共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 140 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
ASTER DEM是利用高分辨率卫星成像设备ASTER获取的立体影像生成的DEM,其全球覆盖范围较广、数据获取快、质量稳定。但其数据精度和质量在我国区域内存在较多不确定性,本文选取具有高山峡谷等典型地貌特征的秦岭山区的ASTER DEM数据,以相应1∶50 000地面高程库数据作参照,从总体统计、检查点法以及剖面法几个方面对其精度进行了实验与分析。结果表明,与地面1∶50 000地面高程库相比,ASTER DEM误差值所对应的点数数据分布呈正态分布,RMSE为30.109 358 028 165 158 m;且其在山峰上的高程值会有所降低,在山谷中的高程值会有所增加。 相似文献
4.
5.
利用ASTER立体像对提取相对DEM及正射影像地图制作 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
本文探讨在PCIGeomatica软件支持下,应用四川省泸州地区ASTER立体像对数据自动提取DEM及其正射影像地图制作。通过与当地实测地形图(1∶50000)比较,表明在平坦地区ASTER DEM与实测地形图吻合很好;在高程变化较大的区域由于太阳高度、方位影响和ASTER后视成像存在着较大的叠掩和阴影效应,ASTER DEM和实测DEM存在一些差异,但总体上可以满足中小比例尺(1∶500,000到1∶1000,000)地图应用。ASTER的应用为DEM的快速提取和正射影像地图制作提供了一种新的途径。 相似文献
6.
ASTER GDEM V2是研究南极冰盖表面的一种重要DEM数据源。由于南极冰雪区反射率高且缺乏地形特征，导致ASTER GDEM V2存在大量的坑、隆起等噪声，难以直接用于南极地形分析。本文以ICESat/GLAS激光点高程数据作为参考，采用修正等高线法对南极伯德（Byrd）冰川ASTER GDEM V2进行了误差校正，并将其与ICESat-1 DEM的垂直精度进行了对比分析。结果表明：ASTER GDEM V2的RMSE由校正前的26.56 m下降到校正后的18.77 m，远低于ICESat-1 DEM的RMSE（121.24 m）；校正后的ASTER GDEM V2高程精度受坡度影响较小，不存在明显的系统误差，而ICESat-1 DEM的高程精度受坡度的影响较大。本研究进一步通过地形剖面分析得到：校正前的ASTER GDEM V2噪声主要分布于高程较低、地形平坦的区域，通过修正等高线的方法可以有效去除这些噪声，去除噪声后的ASTER GDEM V2可作为研究伯德冰川理想的DEM数据源。 相似文献
7.
为了解我国ASTER GDEM数据高程精度,在考虑空间分布的情况下,选取我国东部辽宁、山东、浙江和海南4个地区的平原、丘陵、山地等作为典型研究区,并以1∶5万DEM为假定真值、以1∶25万DEM为参照,通过DEM面误差可视化分析和DEM面误差信息熵模型等方法对ASTER GDEM数据的高程精度做了分析。结果表明:ASTER GDEM数据高程误差在整个地图上分布是否均匀与其高程精度高低无决定关系;在山地和丘陵地形研究区,其数据高程精度要高于SRTM DEM和1∶25万DEM。总体来看,中国东部地区ASTER GDEM数据高程精度整体上要高于SRTM DEM和1∶25万DEM,但低于1∶10万DEM。 相似文献
8.
本文结合生产实践讨论了利用SPOT5 HRS/HRG立体影像提取DEM的技术和方法,通过试验证明了SPOT5 HRS/HRG立体影像在提取高山峡谷地区DEM的优势,并对提取出的DEM成果精度进行了分析。 相似文献
9.
本文侧重于介绍智能化摄影测量机器学习的高差拟合神经网络方法。观测手段和处理方式等限制导致全球高质量无缝DEM数据的缺乏,进而制约了它在水文、地质、气象及军事等领域的应用。本文提出了一种基于高差拟合神经网络的多源DEM融合方法,尝试融合全球DEM产品SRTM1、ASTER GDEM v2和激光雷达测高数据ICESat GLAS。首先,根据ICESat GLAS的相关参数及与DEM数据的高程差值,结合坡度自适应的思想设置高差阈值对ICESat GLAS进行滤波,剔除异常数据点。然后,以ICESat GLAS数据为控制点,利用神经网络模型拟合ASTER GDEM v2的误差分布。以地形坡度信息和经纬度坐标作为网络输入,ICESat GLAS和ASTER GDEM v2的高程差值作为目标输出,训练得到预测高差,将其与ASTER GDEM v2高程值相加即可获得校正结果。最后,引入TIN差分曲面的方法,利用校正后的ASTER GDEM v2高程值对SRTM1的数据空洞进行填充,融合生成空间无缝DEM。本文通过随机选取数据进行真实试验,对模型进行了精度验证,并给出了处理结果的定量评价和目视效果。结果表明,不论是空洞还是整体区域,本文方法相比其他DEM数据集和其他方法的处理结果都能够在RMSE上表现出优势,同时,本文提出的方法能够有效克服ASTER GDEM中异常值的影响,得到空间无缝DEM。 相似文献
10.
11.
12.
XU Junfeng HUANG Jingfeng 《地球空间信息科学学报》2006,9(2):108-111
IKONOS image has been wildly used in city planning, precision agriculture and emergence response. However, the accuracy of IKONOS Geo product is limited due to distortion caused by terrain relief. Orthorectification was performed to remove the distortion and the impact of different DEM on orthorectification were evaluated. 38 ground control points （GCPs） and 25 independent check points （ICPs） were collected. DEMs were generated from 1 ： 10 000 and 1 ： 50 000 topographic maps. Results show that RMS error at the check points is 1. 554 0 m using DEM generated from 1 ： 10 000 topographic map, which can meet the accuracy requirement of IKONOS Precision product （1.9 m RMSE）. While RMS error is 2. 572 4 m using DEM generated from 1 ： 50 000 topographic map. 相似文献
13.
14.
Akira Hirano Roy Welch Harold Lang 《ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing》2003,57(5-6):356
The Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) on-board the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA's) Terra spacecraft provides along-track digital stereo image data at 15-m resolution. As part of ASTER digital elevation model (DEM) accuracy evaluation efforts by the US/Japan ASTER Science Team, stereo image data for four study sites around the world have been employed to validate prelaunch estimates of heighting accuracy. Automated stereocorrelation procedures were implemented using the Desktop Mapping System (DMS) software on a personal computer to derive DEMs with 30- to 150-m postings. Results indicate that a root-mean-square error (RMSE) in elevation between ±7 and ±15 m can be achieved with ASTER stereo image data of good quality. An evaluation of an ASTER DEM data product produced at the US Geological Survey (USGS) EROS Data Center (EDC) yielded an RMSE of ±8.6 m. Overall, the ability to extract elevations from ASTER stereopairs using stereocorrelation techniques meets expectations. 相似文献
15.
以浙江省瓯江流域为例,基于SWBD修复的SRTM DEM数据,采用Arc Hydro Tools水文分析工具自动提取瓯江水系,并分地貌、分河流等级地定量评价水系数据精度,开展1∶250 000水系自动更新的可行性研究。结果表明：①SWBD修复的SRTM DEM的空白区域面积为54.78 km2,有效地弥补了SRTM DEM的数据缺失,进而提高了水系提取的准确度和精度;②与1∶250 000水系数据相比,基于SWBD修复后的SRTM DEM,在小起伏山、中起伏低山、低海拔丘陵上提取的水系数据精度高于其他地貌,而干流、一级支流、二级支流的精度又高于三级支流;③以资源三号卫星ZY-3遥感影像为参照,从水系上采集同名点反复比较点位精度后发现,利用SRTM DEM提取的水系符合制图规范和测绘内业规范（限差1 mm）,可以满足1∶250 000水系自动更新的要求。 相似文献
16.
This paper compares the accuracy of Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) Global Digital Elevation Model (GDEM), Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) C-band and German Aerospace Centre (DLR)-SRTM X-band digital elevation models (DEMs) with the Ziyuan 3 (ZY-3) stereoscopic DEM and ground control points (GCPs). To date, the horizontal error of these DEMs has received little attention in accuracy assessments. Using the ZY-3 DEM as reference, this study examines (1) the horizontal offset between the three DEMs and the reference DEM using the normalised cross-correlation method, (2) the vertical accuracy of those DEMs using kinematic GPS data and (3) the relationship between the three DEMs and the reference ZY-3 DEM. The results show that the SRTM and DLR-SRTM have greater vertical accuracy after applying horizontal offset correction, whereas the vertical accuracy of the ASTER GDEM is less than the other two DEMs. These methods and results can be useful for researchers who use DEMs for various applications. 相似文献
17.
Digital elevation model (DEM) data of Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) are distributed at a horizontal resolution of 90 m (30 m only for US) for the world, Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) DEM data provide 30 m horizontal resolution, while CARTOSAT-1 (IRS-P5) gives 2.6 m horizontal resolution for global coverage. SRTM and ASTER data are available freely but 2.6 m CARTOSAT-1 data are costly. Hence, through this study, we found out a horizontal accuracy for selected ground control points (GCPs) from SRTM and ASTER with respect to CARTOSAT-1 DEM to implement this result (observed from horizontal accuracy) for those areas where the 2.6-m horizontal resolution data are not available. In addition to this, the present study helps in providing a benchmark against which the future DEM products (with horizontal resolution less than CARTOSAT-1) with respect to CARTOSAT-1 DEM can be evaluated. The original SRTM image contained voids that were represented digitally as ?140; such voids were initially filled using the measured values of elevation for obtaining accurate DEM. Horizontal accuracy analysis between SRTM- and ASTER-derived DEMs with respect to CARTOSAT-1 (IRS-P5) DEM allowed a qualitative assessment of the horizontal component of the error, and the appropriable statistical measures were used to estimate their horizontal accuracies. The horizontal accuracy for ASTER and SRTM DEM with respect to CARTOSAT-1 were evaluated using the root mean square error (RMSE) and relative root mean square error (R-RMSE). The results from this study revealed that the average RMSE of 20 selected GCPs was 2.17 for SRTM and 2.817 for ASTER, which are also validated using R-RMSE test which proves that SRTM data have good horizontal accuracy than ASTER with respect to CARTOSAT-1 because the average R-RMSE of 20 GCPs was 3.7 × 10?4 and 5.3 × 10?4 for SRTM and ASTER, respectively. 相似文献
18.
19.
由于数据获取与后期处理方式不同,先进星载热发射和反射辐射仪全球数字高程模型(advanced spaceborne thermalemissionandreflectionradiometerglobaldigitalelevationmodel,ASTERGDEM)和航天飞机雷达地形测绘任务(shuttle radar topography mission,SRTM)数据在高程精度上存在差异,采用弹性反馈（resilient backpropagation,RProp）神经网络算法对二者进行融合处理,实现优势互补以提升高程精度。选取两个黄土丘陵沟壑地貌样区分别用于模型建立与效果验证,1∶10 000高程精度为参考数据,在建模样区应用RProp神经网络算法构建ASTER GDEM高程校正模型、SRTM1高程校正模型、ASTER GDEM与SRTM1高程融合模型,同时应用误差反向传播(back propagation,BP)神经网络建立ASTER GDEM与SRTM1高程融合模型,将这些模型的高程精度优化效果进行对比,并在验证样区检验RProp融合模型的可行性。结果表明,RProp融合模... 相似文献