共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 46 毫秒
1.
ＤｅｆｏｒｍａｔｉｏｎｄａｔｕｍｉｎｓｏｕｒｃｅｍｅｃｈａｎｉｓｍｉｎｖｅｒｓｉｏｎＳＨＯＵ－ＷＥＮＧＯＮＧ（巩守文，ＱＩＮＧ－ＬＩＡＮＧＷＡＮＧ（王庆良），ＹＩ－ＱＩＮＧＺＨＵ（祝意青）ａｎｄＢＩＮＧＣＨＥＮ（陈兵）（ＳｅｃｏｎｄＣｒｕｓｔａｌＤｅ... 相似文献
2.
门源地倾斜异常的深入分析 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
应用形态法、差分法、契氏拟合法对１９８４—１９９５年门源倾斜的资料做了系统的分析、总结，对其２００ｋｍ范围内的中强地震的震前异常进行了分析，发现在１９８６年门源６．４级、１９９０年共和７．０级地震前趋势性异常比较显著，且异常幅度大、持续时间长，而在一些５级左右地震前异常不明显。并且发现在中强地震前门源倾斜ＮＳ向有一个减速过程，这似与以往总结的震例有所区别。并在此基础上对门源倾斜的映震能力作了评价，且提出了未来一个时期的地震趋势。 相似文献
3.
青海共和地震前后地震波参数异常特性的初步研究 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
本文通过分析一九九0年四月二十六日青海共和7.0级地震前后震源区内及附连区域地震的地震波参数异常,为共和地震的前兆异常反映及强余震预测提供一些新的依据。 相似文献
4.
门源、共和地震前甘青交界地区浅层地温异常时空分布特征 总被引：5，自引：0，他引：5
本文研究了１９８６年门源６．４级地震和１９９０年共和７．０级地震地，１９８０－１９９０年青海省东北部甘青交界地区浅层地温场的时空分布特征。主要结论如下：门源地震前，１９８９年出现以青海湖为中心的浅层地温增温区，其中从湟源－门源－带形成椭圆形地温高值区，１９８６年访温区地温下降；共和地震和前从１９８７年出现大面积、长时间浅层地温增高区。增温幅度较大的地区集中在青海省湟源－共和－兴海－线。距震中区较远 相似文献
5.
IntroductionOn September 27, 2003, an earthquake of MS=7.9 struck the border area of China, Russia and Mongolia. According to the field investigation from the Earthquake Administration of XinjiangAutonomous Region, the whole northern Tianshan region felt the hit. Buildings and structures within six counties and one city in Altay region, which is total about 0.11×106 km2 area, were damaged to different extent and caused certain economic losses. The epicenter determined by China National … 相似文献
6.
2013年4月20日四川芦山MW6.7 (MS7.0)地震参数的测定 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
2013年4月20日四川芦山MW6.7(MS7.0)地震发生后, 中国地震台网中心(CENC)发布了地震速报参数. 该文利用中国国家地震台网97个台站的资料对地震速报参数进行了修订, 得出: 四川芦山MW6.7地震的发震时刻为北京时间8时2分47.5秒(世界时间0时2分47.5秒), 震中位置为30.30°N、 102.99°E, 震源深度17 km. 该地震的面波震级为MS7.0, 短周期体波震级为mb6.0, 中长周期体波震级为mB7.0; 利用波形反演的方法计算了震源机制解, 得到的最佳双力偶解的参数分别为节面Ⅰ: 走向17°/倾角48°/滑动角80°; 节面Ⅱ: 走向212°/倾角43°/滑动角101°, 矩震级为MW6.7. 中国地震台网中心发布本次地震为面波震级MS7.0, 而美国地质调查局(USGS)国家地震信息中心(NEIC)发布为矩震级MW6.6. 为了消除这种差别, 建议我国也应将矩震级作为对外发布的首选震级, 使震级的发布与国际接轨. 相似文献
7.
8.
Source process of the 1990 Gonghe,China, earthquake and tectonic stress field in the northeastern Qinghai-Xizang (Tibetan) plateau 总被引：13，自引：0，他引：13
TheM
s
=6.9 Gonghe, China, earthquake of April 26, 1990 is the largest earthquake to have been documented historically as well as recorded instrumentally in the northeastern Qinghai-Xizang (Tibetan) plateau. The source process of this earthquake and the tectonic stress field in the northeastern Qinghai-Xizang plateau are investigated using geodetic and seismic data. The leveling data are used to invert the focal mechanism, the shape of the slipped region and the slip distribution on the fault plane. It is obtained through inversion of the leveling data that this earthquake was caused by a mainly reverse dip-slipping buried fault with strike 102°, dip 46° to SSW, rake 86° and a seismic moment of 9,4×1018 Nm. The stress drop, strain and energy released for this earthquake are estimated to be 4.9 MPa, 7.4×10–5 and 7.0×1014 J, respectively. The slip distributes in a region slightly deep from NWW to SEE, with two nuclei, i.e., knots with highly concentrated slip, located in a shallower depth in the NWW and a deeper depth in the SEE, respectively.Broadband body waves data recorded by the China Digital Seismograph Network (CDSN) for the Gonghe earthquake are used to retrieve the source process of the earthquakes. It is found through moment-tensor inversion that theM
s
=6.9 main shock is a complex rupture process dominated by shear faulting with scalar seismic moment of the best double-couple of 9.4×1018 Nm, which is identical to the seismic moment determined from leveling data. The moment rate tensor functions reveal that this earthquake consists of three consecutive events. The first event, with a scalar seismic moment of 4.7×1018 Nm, occurred between 0–12 s, and has a focal mechanism similar to that inverted from leveling data. The second event, with a smaller seismic moment of 2.1×1018 Nm, occurred between 12–31 s, and has a variable focal mechanism. The third event, with a sealar seismic moment of 2.5×1018 Nm, occurred between 31–41 s, and has a focal mechanism similar to that inverted from leveling data. The strike of the 1990 Gonghe earthquake, and the significantly reverse dip-slip with minor left-lateral strike-slip motion suggest that the pressure axis of the tectonic stress field in the northeastern Qinghai-Xizang plateau is close to horizontal and oriented NNE to SSW, consistent with the relative collision motion between the Indian and Eurasian plates. The predominant thrust mechanism and the complexity in the tempo-spatial rupture process of the Gonghe earthquake, as revealed by the geodetic and seismic data, is generally consistent with the overall distribution of isoseismals, aftershock seismicity and the geometry of intersecting faults structure in the Gonghe basin of the northeastern Qinghai-Xizang plateau.Contribution No. 96 B0006 Institute of Geophysics, State Seismological Bureau, Beijing, China. 相似文献
9.
10.
On July 3rd, 2015, a MW6.4 earthquake occurred on Pishan County, Xinjiang, located in the front of western Kunlun thrust belt, which is the largest earthquake(MW6.0~7.0)in the past 40 years in this region. In this study, we collected both the near-filed geodetic coseismic deformation observations including 4 GPS sites and one high-resolution ALOS-2 InSAR imagery, and far-field teleseismic P waveforms from 25 stations provided by IRIS/USGS, to invert the fault parameters(strike and dip)and coseismic rupture model of 2015 MW6.4 Pishan earthquake. Using the finite fault theory, a non-linear simulated annealing algorithm was employed to resolve our joint inversion problem. The strike (120°~130°) and dip angle(35°~40°)of optimal models are different from that of some previous studies, and the dip change is strongly constrained by combined data than that of strike. In fixing the geometric parameters of optimal fault model, we also considered data weight(5)(geodetic data/teleseismic P waveforms)and constrained weight from moment and smooth factor(2.5). Clearly, our results indicate that the slip distribution mainly concentrates in the depth range from 9 to 16km and a length range of 20km along the strike direction, which is similar to the spatial distribution of the relocated aftershocks. The maximum slip is~95cm. The seismic moment release is 5.45×1018N·m, corresponding to MW6.42. Compared with the single data set, geodetic data or teleseismic waveform, our joint inversion model could simultaneously constrain the seismic moment and slip distribution well, thus avoiding effectively a lower-resolution rupture distribution determined by teleseismic-only inversion and a bias released moment estimated by the geodetic-only inversion. Importantly, we should consider both the near-field geodetic data and far-field teleseismic data in retrieving the rupture model for accurately describing the seismogenic structure of active fault in western Kunlun region. 相似文献
11.
地震震源机制解的确定，对于地震研究及孕震机理解释具有重要意义。近年来我国东北几次破坏性地震主要发生在吉林松原地区，分析震源机制，对认识该地区地质构造和孕震机理具有重要的科学价值。2017年7月23日吉林松原发生4.9级地震，利用CAP方法，反演得到此次地震震源机制解：节面Ⅰ：走向307.0°，倾角66.0°，滑动角12.0°；节面Ⅱ：走向212.1°，倾角79.1°，滑动角155.5°；震源深度6.9 km，结果表明此次地震震源机制解类型为走滑型。 相似文献
12.
The W-phase is a long period phase arriving between the P and S wave phases of a seismic source, theoretically representing the total near-and far-field long-period wave-field. Recent study suggests that the reliable source properties of earthquake with magnitude greater than ~MW4.5 can be rapidly inverted by using the W-phase waveform data. With the advantage of W-phase, most of major earthquake research institutes in the world have adopted the W-phase based inversion method to routinely assess focal mechanism of earthquake, such as the USGS and GFZ. In this study, the focal mechanism of the August 8, 2017 M7.0 Sichuan Jiuzhaigou and August 9, 2017 M6.6 Xinjiang Jinghe earthquakes were investigated by W-phase moment tensor inversion technique using global seismic event waveform recordings provided by Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology, Data Management Center. To get reliable focal mechanism, we strictly select raw waveform data and carry out inversion in stages. At first, we discard waveform without correct instrument information. Then we carry out an initial inversion using selected waveform data to get primary results. Using the preliminary results as input, we carry out grid-search based inversion to find the final optimal source parameters. The inverted results indicate that the August 8, M7.0 Sichuan Jiuzhaigou shock resulted from rupturing on a NW-trending normal fault with majority of strike-slip movement. The parameters of two nodal planes are strike 152.7°, dip 61.4°, rake -4.8° and strike 245.0°, dip 85.8°, rake -151.3° respectively, and focal depth is 14.0km. The August 9, Xinjiang Jinghe M6.6 shock resulted from rupturing on a south-dipping thrust fault with left-lateral strike-slip. The parameters of two nodal planes are strike 100.6°, dip 27.5°, rake 114.1° and strike 259.3°, dip 65.1°, rake 78.0°, and the focal depth is 16.0km. The direction of two nodal planes is consistent with regional seismotectonic background. 相似文献
13.
本文利用GPS观测的1999-2007年汶川震前3期地表变形数据和2008年汶川同震地表变形数据，结合地震位错理论，通过高斯变换和坐标旋转建立断层模型，运用遗传算法，反演了龙门山断裂带断层震前3期和同震滑动参数。结果表明龙门山断层震前3期平均走滑位移为-5.39mm，倾向位移为2.66mm，与同震断层滑移相比较，发现震前断层的滑移趋势与同震断层滑移一致，均为逆冲兼右旋的挤压运动。比较震前3期逆冲方向的滑移量，发现逆冲滑移有加速的现象。并根据震前和同震的断层滑动量估算了汶川地震复发周期。 相似文献
14.
In 1988 two large earthquakes with magnitude of Ms 7.6 and Ms 7.2 occurred in Lancang-Genma area, Southwest China. This paper discusses the determination of the spatial distribution of fault slip caused by the earthquakes using geodetic surveys. The prior information obtained from geological surveys and seismological investigations was used to determine the geometry of the fault plane and the average fault slip. The smooth constraints on the fault slips have been described by a normal distribution with hyperparameters, which are incorporated in the inversion analysis with a Bayesian model. Akaike’s Bayesian Information Criterion (ABIC) is used to get the optimal values of hyperparameters. Once the hyperparameters are determined, the maximum likelihood method is employed to estimate the patterns of a fault slip. Based on the results of inverse analysis monitoring geodetic surveys can be properly designed and conducted to obtain crust deformations and predict potential earthquake sources. 相似文献
15.
2019年5月26日（北京时间）秘鲁北部发生M7.8地震，震源深度为100km。本文利用国际地震学研究联合会数据管理中心（IRIS/DMC）提供的远场波形数据，通过波形反演方法快速反演得到此次地震的矩张量解和破裂过程。W震相快速矩张量解反演结果表明此次地震是一次中深源正断层型地震事件，可能是由于正在向下俯冲的纳斯卡板块产生规模巨大的伸展变形所致。远震体波反演有限断层模型结果显示此次地震的发震断层为高倾角的NNW向断层面，破裂从初始破裂点开始，由震中主要向NNW方向延伸破裂，最大滑移量约3m；地震破裂时间约为70s，在40~60s时释放了整个地震80%的地震矩能量，主要破裂区域在震后40s后才开始形成，在40s之前，破裂的集中程度和地震矩释放的规模均较弱，断层在破裂开始后逐渐加速破裂，约50s时地震矩释放速率达到峰值，60s后破裂迅速愈合。 相似文献
16.
M. Emin Candansayar 《Geophysical Prospecting》2008,56(1):141-157
I investigated the two‐dimensional magnetotelluric data inversion algorithms in studying two significant aspects within a linearized inversion approach. The first one is the method of minimization and second one is the type of stabilizing functional used in parametric functionals. The results of two well‐known inversion algorithms, namely conjugate gradient and the least‐squares solution with singular value decomposition, were compared in terms of accuracy and CPU time. In addition, magnetotelluric data inversion with various stabilizers, such as L2‐norm, smoothing, minimum support, minimum gradient support and first‐order minimum entropy, were examined. A new inversion algorithm named least‐squares solution with singular value decomposition and conjugate gradient is suggested in seeing the outcomes of the comparisons carried out on least‐squares solutions with singular value decomposition and conjugate gradient algorithms subject to a variety of stabilizers. Inversion results of synthetic data showed that the newly suggested algorithm yields better results than those of the individual implementations of conjugate gradient and least‐squares solution with singular value decomposition algorithms. The suggested algorithm and the above‐mentioned algorithms inversion results for the field data collected along a line crossing the North Anatolian Fault zone were also compared each other and results are discussed. 相似文献
17.
18.
19.
Fast and accurate earthquake location within complex medium using a hybrid globallocal inversion approach 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 A novel hybrid approach for earthquake location is proposed which uses a combined coarse global search and fine local inversion with a minimum search routine, plus an examination of the root mean squares (RMS) error distribution. The method exploits the advantages of network ray tracing and robust formulation of the Fréchet derivatives to simultaneously update all possible initial source parameters around most local minima (including the global minimum) in the solution space, and finally to determine the likely global solution. Several synthetic examples involving a 3-D complex velocity model and a challenging source-receiver layout are used to demonstrate the capability of the newly-developed method. This new global-local hybrid solution technique not only incorporates the significant benefits of our recently published hypocenter determination procedure for multiple earthquake parameters, but also offers the attractive features of global optimal searching in the RMS travel time error distribution. Unlike the traditional global search method, for example, the Monte Carlo approach, where millions of tests have to be done to find the final global solution, the new method only conducts a matrix inversion type local search but does it multiple times simultaneously throughout the model volume to seek a global solution. The search is aided by inspection of the RMS error distribution. Benchmark tests against two popular approaches, the direct grid search method and the oct-tree important sampling method, indicate that the hybrid global-local inversion yields comparable location accuracy and is not sensitive to modest level of noise data, but more importantly it offers two-order of magnitude speed-up in computational effort. Such an improvement, combined with high accuracy, make it a promising hypocenter determination scheme in earthquake early warning, tsunami early warning, rapid hazard assessment and emergency response after strong earthquake occurrence. 相似文献
20.
利用国家测震台网记录到的2018年9月12日陕西宁强M_S 5.3地震的波形数据,使用新震级国标计算了此次地震宽频带面波震级M_(S(BB)),利用CAP波形反演方法得到震源机制解及矩震级M_W。结果显示:利用50个宽频带测震台站的波形数据测得此次地震的M_(S(BB))为5.0,与GCMT测定的M_S震级一致;由CAP方法反演得到的最佳双力偶参数为节面Ⅰ:走向169°/倾角81°/滑动角9°,节面Ⅱ:走向78°/倾角81°/滑动角171°;矩震级M_W为5.0,与USGS公布的结果较一致,与GCMT公布的结果仅差0.1。研究认为,此次地震震级应为5.0左右,在日常地震速报中可将M_W作为首选发布震级;而对于中强地震,M_(S(BB))震级相较于M_S震级作为发布震级更为合理。 相似文献