共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 46 毫秒
1.
THE MESOZOIC QIANGTANG FORELAND BASIN IN QINGHAI—XIZANG PLATEAU,CHINANationalKeyFundamentalResearchProjects(973) (G1990 40 80 15 ) ;NSFCGeneralProjects(4980 2 0 13) 相似文献
2.
青藏高原中侏罗世-早白垩世羌塘复合型前陆盆地充填模式 总被引：34，自引：5，他引：34
根据沉积物碎屑组分、粗碎屑楔状体、边缘相、古流向和沉积、沉降中心等重建了盆地结构、古地理和古地貌,认为该盆地是在中侏罗世-早白垩世多岛洋体制下形成的一种复杂的、特殊类型的复合前陆盆地,它的形成和发展同金沙江缝合带与班公湖-怒江缝合带的碰撞和对冲有关,是盆地两侧板块边缘的大型逆冲作用的产物。在此基础上,根据中央隆起地貌景观交替性变化和盆地中“三砂二灰”的幕式沉积特点,将中侏罗世-早白垩世羌塘前陆盆地演化过程分为 5个阶段,其中巴通期和牛津-提唐期是羌塘盆地南北两侧构造活动相对平静期,而巴柔期、卡洛期、提唐-贝里阿斯期是羌塘盆地南北两侧构造活动强烈时期,强烈的逆冲推覆作用产生大量的构造负载,导致中央隆起强烈地挠曲隆升,造成了盆地中的幕式沉积,产生构造层序和层序,恢复了羌塘前陆盆地沉积记录与两侧缝合带的逆冲作用的相互关系. 相似文献
3.
中生代羌塘前陆盆地充填序列及演化过程 总被引：40，自引：1，他引：40
中生代羌塘前陆盆地位于青藏高原巨型造山带内 ,夹于金沙江缝合带与班公湖—怒江缝合带之间 ,是一个与两侧缝合带逆冲作用相关的沉积盆地 ,由羌北盆地 (对应于金沙江缝合带 )、羌南盆地 (对应于班公湖—怒江缝合带 )和中央隆起带构成 ,其中中央隆起是北部前陆盆地和南部前陆盆地共有的前陆隆起 ,显示为对称型复合前陆盆地 ;该盆地形成于晚三叠世 ,并持续发育至早白垩世 ,盆地中充填了巨厚的同构造期的复理石和磨拉石 ,具有总体向上变粗变浅的充填序列 ,以不整合面可将其划分为 5个由顶底不整合面限制的构造层序 ,其中晚三叠世诺利期构造层序对应于金沙江缝合带主碰撞期 ,晚三叠世瑞替期构造层序对应于金沙江缝合带碰撞闭合后冲断抬升 ,早侏罗世构造层序对应于班公湖—怒江缝合带初始逆冲推覆 ,中侏罗世—早白垩世构造层序对应于班公湖—怒江缝合带主碰撞期 ,中白垩世构造层序为班公湖—怒江缝合带碰撞闭合后冲断抬升与金沙江缝合带冲断抬升的产物 ,为中生代羌塘盆地关闭后的磨拉石建造 相似文献
4.
The Kemalpa?a Basin is one of the Quaternary basins in Western Anatolia and represents the south-western branch of the Gediz Graben system in this extensional province. This basin has been formed under the NNE–SSW trending extensional tectonic regime. It is bounded by a major fault, the Kemalpa?a Fault, in the south and it is bounded by a number of downstepping faults, called as Spilda?? Fault Zone, in the north. Both margin-bounding faults of the Kemalpa?a Basin are oblique-slip normal faults. In order to better understand the activities of these faults, we investigated the tectonic geomorphology of the Kemalpa?a Basin and interpreted the effect of tectonic activity on the geomorphological evolution using geomorphic markers such as drainage basin patterns, facet geometries and morphometric indices such as hypsometric curves and integral (HI), basin shape index (Bs), valley floor width-to-height ratio (Vf) and mountain front sinuosity (Smf). The morphometric analysis of 30 drainage basins in total and mountain fronts bounding the basin from both sides suggests a relatively high degree of tectonic activity. The mountain front sinuosity (Smf) generally varies from 1.1 to 1.3 in both sides of the basin suggesting the active fronts and facet slopes (12°–32°) suggest a relatively high degree of activity along the both sides of the Kemalpa?a Basin. Similarly, the valley floor width-to-height ratios (Vf) obtained from the both sides indicate low values varying from 0.043 to 0.92, which are typical values (<1) for tectonically active mountain fronts. The all values obtained are lower for the southern side. Therefore, we suggest that the tectonic activity of the Kemalpa?a Fault higher than the Spilda?? Fault Zone. This difference that can be arised from the different uplift rates also reveals the typical asymmetric characteristics of the Kemalpa?a Basin. Additionally, the trapezoidal facets which have been observed on the southern side of the basin indicate that the Kemalpa?a Fault is evolutionally more active as compared to the Spilda?? Fault Zone. The geomorphic indices indicate that the Quaternary landscape evolution of the Kemalpa?a Basin was governed by tectonic and erosional processes, and also the all results of morphometric analysis suggest a relatively high degree of tectonic activity along the faults bounding the Kemalpa?a Basin. Moreover, considering that active large normal faults with an average 15 km long can cause major earthquake, the earthquake hazard in the Kemalpa?a Basin should be investigated in detailed paleoseismological studies. 相似文献
5.
盆地-山岭耦合体系与地球动力学机制 总被引：40，自引：1，他引：39
盆山耦合分析应该将地球动力学环境和板块运动学序列结合起来, 根据地球动力学环境所提出的: 伸展构造体系、挤压构造体系、走滑构造体系和克拉通构造体系进行定性与定量分析; 依照板块运动学序列所划分的主要旋回: 裂解阶段、俯冲阶段、碰撞阶段和后造山阶段进行定位与定时分析.伸展构造体系在离散期为陆内裂陷盆地及伸展造山带; 在聚合期为弧后裂陷盆地及张性岩浆弧造山带; 在后造山期为后继裂陷盆地及晚期伸展造山带.挤压构造体系在俯冲期为弧后前陆盆地及俯冲造山带; 在碰撞期为周缘前陆盆地及碰撞造山带; 在再活动期为再生前陆盆地及再生造山带.走滑构造体系在伸展期为走滑拉分盆地及剪张山岭; 在挤压期为走滑挠曲盆地及剪压造山带.克拉通构造体系在裂解期为克拉通内部盆地; 在拼合期为克拉通边缘盆地. 相似文献
6.
7.
沉积盆地的地层形态、岩相类型以及空间配置样式是构造事件的重要标识，沉积序列中特征岩石组分的出现标志着毗邻造山带隆升的初始启动时间，与物源区地层单元垂向叠置序列相反或相同的岩屑组分剖面分布则是幕式构造旋回的反映，在前陆盆地中砾石层的出现被认为是冲断岩席活动的记录，而在断陷盆地和走滑拉分盆地中通常可识别出100m级的向上变粗和向上变细的旋回层，它们被解释为构造高地重复姓升和溯源侵蚀的结果，最近的研究工作表明，急剧的构造沉降主要是通过细粒级河湖相沉积补偿的，广泛的砾岩进积发生在构造活动的平静期，构造驱动的山脉隆升表现为砾岩地层呈楔状体，纵向河流水系发育；重力均衡回返所导致的山系隆升则形成以横向河流水系为主的板状砾岩沉积，从青藏高原腹地、周缘和外延海洋盆地的沉积记录中可获得取重大构造变革时期的信息，也许是解决目前有关印度与亚洲大陆碰撞、高原隆升等时性或穿时性以及限定陆内变形调节机制的一个重要手段。 相似文献
8.
沉积盆地的地层形态、岩相类型以及空间配置样式是构造事件的重要标识.沉积序列中特征岩石组分的出现标志着毗邻造山带隆升的初始启动时间,与物源区地层单元垂向叠置序列相反或相同的岩屑组分剖面分布则是幕式构造旋回的反映.在前陆盆地中砾石层的出现被认为是冲断岩席活动的记录,而在断陷盆地和走滑拉分盆地中通常可识别出100m级的向上变粗和向上变细的旋回层,它们被解释为构造高地重复隆升和溯源侵蚀的结果.最近的研究工作表明,急剧的构造沉降主要是通过细粒级河湖相沉积补偿的,广泛的砾岩进积发生在构造活动的平静期.构造驱动的山脉隆升表现为砾岩地层呈楔状体,纵向河流水系发育;重力均衡回返所导致的山系隆升则形成以横向河流水系为主的板状砾岩沉积.从青藏高原腹地、周缘和外延海洋盆地的沉积记录中可获取重大构造变革时期的信息,也许是解决目前有关印度与亚洲大陆碰撞、高原隆升等时性或穿时性以及限定陆内变形调节机制的一个重要手段. 相似文献
9.
四川类前陆盆地须家河组层序—岩相古地理特征 总被引：20，自引：2，他引：18
通过对四川盆地的构造格局和盆—山耦合关系分析,确定该盆地属于类前陆盆地,晚三叠世须家河期具备以川中古隆起为中心的,由川西坳陷、川东北坳陷、渝东—川东南坳陷三个盆—山耦合次系统组成的“三坳围一隆”构造—沉积格局。以盆缘地表及盆地内钻井剖面的须家河组和香溪群地层划分、沉积相和层序地层分析、基准面旋回划分及区域等时对比为依据,将须家河组划分为全盆地范围内可追踪对比的2个超长期（SLSC1—SLSC2）和5个长期（LSC1—LSC5）基准面旋回层序。以此为基础,选择各长期旋回层序上升和下降半旋回相域为等时地层单元编制四川盆地层序—岩相古地理图。编图结果表明须家河组各时期岩相古地理面貌、相带展布规律和沉降—沉积中心及其迁移方向,严格受龙门山和米仓山—大巴山两造山带非同步的、但交替发育的逆冲推覆作用与“三坳围一隆”构造—沉积格局控制,盆—山间的耦合关系具有造山带隆升蚀顶与盆地横向生长、沉降、充填的物质循环平衡过程。这一独具特色的构造—沉积格局始终控制着须家河组各超长期、长期旋回层序的沉积充填作用,古地理面貌、生储盖组合特征和围绕川中古隆起为中心的油气成藏规律。 相似文献
10.
Maranon、Ucayali和Madre de Dios盆地是3个弧后前陆盆地,对比研究发现：(1)古近纪和新近纪的构造运动对Ucayali盆地的影响比Maranon盆地要大。Maranon盆地西边界的古生代地层被大断层裂开,除了在老构造上有低幅度褶皱外并未明显被反转或压缩;而在Ucayali盆地内,则发育基底相关的逆冲褶皱和反转构造。(2)三叠纪期间,Maranon和Ucayali盆地的大部分地区,大的断裂和构造抬升交替保存和剥蚀着原古生代的地层,而在Madre de Dios盆地,很少有断层产生或抬升剥蚀,导致Madre de Dios盆地古生代地层比Maranon和Ucayali盆地保存较好。(3)自北向南3个盆地的主力烃源岩和主力储层的地层年代越来越老。盆地的前渊带,储层埋藏深度大和成岩作用强的特点导致储层的物性明显变差。(4)晚白垩世以来的挤压和冲断运动在3个盆地的中西部形成了大量中-高幅度的背斜、断背斜等构造圈闭。盆地东部的地层向克拉通地台方向逐层超覆,发育地层圈闭。Maranon和Ucayali盆地北部, 新近纪的构造挤压运动影响到基底,使断层贯穿至盆地基底,发育与基底相关的断层,而在Ucayali盆地的最南部发育薄皮式断层。最后,指出了3个盆地下一步勘探的领域和方向。 相似文献
11.
12.
F. Martín‐Gonzlez M. Freudenthal N. Heredia E. Martín‐Surez R. Rodríguez‐Fernndez 《Geological Journal》2014,49(1):15-27
Ages of Cenozoic sedimentary basins yield information that can be used to infer detailed spatial and temporal evolution in the Alpine foreland. The Tertiary deposits of the NW Iberian Peninsula comprise the remains of a broken foreland basin (the West Duero Basin). This work constrains the timing of tectonic fragmentation and the evolution of the western termination of the Alpine Pyrenean–Cantabrian Orogen (NW Iberian Peninsula). The discovery of Issiodoromys cf. minor 1 and Pseudocricetodon in the lower formation of the Tertiary depression of Sarria (the Toral Formation) constrains its age to the late Early Oligocene (MP23–MP25), similar to its age in the El Bierzo depression (MP24–MP25). Sedimentation initiated in the NE of the study area at Oviedo during the Middle Eocene (Bartonian–Early Priabonian MP16–MP17) and migrated towards the west and south during the Early Oligocene. The Toral Formation was deposited in a foreland basin that connected the present day outcrops of the El Bierzo, Sarria and As Pontes Tertiary depressions. The basin was segmented during the westward migration of structural deformation associated with the Orogen, and the subsequent uplift of the Galaico–Leoneses Mountains. The present‐day height above reference level of the base of the Toral Formation has been used to quantify Alpine segmentation that took place after Early Oligocene times. Minimum tectonic uplift assessed is 960 m in the Cantabrian Mountains and 1050 m in the Galaico–Leoneses Mountains. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 相似文献
13.
14.
前陆盆地陆源沉积序列的特征与成因机制 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
前陆盆地接受的来自毗邻造山带的陆源碎屑沉积是盆山耦合关系研究的主要对象之一.这套沉积通常具有以下3个方面的特征:①在地层剖面中,前陆盆地陆源沉积序列呈向上变粗的趋势,其成因有多种可能,包括源区构造隆升、侵蚀卸栽导致的盆地基底均衡回弹、气候变化、岩性变化等;②构造抬升导致的粗粒相沉积事件与构造事件之间存在时滞,其大小取决于源区基岩剥露速率、侵蚀与搬运条件、沉积区距造山带构造变形前缘之间的距离等因素;③粗粒相沉积在前陆盆地内的分布具有穿时性.重视这些方面的研究,有助于得出有关前陆盆地及毗邻造山带演化的合理结论. 相似文献
15.
Stanislaw Mazur Magdalena Scheck-Wenderoth Piotr Krzywiec 《International Journal of Earth Sciences》2005,94(5-6):782-798
Several selected seismic lines are used to show and compare the modes of Late-Cretaceous–Early Tertiary inversion within the
North German and Polish basins. These seismic data illustrate an important difference in the allocation of major zones of
basement (thick-skinned) deformation and maximum uplift within both basins. The most important inversion-related uplift of
the Polish Basin was localised in its axial part, the Mid-Polish Trough, whereas the basement in the axial part of the North
German Basin remained virtually flat. The latter was uplifted along the SW and to a smaller degree the NE margins of the North
German Basin, presently defined by the Elbe Fault System and the Grimmen High, respectively. The different location of the
basement inversion and uplift within the North German and Polish basins is interpreted to reflect the position of major zones
of crustal weakness represented by the WNW-ESE trending Elbe Fault System and by the NW-SE striking Teisseyre-Tornquist Zone,
the latter underlying the Mid-Polish Trough. Therefore, the inversion of the Polish and North German basins demonstrates the
significance of an inherited basement structure regardless of its relationship to the position of the basin axis. The inversion
of the Mid-Polish Trough was connected with the reactivation of normal basement fault zones responsible for its Permo-Mesozoic
subsidence. These faults zones, inverted as reverse faults, facilitated the uplift of the Mid-Polish Trough in the order of
1–3 km. In contrast, inversion of the North German Basin rarely re-used structures active during its subsidence. Basement
inversion and uplift, in the range of 3–4 km, was focused at the Elbe Fault System which has remained quiescent in the Triassic
and Jurassic but reproduced the direction of an earlier Variscan structural grain. In contrast, N-S oriented Mesozoic grabens
and troughs in the central part of the North German Basin avoided significant inversion as they were oriented parallel to
the direction of the inferred Late Cretaceous–Early Tertiary compression. The comparison of the North German and Polish basins
shows that inversion structures can follow an earlier subsidence pattern only under a favourable orientation of the stress
field. A thick Zechstein salt layer in the central parts of the North German Basin and the Mid-Polish Trough caused mechanical
decoupling between the sub-salt basement and the supra-salt sedimentary cover. Resultant thin-skinned inversion was manifested
by the formation of various structures developed entirely in the supra-salt Mesozoic–Cenozoic succession. The Zechstein salt
provided a mechanical buffer accommodating compressional stress and responding to the inversion through salt mobilisation
and redistribution. Only in parts of the NGB and MPT characterised by either thin or missing Zechstein evaporites, thick-skinned
inversion directly controlled inversion-related deformations of the sedimentary cover. Inversion of the Permo-Mesozoic fill
within the Mid-Polish Trough was achieved by a regional elevation above uplifted basement blocks. Conversely, in the North
German Basin, horizontal stress must have been transferred into the salt cover across the basin from its SW margin towards
the basins centre. This must be the case since compressional deformations are concentrated mostly above the salt and no significant
inversion-related basement faults are seismically detected apart from the basin margins. This strain decoupling in the interior
of the North German Basin was enhanced by the presence of the Elbe Fault System which allowed strain localization in the basin
floor due to its orientation perpendicular to the inferred Late Cretaceous–Early Tertiary far-field compression. 相似文献
16.
This study documents sediment infill features and their responses to the tectonic evolution of the Sichuan Basin and adjacent areas. The data include a comparison of field outcrops, well drillings, inter-well correlations, seismic data, isopach maps, and the spatial evolution of sedimentary facies. We divided the evolutionary history of the Sichuan Cretaceous Basin into three stages based on the following tectonic subsidence curves: the early Early Cretaceous (145–125 Ma), late Early Cretaceous to early Late Cretaceous (125–89.8 Ma), and late Late Cretaceous (89.8–66 Ma). The basin underwent NW–SE compression with northwestward shortening in the early Early Cretaceous and was dominated by alluvial fans and fluviolacustrine sedimentary systems. The central and northern areas of the Sichuan Basin were rapidly uplifted during the late Early Cretaceous to early Late Cretaceous with southwestward tilting, which resulted in the formation of a depression, exhibited southwestward compression, and was characterized by aeolian desert and fluviolacustrine deposits. The tectonic framework is controlled by the inherited basement structure and the formation of NE mountains, which not only affected the clastic supply of the sedimentary basin but also blocked warm-wet currents from the southeast, which changed the climatic conditions in the late Late Cretaceous. The formation and evolution of Cretaceous sedimentary basins are closely related to synchronous subtle far-field tectonism and changes in climate and drainage systems. According to the analysis of the migration of the Cretaceous sedimentation centers, different basin structures formed during different periods, including periods of peripheral mountain asynchronous thrusting and regional differential uplift. Thus, the Sichuan Cretaceous sedimentary basin is recognized as a superimposed foreland basin. 相似文献
17.
循化-化隆盆地新生代沉积及盆地基底和周缘山系磷灰石裂变径迹年代学分析揭示了青藏高原东北缘晚白垩世以来经历过3期隆升剥露事件: (1)盆地基底及拉脊山和西秦岭北缘构造带磷灰石裂变径迹年龄分析普遍记录了晚白垩世-始新世中期相对快速的区域性的隆升剥露事件, 西秦岭北缘快速抬升的起始时间为84Ma, 受控于向北的逆冲抬升; 向北到循化-化隆盆地中部的拉目峡抬升的起始时间为69Ma; 更北的拉脊山一带快速抬升期主要为40~50Ma, 从而反映晚白垩世-始新世中期的快速抬升由南向北逐渐扩展.这一期构造隆升事件导致循化-化隆盆地和临夏盆地缺失了北部西宁-民和盆地古近纪所具有的西宁群沉积.隆升剥露结束于31Ma左右, 此时化隆-循化盆地向东与同时期的临夏盆地相连为一个统一的大型西秦岭山前盆地, 两者具有相同的构造、沉积演化史, 因此循化-化隆盆地他拉组底部地层年龄最老不会超过临夏盆地最老地层的古地磁年龄, 即29Ma.(2)渐新世晚期约26Ma拉脊山开始双向逆冲隆升, 并可能延续到中新世早期约21Ma, 隆升作用使循化-化隆盆地成为挟持于拉脊山逆冲带和西秦岭构造带之间的山前挤压型前陆盆地, 循化-化隆盆地开始大规模沉积巨厚的他拉组冲积扇相粗碎屑岩.(3)通过循化-化隆盆地咸水河组和临夏组的沉积相分析、古流方向和砾石成分分析, 揭示出拉脊山构造带在中新世8Ma左右发生的最大规模的双向逆冲隆升事件, 这次事件直接导致循化-化隆盆地由前陆挤压盆地转变为山间盆地, 形成现今青藏高原东北缘的盆山地貌基本格局. 相似文献
18.
Zhao Zhijun Fang Xiaomin Li Jijun Yan Maodu Shi Zhengtao Song Chunhui Gao Junping WT ”BX 《地学前缘》2000,(Z1)
LATE CENOZOIC LITHOLOGY AND MAGNETIC POLARITY STRATIGRAPHY IN THE JIUXI BASIN: IMPLICATIONS FOR TECTONIC EVENTS OF THE WEST QILIAN MTtheNationalKeyProjectforBasicResearchandCASProjectforTibetanResearchProject (KZ951 A1
2 0 4 ,KZ95T 0 6 ) 相似文献
19.
库车前陆盆地与波斯湾盆地盐构造对比研究 总被引：6，自引：0，他引：6
通过对库车前陆盆地和波斯湾盆地的盐层发育状况、盐构造特征以及盐构造与油气关系的对比研究,认为盐底辟构造与油气密切相关。库车前陆盆地勘探程度较低,应注重寻找盐底辟构造,以及与其相关的圈闭。库车前陆盆地盐构造的形成机制与波斯湾盆地下法尔斯组/加奇萨兰组相似,与霍尔姆兹组不同。根据波斯湾盆地下法尔斯组/加奇萨兰组盐构造在油气成藏中的作用,认为库车前陆盆地南部盐层较厚的地区应加强盐下勘探的力度,寻找盐下圈闭。北部山前盐层欠发育地区应注重寻找盐上圈闭,同时兼顾盐下圈闭。库车前陆盆地具有良好的三叠系和侏罗系烃源岩,应该有很广阔的勘探前景。 相似文献
20.
北天山前陆盆地中段成煤及后期构造演化 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
早石炭世哈萨克斯坦板与塔里木板块碰撞拼接，古亚洲洋闭合，褶皱隆起形成造山带，与其相邻的地块由于造山带隆升产生的构造负荷作用，引起岩石圈挠曲，在天山造山带南北两侧形成前陆盆地。前陆盆地演化过程中，不仅形成丰富的能源矿产，而且记载了造山发展演化的历史。 相似文献