共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 187 毫秒
1.
本文讨论了发震构造类型与其所发生的地震的类型之间的关系,认为弧形构造的地震类型主要为主余震型和主震—强余震型;平直构造为主震—弱余震型;拐折形构造为续发性大震型;当构造间交角区为拉应力区时,共轭形构造一般为双震型;破碎形构造为震群型。另外,本文还讨论了震源端部构造条件对震形的影响。作者认为震源端部构造一般起调整作用,其能否为地震时断层的错动提供足够的让位条件,决定了其发震类型的差别。在本文中作者还讨论了不同发震构造的地理环境与最大地震强度的关系及今后需要进一步研究的一些问题。 相似文献
2.
1976年唐山地震(Ms=7.8)的早期较大余震(ML40)的优势分布不是直线的,表明与此次地震有关的断层不是一条单一的断层,它由两段组成,其中西南段(a1)的走向 N30E,东北段(a2)的走向 N50E,主震位于拐折部位.震前跨断层且通过主震震中附近的垂直形变的观测和反演表明,主震东北侧的断层段a2上曾经发生了断层的无震滑动,而且其规模不断扩大,本文把这种断层的无震滑动看成是a2向西南方向的扩展的结果,在考虑 a1和 a2间的相互作用的情况下,计算了主震附近的应力场随 a2尺度的变化,讨论了主震附近的无震滑动对主震发生的影响.结果表明,随着 a2的扩展,a1和 a2间的阶区内的引张性质的平均应力不断增大,意味着围压不断减小,或者说 a1端部的摩擦阻力不断减小;同时剪应力和应力强度因子也不断增大,并且当 a2的尺度达到一定的规模时,增长率明显加大,在震源区的应力状态已经很高的情况下,应力场的这种变化应对主震的发生起到促进作用. 相似文献
3.
综合利用区域台站和流动台站(近台)的记录,基于初至P震相重新测定了2017年九寨沟序列M_S7.0主震和M_L≥3.0余震的震源位置,并利用较高精度的定位结果分析余震分布与地震构造的关系,解释发震断裂带的结构.获得的新认识有:(1)九寨沟主震震源深度为16km,位于余震带中段的南缘;余震主要分布深度为4～17km.(2)沿余震带的走向,余震分布与主震同震位错大小的分布明显相关.余震带中段8～16km深度存在的余震稀疏区与同震位错的高值区相吻合,应是发震断裂带主凹凸体的部位,也是主震时应变释放较充分的部位;余震带南东段10～18km深度的余震密集区对应了同震位错的亏损区之一,三次M_L≥5.0余震都发生于此;余震带西北段在5～10km之下既缺少余震,又属同震位错的亏损区,可能与那里多条断裂的交汇或合并造成的构造复杂性有关;余震带中-北西段3～5km深度的也缺少余震,也对应了浅部的同震位错亏损区.(3)证实了九寨沟地震的发震构造为虎牙断裂带北段,同时新揭示出发震断裂带表现为由主断裂和分支断裂构成的、向上分叉的花状结构,尺度约为4.5km宽(最大)、35km长,主断裂朝SW陡倾.这些反映主震破裂可能不只受控于单一的断裂,而有可能是沿主断裂发生主破裂,而沿分支断裂发生次要破裂.另外,本文对发震断裂带结构的分段解释,是遵循构造地质学原理去综合震源排列、震源机制解、地表断层已知位置、相邻剖面断层解释结果等信息的分析结果,而不仅仅依据余震的密集分布进行推断. 相似文献
4.
烈度与余震分布显示2014年云南鲁甸MW6.1(MS6.5)地震的发震构造较复杂.为深入了解鲁甸地震的发震断层与破裂特征,本文考虑了单一断层破裂和共轭断层破裂的情况,对震中距250km范围内的近震资料(宽频带资料和强震资料)和远震体波资料进行了反演,得到了鲁甸地震的破裂过程,探讨了滑动分布与余震分布之间的关系.根据反演得到的滑动分布、震源时间函数和波形拟合,认为鲁甸地震是一次在北西向主压应力与北东向主张应力的统一应力场下发生的两条共轭断层先后破裂的一次复杂地震事件.在破裂开始后0~2s,破裂主要发生在ENE—WSW向(近东西向)的断层上,随后NNW—SSE向(近南北向)断层开始破裂,释放了大部分的地震矩.由于近南北向断层南段(即震中以南)的破裂规模较大,且以左旋走滑为主,对近东西向断层的西段起到了一定程度的解锁作用,可能是震中以西无明显主震破裂但存在密集余震分布的主要原因. 相似文献
5.
2003年云南大姚6.2、6.1级地震序列特征分析及地震触发研究 总被引：15，自引：2，他引：15
本文采用双差定位法对2003年7月21日、10月16日云南大姚先后发生的6.2、6.1级地震及其余震序列进行精定位。结果表明,两个主震的震中位置相当接近,余震序列的空间分布呈明显的线性分布,地震序列精定位后的结果同震源机制解吻合很好,两个地震的发震断层均是近乎直立的右旋走滑断层。此次大姚6.2、6.1级双震,和云南地区大多数其它双震有所不同,余震分布并不呈现共轭分布,而近乎一条直线,两者间有部分重叠,表明两者受控于同一发震断层。相对主震而言,余震都呈不均匀分布,近乎一种单侧分布,6.2级地震的余震集中于主震的西北方向,6.1级地震的余震集中于主震的东南方向,并且6.1级地震是6.2级地震在同一断层向东南端延伸的另一次破裂。库仑破裂静应力变化Δσf研究结果表明,7月21日6.2级地震对10月16日6.1级地震有明显的触发作用,两个主震对断层外余震的发生均有不同程度的应力触发作用,并且2000年姚安6.5级地震对大姚两次地震的发生也有触发作用。 相似文献
6.
针对2008年1月9日MW6.4西藏改则地震和2008年1月16日的MW5.9余震,通过两通(2-pass)加外部DEM差分干涉处理技术(D-InSAR),提取了地震区域2次地震累积的视线向(LOS)同震形变场。结果表明:发震断层均为正断层,位于依布茶卡-日干配错断裂端点附近。主震发震断层走向为N30°E,余震发震断层走向为N21°E,两断层距离约7km;在影像上主震发震断层有造成地表破裂的痕迹,余震未见地表破裂的痕迹;这次地震造成的同震形变场长约30km,宽约20km,主震断层上盘和下盘视线向最大形变量分别为39.2cm和11.2cm,两盘相对位错达50.4cm,余震造成的视线向形变量为9.4cm 相似文献
7.
在内蒙古河套断陷带中—西段,1979年8月和1996年5月分别发生了五原6.0级地震和包头6.4级地震.针对这2次地震的发震构造,在前人研究工作的基础上,进一步集成活动构造、石油物探、重新定位的地震分布、烈度分布以及震源机制解等信息进行分析,构建通过这2次地震震源区的地震构造剖面,并重新确定了相应的发震断层.结果表明:1979年五原6.0级地震更可能是走向近EW、倾向S的色尔腾山山前主断层发生正断层作用的结果;而1996年包头6.4级地震更可能是乌拉山凸起之下的一条走向NWW、倾向SSW的无名隐伏断层发生斜滑正断层作用的结果.对这2次地震发震构造的新认识,能够最大程度符合并解释各自震源区的地表活动构造、余震分布、主震的烈度分布与震源机制解以及主震时的地面宏观破坏等现象.惟一不能完全解释的是包头地震的极震区(Ⅷ度区)面积约有2/5位于所判定的发震断层北侧(下盘).另外,包头地震发震构造的例子显示出在大型活动断陷带内部的相对凸起区之下,也可能存在具有发生强震能力的活动性正断层或斜滑正断层. 相似文献
8.
9.
10.
利用日本ALOS-2和欧空局Sentinel-1A卫星获得的尼泊尔地震同震形变场,结合GPS同震位移数据,联合反演了断层滑动分布特征和空间展布.结果表明:尼泊尔地震的同震形变场主要集中在150km×100km的范围内,且分为南北两个相邻的形变中心,南形变中心的视线向抬升量约为1.2m,北形变中心的视线向沉降量约为0.8m,均位于发震断层上盘.位于形变抬升区的KKN4和NAST两个GPS站,抬升量和南向运动量均达到了m级,而远离震区的其他GPS台水平和垂直观测量均在1cm以内.联合反演得到的断层位错分布主要集中在沿走向150km,沿倾向70km的范围内,最大滑动量为5.59m,平均滑动量为0.94m.断层面倾角在浅部约为7°,随着深度增加,倾角逐渐变大,到垂直深度20km时倾角接近12°;5月12日MW7.2级余震位于主震破裂区的"凹"型滑动缺损区域;主震破裂区的上边界与MBT空间位置十分吻合,主震破裂区主要集中的MBT以北50~60km处,垂直深度为8~9km,倾角为9°,继续向北时主震破裂面以10°~12°的倾角向深延伸,在18~20km可能与MHT交汇.因此,初步判定MBT为此次地震的发震断层. 相似文献
11.
STUDY ON THE SEISMOGENIC FAULT AND DYNAMICS PARAME-TERS OF THE 2014 MS6.6 JINGGU EARTHQUAKE IN YUNNAN 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 On October 17, 2014, a MS6.6 earthquake occurred in Jinggu, Yunnan. The epicenter was located in the western branch of Wuliang Mountain, the northwest extension line of Puwen Fault. There are 2 faults in the surrounding area, one is a sinistral strike-slip and the other is the dextral. Two faults have mutual intersection with conjugate joints property to form a checkerboard faulting structure. The structure of the area of the focal region is complex. The present-day tectonic movement is strong, and the aftershock distribution indicates the faulting surface trending NNW. There is no obvious surface rupture related to the known fault in the epicenter, and there is a certain distance from the surface of the Puwen fault zone. Regional seismic activity is strong. In 1941, there were two over magnitude 7.0 earthquakes in the south of the epicenter of Jinggu County and Mengzhe Town. In 1988, two mainshock-aftershock type earthquakes occurred in Canglan-Gengma Counties, the principal stress axes of the whole seismic area is in the direction of NNE. Geological method can be adopted to clarify the distribution of surficial fracture caused by active faults, and high-precision seismic positioning and spatial distribution characteristics of seismic sequences can contribute to understand deep seismogenic faults and geometric features. Thus, we can better analyze the three-dimensional spatial distribution characteristics of seismotectonics and the deep and shallow tectonic relationship. The focal mechanism reveals the property and faulting process to a certain extent, which can help us understand not only the active property of faults, but also the important basis for deep tectonic stress and seismogenic mechanism. In order to study the fault characteristic of the Jinggu earthquake, the stress field characteristics of the source area and the geometric parameters of the fault plane, this paper firstly uses the 15 days aftershock data of the Jingsuo MS6.6 earthquake, to precisely locate the main shock and aftershock sequences using double-difference location method. The results show that the aftershock sequences have clustering characteristics along the NW direction, with a depth mainly of 5~15km. Based on the precise location, calculations are made to the focal mechanisms of a total of 46 earthquakes including the main shock and aftershocks with ML ≥ 3.0 of the Jinggu earthquake. The double-couple(DC)component of the focal mechanism of the main shock shows that nodal plane Ⅰ:The strike is 239°, the dip 81°, and the rake -22°; nodal plane Ⅱ, the strike is 333°, the dip 68°, and the rake -170.31°. According to focal mechanism solutions, there are 42 earthquakes with a focal mechanism of strike-slip type, accounting for 91.3%. According to the distribution of the aftershock sequence, it can be inferred that the nodal plane Ⅱ is the seismogenic fault. The obtained focal mechanism is used to invert the stress field in the source region. The distribution of horizontal maximum principal stress orienation is concentrated. The main features of the regional tectonic stress field are under the NNE-SSW compression(P axis)and the NW-SE extension(T axis)and are also affected by NNW direction stress fields in the central region of Yunnan, which indicates that Jinggu earthquake fault, like Gengma earthquake, is a new NW-trending fault which is under domination of large-scale tectonic stress and effected by local tectonic stress environment. In order to define more accurately the occurrence of the fault plane of the Jinggu earthquake, with the precise location results and the stress field in the source region, the global optimal solution of the fault plane parameters and its error are obtained by using both global searching simulated annealing algorithm and local searching Gauss-Newton method. Since the parameters of the fault plane fitting process use the stress parameters obtained by the focal mechanism inversion, the data obtained by the fault plane fitting is more representative of the rupture plane, that is, the strike 332.75°, the dip 89.53°, and the rake -167.12°. The buried depth of the rupture plane is 2.746km, indicating that the source fault has not cut through the surface. Based on the stress field characteristics and the inversion results of the fault plane, it is preliminarily believed that the seismogenic structure of the Jinggu earthquake is a newly generated nearly vertical right-lateral strike-slip fault with normal component. The rupture plane length is about 17.2km, which does not extend to the Puwen fault zone. Jinggu earthquake occurred in Simao-Puer seismic region in the south of Sichuan-Yunnan plate. Its focal mechanism solution is similar to that of the three sub-events of the Gengma earthquake in November 1988. The seismogenic structure of both of them is NW-trending and the principal stress is NE-SW. The rupture plane of the Jinggu main shock(NW direction)is significantly different from the known near NS direction Lancang Fault and the near NE direction Jinggu Fault in the study area. It is preliminarily inferred that the seismogenic structure of this earthquake has a neogenetic feature. 相似文献
12.
13.
南天山及塔里木北缘构造带位于帕米尔地区东北侧,地震活动强烈。文中通过地质构造剖面、深部探测资料和地震震源机制解资料,综合研究了该区的地震构造模型。结果认为,该区的构造活动主要表现为天山地块逆冲于塔里木地块之上。天山构造系统包括迈丹断裂及其前缘推覆构造;塔里木构造系统包括深部的塔里木北缘断裂、基底共轭断层和浅部的推覆构造。塔里木北缘断裂是发育于塔里木地壳内部的高角度断裂,其形成原因在于塔里木和天山构造变形方向的差异。塔里木北缘断裂为研究区大地震的主要发震构造,天山推覆构造和塔里木基底断裂系统均具有不同性质的中强地震发震能力 相似文献
14.
提出了一种新的发震构造型式－转换破型型。其特征是地震不发生在主干断裂和共轭断裂面上，而是在其两侧一定距离的岩块中；发震断裂不与其平行而是成一定的交角；震源机制解的三个力轴与造力应场相对应的三个力轴不一致，而是有规律地旋转了一定有角度。 相似文献
15.
本实验研究了地壳内对压组合构造和对张组合构造中垂断层蠕滑,破裂错动时对主震断层(底断层)应力积累过程的影响,并结合实际地震活动中的一些现象进行了讨论。所得结论如下: 1.当垂断层蠕滑时,对压组合构造中垂直于底断层的压应力增大,它可以延迟主震发生但增大发震的能量;对张组合构造中垂直于底断层的压应力减小,剪应力略有增大,因而可以促使主震发生。2.如果垂断层某一部分为原来锁住的愈合断层或为完整介质,当其突然破裂错动时,可以使对张组合构造中的底断层的剪应力突然增大,同时压应力减小,因此前震序列中这类垂断层上的较大前震可看作底断层上主震即将来临的信号。3.由垂断层破裂前后单轴压力不变和位移不变的实验结果说明了地壳中主震断层应力集中的过程。4.底断层的主震破裂可以使处于引张状态的垂断层上余震发育甚至发生强余震。本文还应用实验结果对前震活动的条带现象进行了解释,这将有助于判定对压组合构造中主震的断层面。 相似文献
16.
LI Cui-ping TANG Mao-yun GUO Wei-ying HUANG Shi-yuan WANG Xiao-long GAO Jian 《地震地质》2019,41(3):603-618
The Wulong MS5.0 earthquake on 23 November 2017, located in the Wolong sap between Wenfu, Furong and Mawu faults, is the biggest instrumentally recorded earthquake in the southeastern Chongqing. It occurred unexpectedly in a weak earthquake background with no knowledge of dramatically active faults. The complete earthquake sequences offered a significant source information example for focal mechanism solution, seismotectonics and seismogenic mechanism, which is helpful for the estimation of potential seismic sources and level of the future seismic risk in the region. In this study, we firstly calculated the focal mechanism solutions of the main shock using CAP waveform inversion method and then relocated the main shock and aftershocks by the method of double-difference algorithm. Secondly, we determined the seismogenic fault responsible for the MS5.0 Wulong earthquake based on these calculated results. Finally, we explored the seismogenic mechanism of the Wulong earthquake and future potential seismic risk level of the region.
The results show the parameters of the focal mechanism solution, which are:strike24°, dip 16°, and rake -108° for the nodal plane Ⅰ, and strike223°, dip 75°, and rake -85° for the nodal plane Ⅱ. The calculations are supported by the results of different agencies and other methods. Additionally, the relocated results show that the Wulong MS5.0 earthquake sequence is within a rectangular strip with 4.7km in length and 2.4km in width, which is approximately consistent with the scales by empirical relationship of Wells and Coppersmith(1994). Most of the relocated aftershocks are distributed in the southwest of the mainshock. The NW-SE cross sections show that the predominant focal depth is 5~8km. The earthquake sequences suggest the occurrence features of the fault that dips northwest with dip angle of 63° by the least square method, which is largely consistent with nodal planeⅡof the focal mechanism solution. Coincidentally, the field outcrop survey results show that the Wenfu Fault is a normal fault striking southwest and dipping 60°~73° by previous studies. According to the above data, we infer that the Wenfu Fault is the seismogenic structure responsible for Wulong MS5.0 earthquake.
We also propose two preliminary genetic mechanisms of "local stress adjustment" and "fluid activation effect". The "local stress adjustment" model is that several strong earthquakes in Sichuan, such as M8.0 Wenchuan earthquake, M7.0 Luzhou earthquake and M7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake, have changed the stress regime of the eastern margin of the Sichuan Basin by stress transference. Within the changed stress regime, a minor local stress adjustment has the possibility of making a notable earthquake event. In contract, the "fluid activation effect" model is mainly supported by the three evidences as follows:1)the maximum principle stress axial azimuth is against the regional stress field, which reflects NWW-SEE direction thrusting type; 2)the Wujiang River crosscuts the pre-existing Wenfu normal fault and offers the fluid source; and 3)fractures along the Wenfu Fault formed by karst dissolution offer the important fluid flow channels. 相似文献
17.
18.
19.
2008年3月21日新疆于田7.4级地震序列特征及震前部分地震学异常特征 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
介绍了2008年3月21日新疆于田7.4级地震的基本参数、震区周围应力场背景及构造、地震序列特征等,分析了震前震区周围及相邻构造区域地震活动特征,对比分析于田序列和其后发生的汶川8.0级和乌恰6.9级地震的关系。结果显示,于田7.4级地震发生在阿尔金断裂与西昆仑断裂的交汇部位,可能是阿尔金断裂发生左旋扭错,牵引其西南端位于阿什库勒盆地的分支断裂发生张性破裂的结果。该地震序列为主-余型,最大余震为MS5.8,余震衰减较快,且具有一定的成丛性。震源机制解和震中分布可以看出,该地震具有单侧破裂特征。地震活动表明震前存在明显的中期和中短期异常,但未有短临异常出现。在汶川8.0级和乌恰6.9级地震前,该序列出现显著增强活动,具有一定的窗口效应。 相似文献