共查询到18条相似文献，搜索用时 487 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
2020年7月12日唐山古冶 MS5．1地震发生前,井下小极距地电阻率出现快速下降-折返的变化,变化形态、异常时长符合地电阻率孕震机理变化,但下降幅度远远小于地表大极距地电阻率孕震过程的变化幅度.因此,文章基于通州台地下电性结构和装置系统,采用数值分析方法,分析地表和井下小极距地电阻率的探测深度.结果表明,当底层电性变化区域介质电阻率发生某种减小时,通州台地表和井下小极距地电阻率装置系统地电阻率观测值会下降,下降的幅度随着深部介质电阻率变化区域上界面向上的扩展而增大.相比地表观测,井下小极距电阻率观测能更显著地接收到深部电阻率变化信号,对孕震有更强的反映能力. 相似文献
4.
开展小极距井下地电阻率观测的可行性分析 总被引：2，自引：2，他引：0
目前,我国用于地震监测的地电阻率观测面临着两个难题:①测区范围较大导致台网稀疏且分布不均匀;②易受环境干扰。本文结合台站实际的地下电性结构,采用地电阻率解析表达式和有限元数值分析方法,对开展小极距井下地电阻率观测的可行性进行了讨论。结果表明:小极距井下观测方式能有效抑制地表电性异常体类干扰和年变化的影响,也能记录到地表大极距观测和井下大极距观测所能记录到的震前异常变化。小极距井下观测能大幅减小布极区范围,有助于地电阻率的足密度组网成场观测,可为解决目前地电阻率观测面临的难题提供一种可选方案。 相似文献
5.
为加强2022年北京冬奥会举办地区的震情保障工作,2019—2020年,依托原有地电台网,建设平谷、通州、阳原、大同、代县、临汾、宝昌、和林格尔等8个小极距井下地电阻率观测站（点）,目前均运行良好,与同台地表大极距地电观测相比,观测数据精度提高。选取2021年9—11月井下地电阻率观测站数据记录,就相对均方差、日精度、月精度、月离散度、变化幅度等指标,分析小极距井下地电阻率观测数据质量。结果表明,8个井下地电阻率观测站（点）运行稳定,观测数据精度较高,具备一定映震效能,可为冬奥会举办区域及周边地区的震情跟踪有效服务。 相似文献
6.
地震地电阻率是观测中强地震孕震过程中微变形或微破裂变化的方法之一。近年来发展起来的小极距井下地电阻率观测，不仅能够抑制地表环境干扰，还能够缓解地表地电阻率占地面积大的困扰。基于北京地区延庆台、平谷台和通州台小极距井下地电阻率观测，通过与同场地地表地电阻率对比观测和数值模拟计算，分析了地表铁质干扰、季节变化、降水和潜水等因素对地电阻率观测的影响。结果显示，与同场地地表地电阻率相比，小极距井下地电阻率对地表自然环境因素的影响有较好的抑制能力，增强了观测效能。 相似文献
7.
地铁建设对江宁地电台地电阻率观测造成较大影响,通过分析观测数据,比较了地表、井下观测受地铁等因素的干扰情况,并探讨了用影响系数来研究地表、井下观测的地表浅层干扰抑制能力,得到以下初步结果:①地铁试运行期间的干扰影响大于正式运营;②井下观测对供电电流更加敏感;③井下观测能够减轻地铁等的干扰,其地表浅层干扰抑制能力优于地表观测,可作为地电观测的重点发展方向之一。 相似文献
8.
我国井下地电阻率观测技术现状分析 总被引：5，自引：2，他引：3
地震地电阻率前兆观测在中国开展了近50年,各种电磁干扰以及一些与地震无关的地表覆盖层电性结构变化一直影响着地电阻率观测,特别是近年来,电磁干扰越来越严重,为了抑制和减小电磁干扰和环境因素的影响,多个台站开展了试验性的井下地电阻率观测。通过对我国目前开展井下地电阻率观测台站的调研,总结了观测中成功的经验和存在的问题,并在此基础上,对井下观测装置技术的各个环节,提出相应较合理的技术措施。 相似文献
9.
10.
为了正确评价天津宝坻地震台地电阻率的观测效能,调查分析了宝坻地震台地电阻率观测场地和观测系统,统计分析了观测数据的产出和映震效能。结果表明:宝坻地震台地电阻率观测场地、观测系统等基本符合观测规范的要求;观测数据连续、可靠,但精度却有逐年下降的趋势;观测数据对华北北部多个5.0级以上地震和本区及邻近地区多个3.0级以上地震有震前异常反应。宝坻地震台地电阻率观测场地能反映出地震孕育的信息,产出的数据连续、可靠,映震能力较强,但随着城市建设进程的加剧,原良好观测环境有逐渐丧失的可能。 相似文献
11.
12.
观测地壳浅层电阻率随时间变化以寻找地震信息是地电阻率方法的目的。实际工作中,在保证观测精度的前提下,发现正常（无震）情况的地电阻率仍然存在着复杂的变化,给定量和定性分析地震异常带来相当大的困难。 本文分析了一些台站正常地电阻率的变化规律,并在此基础上提出“变化电性剖面模式”,来阐明一些台站正常地电阻率变化的复杂过程及其产生的可能原因。从此观点出发,导出以二层电性剖面为特征的台站正常地电阻率相对似年变化幅度公式。通过典型计算,提出获取平稳的正常原始资料是解决上述困难问题的方向,并指出了获取平稳正常变化资料的具体途径。 相似文献
13.
SHIFTING SELF-CORRELATION METHOD INITIALY USED IN THE APPARENT RESISTIVITY OBSERVATION DATA 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 In this paper,we propose a method of seismic prediction using the geo-electric resistivity shifting self-correlation (SSC),and a numerical test is carried out using random time series analysis to verify the validity of the method.The SSC method is applied to the actual observation data of three geo-electric resistivity stations,and results are obtained as follows:(1) SSC coefficient changes in Ganzi and Shandan stations have good correspondence to earthquake,which is represented mainly by the phased increase of correlation coefficient appearing six months to a year before the earthquake.At the same time,the correlation coefficient anomalies of the two stations also exhibit strong anisotropy.(2) Although Chengdu geo-electric resistivity station had suffered serious disturbance,the correlation coefficient anomaly also has a good correspondence with earthquake.In addition to the validity of the SSC method,it may also be attributed to the magnitude of the earthquake event,the smaller distance of epicenter,and the time of the earthquake.Anisotropy also exists in the anomaly at Chengdu station.(3) By comparing the characteristics of different magnitudes of earthquakes,the results are obtained that,when the magnitude of the selected characteristic earthquake is relatively small,the amplitude of the anomaly before earthquake is different,but when the magnitude is larger,for example MS ≥ 5.0,the impact on the results of this study is very limited.In addition,we briefly discussed the anisotropy of seismic geoelectrical resistivity anomalies and the selection of the characteristic earthquake. 相似文献
14.
15.
为了深入研究地电阻率1年尺度以上趋势变化的区域性和同步性，本文从地电阻率与水位、水准的关系以及地电阻率固体潮现象的角度，通过理论、实验、实例分析了地电阻率趋势变化产生的原因.分析结果显示，地电阻率趋势变化与观测系统或水位(非构造水位)无关，而与周围构造变化有关，且趋势上升和下降分别反映了周围应力场的压性和张性变化.在此基础上，以高邮台和成都台为例，从地电阻率与周围地震的关系分析了地电阻率趋势变化的场兆特征，结果表明地电阻率在上升趋势转折时更具有短期的预测意义.本文结果可以为研究地电阻率的长期趋势变化现象提供参考; 未来地震的预测需在综合各台站观测结果的基础上才能有效地判定区域应力场的方向和相对幅度，从而给出有意义的地震前兆预测结果. 相似文献
16.
地电阻率多极距观测系统及试验研究 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
目前, 我国用于地震前兆监测的地电阻率观测系统大部分都是单一极距的, 这种观测方法在实际观测中普遍存在着地电阻率季节性变化的现象, 这种季节性变化与地震异常变化一起叠加在观测值中, 给地震异常的识别和判定带来了一定困难。 而解决这一问题的有效途径就是进行地电阻率的多极距观测。 本文介绍了采用ZD8MI电阻率多极距观测系统在山丹地震台的试验观测情况, 该系统是最新研制的、 专用于地震前兆监测的地电阻率多极距观测系统。 一年多的台站试验观测和反演结果表明, 浅层电阻率的变化相对较大, 而深层的相对变化较小, 因此利用多极距观测系统进行不同层位的地电阻率观测, 对排除干扰和识别地震前兆信息显得尤为重要, 是地电阻率观测技术发展的一个趋势。 相似文献
17.
Parts of the consecutive apparent resistivity monitoring stations of China have recorded clear diurnal variations. The relative amplitudes of diurnal variations at these stations range from 1.3‰ to 5.8‰. The daily accuracies of apparent resistivity observation are better than 1‰, because the background electromagnetic noise is rather low at these stations. Therefore, the diurnal variations of apparent resistivity recorded at these stations are real phenomena. The diurnal variation shapes can be divided into two opposite types according to their characteristics. One type is that the apparent resistivity data decreases during the daytime but increases during the nighttime(Type 1). The other type is the apparent resistivity data increases during the daytime but decreases during the nighttime(Type 2). There is a correspondence between the diurnal and annual variation patterns of apparent resistivity. For the monitoring direction with diurnal variation of Type 1, the apparent resistivity decreases in summer and increases in winter. However, for the monitoring direction with diurnal variation of Type 2, the apparent resistivity increases in summer and decreases in winter.
We take an analysis on the mechanism of apparent resistivity diurnal variation, combining the influence factors of water-bearing medium's resistivity, the electric structure of stations, and the apparent resistivity sensitivity coefficient(SC)theory. Intuitively, diurnal variation of apparent resistivity is caused by diurnal variation of medium resistivity in the measured area. The diurnal variation of medium resistivity will inevitably be caused by the factors with diurnal variation. Among the possible factors, there is diural variation in earth tide and temperature.
Our analysis displays that apparent resistivity diurnal variation is not caused by the usually-believed earth tide, but by the ground temperature difference between daytime and nighttime. The earth tide strain is too small to cause remarkable effects on the apparent resistivity data. On the other hand, the daily tide strain has two peak-valley variations, and its phase and amplitude has a period of approximate 28 days. However, the apparent resistivity data do not show these corresponding features to earth tide. Furthermore, the detection range of current apparent resistivity stations is within a depth of several hundred meters. Within this depth range, the medium deformation caused by solid tide can be regarded as uniform change. Therefore, all monitoring directions and all stations will have the same pattern of diurnal variation.
In general, the temperature increases in the daytime but decreases in the nighttime. For most water-bearing rock and soil medium, its resistivity decreases as temperature increases and increases as temperature decreases. Diurnal temperature difference affects about 0.4m of soil depth. Therefore, resistivity of this surface thin soil layer decreases in the daytime while increases in the nighttime. Under layered medium model, SC of each layer represents its contribution to the apparent resistivity. For the stations with positive SC of surface layer, apparent resistivity decreases in the daytime but increases in the nighttime. While for the stations with negative SC of surface layer, apparent resistivity diurnal variations display the opposite shape. 相似文献