共查询到18条相似文献，搜索用时 125 毫秒
1.
2019年12月26日湖北应城发生M4.9有感地震,其震感波及武汉大部分地区。为了分析该地震的发震构造及余震活动性,本文利用波形拟合方法测定了不同速度模型下该地震的震源机制解和矩心深度,并用Bootstrapping抽样反演技术评价反演结果;此外,利用模板匹配技术匹配主震和目录余震波形,获取了更为完整的余震目录。结果显示,应城地震以走滑为主,矩心深度7.5km左右,矩震级MW4.67;应城地震有1个前震和17个余震,余震序列缺少M2~4事件,表明应城地震为孤立型地震,M2以下地震的b值为0.8。 相似文献
2.
中强地震序列的主震发生后，短时间内受台站距震中较远、尾波干扰和波形重叠等因素的影响，往往会遗漏大量的地震，而地震目录的完整性会直接影响到震后趋势判定和余震序列特征分析的科学性和可靠性。本文利用基于GPU加速的模板匹配方法对2017年8月1～12日的连续波形进行扫描计算，检测九寨沟MS7.0地震前后遗漏的地震事件，选取台网目录中信噪比较高的1033个地震事件作为模板，在主震前7天至震后5天期间识别出4854个检测地震事件，为台网可定位目录的3.3倍，除去对台网单台地震事件的修正外，还检测到1797个遗漏地震事件，将完备震级从1.6级降低到1.4级。基于补充了遗漏地震的完整地震目录，对2017年8月8日九寨沟MS7.0地震序列活动特征进行分析。结果表明，前震序列在主震前短时间内出现了地震活动的密集增强，b值也显示为低值状态，可能是深部断层发生破裂之前的加速蠕动的结果。随着时间的推移，余震序列的完备震级逐渐下降并趋于稳定，b值存在缓慢升高的趋势，未来较长时期内余震序列仍将处于持续衰减的状态。 相似文献
3.
2018年9月4日新疆伽师发生MS5.5地震，震中处于塔里木地块西北缘，位于1997~1998年伽师强震群震区内。此次伽师地震前发生了MS4.7前震，截至9月30日最大余震震级为MS4.6（ML5.0），初步判定为前-主-余型地震序列。序列精定位结果显示，余震沿近NE向展布，主震震源深度与1997~1998年伽师强震主震基本一致，发震断层陡立。本文从区域的构造环境、地震震源机制解和余震分布特征等方面分析认为，地震发生在伽师隐伏断裂东南端部，为1997~1998年伽师强震群震区的一次新的构造活动。序列参数、视应力等计算结果显示，伽师MS5.5地震的预测最大余震震级与最大余震震级MS4.6接近，表明序列最大余震已经发生。 相似文献
4.
本文选取2004年12月26日发生在印度尼西亚西北近海、震中位于巽他海沟的东侧的MW9.0地震的余震分布空间范围为研究区域，分析了该区域震源机制，并利用震源机制和构造应力场的一致性参数a进行了地震检验。研究结果表明，MW≥7.5地震之前，都有参数a降低的现象，MW9.0地震前，a值都有动荡起伏的情况。该研究区长达数千千米，而连续发生的MW≥5.0地震的震源机制与构造应力场一致，应当不是随机现象，似可视为具某种前兆意义的现象。 相似文献
5.
2022年9月19日墨西哥米却肯州发生MW7.6地震,该地震位于北美板块与科科斯板块交汇处。为进一步研究本次地震对周围断层和后续地震的影响,剖析该地震的孕震背景和发生条件,首先使用包括USGS在内的多个国外地震机构得到的墨西哥MW7.6地震以及后续的两次MW＞5.0地震的震源机制解,分别计算出震源机制中心解,然后通过计算主震产生库伦破裂应力变化来研究本次地震对后续两次地震的触发作用,最后收集了1976年1月1日至2022年5月31日发生在本次地震附近的MW≥4.9的29条震源机制解数据,反演该地区的构造应力场,并模拟在局部构造及其作用下产生的各种断层形状及相对正应力和剪应力的分布情况。研究结果表明:①震源机制中心解表明主震和6.8级余震为逆冲型地震,而5.8级余震的震源机制为正断型地震; ②本次地震对5.8级和6.8级余震的库伦破裂力变化均超过0.01MPa的阈值,表明这两次强余震可能是在主震的触发下发生的; ③震源区应力场的主压应力轴为NNE-SSW向,主张应力轴近乎垂直。本地震序列的断层破裂近乎沿应力场的最大剪应力平面发生,最大限度地释放了构造运动积累的应力。 相似文献
6.
2022年1月8日青海省海北州门源县发生MS6.9地震,震中距离2016年1月21日门源MS6.4地震震中约33km,两次门源地震均发生在冷龙岭断裂附近,但在震源机制、主发震断层破裂过程及地震序列余震活动等方面显著不同。针对两次门源地震序列的比较分析,对研究冷龙岭断裂及其附近区域强震序列和余震衰减特征等具有重要研究意义。通过对比分析2022年门源MS6.9地震和2016年门源MS6.4地震余震的时空演化特征,发现二者在震源过程和断层破裂尺度上存在明显差异,前者发震断层破裂充分,震后能量释放充分,余震丰富且震级偏高;而后者发震断层未破裂至地表,余震震级水平偏低。综合分析两次门源地震序列表现出来的差异性,认为其可能与地震发震断层的破裂过程密切相关,且同时受到区域构造环境的影响。 相似文献
7.
2017年8月9日精河发生MS6.6地震，随后发生一系列余震。本文采用PTD方法和新疆测震台网分析的震相数据，基于新疆“2015地壳速度模型”，计算了该地震序列的震源深度，得到MS6.6主震震源深度约为14km，MS≥2.5余震深度为9～18km。所有震相数据来自中国地震台网中心编目数据库。 相似文献
8.
前震序列分析在主震成核过程研究中具有重要意义.为探讨2011年3月10日盈江 MS5．8地震孕震发震机理,利用微震匹配定位技术(MatchandLocate),以92个 MS≥2．0的地震事件作为模板事件,对主震区周围5个台站连续地震记录进行前震检测,并结合前震、余震分布特点和主震前、后b 值变化趋势等开展综合分析.结果显示,盈江 MS5．8地震前震主要集中于大盈江断裂第一分支西侧,余震沿ENE、SSE两个优势方向展布,推测此次盈江 MS5．8地震的主要动力学成因系印度板块的持续向东挤压致使 ENE向的大盈江断裂和SSE向的隐伏断层构成的共轭断层系统发生破裂导致;主震前、后b 值变化暗示腾冲火山区下方广泛存在的流体在此次地震孕育发生过程中起到重要的诱发和促进作用. 相似文献
9.
以青海、新疆、西藏地区为研究区域,系统研究总结了该区域2010—2020年5.0级以上地震前Wq值的时空演化特征,并以2020年新疆于田6.4级和西藏尼玛6.6级地震为实例进行阐述。得出以下三点认识:①地震一般发生在Wq值异常扩展时段或扩展—减小时段,6.0级以上Wq值异常的震例中,约81%发生于异常出现后的9个月内;②地震一般位于Wq值异常面积扩展区或扩展—减小恢复区附近,近70%的震例发生在Wq值异常区内;③建立了震级与Wq值异常区面积间的正相关统计模型,二者的相关系数(R)为0.85,为预测青海、新疆和西藏地区地震的强度提供了定量关系。青海、新疆和西藏地区Wq值方法对6.0～6.9级地震的预测效果(Wq值异常的地震报准率为61%)优于5.0～5.9级地震(Wq值异常的地震报准率为26%),为我国地球物理观测程度较低地区开展强震中短期(1年内)预测提供了参考依据。 相似文献
10.
2017年8月8日四川九寨沟发生MS7.0地震，该地震发生在巴颜喀喇块体的东北边界，震中区域构造条件复杂，是巴颜喀喇块体北侧左旋走滑环境向东侧逆冲挤压环境过渡的位置，附近地区历史强震较多。九寨沟地震是一次主-余型地震，余震活动水平较弱，主震发生后短时间内ML≥4.0余震的“等待时间”存在异常，震后较长时间余震活动恢复到正常状态，序列h值、余震视应力等符合主-余型序列特征。序列b值为0.84，G-R关系推测序列最大余震的震级约为ML5.4（MS5.0），8月9日发生的MS4.8地震是目前该序列的最强余震。通过与1970年以来附近地区7级左右地震序列的对比认为，九寨沟地震与1976年松潘-平武2次7.2级地震序列在余震空间位置、发震构造和震源机制等方面存在较大差异，因此，不具备发育为震群型序列的条件。九寨沟地震主震视应力为0.36～0.38MPa，属于应力下调模型，序列余震的平均视应力水平接近龙门山断裂带附近中小地震的平均背景水平。 相似文献
11.
利用模板匹配方法对2015年11月23日青海省祁连县M_S5.2地震进行遗漏地震检测研究,由于主震后短时间内目录中遗漏事件较多,故对主震后1天的连续波形进行检测。主震后1天内青海测震台网记录到的余震个数(包括单台)共62个,选取主震后M_L1.0以上余震30个作为模板事件,通过匹配滤波的方式扫描出遗漏地震31个,约为台网目录给出的0.5倍。基于包络差峰值振幅与震级的线性关系估测检测事件的震级参数,最后将检测后的余震目录与台网余震目录在主震后1天内的最小完备震级进行对比分析,结果发现检测后最小完备震级从M_L1.2降到了M_L0.7,得到青海测震台网在祁连地区最小完整性震级为M_L0.7。 相似文献
12.
Vassilios Karakostas Eleftheria Papadimitriou Maria Mesimeri Charikleia Gkarlaouni Parthena Paradisopoulou 《Acta Geophysica》2015,63(1):1-16
The 2014 Kefalonia earthquake sequence started on 26 January with the first main shock (MW6.1) and aftershock activity extending over 35 km, much longer than expected from the causative fault segment. The second main shock (MW6.0) occurred on 3 February on an adjacent fault segment, where the aftershock distribution was remarkably sparse, evidently encouraged by stress transfer of the first main shock. The aftershocks from the regional catalog were relocated using a 7-layer velocity model and station residuals, and their distribution evidenced two adjacent fault segments striking almost N-S and dipping to the east, in full agreement with the centroid moment tensor solutions, constituting segments of the Kefalonia Transform Fault (KTF). The KTF is bounded to the north by oblique parallel smaller fault segments, linking KTF with its northward continuation, the Lefkada Fault. 相似文献
13.
An earthquake ofM
S=6.9 occurred at the Gonghe, Qinghai Province, China on April 26, 1990. Three larger aftershocks took place at the same region,M
S=5.5 on May 7, 1990,M
S=6.0 on Jan. 3, 1994 andM
S=5.7 on Feb. 16, 1994. The long-period recordings of the main shock from China Digital Seismograph Network (CD-SN) are deconvolved
for the source time functions by the correspondent recordings of the three aftershocks as empirical Green’s functions (EGFs).
No matter which aftershock is taken as EGF, the relative source time functions (RSTFs) obtained are nearly identical. The
RSTFs suggest theM
S=6.9 event consists of at least two subevents with approximately equal size whose occurrence times are about 30 s apart, the
first one has a duration of 12 s and a rise time of about 5 s, and the second one has a duration of 17 s and a rise time of
about 8 s. Comparing the RSTFs obtained from P- and SH-phases respectively, we notice that those from SH-phases are a slightly
more complex than those from P-phases, implying other finer subevents exist during the process of the main shock. It is interesting
that the results from the EGF deconvolution of long-period wavform data are in good agreement with the results from the moment
tensor inversion and from the EGF deconvolution of broadband waveform data. Additionally, the two larger aftershocks are deconvolved
for their RSTFs. The deconvolution results show that the processes of theM
S=6.0 event on Jan. 3, 1994 and theM
S=5.7 event on Feb. 16, 1994 are quite simple, both RSTFs are single impulses.
The RSTFs of theM
S=6.9 main shock obtained from different stations are noticed to be azimuthally dependent, whose shapes are a slightly different
with different stations. However, the RSTFs of the two smaller aftershocks are not azimuthally dependent. The integrations
of RSTFs over the processes are quite close to each other, i. e., the scalar seismic moments estimated from different stations
are in good agreement.
Finally the scalar seismic moments of the three aftershocks are compared. The relative scalar seismic moment of the three
aftershocks deduced from the relative scalar seismic moments of theM
S=6.9 main shock are very close to those inverted directly from the EGF deconvolution. The relative scalar seismic moment of
theM
S=6.9 main shock calculated using the three aftershocks as EGF are 22 (theM
S=6.0 aftershock being EGF), 26 (theM
S=5.7 aftershock being EGF) and 66 (theM
S=5.5 aftershock being EGF), respectively. Deducing from those results, the relative scalar sesimic moments of theM
S=6.0 to theM
S=5.7 events, theM
S=6.0 to theM
S=5.5 events and theM
S=5.7 to theM
S=5.5 events are 1.18, 3.00 and 2.54, respectively. The correspondent relative scalar seismic moments calculated directly from
the waveform recordings are 1.15, 3.43, and 3.05.
Contribution No. 96B0007, Institute of Geophysics, SSB, China. 相似文献
14.
An earthquake ofM S=6.9 occurred at the Gonghe, Qinghai Province, China on April 26, 1990. Three larger aftershocks took place at the same region,M S=5.5 on May 7, 1990,M S=6.0 on Jan. 3, 1994 andM S=5.7 on Feb. 16, 1994. The long-period recordings of the main shock from China Digital Seismograph Network (CD-SN) are deconvolved for the source time functions by the correspondent recordings of the three aftershocks as empirical Green’s functions (EGFs). No matter which aftershock is taken as EGF, the relative source time functions (RSTFs) obtained are nearly identical. The RSTFs suggest theM S=6.9 event consists of at least two subevents with approximately equal size whose occurrence times are about 30 s apart, the first one has a duration of 12 s and a rise time of about 5 s, and the second one has a duration of 17 s and a rise time of about 8 s. Comparing the RSTFs obtained from P- and SH-phases respectively, we notice that those from SH-phases are a slightly more complex than those from P-phases, implying other finer subevents exist during the process of the main shock. It is interesting that the results from the EGF deconvolution of long-period wavform data are in good agreement with the results from the moment tensor inversion and from the EGF deconvolution of broadband waveform data. Additionally, the two larger aftershocks are deconvolved for their RSTFs. The deconvolution results show that the processes of theM S=6.0 event on Jan. 3, 1994 and theM S=5.7 event on Feb. 16, 1994 are quite simple, both RSTFs are single impulses. The RSTFs of theM S=6.9 main shock obtained from different stations are noticed to be azimuthally dependent, whose shapes are a slightly different with different stations. However, the RSTFs of the two smaller aftershocks are not azimuthally dependent. The integrations of RSTFs over the processes are quite close to each other, i. e., the scalar seismic moments estimated from different stations are in good agreement. Finally the scalar seismic moments of the three aftershocks are compared. The relative scalar seismic moment of the three aftershocks deduced from the relative scalar seismic moments of theM S=6.9 main shock are very close to those inverted directly from the EGF deconvolution. The relative scalar seismic moment of theM S=6.9 main shock calculated using the three aftershocks as EGF are 22 (theM S=6.0 aftershock being EGF), 26 (theM S=5.7 aftershock being EGF) and 66 (theM S=5.5 aftershock being EGF), respectively. Deducing from those results, the relative scalar sesimic moments of theM S=6.0 to theM S=5.7 events, theM S=6.0 to theM S=5.5 events and theM S=5.7 to theM S=5.5 events are 1.18, 3.00 and 2.54, respectively. The correspondent relative scalar seismic moments calculated directly from the waveform recordings are 1.15, 3.43, and 3.05. 相似文献
15.
K. Nishigami 《Pure and Applied Geophysics》2006,163(2-3):601-616
The 2004 Mid Niigata Prefecture earthquake (MJMA 6.8) and its aftershock sequences generated complicated, i.e., several conjugate fault planes in their source region. In
order to understand the generating process of these earthquakes, we estimated a 3-D distribution of relative scattering coefficients
in the source region. The large slip area during the main shock rupture seems to be bounded by strong heterogeneous zones
with larger scattering coefficients. Hypocenters of the main shock and major large aftershocks with M 5-6 classes tend to be located close to stronger scattering areas. We found that one of these strong heterogeneities already
existed before the occurrence of the M 5.9 aftershock on November 8. We suppose that heterogeneous structures in the source region of this earthquake sequence affected
the initiation and growth of ruptures of the main shock and major large aftershocks. 相似文献
16.
17.
The earthquake stress-drop values of two sequences were accurately calculated after taking away the effects due to regional earthquake anelastic attenuation and station site response, using waveform data and seismic phase data of sequences of the Jinggu MS6.6, and Ludian MS6.5 earthquakes in Yunnan. These results show that the stress drop with magnitude increases within the scope of this study of magnitude. After eliminating the influence of the magnitude, the average value of stress-drop in the Jinggu sequence is higher than that of the Ludian sequence at the same magnitude range. This may be related to the stress state in different regions. In terms of the changes of time and space of stress-drop, before MS5.8 strong aftershock, the stress-drop is "slowing down-turning up-keeping a high value" after the mainshock, meanwhile, almost all of the abnormally high stress drop value is distributed around the MS5.8 strong aftershock, showing that the stress environment in the region was increasing after the mainshock. And after the MS5.9 strong aftershock, stress-drop rapidly declines to a relatively stable state, meanwhile, the high value of stress-drop is distributed around the strong aftershock, showing that the regional tectonic stress gets more fully release, its stress environment begins to rapidly decrease. For the Ludian sequence without a strong aftershock occurring, the average value of stress drop is lower than that of the Jinggu earthquake sequence at the same magnitude range, while at the same time, the stress-drop of the aftershock sequence almost hasn''t changed much. In the time after the mainshock, combined with the release characteristics of the main energy, the stress in the region is excessively released, the subsequent stress in the region gradually returns to normal. This may be the reason why the activity of Ludian aftershocks significantly was weaker and subsequently there were no strong aftershocks occurred. 相似文献
18.
The 2018,Songyuan,Jilin M_S5. 7 earthquake occurred at the intersection of the FuyuZhaodong fault and the Second Songhua River fault. The moment magnitude of this earthquake is M_W5. 3,the centroid depth by the waveform fitting is 12 km,and it is a strike-slip type event. In this paper,with the seismic phase data provided by the China Earthquake Network, the double-difference location method is used to relocate the earthquake sequence,finally the relocation results of 60 earthquakes are obtained. The results show that the aftershock zone is about 4. 3km long and 3. 1km wide,which is distributed in the NE direction. The depth distribution of the seismic sequence is 9km-10 km. 1-2 days after the main shock,the aftershocks were scattered throughout the aftershock zone,and the largest aftershock occurred in the northeastern part of the aftershock zone. After 3-8 days,the aftershocks mainly occurred in the southwestern part of the aftershock zone. The profile distribution of the earthquake sequence shows that the fault plane dips to the southeast with the dip angle of about 75°. Combined with the regional tectonic setting,focal mechanism solution and intensity distribution,we conclude that the concealed fault of the Fuyu-Zhaodong fault is the seismogenic fault of the Songyuan M_S5. 7 earthquake. This paper also relocates the earthquake sequence of the previous magnitude 5. 0 earthquake in 2017. Combined with the results of the focal mechanism solution,we believe that the two earthquakes have the same seismogenic structure,and the earthquake sequence generally develops to the southwest. The historical seismic activity since 2009 shows that after the magnitude 5. 0 earthquake in 2017,the frequency and intensity of earthquakes in the earthquake zone are obviously enhanced,and attention should be paid to the development of seismic activity in the southwest direction of the earthquake zone. 相似文献