共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 531 毫秒
1.
2.
1995年7月25日广西那坡发生了4．3级地震,通过对那坡地区的地震地质、地震前兆、地震序列等资料分析,认为此次地震发生在北东向德隆一下华断裂带上,地震等烈度线长轴为北东向,宏观震中在那坡县规弄山中,震源机制解结果表明节面Ⅰ是本次地震的主破裂面,走向北东,与德隆一下华断裂一致。由于震中附近观测台站较少,震前没有发现前兆异常,测震学资料在很大程度上又受到北部湾6．1、6．2级地震序列的影响,无法分辩异常,据震后调查震前有少量宏观异常现象出现。 相似文献
3.
2015年3月14日在安徽阜阳地区发生了M_S4.3地震,随后发生3月23日M_s3.6余震.主震造成2人死亡13人受伤.房屋倒塌155间,受损1万多间.主震震级不大,而造成的灾害巨大.本文使用CAP方法反演了两次地震的震源机制解和震源深度,结果显示两次地震的震源机制解和深度一致.主震的机制解节面Ⅰ走向110°,倾角75°,滑动角—10°;节面Ⅱ走向202°,倾角80°,滑动角—164°;矩震级M_w4.3,余震矩震级M_w3.7,反演最佳深度均为3 km.最佳深度时波形拟合相关系数较高,表明反演结果是可靠的.使用sPn和sPL深度震相进一步分析了两次地震的震源深度.结果显示,选取的7个台站的sPn震相与Pn震相的平均到时差为1 s,对应的震源深度为3 km.震中距为36 km的利辛台的sPL震相与Pg震相到时差约为1.1 s,对应震源深度约3~4 km之间.两种深度震相分析的震源深度与CAP方法的结果一致,表明本文给出的阜阳地震震源深度为3 km左右基本是可靠的.本次地震造成较大灾害的原因很可能与地震震源较浅有关.阜阳地区地壳结构相对稳定,地质构造演化形成3 km厚的沉积层,本次地震可能是区域应力作用下发生在沉积层里的一次地震. 相似文献
4.
2012年6月24日宁蒗—盐源之间发生MS5.7地震.为了探讨其发震构造,本文首先利用近震宽频带波形记录,基于CrustModel2提供的速度模型,采用“裁剪-粘贴”(CAP,Cut And Paste)方法反演了震源机制解和深度.结果表明,该地震是以正断为主,兼具走滑分量,两个断层节面解的走向/倾角/滑动角分别为189°/59°/-40°和302°/55°/-141°,矩震级为5.3,矩心深度为4 km,采用该区其他速度结构模型得到的震源深度为6 km.通过分析近距离台站LGH的sPL波震相及远震距离澳大利亚台网上记录的sP波深度震相,进一步确认本次地震震源深度为4～8 km,是一次浅源地震.震后2天内的余震分布主要沿北西向分布,结合当地地质构造推断,本次地震可能发生在北西向永宁断裂上. 相似文献
5.
精确确定地震的震源机制解、震源深度和序列的相对位置是地震危险性分析的重要基础.2010年10月24日和2011年3月8日,河南太康地区分别发生MS4.6和MS4.1显著地震,为分析该弱震、少震区的地震危险性,本文利用CAP方法反演了震源机制解和震源深度,并结合深度震相波形记录进一步确认了深度的可靠性.结果显示,两次地震的震源机制解较为接近,均以走滑为主,深度也均为13km左右.此外,以主震作为参考事件,采用主事件法对余震的水平位置进行了相对定位,定位结果显示余震空间上分布的走向分别与主震震源机制解两个节面走向大致相同.本文结果为研究当地地震危险性提供了一定依据. 相似文献
6.
为了更好地确定2017年8月8日九寨沟M_(S )7.0地震震源深度其发震机理,利用四川、甘肃和青海区域地震台网的观测波形数据,采用多种方法研究了此次地震的震源深度。首先,采用gCAP方法反演了九寨沟M_(S )7.0地震的震源机制解和矩心深度,结果显示,节面Ⅰ走向243°/倾角87°/滑动角-158°,节面Ⅱ走向151°/倾角68°/滑动角-3°,矩震级为M_(W )6.5,矩心深度为8 km;然后,采用ISOLA近震全波形方法反演了此次地震的震源机制解,反演结果与gCAP方法结果相差不大,矩心深度为7 km;最后,通过sPn震相与Pn震相之间的走时差测定此次地震初始破裂震源深度,结果显示深度约为12 km。研究表明,九寨沟M_(S )7.0地震的矩心深度为7—8 km,初始破裂深度约为12 km。 相似文献
7.
基于新疆区域数字地震台网震相观测报告, 采用双差定位方法对2019年新疆疏附MS5.1地震序列ML≥1.0地震进行重定位, 采用CAP波形反演方法, 获得了主震的震源机制解和震源矩心深度, 进而综合分析了本次地震可能的发震构造。 结果表明, 疏附5.1级地震震源位置为39.59°N, 75.57°E, 初始破裂深度为18 km, 震源矩心深度为18 km。 重定位后的地震序列呈两个优势方向展布, 分别为NEE向和NE向分支, NEE向为主要的余震优势分布区域, 呈长约13 km窄带状分布在喀什断裂附近。 另一条优势分布为沿NE向长度约9 km, 这可能与喀什断裂阶区有关。 深度剖面显示, 地震震源深度主要集中分布在8~20 km。 沿NEE走向深度剖面显示, 疏附5.1级地震破裂于深部, 余震沿优势分布的震源深度自SWW向NEE呈现逐渐加深的变化特征。 垂直于震中优势分布的深度剖面显示, 本次地震发震断层面倾向为N倾。 震源机制解显示本次地震断错类型为逆冲型, 结合震源深度剖面特征推断节面Ⅰ为本次地震的发震断层面。 综合地震序列空间分布特征、 震源机制以及震源区地质资料, 推测此次地震的发震构造可能为喀什断裂, 余震向浅部扩展。 相似文献
8.
华北地区近年来小震群活动频繁, 在有数字波形记录的中强地震相对缺乏的背景下, 小震群发震构造精细研究可为华北地区地震危险性分析和地震趋势判断提供重要依据. 本文利用匹配滤波技术对2013年8月22—25日河北蔚县小震群遗漏地震事件进行检测, 并通过地震精定位和震源机制求解分析此次震群的发震构造. 计算结果显示, 通过互相关扫描检测到18次被地震台网常规分析遗漏的地震, 约为地震目录给出的13次地震事件的1.38倍. 该震群发震构造有北东向和北西向两组断裂, 震群活动前期以北东向构造活动为主, 后期地震主要发生在北西向构造, 北西向构造在此次震群活动中地震频度和强度均高于北东向构造. 震源机制计算结果显示北西向构造发震机制以正断拉张为主. 相似文献
9.
为深入研究1997年新疆伽师地区连续发生的强震群的震源破裂特征,利用全球数字地震台网(GDSN)宽频带数字资料及区域台网资料,较详细地研究了伽师强震群的震源机制及震源破裂特征.结果表明:伽师强震群的震源机制解主要有走滑和正倾两种破裂类型,其共同特点是主压应力轴方向沿北北东向,主张应力轴沿北西向,与区域构造应力场方向存在差异,具有明显局部特征;从震源破裂特征来看,伽师强震的滑动尺度、上升时间和持续时间均较小,震源破裂面积不大,是由一点向四周快速扩散的脆性破裂,无明显伸展方向;伽师强震群的破裂断层面为北东向,与震源深度梯度变化带、地壳接触变形梯度变化带、等烈度线以及地震扩展方向吻合;伽师强震群是在近南北向挤压环境下,在震源区附近剪切和张扭应力作用下发生的多次沿北东向的脆性快速破裂,从而造成了伽师强震群以张性破裂和左旋走滑为主的震源特征. 相似文献
10.
基于区域数字地震台网记录,采用HYPODD方法精确定位了2011年9月10日瑞昌—阳新地震序列的震源位置,采用CAP方法反演得到了4.6级主震的震源深度和震源机制解,并结合区域深度震相sPg、PmP和sPmP对主震震源深度进行了进一步确定,随后探讨了这次地震的震源破裂特征和所在区域的强震危险性.结果显示:瑞昌—阳新4.6级地震的震源深度为15±2 km,震源机制解为节面Ⅰ走向30°,倾角86°,滑动角-169°,节面Ⅱ走向299°,倾角79°,滑动角-4°,发震构造为郯城—庐江断裂带往震区延伸隐伏的瑞昌—武穴断裂;本次地震发生在长江中下游断块东部,所在区域的5.5级以上地震具有明显的成组活动特征,近期显著地震集中发生在郯城—庐江断裂带南段及其分支断裂上,地震能量有加速释放的趋势,未来十年左右该区域存在发生6级左右强震的可能性. 相似文献
11.
12.
By means of the hypocenter distribution and focal mechanism of Wuding MS=6.5 earthquake sequence occurred in 1995, the space orientation and activity characteristics of focal fault of Wuding earthquake have been studied from the three-dimensional space-time process. The results indicate that the focal fault of Wuding earthquake is a subsurface, NWW-trending, upright and right-lateral strike slip fault which is consistent with the intensity distribution in the meizoseismal region. Although the large-scale NS-trending Tanglang-Yimen active fault passes through the earthquake region, it is irrelevant to the MS=6.5 Wuding main earthquake. Since the relationship between the strong earthquake and the shallow geological active fault can not be determined, the crustal deep structure should be studied. The method proposed in the paper can be used to distinguish the focal fault in the deep crust. 相似文献
13.
The Yecheng, Xinjiang, China, earthquake of February 14, 1980
—A destructive intermediate earthquake
—A destructive intermediate earthquake
In this study, we have checked the location and focal depth of the Yecheng earthquake (m
b
= 6.0, maximum intensity VII) of February 14, 1980. The result shows that this is an intermediate event with a focal depth
of 90 km. The microepicenter is located at 36. 4°N, 76, 9°E, while the macroepicenter is at 37.3°N, 76.9°E, 90 km to the north
of the microepicenter. This is the first destructive intermediate event in China which led to a damage as severe as of intensity
VII. The focal mechanism of the event is determined to be of thrust type. Combined with the analysis of seismological and
geological data in surrounding area, the possible relation between the event and plate movement has been discussed. The result
in this paper indicates that in some particular place, the destructive effect of intermediate event should be considered in
seismic hazard assessment.
The Chinese version of this paper appeared in the Chinese edition ofActa Seismologica Sinica,14, 137–143, 1992. 相似文献
14.
15.
通过对云南地区1986年以来强震前中小地震的震源深度及时空特点的研究分析,找出震源深度的变化特性,深度异常与大震之间的关系。分析结果表明,强震发生的时间集中在震源深度首次出现15km的180天以内,而且深度异常形成的条带常沿断裂带分布,强震的震中区主要位于异常条带上或异常条带的延长线上。 相似文献
16.
XIN YANG GUO YING GAO Seismological Bureau of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region rümqi China 《地震学报(英文版)》1998,11(6):669-676
ｎｔｒｏｄｕｃｔｉｏｎＸｉｎｊｉａｎｇｉｓａｓｅｉｓｍｉｃａｌｙａｃｔｉｖｅｒｅｇｉｏｎｉｎＣｈｉｎａ,ａｎｄＪｉａｓｈｉｉｓａｆｏｃａｌｍｏｎｉｔｏｒｉｎｇａｒｅａｉｎＸｉｎｊｉａｎｇ．ＩｎｔｈｅｐｅｒｉｏｄｆｒｏｍＪａｎｕａｒｙ２１ｔｏＡｐｒｉｌ... 相似文献
17.
采用CAP方法反演2010年玉树7.1级地震序列前震、主震及余震19个ML≥4.0事件的震源机制解，19个结果以走滑类型为主，前震、主震的震源机制解十分接近，反映出前震、主震之间密切的联系；震源深度集中在7~12 km，震源最浅（4.5 km）与最深（34 km）的两个余震事件具有明显的逆冲性质，表现出明显的边界特征；19个事件的震中分布在甘孜-玉树断裂北支玉树-隆宝断裂上，目前已经证明该断裂即为玉树地震的发震构造。自SE-NW沿玉树-隆宝断裂走向拉一剖面，观察震源深度沿剖面的变化情况，可看出玉树-隆宝断裂西北段震源深度要大于东南段，该段主要是余震活动的中后期，因此在地震活动的中后期，余震向地壳深部扩展，断裂累积的应变能得到更进一步的释放；P轴方位角优势分布集中在220°~230°，T轴方位优势分布集中在310°~320°，两个优势分布互相垂直性与单个事件的沙滩球应力轴一样，说明玉树地震的震源机制解类型较为简单；玉树周边地区应力场分布比较均匀，并不像汶川周边地区那么复杂，本次玉树地震为巴颜喀拉地块与羌塘块体边界处甘孜-玉树断裂应变能量的正常释放。 相似文献
18.
2011年1月19日发生的安庆MS4.8地震,在较远范围引起了明显震感．通过仔细辨认此次地震不同频段的波形记录,发现在一些台站记录到了清晰的SmS震相．采用CAP方法反演了其震源机制解,并利用理论地震图与实际观测数据对比进一步确认了SmS震相的存在．结合已有实验结果,推断在人类有感频率（1Hz至几Hz）范围内,震中距70——200 km内SmS震相往往是振幅最大的震相,是引起远距离有感的主要原因．利用理论地震图研究了震源深度对SmS震相的影响. 结果表明,震源深度可改变SmS震相发育的临界震中距,震源越深对应的临界震中距越小．进一步通过对比SmS与S的振幅比,定性讨论了震源机制解中倾角、滑动角和地壳浅层衰减等因素对SmS震相的影响．结果表明,倾角和滑动角对其振幅比影响呈现比较复杂的关系,而SmS与S振幅比随地壳浅层衰减的增大而减小,说明浅层衰减对SmS震相影响较大．综合分析认为,除当地地壳速度结构的影响外,SmS震相的发育受到震源机制解的倾角、滑动角,震源深度以及地壳浅层衰减等多种因素的影响． 相似文献
19.
RESEARCH ON GENESIS OF M4.2 AND M4.5 EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCES IN MARCH 2014 IN ZIGUI COUNTY,HUBEI PROVINCE 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 On 27th and 30th March 2014, an M4.2 and M4.5 earthquake sequence occurred in Zigui County, Hubei Province, and the earthquake sequence type is double seismic type. The two earthquake sequences occurred at the water unloading stage of the 175m trial impounding, and G-R relations showed the similar characteristics with that of the tectonic earthquakes. In order to verify the influences of dam reservoir on earthquake triggering, ETAS model was introduced, the results showed that the slow water level changes had little impact on the occurrence of earthquake. Double difference precision relocation results indicated that the two earthquake sequences occurred at the intersection part of a NE-striking fault and the NNW-striking Xiannvshan Fault, and the preferred direction of aftershock distribution was separately NE and NNW. Moment tensor inversion method and P wave initial motion method were used to determine the focal mechanisms of the two earthquakes, and the results indicated that the two earthquakes were controlled by the regional tectonic stress field and were of reverse-slip type. Comprehensive analysis showed that the M4.2 earthquake was caused by a small-scale fault striking NE with a big dip angle. From the hypocenter profile, it can be seen that the M4.2 earthquake sequence was restrained by an east-dip fault, and the M4.5 earthquake sequence was the product under the conjugate action of the NE-striking fault and the NNW-striking Xiannvshan fault. 相似文献
20.
On July 31st, 2016, an earthquake of MS5.4 occurred in Cangwu County, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, which is the first MS ≥ 5.0 earthquake in coastal areas of southern China in the past 17a. The moderate earthquake activities have come into a comparatively quiet period in coastal areas of southern China for decades, so the study about the Cangwu MS5.4 earthquake is very important. However, differernt research institutions and scholars have got different results for the focal depth of the Cangwu MS5.4 earthquake. For this reason, we further measured the focal depth by using CAP method and sPL phase method.
sPL phase was first put forward by Chong in 2010. It is often observed between P and S wave of continental earthquakes with epicentral distance of about 30km to 50km. The energy of sPL phase is mainly concentrated on the radial component. Arrival time difference between sPL phase and direct P wave is insensitive to epicentral distancs, but increases almost linearly with the increase of focal depth. Based on these characteristics and advantages, sPL phase method is chosen to measure the focal depth of Cangwu MS5.4 earthquake in the paper.
First of all, we selected the broadband waveform data through seismic stations distributed mainly in Guangxi and adjacent provinces from Data Management Centre of China National Seismic Network and Guangxi Earthquake Networks Center. And an appropriate velocity model of Cangwu area was constructed by the teleseismic receiver function method. Then, the focal mechanism and focal depth of Cangwu MS5.4 earthquake were determined by using the CAP(Cut and Paste)method. Next, we compared the synthetic waveforms simulated by F-K forward method of different focal depth models with the actual observed waveforms. According to the difference of arrival times between sPL and Pg phases, we finally obtained the focal depth of Cangwu earthquake. The results show that the focal depth is 11km measured by CAP method and 9km by sPL phase method. Based on the focal mechanism solution, isoseismal shapes, aftershocks distributions and investigation on spot, we conclude that the Cangwu MS5.4 earthquake is a left-lateral strike-slip earthquake which occurred in the upper crust. Our preliminary analysis considers that the seismogenic structure of Cangwu earthquake is a north-northwest branch fault, and the control fault of this earthquake is the Hejie-Xiaying Fault. 相似文献