共查询到18条相似文献，搜索用时 500 毫秒
1.
关于全球板块运动模型ITRF2000VEL若干问题探讨 总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4
利用最新的国际地球自转服务（IERS）发布的国际地球参考架ITRF2000速度场，建立了一个独立于任何其它模型、安全基于现代空间大地测量实测结果的现今全球板块运动模型ITRF2000VEL，较百万年平均地质模型NNR－NUVELIA更能真正反映全球板块现今运动特征，相比ITRF96,晚接近于百万年地质模型NNR－NUVELIA，而且ITRF2000参考架在定向、原点和尺度的定义较ITRF96和ITRF97参考架有了改进，但ITRF200VEL模型存在诸多问题：总角动量|L|=0.127，即不为零，与协议参考架（CTRF）不符，存在整体旋转，并建立无旋转NNR－ITRF2000VEL模型，台站不均匀分布全球板块、部分板块界线不明确以及有的板块不满足刚性特征等，这些对ITRF2000的高精度应用和长期维持、地球自转参数的长期变化都将产生一定的影响。 相似文献
2.
基于ITRF2000的全球板块运动模型和中国的地壳形变 总被引：10，自引：0，他引：10
基于最新的国际地球参考架ITRF2000的速度场构建了一个新的现时板块运动模型ITRF2000VEL,比以往用空间测量技术或地质、地球物理资料建立的板块运动模型,更精确和更全面地反映现时全球板块运动的特点.同时发现了ITRF2000存在整体旋转,旋转角动量矢量为(0.12°/m@a,40.2°S,154.4°E),不符合协议地球参考架的定义.以ITRF2000VEL的欧亚板块运动为背景,计算了近10年来建立的中国地壳运动GPS监测网(全国网和部分区域网)和亚太网的300多个GPS测站在ITRF2000框架内的运动速度.给出和研究了中国大陆及周边地区相对于欧亚板块地壳形变的特点,中国大陆地壳形变具有南强北弱,西强东弱的特点.西部具有一致性的北向运动,而东部具有一致性的南向运动. 相似文献
3.
利用最新的国际地球自转服务(IERS)发表的国际地球参考框架ITRF2005的速度场,建立了一个完全基于现代空间大地测量实测结果的现今全球板块运动模型ITRF2005VEL,并与地质模型NNR-NUVELlA及以往利用ITRF序列所建立的模型进行了比较.结果表明,从整体上看ITRF2005VEL与NNR-NUVELlA模型有较好的一致性,且较以往的ITRF序列的模型精度更高,但同时也存在着一定的差异性,这与观测台站、板块本身等相关因素都有关.本文还由ITRF2005VEL模型计算了构造板块的总角动量,结果不为零,说明ITRF2005框架有可能不满足无整体旋转的要求. 相似文献
4.
本文指出了最新的国际地球参考框架ITRF（International Terrestrial Reference Frame）2005已不能满足当今毫米级地球动态变化监测的需要.提出了利用ITRF2005、SBL/GGFC（Special Bureau for Loading/Global Geophysical Fluids Center）和GRACE（Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment）等卫星的最新成果,构建毫米级地球参考框架的方案,介绍了对其两个关键问题：地壳非线性运动特征∑RΔXiR(t)和地球质心运动ΔX0(t)的空间技术（GPS,VLBI,SLR和GRACE）监测和地球物理因素模制的方法和一些初步结果,并对目前建立和实现毫米级地球参考框架存在的问题和所能达到的精度进行了初步评估. 相似文献
5.
随着近年来空间大地测量学的不断发展，地球的质量中心（CM）与几何中心（CF）再也不是不可辨别的了。现在，国际地球参考框架（ITRF）原点被确定为CM，显示出相对真实的CM有从几毫米到1cm范围内的季节性变化。由于科学家们研究地球的季节性及短时间尺度的动态形变，并开始把观测的地心运动与地球物理学模型的预测结果进行比较，参考框架显现出了因未考虑地心运动带来的明显误差。本文讨论了ITRF原点的性质，探讨了GPS测量对于地心运动的敏感性。我们发现地心运动的非线性值并没有包含在ITRF中，当前国际地球参考框架原点的特性在长趋势上反映地球的质量中心，但在季节性上反映几何中心。ITRF原点的本质取决于所采纳的运动学模型和无模型的网络运动。现有ITRF的原点应该定义新的术语来精确地反映CM的本质。这样，原点将保持其现有的长期稳定性，从而把季节性时间尺度的原点精度提高到亚毫米级水平。通过1度形变方法，GPS在测定季节和更短时间尺度的地心变化方面具有提供有价值信息的潜能。 相似文献
6.
ITRF2000的无整体旋转约束及最新全球板块运动模型NNR-ITRF2000VEL 总被引：11，自引：0，他引：11
由IERS最新公布的ITRF2000地球协议参考架中, 用54个台站维持参考架的定向. 它有两个不足, (ⅰ) 54个台站只分布在全球14个大板块中的9个, 其中有3个板块只有1个台站, 因此这些台站不能很好地维持全球地壳无整体旋转的条件; (ⅱ) 虽然ITRF2000公报中称ITRF2000相对于NNR-NUVEL1A 地质模型为无整体旋转约束, 但计算结果表明ITRF2000不满足地球协议参考架相对于地壳无整体旋转的条件. 结合实测速度场与地质板块模型, 导出产生ITRF地球协议参考架的无整体旋转的条件, 给出选择维持地球协议参考架无整体旋转条件的核心站条件. 同时在建立ITRF地球协议参考架过程中获得新的地球板块运动模型, 可作为ITRF的产品. 相似文献
7.
关于ITRF96参考架整体旋转性的探讨 总被引：11，自引：3，他引：8
利用国际地球自转服务IERS发布的国际地球参考架ITRF96的速度场 ,建立了一个基于现代空间大地测量实测结果的全球板块运动模型ITRF96VEL ,该模型与NNR -NUVEL1A模型有着较好的一致性 .利用该模型 ,本文对ITRF96参考架相对无整体旋转参考架是否存在一个整体旋转的问题进行了初步的探讨 ,结果表明ITRF96参考架相对无整体旋转参考架有一个整体旋转 ,旋转角速度为 0 1 61°/Ma ,旋转极指向南纬 50 5° ,东经 65 5°,这与要求ITRF96无整体旋转的定义不相符 ,这个整体旋转将会对国际地球参考架的高精度应用和长期维持 ,特别是对地球自转参数长期变化的研究产生一定的影响 相似文献
8.
选用中国大陆地壳运动观测台网（CMONOC）在华北地区约8年（2011年10月～2019年9月）的连续观测数据,建立了华北稳定参考框架——NChina20。NChina20与全球参考框架（IGS14）保持坐标系缩放比例一致,两坐标系统在历元2020.0对齐。本文详细介绍了将相对于IGS14的位置时间序列转换到NChina20的方法,并列举了NChina20在城市地面升降长期观测领域的应用。NChina20的稳定性（精度）在水平方向约为0.5mm/a,在垂直方向约为0.6mm/a。参考框架的稳定性随时间的推移而退化,建议NChina20的使用范围在时间上限于2006～2025年的时间窗口内,在空间上限于华北活动地块区域内。选用华北地区5个基岩站20年（2000～2019年）的连续观测数据,建立了华北地区季节性地面升降预测模型。华北稳定参考框架将每隔几年更新一次,以缓解框架稳定性随时间的退化,并与IGS参考框架同步更新。 相似文献
9.
在地磁与空间物理学实验研究和理论研究中,无论是观测资料和实验数据,还是理论计算和数值模拟结果,都需要组织在一定的坐标框架中,或者用一定的函数(函数系)来表达.坐标系或函数系的选择对于合理描述资料和发现自然规律是十分重要的环节.本文综述了地磁与空间物理研究中经常使用的20多种坐标系,着重探索这些坐标系的基本设计思想和相互联系,追踪它们的发展演化轨迹,从而加深对资料组织和坐标系选择的理解. 相似文献
10.
对影响地球参考框架稳定度与精确度的地球动力学因素进行深入研究,能更好地促进毫米级地球参考架的建立.而研究GNSS测站坐标的非线性变化及其相关机制,是实现毫米级地球参考框架的前提,也为提升GNSS坐标精度、研究地球物理因素等提供参考.首先研究了GNSS测站坐标非线性变化的影响机制与理论改正模型,给出了季节性温度效应、地表物质负荷效应、GNSS周年性系统误差和高阶电离层延迟这四种因素的研究进展,并提出了在机制和模型研究方面一些改进的方向.然后通过以高阶电离层延迟对GNSS测站坐标时间序列的影响为例,进行分组实验,研究了高阶电离层延迟对GNSS测站坐标非线性变化的影响,并进一步将影响进行了量化.研究结果有助于对测站坐标非线性变化的机制做出更精确合理的解释,同时也有助于削弱与限制高阶电离层延迟对建立高精度地球参考框架的影响;为我国北斗地球参考框架的建立与维持提供了可靠的理论基础,具有一定的参考价值. 相似文献
11.
The present article is written in response to the recent call of the United Nations for the enhanced international cooperation of different countries on global geodesy to build the Global Geodetic Reference Frame (GGRF). It reviews historical landmarks in the development of the State Geodetic Reference Frame on the territory of Russia over the last two centuries. It discusses major steps in creating the Russian terrestrial reference frame by both the ground-based and space geodesy methods relying upon the satellite observation techniques. Currently the State Geodetic Reference Frame undergoes a radical improvement in order to effectively implement the potential of modern satellite technologies through the use of the Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS). We outline the current status of the National Geodetic Network in Russia, its hierarchical structure and accuracy. We pay a particular attention to the high-precision State Geodetic Coordinate System (GSK-2011), created simultaneously along with the global reference-ellipsoid, and designed for various types of users to conduct the land surveying and mapping in Russia. We also present the geocentric coordinate system (PZ-90.11) used for navigating space missions, solving various problems of global geodesy, and supporting the continuous operation of GLONASS. 相似文献
12.
Terrestrial reference frame requirements within GGOS perspective 总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4
One of the main objectives of the promising and challenging IAG project GGOS (Global Geodetic Observing System) is the availability of a global and accurate Terrestrial Reference Frame for Earth Science applications, particularly Earth Rotation, Gravity Field and geophysics. With the experience gained within the activities related to the International Terrestrial Reference System (ITRS) and its realization, the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF), the combination method proved its efficiency to establish a global frame benefiting from the strengths of the various space geodetic techniques and, in the same time, underlining their biases and weaknesses. In this paper we focus on the limitation factors inherent to each individual technique and to the combination, such as the current status of the observing networks, distribution of the co-location sites and their quality and accuracy of the combined frame parameters. Results of some TRF and EOP simultaneous combinations using CATREF software will be used to illustrate the current achievement and to help drawing up future goals and improvements in the GGOS framework. Beyond these technical aspects, the overall visibility and acceptance of ITRS/ITRF as international standard for science and applications is also discussed. 相似文献
13.
《Journal of Geodynamics》2006,41(4-5):363-374
One of the main objectives of the promising and challenging IAG project GGOS (Global Geodetic Observing System) is the availability of a global and accurate Terrestrial Reference Frame for Earth Science applications, particularly Earth Rotation, Gravity Field and geophysics. With the experience gained within the activities related to the International Terrestrial Reference System (ITRS) and its realization, the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF), the combination method proved its efficiency to establish a global frame benefiting from the strengths of the various space geodetic techniques and, in the same time, underlining their biases and weaknesses. In this paper we focus on the limitation factors inherent to each individual technique and to the combination, such as the current status of the observing networks, distribution of the co-location sites and their quality and accuracy of the combined frame parameters. Results of some TRF and EOP simultaneous combinations using CATREF software will be used to illustrate the current achievement and to help drawing up future goals and improvements in the GGOS framework. Beyond these technical aspects, the overall visibility and acceptance of ITRS/ITRF as international standard for science and applications is also discussed. 相似文献
14.
15.
Jaroslaw Bosy 《Pure and Applied Geophysics》2014,171(6):783-808
In July 2003 the International Association of Geodesy (IAG) established the Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS). The GGOS is integrating the three basic components: geometry, the earth rotation and gravity. The backbone of this integration is the existing global ground network, based on the geodetic space techniques: very long baseline interferometry, satellite laser ranging, global navigation satellite systems and Doppler orbitography and radiopositioning integrated by satellite. These techniques have to operate as one global entity and in one global reference frame. The global reference frame in the GGOS is a realization of the International Terrestrial Reference System (ITRS). The ITRS is a world spatial reference system co-rotating with the Earth in its diurnal motion in the space. The IAG Subcommision for the European Reference Frame (EUREF) in 1991 recommended that the terrestrial reference system for Europe should be coincident with ITRS at the epoch t 0 = 1989.0 and fixed to the stable part of the Eurasian Plate. It was named the European Terrestrial Reference System 89 (ETRS89). On the 2nd of June 2008, the Head Office of Geodesy and Cartography in Poland commenced operating the ASG-EUPOS multifunctional precise satellite positioning system. The ASG-EUPOS network defines the European Terrestrial Reference System ETRS89 in Poland. A close connection between the ASG-EUPOS stations and 15 out of 18 Polish EUREF permanent network stations controls the realization of the ETRS89 on Polish territory. This paper is a review of the global ITRS, as well as a regional and a national geodetic reference systems ETRS89. 相似文献
16.
Tidally induced sub-daily Earth Rotation Parameters (ERP) variations, when not properly accounted for, can cause apparent orbit and ERP rate errors, which can significantly exceed the IGS solution errors. All International GPS Service (IGS) Analysis Centers currently apply the conventional sub-daily ERP model in their transformations from ITRF (International Terrestrial Reference Frame) to ICRF (International Celestial Reference Frame), both of which are used for IGS global analyses. However, some IGS Analysis Centers did not apply the sub-daily ERP model when transforming ICRF orbit solutions to ITRF, which is used for IGS orbit/clock products. This transformation inconsistency can cause significant orbit RMS differences that could exceed the 5-cm level. Independent ERP rate solutions are sensitive even to small errors in the sub-daily ERP model, and can be used to verify the sub-daily ERP model at, or below 0.1 mas/day precision level.The Precise Point Positioning (PPP) via precise station position solutions with the IGS orbit/clock combined products, provides an ideal interface to access the IGS realization of ITRF. PPP also yields precise station clock and tropospheric zenith delays (TZD) solutions, all at the sub-cm precision level. However, when using IGS orbit/clock products it is important that the same convention be used with respect to sub-daily ERP. Otherwise, the solutions of station navigation positions, station clocks and TZD's will be affected by significant errors that could exceed the 1-cm level. 相似文献
17.
In this paper we analyze the scale of the DORIS (Doppler Orbitography and Radiopositioning Integrated by Satellite) solutions with respect to DORIS extension of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF) for Precise Orbit Determination DPOD2014. The main goal is to explain the scale inconsistencies and to find the optimal solution reaching low-biased and consistent scale time series. Our analysis profits from 4 different strategies based only on the Geodetic Observatory Pecný analysis center solution, using DORIS exchange format data 2.2. A difference in the sequence of the solutions directly corresponds to one of the changes in the solution settings: data elevation dependent weighting, application of data validity indicators and application of phase center - reference point correction. We process multi-satellite and single-satellite solutions for the time period 2011.0–2017.0. Our analysis examines scale inconsistency issues in 2011/2012 and in 2015. The scale increment in 2011/2012 is explained as a result of the concurrence of changes in satellite constellation and change in the provider data validity standards for Cryosat-2 and Jason-2 satellites. The scale increment in 2015 is explained as the effect of change in the standards for phase center - reference center corrections for Saral, Jason-2 and Cryosat-2 satellites. Moreover, comparing the solutions with and without elevation dependent data downweighting using the same elevation cutoff (10°), we found a significant reduction of scale bias and scale variation applying the data downweighting. The data downweighting improved also the station positioning repeatability. We demonstrate that the solution, which is completely free from the additional data associated with observations in DORIS exchange format 2.2 and includes the data downweighting law, eventuates in a consistent scale time series with the lowest offset with respect to DPOD2014 (version 1.0) (12.7 ± 2.3 mm for 2011.0–2017.0). The only remaining scale issue is the part of 2011/2012 increment of around 5 mm, explained by a change in the DORIS satellite constellation. 相似文献
18.
R. M. S. Fernandes L. Bastos B. A. C. Ambrosius R. Noomen S. Matheussen P. Baptista 《Pure and Applied Geophysics》2004,161(3):683-699
—GPS (Global Positioning System) observations started to be carried out in the Azores region under the scope of the TANGO (TransAtlantic Network for Geodesy and Oceanography) project in 1988. The measurements carried out between 1993 and 2000 (five campaigns) on nine GPS sites (one per island) were reprocessed using two state–of–the-art software packages. Different methodologies were applied to compute each campaign solution and the derived velocity field. The velocity fields, including the motions of two permanent stations, recently installed in the Azores, were computed within the most recent geodetic reference frame, ITRF2000 (International Terrestrial Reference Frame, solution 2000). They are compared with the motions of the stable rigid tectonic plates using as reference DEOS2k, a global tectonic model developed using geodetic data. The relative motions between the Western and Central groups of islands yield to evaluate the opening rate of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge (boundary between the North American plate and the Eurasian and African plates). Concerning the boundary between the Eurasian and African plates, the motion of the TANGO sites in the Central and Eastern groups clearly identifies the transition pattern between those two plates. Two of the sites are considered to be located in the stable part of these plates, whereas the remaining five are within the deformation region of the Eurasia-Africa boundary. The conclusions are analyzed in view of the different deformation models, derived from geodynamic or geophysical data that have been proposed for the region. 相似文献