逆冲型事件。通过反演部分MS≥3.6余震的震源机制解发现,早期余震的破裂方式与主震较为一致,随着时间的推移余震震源机制出现走滑型和正断型,表明早期余震的破裂受主震影响较大,随着序列的发展变化,后期震源区应力场可能出现一定程度的调整。统计皮山6.5级地震序列P轴方位发现,优势方位为NNE向,与该区域构造应力场方向较为一致。结合地震序列的震源机制及他人精定位结果和震源区地质构造情况,初步解释了导致此次地震的原因。  相似文献   

8.
2016年12月8日呼图壁县发生MS6.2地震,由于初始定位误差较大,余震序列分布离散,对呼图壁地震的发震断层尚不清楚。本研究采用CAP方法反演主震及余震中MS ≥ 3.5地震的震源机制解,并采用双差定位方法对余震进行重定位,得到了637个地震的震源参数。结果显示,呼图壁地震主震的最佳双力偶节面解为:节面Ⅰ走向82°,倾角18°,滑动角61°;节面Ⅱ走向292°,倾角74°,滑动角98°。其中节面Ⅱ为本次地震的破裂面。重定位后,主震的震源位置被重定为(86.36°E,43.79°N),震源深度14 km,根据余震的分布特点、震源机制解特征和区域构造特征,呼图壁地震的发震断层并不是南倾的准噶尔南缘断裂,而是在其北边的霍尔果斯-玛纳斯-吐谷鲁断裂带上的一个反冲断层。在北天山区域内,由于构造反转的作用,存在诸多倾角在45°~55°之间的北倾的断层。根据GPS的资料显示,天山北部地区的应力在新生代晚期已开始积累,这增加了天山北部前缘的发震概率。  相似文献   

9.
采用CAP(Cut and Paste)方法反演了2016年1月21日青海门源MS6.4地震的震源机制解,其最佳双力偶解节面I走向339°,倾角49°,滑动角111°:节面Ⅱ走向129°,倾角45°,滑动角68°,矩震级MW5.92,矩心震源深度约为9 km,地震破裂类型为逆冲型地震。结合余震序列展布及震区的活动构造特征,判定发震断层面为节面I,推测此次地震的发震断裂为冷龙岭断裂。  相似文献   

10.
2021年5月22日02时04分11.3秒(北京时间)青海果洛州玛多县发生M7.4地震。中国地震台网中心在震后立即启动余震监测和统计工作,于震后9min发布正式速报结果。同时,中国地震台网中心联合多家单位,共产出9类14种数据产品。产品结果显示,本次地震发生在巴颜喀拉块体,位于甘德南缘断裂带和玛多甘德地震带之间,推测极震区的烈度达到Ⅸ度;震源机制解显示该地震为一次走滑型事件,余震在震中两侧均有分布,总体呈NW-SE走向;震源破裂过程的结果表明本次地震持续时间约为45s,主要能量在震后30s释放,地震的破裂方式为双侧破裂,最大滑移量达4.5m,地壳浅层滑动位移量较大,推测可能存在地表破裂。  相似文献   

11.
The 2018,Songyuan,Jilin M_S5. 7 earthquake occurred at the intersection of the FuyuZhaodong fault and the Second Songhua River fault. The moment magnitude of this earthquake is M_W5. 3,the centroid depth by the waveform fitting is 12 km,and it is a strike-slip type event. In this paper,with the seismic phase data provided by the China Earthquake Network, the double-difference location method is used to relocate the earthquake sequence,finally the relocation results of 60 earthquakes are obtained. The results show that the aftershock zone is about 4. 3km long and 3. 1km wide,which is distributed in the NE direction. The depth distribution of the seismic sequence is 9km-10 km. 1-2 days after the main shock,the aftershocks were scattered throughout the aftershock zone,and the largest aftershock occurred in the northeastern part of the aftershock zone. After 3-8 days,the aftershocks mainly occurred in the southwestern part of the aftershock zone. The profile distribution of the earthquake sequence shows that the fault plane dips to the southeast with the dip angle of about 75°. Combined with the regional tectonic setting,focal mechanism solution and intensity distribution,we conclude that the concealed fault of the Fuyu-Zhaodong fault is the seismogenic fault of the Songyuan M_S5. 7 earthquake. This paper also relocates the earthquake sequence of the previous magnitude 5. 0 earthquake in 2017. Combined with the results of the focal mechanism solution,we believe that the two earthquakes have the same seismogenic structure,and the earthquake sequence generally develops to the southwest. The historical seismic activity since 2009 shows that after the magnitude 5. 0 earthquake in 2017,the frequency and intensity of earthquakes in the earthquake zone are obviously enhanced,and attention should be paid to the development of seismic activity in the southwest direction of the earthquake zone.  相似文献   

12.
玉树地震震源区速度结构与余震分布的关系   总被引:14,自引:5,他引:9       下载免费PDF全文
利用玉树震区21个应急流动地震台站和青海省地震台网固定地震台站的观测数据,采用双差层析成像方法,对2010年4月14日至6月15期间发生的地震进行了重定位,并反演得到了玉树地震震源区的三维速度结构.重定位结果揭示余震主要沿NW向成窄带状分布在断层的两侧,表明脆性破裂应力释放主要集中于一个狭窄的区域内.在西北端,余震偏离玉树—甘孜断裂分布,在SW向也有分布,推测可能与南西向次级断裂有关.双差层析成像得到的速度结构在浅部与地表地质构造相一致,中上地壳的速度结构显示巴颜喀拉地块为高速异常,羌塘地块为低速异常.玉树地震余震分布与特定的速度结构存在相关性:主震发生在高低速过渡带偏高速体的一侧,余震主要分布在高速体外围,高速体内部几乎没有余震分布.一般说来,中上地壳的高速体通常具有较高的强度,可以积累较强的孕震能量.主震发生后,高速体内积累的弹性能量向周边释放,可能是导致高速体周边余震发生的主要原因.  相似文献   

13.
Using hypocenter relocation, moment tensor inversion, stress field inversion, and fault slip tendency analysis, this study systematically investigated three M5.5–5.8 earthquake sequences that occurred after 2000 in the Yongning-Luguhu faulted basin in the middle of the Lijiang-Xiaojinhe fault zone within the Sichuan-Yunnan block, Southwest China. Our results show that since the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake, the tectonic stress pattern in this area may have changed and that b-values estimated for the earthquake sequences show evidence of an increasing trend in stress in the study area. Seismicity in the small-scale faulted basin adjacent to the large-scale fault zone is a possible indicator of regional stress. We also note that the aftershocks of the M5.7 earthquake sequence in 2012 and the M5.5 earthquake sequence in 2022 show relatively clear fluid diffusion-triggering characteristics. Overpressure of deep fluids is still the main factor driving seismic activity in the region, and we propose that the background tectonic stresses have not yet reached critical levels.  相似文献   

14.
In this paper, we have carefully determined the stress zones in the Sichuan-Yunnan region with reference to the in-situ stress data of hydraulic fracturing and the inverted fault slip data by using the step-by-step convergence method for stress zoning based on focal mechanism solutions. The results indicate that the tectonic stress field in the Sichuan-Yunnan region is divided into 3 stress zones by 2 approximately parallel NNW-trending stress transition belts. The area between the 2 belts is the Sichuan-Yunnan stress zone where the maximum principal stress σ1 is just in the NNW direction. The eastern boundary of Sichuan-Yunnan stress zone (the eastern stress transition belt) is basically consistent with the eastern boundary of Sichuan-Yunnan rhombic block. The western boundary of Sichuan-Yunnan stress zone (the western stress transition belt) is not totally consistent with the western boundary of Sichuan-Yunnan rhombic block. The northern segment of the western stress transition belt extends basically along the Jinshajiang fault and accords with the western boundary of Sichuan-Yunnan rhombic block, while its southern segment does not extend along the southwestern boundary of the rhombic block, i.e., Honghe fault and converge with the eastern stress transition belt, but stretches continuously in the NNW direction and accords with the Yingpanshan fault. We therefore consider that under the combined influence from the northward motion of India Plate, the southeastward shift of east Qinghai-Xizang Plateau and the strong obstruction of South China block, the tectonic stress field in the Sichuan-Yunnan region might not be totally controlled by the previous tectonic frame and new stress transition belt may have possibly formed.  相似文献   

15.
On 27 June 2015, a moderate earthquake with magnitude Mb 5.2 struck the Gulf of Aqaba near Nuweiba City. This event was instrumentally recorded by the Egyptian National Seismic Network (ENSN) and many other international seismological centres. The event was felt in all the cities on the Gulf of Aqaba, as well as Suez City, Hurghada City, the greater Cairo Metropolitan Area, Israel, Jordan and the north-western part of Saudi Arabia. No casualties were reported, however. Approximately 95 aftershocks with magnitudes ranging from 0.7 to 4.2 were recorded by the ENSN following the mainshock. In the present study, the source characteristics of both the mainshock and the aftershocks were estimated using the near-source waveform data recorded by the very broadband stations of the ENSN, and these were validated by the P-wave polarity data from short period stations. Our analysis reveals that an estimated seismic moment of 0.762?×?1017 Nm was released, corresponding to a magnitude of Mw 5.2, a focal depth of 14 km, a fault radius of 0.72 km and a rupture area of approximately 1.65 km2. Monitoring the sequence of aftershocks reveals that they form a cluster around the mainshock and migrated downwards in focal depth towards the west. We compared the results we obtained with the published results from the international seismological centres. Our results are more realistic and accurate, in particular with respect to the epicenteral location, magnitude and fault plane solution which are in accordance with the hypocentre distribution of the aftershocks.  相似文献   

16.
北京时间2017年11月18日06时34分(GMT:2017-11-17 22∶34),西藏自治区林芝市米林县发生了M6.9地震.本次地震位于东喜马拉雅东构造结末端旋转变形强烈部位.本研究基于林芝台阵记录的波形数据,应用双差定位方法和匹配滤波方法对本次地震早期余震序列进行了全面检测分析.截至2017年11月25日上午08时,我们共获得约10倍的中国地震台网公布的余震事件.余震的时空分布特征显示,本次米林M6.9地震余震呈NW向,位于北东向南迦巴瓦构造结北部的东西两侧边界断裂带之间,沿西兴拉断裂带分布,断层具有明显的分段破裂特征,主震位于余震分布带中部.根据余震分布特征以及震源机制解显示,发震断层的深部几何结构为北东向陡倾,主震北东侧的断层活动为主震及发震断层触发的结果,其深部几何结构也较陡,余震整体沿断层分布长度约50 km.  相似文献   

17.
An M=6.0 earthquake occurred on February 23, 2001 in the western Sichuan Province, China. The macro seismic epicenter situated in the high mountain-narrow valley region between Yajiang and Kangding counties. According to field investigation in the region, the intensity of epicentral area reached VIII and the areas with intensity VIII, VII and VI are 180 km2, 1 472 km2 and 3 998 km2, respectively. The isoseismals are generally in elliptic shape with major axis trending near N-S direction. The earthquake destroyed many buildings and produced some phenomena of ground failure and mountainous disasters in the area with intensity VIII. This event may be resulted from long-term activities of the Litang fault and Yunongxi fault, two main faults in the western Sichuan. The movements between the main faults made the crust stress adjusted and concentrated, and finally the earthquake on a secondary fault in the block released a quite large energy.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号