共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 156 毫秒
1.
由于数据获取与后期处理方式不同,先进星载热发射和反射辐射仪全球数字高程模型(advanced spaceborne thermalemissionandreflectionradiometerglobaldigitalelevationmodel,ASTERGDEM)和航天飞机雷达地形测绘任务(shuttle radar topography mission,SRTM)数据在高程精度上存在差异,采用弹性反馈（resilient backpropagation,RProp）神经网络算法对二者进行融合处理,实现优势互补以提升高程精度。选取两个黄土丘陵沟壑地貌样区分别用于模型建立与效果验证,1∶10 000高程精度为参考数据,在建模样区应用RProp神经网络算法构建ASTER GDEM高程校正模型、SRTM1高程校正模型、ASTER GDEM与SRTM1高程融合模型,同时应用误差反向传播(back propagation,BP)神经网络建立ASTER GDEM与SRTM1高程融合模型,将这些模型的高程精度优化效果进行对比,并在验证样区检验RProp融合模型的可行性。结果表明,RProp融合模... 相似文献
2.
基于Google软件的农地区高程获取及精度评价 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
相比于传统大比例尺测绘,高分遥感和雷达技术可以快速高效地获取农地地形边界和特征点位高程,因而可为农地整理和机械化前期研究提供决策依据。本研究基于Google Maps高分辨率遥感影像数字化农地特征点位和边界,开发了在Google Earth(谷歌地球)软件上获取坐标点位高程的程序,实现了农地特征点位数字化和高程获取;使用国家1:1万数字地形图对该方法进行了精度评估,并且与直接基于SRTM3和ASTER数字高程模型插值方法进行了比较。结果表明,本研究实现了高分辨率遥感影像和数字地形模型的整合应用,在农地边界和特征点位获取、影像校正方面比直接通过SRTM3数据插值获取高程有优势,有较好的应用潜力。 相似文献
3.
4.
全球数字高程产品概述 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
随着世界各国乃至全球信息化和数字化的发展以及全球化热点问题的研究,高精度、高分辨率全球数字高程产品在广泛的应用领域中扮演着越来越重要的角色。为了方便不同用户根据个人需求选择合适的数据产品,本文首先论述了数字高程产品的精度衡量指标,并对其常用的指标进行等价描述,以便不同数字产品之间的比较分析;然后从全球化高程数据的获取方式出发,经由最初的多源数据融合,到后续基于光学立体摄影测量及合成孔径雷达干涉测量InSAR (Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar)的全球测图,对其发展的ETOPO、GTOPO30、GMTED2010、ASTER GDEM、AW3D30、SRTM及TanDEM-X DEM全球化数据产品的主要性质和特点进行详细介绍,并简单概括了不同数字产品的发展历程。在此基础上,本文以宁夏回族自治区吴忠市一座山脉为例,通过定性及定量对比的方式详细分析了1″及3″经纬度格网分辨率下的数字高程产品。分析表明,对于采用同一种技术手段生产的数字高程产品,AW3D30及ASTER GDEM均展现出相对丰富的地貌细节特征,均优于SRTM及TanDEM-X DEM产品,但ASTER GDEM产品颗粒效应明显,且产品精度较低;而TanDEM-X DEM是从更高分辨率产品重采样获取,因此相对平滑;就数字高程产品的高程精度而言,TanDEM-X DEM产品精度最高,其次为AW3D30及SRTM产品,均远优于由多源数据融合获取的全球数字产品。 相似文献
5.
利用航天飞机成象雷达干涉数据提取数字高程模型 总被引：20，自引：1，他引：20
首先介绍干涉雷达 (INSAR)成象原理和处理方法 ,接着介绍了二维离散包缠 (wrapped)干涉相位纹图的解缠 (unwrapping)算法。利用航天飞机成象雷达 (SIR -C) 1994年 10月获取的昆仑山干涉数据 ,研究了SIR -CINSAR获取数字高程模型的方法 ,显示了INSAR在三维信息获取和动态监测方面的优越性和应用前景 相似文献
6.
7.
获取高精度DEM是分布式水文模型开发和应用的基础,而最新发布的全球高分辨率SRTM数据在很大程度上解决了高分辨率DEM数据获取相对困难的问题,对于水文学研究具有重要意义。由于利用雷达技术获取地面高程数据技术本身的限制,SRTM原始DEM数据中存在着很多问题。本文以雪野水库区域为例,利用ASTER数据通过分析两种数据高程差异的分布特点对SRTM高程数据无效区域进行了填充,计算结果表明该方法可以提高无效数据处理结果的精度,是一种有效的获取相对完整地形数据的方法。 相似文献
8.
SRTM高程数据中空缺单元的内插填补 总被引：13，自引：3，他引：13
简要介绍了SRTM生产的数字高程数据,认为采用直接内插来填补其中的空缺数据是最为简便的方法,以加权平均水平面移动拟合法为例,详细阐述了空缺单元的内插计算方法和基本过程,讨论比较了不同条件下的效果,认为SRTM的数字高程数据具有非常广泛的用途和前景。 相似文献
9.
10.
11.
为探究ASTER GDEMV3、SRTM1 DEM和AW3D30 DEM 3种开源DEM数据的高程精度,本文以高精度ICESat-2 ATLAS测高数据为参考数据,利用GIS统计分析、误差相关分析及数理统计对DEM的高程精度进行对比评价。结果表明：①AW3D30的质量最稳定;SRTM1 DEM在平原精度最高;在高原山地精度由高到低依次为AW3D30 DEM、ASTER GDEMV3、SRTM1 DEM。②DEM数据高程精度受地表覆盖影响较大,且与地形因素密切相关,在相同地表覆盖的两个研究区中DEM数据高程精度表现情况不一致,SRTM在平原地表覆盖下精度表现最好,平均误差为3.15 m,AW3D30 DEM在山地地表覆盖下精度表现最好,平均误差为7.61 m。③坡度对DEM数据的高程精度影响较大,在两个研究区3种DEM数据的高程误差均随坡度的增加而增加;坡向对DEM数据的高程精度影响较小,未发现明显的规律。 相似文献
12.
Digital elevation models (DEMs) are essential to various applications in topography, geomorphology, hydrology, and ecology. The Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission (SRTM) DEM data set is one of the most complete and most widely used DEM data sets; it provides accurate information on elevations over bare land areas. However, the accuracy of SRTM data over vegetated mountain areas is relatively low as a result of the high relief and the penetration limitation of the C-band used for obtaining global DEM products. The objective of this study is to assess the performance of SRTM DEMs and correct them over vegetated mountain areas with small-footprint airborne Light Detection and Ranging (Lidar) data, which can develop elevation products and vegetation products [e.g., vegetation height, Leaf Area Index (LAI)] of high accuracy. The assessing results show that SRTM elevations are systematically higher than those of the actual land surfaces over vegetated mountain areas. The mean difference between SRTM DEM and Lidar DEM increases with vegetation height, whereas the standard deviation of the difference increases with slope. To improve the accuracy of SRTM DEM over vegetated mountain areas, a regression model between the SRTM elevation bias and vegetation height, LAI, and slope was developed based on one control site. Without changing any coefficients, this model was proved to be applicable in all the nine study sites, which have various topography and vegetation conditions. The mean bias of the corrected SRTM DEM at the nine study sites using this model (absolute value) is 89% smaller than that of the original SRTM DEM, and the standard deviation of the corrected SRTM elevation bias is 11% smaller. 相似文献
13.
作为我国首颗民用立体测绘卫星数据产品,ZY-3 DSM对于我国地学分析具有极其重要的作用。本文在顾及地貌情况前提下,选取云南省高海拔山区为试验区,辅以1∶10 000野外实测地形图DEM为参考值,将分辨率为15 m的ZY-3 DSM与90 m的SRTM DEM从高程精度和地形精度进行较为全面的数据质量比较。结果表明:ZY-3 DSM在高程精度和地形精度均有更好的表现。总体看来,ZY-3 DSM数据质量更高,具有更广泛的利用价值。 相似文献
14.
Digital elevation model (DEM) data of Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) are distributed at a horizontal resolution of 90 m (30 m only for US) for the world, Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) DEM data provide 30 m horizontal resolution, while CARTOSAT-1 (IRS-P5) gives 2.6 m horizontal resolution for global coverage. SRTM and ASTER data are available freely but 2.6 m CARTOSAT-1 data are costly. Hence, through this study, we found out a horizontal accuracy for selected ground control points (GCPs) from SRTM and ASTER with respect to CARTOSAT-1 DEM to implement this result (observed from horizontal accuracy) for those areas where the 2.6-m horizontal resolution data are not available. In addition to this, the present study helps in providing a benchmark against which the future DEM products (with horizontal resolution less than CARTOSAT-1) with respect to CARTOSAT-1 DEM can be evaluated. The original SRTM image contained voids that were represented digitally as ?140; such voids were initially filled using the measured values of elevation for obtaining accurate DEM. Horizontal accuracy analysis between SRTM- and ASTER-derived DEMs with respect to CARTOSAT-1 (IRS-P5) DEM allowed a qualitative assessment of the horizontal component of the error, and the appropriable statistical measures were used to estimate their horizontal accuracies. The horizontal accuracy for ASTER and SRTM DEM with respect to CARTOSAT-1 were evaluated using the root mean square error (RMSE) and relative root mean square error (R-RMSE). The results from this study revealed that the average RMSE of 20 selected GCPs was 2.17 for SRTM and 2.817 for ASTER, which are also validated using R-RMSE test which proves that SRTM data have good horizontal accuracy than ASTER with respect to CARTOSAT-1 because the average R-RMSE of 20 GCPs was 3.7 × 10?4 and 5.3 × 10?4 for SRTM and ASTER, respectively. 相似文献
15.
为了评价国产资源三号测绘卫星DSM数据精度,在顾及地貌类型的情况下,以涵盖平原、台地、丘陵等地貌的高海拔山区为研究案例,并以1∶1万实测地形图DEM为假定真值,以90m分辨率SRTM DEM为评价参照,从高程精度和地形描述精度两个方面,对15m分辨率ZY-3DSM进行精度评价分析。研究结果表明:ZY-3DSM高程精度优于SRTM DEM,前者高程中误差仅为后者的1/6;就地形描述精度来讲,ZY-3DSM与SRTM DEM相比,其地形描述精度更接近理论值,前者RMS Et实际值仅为理论值0.99倍,而后者的实际值却是理论值5.13倍。由此看来,ZY-3DSM数据精度整体上高于SRTM DEM。 相似文献
16.
黄朝安 《测绘与空间地理信息》2011,34(4):110-112
SRTM全球数字高程模型数据目前已被广泛应用于多个领域。最新版本的SRTM DEM仍然存在较小的高程空值区域（数据空洞）和模糊区域。文章在模拟某试验区域SRTM DEM数据空洞的基础上,利用线性插值、反距离权插值、二次多项式插值、三次样条插值等DEM插值方法进行了数据空洞的插值填补试验和对比分析,结果表明在丘陵地区和空... 相似文献
17.
《制图学和地理信息科学》2013,40(1):95-104
Depending on scale, topographic maps depicting the shape of the land surfaces of the Earth are produced from different data sources. National topographic maps at a scale of 1:25 000 (25K maps) produced by General Command of Mapping are used as the base map set in Turkey. This map set, which consists of approximately 5500 sheets, covers the whole country and is produced using photogrammetric methods. Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) created from these maps are also available. Recently, another data source, Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) interferometric data, has become more important than those produced by conventional methods. The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) contains elevation data with 3 arc-second resolution and 16 m absolute height error (90 percent confidence level). These data are freely available via the Internet for approximately 80 percent of the Earth's land mass. In this study, SRTM DEM was compared with DEM derived from 25K topographic maps for different parts of Turkey. The study areas, each covering four neighboring 25K maps, and having an area of approximately 600 km2, were chosen to represent various terrain characteristics. For the comparison, DEMs created from the 25K maps were obtained and organized as files for each map sheet in vector format, containing the digitized contour lines. From these data, DEMs in the resolution of 3 arc-second were created (25K-DEM), in the same structure as the SRTM DEM, allowing the 25K-DEMs and the SRTM DEM to be compared directly. The results show that the agreement of SRTM DEM to the 25K-DEM is within about 13 m, which is less than the SRTM's targeted error of 16 m. The spatial distribution of the height differences between SRTM-DEM and the 25K-DEM and correlation analysis show that the differences were mainly related to the topography of the test areas. In some areas, local height shifts were determined. 相似文献
18.
ENVISAT/ASAR多角度干涉雷达数据山区DEM生成及精度分析 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
在地形起伏较大的山区用干涉SAR生成DEM时,合适的入射角是获取高精度DEM的重要参数之一.本文基于ENVISAT/ASAR多角度干涉雷达数据,SRTM 90米分辨率的DEM以及1:5万的数字化DEM数据,从定性和定量的角度比较和分析了干涉SAR在获取山区DEM时,入射角对DEM精度的具体影响.结果表明:对于ASAR的多入射角干涉雷达数据,在不同入射角条件下由于雷达叠掩和透视收缩的影响,获取的DEM精度差别很大,入射角带来的影响相当显著,比如IS2和IS4角度得到的DEM的精度差超过了6米.因此,在山区干涉SAR地形成图时,必须对入射角的大小进行严格的选择. 相似文献
19.
Pratima Pandey Surendar Manickam Avik Bhattacharya AL. Ramanathan Gulab Singh G. Venkataraman 《国际地球制图》2017,32(4):442-454
Glaciers have a high impact in the socio-economic sectors including water supply, energy production, flood and avalanches. A high precision digital elevation model (DEM) is required to monitor glaciers and to study various glacier processes. The present study deals with the qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the DEM generated from the bistatic TanDEM-X data by comparing it with GPS, Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat) data and standard global DEMs such as Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) and Advanced Space-borne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer Global DEM (ASTER GDEM). The study area consists of highly undulating glaciated terrain in western Himalaya, India. The results reveal that TanDEM-X is slightly better than SRTM both qualitatively and quantitatively, whereas ASTER GDEM showing maximum discrepancy among the three DEMs. The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of the TanDEM-X DEM with respect to GPS is 3.5 m at lower relief and 11.9 m at glaciated terrain, against 6.7 and 12.5 m for SRTM and 9.3 and 19.8 m for ASTER GDEM, respectively, for the same sites. On an average, for the whole study area, the RMSE of TanDEM-X is 7.9 m, SRTM is 9.3 m and ASTER GDM is 14.2 m. The RMSE of TanDEM-X, SRTM and ASTER GDEM with respect to ICESat are 16.3, 19.9 and 101.1 m, respectively. It is evident from the analysis that though SRTM is closer to TanDEM-X in terms of accuracy in the mountainous terrain, however, TanDEM-X will be more useful for studying glacier dynamics and topography. 相似文献