![点击此处可从《地震科学(英文版)》网站下载免费的PDF全文](/ch/ext_images/free.gif)
In this study we performed a classical spectrum analysis of seismic waveforms recorded at far field stations of the great
![]() |
|||||||
|
|||||||
共查询到18条相似文献,搜索用时 406 毫秒
1.
2.
利用中国数字地震台网(简称CDSN,下同)11个台的宽频带长周期(VLP)数字记录对1990-2012年间的124个极远震记录进行了分析处理,在震中距100.0°~179.0°之间,获取了CDSN11个台站的Pdif波的震相数据,得到了Pdif波在地球核幔界面上衍射的运动学特征和《Pdif波走时表》。所得结果大大拓展了Pdif的记录范围,在144.0°~179.0°之间弥补了《IASPEI1991地震波走时表》的缺失,为更大范围内的Pdif震相分析提供了参考标准,有助于提高中国地震台网的地震分析水平和积累震相分析经验,以及对地球核幔边界物理性质的认识。 相似文献
3.
中国地震台网记录到震中距大于160度的衍射波 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
我国基本地震台网过去使用中长周期地震仪,由于受频带限制,虽然记录到一些幔核界面的衍射波震相Pdif,但震相初至清晰可辨的较少,震中距大于160度的Pdif,则从未记录到。自从763型长周期地震仪在我国基本台网铺设以来,则相继记录到震中距110—150度的初至清晰的Pdif。 1985年3月3日在智利发生了一次强震,美国PDE目录给出了如下参数:0:22~h47~m06.9~s;φ:33.155s;λ:71.980w;h:33km;Msz:7.8。这次地震在我国基本台网中 相似文献
4.
郭瑛 《地震地磁观测与研究》1989,(4)
本文讨论了△≥140°的地震衍射波Pdif的走时及振幅、周期。并讨论了识别这一震相的方法,还肯定了763长周期地震仪记录衍射波Pdif的优越性。 相似文献
5.
6.
7.
对昆明地震台数字地震仪记录的2010年2月27日智利Ms8.8地震的震相进行分析,与格尔木、高台、呼和浩特、成都、银川、兰州、西妥等7个地震台记录进行对比,提出智利地震的记录特征、分析难点,并将JB表中Pdif波走时曲线的截止距离从150°延伸到177.8°。 相似文献
8.
9.
对太原台长周期与中长周期地震仪记录的79个地震、180张典型震例进行了对比。发现同一地区地震的体波与面波震相(包括长、短周期面波)不同仪器的记录形态有很大差异,长周期仪对各类长、短周期震相均不明显记录。而中长周期仪有时记录不清极远震的初至波Pdif,而对可以明显反映地球分层特征的地核穿透波PKHKP,长周期面波G,两种仪器均有不同记录。实践表明,对有不同频率特征的仪器所记录的地震波形进行综合分析,有利于提高测震分析的质量及提高测定震源时空参数的准确性。 相似文献
10.
陈江琴 《地震地磁观测与研究》2021,42(4):22-28
2016年2月13日4时17分,芜湖市弋江区发生ML 2.1地震,震中距43.75 km,震源深度8 km。当涂地震站记录的两水平向波形均出现3个明显震相,前面2个震相分别为Pg、Sg,在横波Sg震相之后又出现一个振幅较大的不明震相。通过分析,发现该不明震相为康拉德面上的反射波Sc。分析马鞍山测震台网记录的初动较清晰的6个Sc震例,对Sc走时和震中距进行拟合,得到康拉德面上方横波速度为3.59 km/s,康拉德面深度在20.35—23.85 km之间,与已知相关数值接近。 相似文献
11.
On July 31th, 2016, a magnitude 5.4 earthquake struck Cangwu Country, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, it was the largest earthquake recorded by Guangxi Seismological Network since it set up. The number of people affected by the earthquake had reached 20 000, and the direct economic losses caused by the earthquake were nearly 100 million Yuan.
After the earthquake, USGS provided a global earthquake catalog showing that the focal depth of Cangwu earthquake was about 24.5km. However, the result given by the Global Centroid Moment Tensor showed the focal depth of this earthquake was 15.6km. However, the result obtained by Xu Xiaofeng et al. using CAP method was 5.1km. It was clear that the focal depths of Cangwu earthquake given by different institutions were quite different from each other. However, accurate focal depth of the earthquake has important significance for exploring the tectonic mechanism near the epicenter, so it is necessary to further determine the more accurate depth of the Cangwu earthquake.
In order to further accurately determine the focal depth of Cangwu earthquake, we used the global search method for travel-time residual to calculate the focal depth of this earthquake and its error range, based on the regional velocity model, which is a one-dimensional velocity model of the Xianggui tectonic belt produced by the comprehensive geophysical profile. Then, we inverted the focal mechanism of this earthquake with the CAP method. Based on this, the focal depth of Cangwu MS5.4 earthquake was further determined by the method of the Rayleigh surface wave amplitude spectrum and the sPL phase, respectively.
Computed results reveal that the focal depth of this earthquake and its error range from the travel-time residual global search method is about(13±3)km, the focal depth inverted by CAP method is about 10km, the focal depth from sPL phase is about 10km, and the focal depth from Rayleigh surface wave amplitude spectrum is about 9~10km. Finally, we confirmed that the focal depth of Cangwu MS5.4 earthquake is about 10km, which indicates that this earthquake still occurred in the upper crust. In the case of low network density, the sPL phase and Rayleigh wave amplitude spectrum recorded by only 1 or 2 broadband stations could be used to obtain more accurate focal depth.
The focal depth's accuracy of Cangwu MS5.4 earthquake in the USGS global earthquake catalog has yet to be improved. In the future, we should consider the error of the source parameters when using the USGS global earthquake catalog for other related research. 相似文献
12.
The April 24, 2013 Changning M
s4.8 earthquake: a felt earthquake that occurred in Paleozoic sediment
![]() The dense broadband seismic network provides more high-quality waveform that is helpful to improve constraint focal depth of shallow earthquake. Many shallow earthquakes occurring in sediment were regarded as induced events. In Sichuan basin, gas industry and salt mining are dependent on fluid injection technique that triggers microseismicity. We adopted waveform inversion method with regional records to obtain focal mechanism of an M s4.8 earthquake at Changning. The result suggested that the Changning earthquake occurred at a ESE thrust fault, and its focal depth was about 3 km. The depth phases including teleseismic pP phase and regional sPL phase shows that the focal depth is about 2 km. The strong, short-period surface wave suggests that this event is a very shallow earthquake. The amplitude ratio between Rayleigh wave and direct S wave was also used to estimate the source depth of the mainshock. The focal depth (2–4 km) is far less than the depth of the sedimentary layer thickness (6–8 km) in epicentral region. It is close to the depth of fluid injection of salt mining, which may imply that this event was triggered by the industrial activity. 相似文献
13.
In this study we performed a classical spectrum analysis of seismic waveforms recorded at far field stations of the great 14.
采用双差定位法对2018年5月6日称多5.3级地震及其余震序列进行重新定位,至2018年7月15日共获取129个地震的重新定位结果。结果显示,称多5.3级地震序列主要呈NWW或NNW向分布,其中长轴沿NWW向展布,长约11 km,震源深度主要分布在6-12 km范围内,优势分布为8-11 km。此次地震的震源机制解为走滑型,最佳波形拟合深度为10.1 km。结合精定位、震源机制等综合分析,认为主破裂面走向呈NNW向,发震构造应为巴颜喀拉山主峰断裂。 相似文献
15.
2015年3月14日在安徽阜阳地区发生了M_S4.3地震,随后发生3月23日M_s3.6余震.主震造成2人死亡13人受伤.房屋倒塌155间,受损1万多间.主震震级不大,而造成的灾害巨大.本文使用CAP方法反演了两次地震的震源机制解和震源深度,结果显示两次地震的震源机制解和深度一致.主震的机制解节面Ⅰ走向110°,倾角75°,滑动角—10°;节面Ⅱ走向202°,倾角80°,滑动角—164°;矩震级M_w4.3,余震矩震级M_w3.7,反演最佳深度均为3 km.最佳深度时波形拟合相关系数较高,表明反演结果是可靠的.使用sPn和sPL深度震相进一步分析了两次地震的震源深度.结果显示,选取的7个台站的sPn震相与Pn震相的平均到时差为1 s,对应的震源深度为3 km.震中距为36 km的利辛台的sPL震相与Pg震相到时差约为1.1 s,对应震源深度约3~4 km之间.两种深度震相分析的震源深度与CAP方法的结果一致,表明本文给出的阜阳地震震源深度为3 km左右基本是可靠的.本次地震造成较大灾害的原因很可能与地震震源较浅有关.阜阳地区地壳结构相对稳定,地质构造演化形成3 km厚的沉积层,本次地震可能是区域应力作用下发生在沉积层里的一次地震. 相似文献
16.
17.
On July 31st, 2016, an earthquake of MS5.4 occurred in Cangwu County, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, which is the first MS ≥ 5.0 earthquake in coastal areas of southern China in the past 17a. The moderate earthquake activities have come into a comparatively quiet period in coastal areas of southern China for decades, so the study about the Cangwu MS5.4 earthquake is very important. However, differernt research institutions and scholars have got different results for the focal depth of the Cangwu MS5.4 earthquake. For this reason, we further measured the focal depth by using CAP method and sPL phase method.
sPL phase was first put forward by Chong in 2010. It is often observed between P and S wave of continental earthquakes with epicentral distance of about 30km to 50km. The energy of sPL phase is mainly concentrated on the radial component. Arrival time difference between sPL phase and direct P wave is insensitive to epicentral distancs, but increases almost linearly with the increase of focal depth. Based on these characteristics and advantages, sPL phase method is chosen to measure the focal depth of Cangwu MS5.4 earthquake in the paper.
First of all, we selected the broadband waveform data through seismic stations distributed mainly in Guangxi and adjacent provinces from Data Management Centre of China National Seismic Network and Guangxi Earthquake Networks Center. And an appropriate velocity model of Cangwu area was constructed by the teleseismic receiver function method. Then, the focal mechanism and focal depth of Cangwu MS5.4 earthquake were determined by using the CAP(Cut and Paste)method. Next, we compared the synthetic waveforms simulated by F-K forward method of different focal depth models with the actual observed waveforms. According to the difference of arrival times between sPL and Pg phases, we finally obtained the focal depth of Cangwu earthquake. The results show that the focal depth is 11km measured by CAP method and 9km by sPL phase method. Based on the focal mechanism solution, isoseismal shapes, aftershocks distributions and investigation on spot, we conclude that the Cangwu MS5.4 earthquake is a left-lateral strike-slip earthquake which occurred in the upper crust. Our preliminary analysis considers that the seismogenic structure of Cangwu earthquake is a north-northwest branch fault, and the control fault of this earthquake is the Hejie-Xiaying Fault. 相似文献
18.
2017年9月4日河北临城地区发生ML 4.4地震,为得到准确的震源深度,根据sPL震相基本特征,对震中距20-70 km范围内8个地震台站波形数据进行处理,在其中4个地震台观测到明显的sPL震相,利用频率-波数(F-K)方法,计算其理论波形图,与处理后的观测波形拟合对比,得到震源深度范围,与TDMT-INV方法、PTD方法及河北测震台网编目等结果基本一致,表明利用sPL震相测定河北临城ML 4.4地震震源深度可靠,其深度范围为10-11 km。 相似文献
|
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏 |
Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司 京ICP备09084417号 |