共查询到16条相似文献，搜索用时 125 毫秒
1.
对AW3D30的绝对高程精度,特别是在我国典型区域的绝对高程进行验证分析,对于后续该数据集的应用具有参考价值,对于我国自主的全球高精度DSM数据生产也有一定的借鉴意义。本文选取了我国4种典型区域,以SRTM、部分高精度野外控制点以及ICESat/GLAS为辅助参考数据,对AW3D30进行了精度验证。采用地理信息系统(GIS)空间统计分析方法选取平均误差、标准差、中误差等参数指标进行精度验证,同时,分析了坡度、地表覆盖等因素对精度的影响。结果表明:AW3D30的高程精度与坡度有很明显的相关性,坡度较大地区高程精度较差,但在坡度小于5°时其高程精度可达5.0 m,在坡度小于1°时高程精度可达到3.0 m。地表覆盖类型也会对精度造成一定的影响,其中,林地影响对精度的影响最明显,而人造地表的影响最小。 相似文献
2.
针对数字高程模型数据源不同会带来一定的不确定性和差异性的问题,选取德国某露天矿为实验区,以高精度DEM数据TanDEM-X为参照,对比了SRTM、AW3D30、ASTER GDEM与TanDEM-X数据的高程精度,分析了DEM数据的差异。结果表明:(1)露天矿区的开采和复垦活动明显地体现在了不同时期获取的DEM高程变化中;(2)在非采矿区,不同DEM数据之间具有较好的一致性,TanDEM-X数据与其他数据的高差均方根误差分别为2.64 m、5.88 m、2.99 m;(3)DEM空间分辨率越高提取得到坡度最值越大,地形描述准确性越高。研究结果为露天矿区DEM应用提供参考。 相似文献
3.
为了解我国ASTER GDEM数据高程精度,在考虑空间分布的情况下,选取我国东部辽宁、山东、浙江和海南4个地区的平原、丘陵、山地等作为典型研究区,并以1∶5万DEM为假定真值、以1∶25万DEM为参照,通过DEM面误差可视化分析和DEM面误差信息熵模型等方法对ASTER GDEM数据的高程精度做了分析。结果表明:ASTER GDEM数据高程误差在整个地图上分布是否均匀与其高程精度高低无决定关系;在山地和丘陵地形研究区,其数据高程精度要高于SRTM DEM和1∶25万DEM。总体来看,中国东部地区ASTER GDEM数据高程精度整体上要高于SRTM DEM和1∶25万DEM,但低于1∶10万DEM。 相似文献
4.
5.
本文首先以DEM数据为例,将输入数据与参考数据配准至同一像素位置,然后分别将均方根误差和标准差作为参考指标,在不同坡度等级的区域内,通过权重系数从0至1的遍历探寻最佳加权融合系数,从而确定融合方案并进行NASA DEM与AW3D30 DEM的数据融合,最后对融合效果进行定量评价。结果表明:配准前,NASA DEM沿x、y、z方向的位移分别为-2.65、2.41、0.60m,AW3D30 DEM位移分别为1.04、7.51、-3.33m;配准后,原始数据各项误差均减小,且NASA DEM的系统误差基本消失。融合DEM相较于NASA DEM,平均误差和均方根误差分别减小了25.0%和36.8%;对于AW3D30 DEM,误差降幅分别为86.5%和13.2%。 相似文献
6.
ASTER GDEM与SRTM3高程差异影响因素分析 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
作为最新发布的全球地形数据,ASTER GDEM比目前常用的SRTM3数据有着更高的分辨率和更广的覆盖范围,对于相关地学分析具有重要意义。本文以华中地区为研究区域,对ASTER GDEM与SRTM3数据进行了比较,重点分析了坡度、坡向、地形起伏度、土地利用类型、植被覆盖度、生成ASTER GDEM栅格点高程数据所用的ASTER DEM影像数等因素对2种DEM数据高程差异的影响。结果表明,在研究区域内,ASTER GDEM高程比SRTM3高程平均低5.42 m,两种DEM数据高程差异的RMS值为16.90 m;ASTER GDEM与SRTM3之间的高程差异随着坡度、地形起伏度、植被覆盖度的增大而增大,而ASTER DEM影像数越大,高程差异越小;坡向、土地利用类型对高程差异也有影响。 相似文献
7.
为了评价国产资源三号测绘卫星DSM数据精度,在顾及地貌类型的情况下,以涵盖平原、台地、丘陵等地貌的高海拔山区为研究案例,并以1∶1万实测地形图DEM为假定真值,以90m分辨率SRTM DEM为评价参照,从高程精度和地形描述精度两个方面,对15m分辨率ZY-3DSM进行精度评价分析。研究结果表明:ZY-3DSM高程精度优于SRTM DEM,前者高程中误差仅为后者的1/6;就地形描述精度来讲,ZY-3DSM与SRTM DEM相比,其地形描述精度更接近理论值,前者RMS Et实际值仅为理论值0.99倍,而后者的实际值却是理论值5.13倍。由此看来,ZY-3DSM数据精度整体上高于SRTM DEM。 相似文献
8.
作为"云控制"摄影测量理论和方法的发展,研究了DEM约束的立体卫星影像区域网平差方法。与DEM仅作为高程控制信息使用,或者是通过DEM表面匹配实现绝对定向的间接定位方法不同,DEM作为平高控制信息被直接引入至基于RFM模型的卫星影像区域网平差之中。本文方法将连接点地面高程与DEM格网内插高程之差作为虚拟观测值构建约束方程,不仅利用了DEM高程信息,并且利用了其地形曲面包含的平面信息,以"云控制"方式在区域网平差过程中有效消除卫星影像RPC参数中包含的整体偏移及区域网内部的扭曲变形,实现了无地面控制点条件下卫星影像平面及高程绝对定位精度的大幅提升。使用覆盖山东全境的330景天绘一号立体卫星影像进行试验,分别以AW3D30、ASTER GDEM和SRTM GL3共3种开源DEM作为控制信息,并使用100个外业实测控制点进行精度评测。试验表明,以DEM作为控制可显著提高区域网平差的平面与高程精度,卫星影像绝对定位精度与DEM自身精度有关。当使用AW3D30作为控制时,可以取得与使用100个外业控制点平差同等精度,平面中误差为5.0 m(约1像素),高程中误差为2.9 m。试验结果证明了DEM替代外业控制点作为平差控制信息的有效性与可行性。 相似文献
9.
全球数字高程产品概述 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
随着世界各国乃至全球信息化和数字化的发展以及全球化热点问题的研究,高精度、高分辨率全球数字高程产品在广泛的应用领域中扮演着越来越重要的角色。为了方便不同用户根据个人需求选择合适的数据产品,本文首先论述了数字高程产品的精度衡量指标,并对其常用的指标进行等价描述,以便不同数字产品之间的比较分析;然后从全球化高程数据的获取方式出发,经由最初的多源数据融合,到后续基于光学立体摄影测量及合成孔径雷达干涉测量InSAR (Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar)的全球测图,对其发展的ETOPO、GTOPO30、GMTED2010、ASTER GDEM、AW3D30、SRTM及TanDEM-X DEM全球化数据产品的主要性质和特点进行详细介绍,并简单概括了不同数字产品的发展历程。在此基础上,本文以宁夏回族自治区吴忠市一座山脉为例,通过定性及定量对比的方式详细分析了1″及3″经纬度格网分辨率下的数字高程产品。分析表明,对于采用同一种技术手段生产的数字高程产品,AW3D30及ASTER GDEM均展现出相对丰富的地貌细节特征,均优于SRTM及TanDEM-X DEM产品,但ASTER GDEM产品颗粒效应明显,且产品精度较低;而TanDEM-X DEM是从更高分辨率产品重采样获取,因此相对平滑;就数字高程产品的高程精度而言,TanDEM-X DEM产品精度最高,其次为AW3D30及SRTM产品,均远优于由多源数据融合获取的全球数字产品。 相似文献
10.
为揭示我国SRTM3DEM数据高程精度质量,结合已开展过SRTM3DEM高程精度质量评价工作的局部地区的研究,考虑空间分布情况,选取新疆、辽宁、山东、浙江、海南5个地区的平原、丘陵、盆地、山地等地形区域作为典型研究区,并以1∶5万DEM为假定真值、以1∶25万DEM为参照,通过DEM面误差可视化分析、DEM面误差信息熵模型、中误差模型等方法对SRTM3DEM数据高程精度质量做了分析。计算结果表明我国SRTM3DEM数据高程精度质量受地形影响并存在一定的空间差异性,同时我国范围内SRTM3DEM数据高程精度质量整体上要高于1∶25万DEM。 相似文献
11.
Loudi Yap Ludovic Houetchak Kandé Robert Nouayou Nasser Abdou Ngouh Marie Brigitte Makuate 《International Journal of Digital Earth》2019,12(5):500-524
Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) contain topographic relief data that are vital for many geoscience applications. This study relies on the vertical accuracy of publicly available latest high-resolution (30?m) global DEMs over Cameroon. These models are (1) the ALOS World 3D-30?m (AW3D30), (2) the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission 1 Arc-Second C-Band Global DEM (SRTM 1) and (3) the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Global DEM Version 2 (ASTER GDEM 2). After matching their coordinate systems and datums, the horizontal positional accuracy evaluation was carried out and it shows that geolocation errors significantly influence the vertical accuracy of global DEMs. After this, the three models are compared among them, in order to access random and systematic effects in the elevation data each of them contains. Further, heights from 555 GPS/leveling points distributed all over Cameroon are compared to each DEM, for their vertical accuracy determination. Traditional and robust statistical measures, normality test, outlier detection and removal were used to describe the vertical quality of the DEMs. The test of the normality rejected the hypothesis of normal distribution for all tested global DEMs. Overall vertical accuracies obtained for the three models after georeferencing and gross error removal in terms of Root Mean Square (RMS) and Normalized Median Absolute Deviation (NMAD) are: AW3D30 (13.06?m and 7.75?m), SRTM 1 (13.25?m and 7.41?m) and ASTER GDEM 2 (18.87?m and 13.30?m). Other accuracy measures (MED, 68.3% quantile, 95% quantile) supply some evidence of the good quality of AW3D30 over Cameroon. Further, the effect of land cover and slope on DEM vertical accuracy was also analyzed. All models have proved to be worse in the areas dominated by forests and shrubs areas. SRTM 1 and AW3D30 are more resilient to the effects of the scattering objects respectively in forests and cultivated areas. The dependency of DEMs accuracy on the terrain roughness is evident. In all slope intervals, AW3D30 is performing better than SRTM 1 and ASTER GDEM 2 over Cameroon. AW3D30 is more representative of the external topography over Cameroon in comparison with two others datasets and SRTM 1 can be a serious alternative to AW3D30 for a range of DEM applications in Cameroon. 相似文献
12.
Digital elevation model (DEM) data of Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) are distributed at a horizontal resolution of 90 m (30 m only for US) for the world, Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) DEM data provide 30 m horizontal resolution, while CARTOSAT-1 (IRS-P5) gives 2.6 m horizontal resolution for global coverage. SRTM and ASTER data are available freely but 2.6 m CARTOSAT-1 data are costly. Hence, through this study, we found out a horizontal accuracy for selected ground control points (GCPs) from SRTM and ASTER with respect to CARTOSAT-1 DEM to implement this result (observed from horizontal accuracy) for those areas where the 2.6-m horizontal resolution data are not available. In addition to this, the present study helps in providing a benchmark against which the future DEM products (with horizontal resolution less than CARTOSAT-1) with respect to CARTOSAT-1 DEM can be evaluated. The original SRTM image contained voids that were represented digitally as ?140; such voids were initially filled using the measured values of elevation for obtaining accurate DEM. Horizontal accuracy analysis between SRTM- and ASTER-derived DEMs with respect to CARTOSAT-1 (IRS-P5) DEM allowed a qualitative assessment of the horizontal component of the error, and the appropriable statistical measures were used to estimate their horizontal accuracies. The horizontal accuracy for ASTER and SRTM DEM with respect to CARTOSAT-1 were evaluated using the root mean square error (RMSE) and relative root mean square error (R-RMSE). The results from this study revealed that the average RMSE of 20 selected GCPs was 2.17 for SRTM and 2.817 for ASTER, which are also validated using R-RMSE test which proves that SRTM data have good horizontal accuracy than ASTER with respect to CARTOSAT-1 because the average R-RMSE of 20 GCPs was 3.7 × 10?4 and 5.3 × 10?4 for SRTM and ASTER, respectively. 相似文献
13.
在无控制点的卫星影像正射校正中,大多采用DSM/DEM数据作为辅助数据来消除或限制因地形起伏引起的形变,然而经不同格网密度的DSM/DEM正射校正后的影像对后续处理会产生不同程度的影响,如对地物分类精度产生影响。针对这一问题,本文分别采用不同的DSM/DEM数据(China DSM 15 m、ASTER GDEM 30 m和SRTM 90 m)对资源三号影像进行正射校正,然后对正射校正后影像利用支持向量机进行分类,比较正射校正后影像结果的分类精度。结果表明:在相同重采样方法下,影像经China DSM 15 m DSM正射校正后结果的分类精度优于ASTER GDEM 30 m DEM和SRTM 90 m DEM。 相似文献
14.
This paper compares the accuracy of Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) Global Digital Elevation Model (GDEM), Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) C-band and German Aerospace Centre (DLR)-SRTM X-band digital elevation models (DEMs) with the Ziyuan 3 (ZY-3) stereoscopic DEM and ground control points (GCPs). To date, the horizontal error of these DEMs has received little attention in accuracy assessments. Using the ZY-3 DEM as reference, this study examines (1) the horizontal offset between the three DEMs and the reference DEM using the normalised cross-correlation method, (2) the vertical accuracy of those DEMs using kinematic GPS data and (3) the relationship between the three DEMs and the reference ZY-3 DEM. The results show that the SRTM and DLR-SRTM have greater vertical accuracy after applying horizontal offset correction, whereas the vertical accuracy of the ASTER GDEM is less than the other two DEMs. These methods and results can be useful for researchers who use DEMs for various applications. 相似文献
15.
16.
This study reports results from evaluation of the quality of digital elevation model (DEM) from four sources viz. topographic map (1:50,000), Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission (SRTM) (90 m), optical stereo pair from ASTER (15 m) and CARTOSAT (2.5 m) and their use in derivation of hydrological response units (HRUs) in Sitla Rao watershed (North India). The HRUs were derived using water storage capacity and slope to produce surface runoff zones. The DEMs were evaluated on elevation accuracy and representation of morphometric features. The DEM derived from optical stereo pairs (ASTER and CARTOSAT) provided higher vertical accuracies than the SRTM and topographic map-based DEM. The SRTM with a coarse resolution of 90 m provided vertical accuracy but better morphometry compared to topographic map. The HRU maps derived from the fine resolution DEM (ASTER and CARTOSAT) were more detailed but did not provide much advantage for hydrological studies at the scale of Sitla Rao watershed (5800 ha). 相似文献