共查询到16条相似文献，搜索用时 140 毫秒
1.
华北地区三维地壳上地幔结构 总被引：40，自引：7，他引：33
本文用均等显示滤波频时分析方法分析了长周期瑞利面波资料,获得了路经中国大陆及邻区的238条混合路径的面波群速度频散,其周期范围为10.5-113s.用改进的分格反演方法从混合路径频散中提取出位于华北地区的12个4°×4°网格单元的纯路径频散并反演其地壳上地幔结构.所得结果表明,华北地区地壳上地幔结构横向变化显著;从东向西地壳逐渐变厚;位于华北东部的分格在地壳中20km深处普遍存在低速层,整个华北地区上地幔低速层埋藏较浅,一般为55-100km之间.各个网格上地幔低速层的速度不尽相同. 相似文献
2.
本文使用适配滤波频时分析技术首次对中国数字地震台网的中长周期面波记录进行处理,获得穿过东南地区的82条勒夫波频散数据.使用随机反演理论,获得了东南沿海地区4°×4°网格的纯路径频散数据.这些频散的周期为1.95-68.27s,弥补了长周期面波所不能分辨的浅层结构.在网格反演的基础上,使用Harkrider的面波及演程序得出了中国东南地区的地壳和上地幔结构,浅部可分辨到1km,深部可达80km.在分辨率保证的前提下得出东南地区深至80km的三维剪切波速度结构. 相似文献
3.
研究了中、新生界沉积层所覆盖的我国西北各沉积盆地：准噶尔盆地、塔里木盆地、柴达木盆地，以及一系列中小型盆地和其邻近地域的深部岩石层三维速度结构，探讨其和造山带与油气田的关系．使用了适配滤波频时分析方法，分析了我国数字台网的中长周期瑞利面波资料，计算得到２５７条混合路径的面波群速度频散．利用改进的分格随机反演理论与方法，从混合路径中提取了１００条频散突出路径的４°×４°网格单元的纯路径频散，并反演研究区的三维Ｓ波速度结构．频散的周期从１．９５ｓ到１５１．７ｓ，浅部分辨率可达１ｋｍ，得出了该区深达２００ｋｍ范围内三维瑞利波群速度的分布与特征．所得结果表明：塔里木盆地、哈密－吐鲁番盆地、伊宁盆地以及藏北地区的羌塘盆地具有较好的油气前景．我国西北邻国接壤地带，也均为良好的油气盆地潜在地带． 相似文献
4.
本文用长周期763地震仪面波群速度资料反演了中国南北带及邻区的三维速度结构.其中采集238条瑞利波和358条勒夫波混合频散曲线,使用均等显示滤波方法,并以4°×4°为一格将我国境内分为147格.用随机逆反演方法得到了研究区16格的纯路径频散.面波速度结构及演结果表明:1.莫霍界面深度一般在40-50km之间,最深达65km.总趋势是从东到西加深,且在南北带西侧南北两端向中部明显加深,东侧变化小.2.地幔顶部普遍出现很厚的低速层,上界面一般埋深60-80km.上地幔顶盖厚度一般为20-60km,速度为4.30-4.50km/s.3.研究区普遍存在各向异性,而且勒夫波和瑞利波速度的差值(VSV-VSH)的绝对值随深度有增大的特点,在南北带南部和西北部VSV-VSH各向异性现象更为明显. 相似文献
5.
利用上海测震台网固定台站地震面波数据记录,通过多重滤波法提取周期为8—20s的瑞雷面波群速度频散曲线,反演得到台站下方介质一维速度结构。结果表明：对于整个上海地区,其剪切波速度横向不均性不明显,在相同深度,每个台站S波速度差异较小,上地壳平均速度约为3.6 km/s,中下地壳平均速度约为3.8 km/s、4.1 km/s。 相似文献
6.
应用希腊西部宽频带地震台得到的几个1999年土耳其地震的记录，研究了面波（主要是勒夫波）的频散。观测到的群速度频散曲线应用一个修正的单参数变量方法反演了地壳的水平分层模型。与希腊境内过去的模型相比，频散数据要求地壳顶层具有明显低得多的速度和较薄的地壳厚度。值得注意的是，结果模型显示出上部2km和33km的地壳厚度内S波速度介于1．3－2．4km/s。 相似文献
7.
收集了研究区域(68°-150°E,5°-55°N)内33个数字地震台站记录的面波资料,利用多重滤波技术提取了4000余条路径上的Love波群速度频散曲线. 将研究区域划分成1°×1°网格,采取Occam反演方法得到了7.3-184s共43个周期的Love波群速度分布图;然后对网格结点进行S波速度结构反演,得出研究区域内420km深度内的地壳上地幔三维速度结构. 并采用Checkerboard方法对分辨率进行检验,得到横向的分辨率约为3°-5°. 研究结果表明:中国大陆地壳上地幔结构的横向不均匀性非常明显,内部结构与地表特征的相关性可以达到0-150km深度. 大陆地区东西分带、南北分块,块体的边界反映比较清晰. 相似文献
8.
考虑到面波频散对介质S波速度、接收函数对界面深度的各自敏感性优势,综合利用面波和接收函数资料实现联合反演,求取滇西地区壳幔速度结构. 本文利用适配滤波频时分析技术处理覆盖滇西地区的长周期面波资料,获得105～1050s周期范围内的面波群速度频散,进而利用分格反演方法提取研究区内1°×1°网格纯路径频散;基于滇西地区宽频带三分量远震记录,经反褶积后得到台站下方的远震P波接收函数. 联立面波纯路径频散信息和接收函数资料建立系统方程,利用阻尼最小二乘法实现联合反演,从而获得滇西地区壳幔S波速度结构. 结果表明,滇西地区以红河断裂为界,东西两侧壳幔结构存在明显差异,断裂西侧约20km深度处存在一厚度为10km左右的低速层,而东侧并不明显;滇缅泰块体上的畹町、沧源一带属于上地幔低速区,而另一个地幔低速区则位于滇中块体上的康滇古隆起上,两处地幔低速区与大地高热流分布、强震活动具有较好的对应关系. 相似文献
9.
利用中国27个地震基准台和世界标准地震台网 WWSSN 西南亚3个台站记录的中国大陆及邻近地区79个地震共238条路径的长周期面波资料,应用适配滤波频时分析技术和改进的分格频散反演方法,得到该地区147个44斜方格的纯路径群速度频散值,进而反演得到华南地区深至170km 左右的三维 S 波速度构造.结果表明:华南地区各一级构造单元之间有明显差异,一级单元内的次级构造单元也有一定差异.东部地壳较薄,由东往西逐渐变厚,厚度为30-43km 左右.地壳中 S 波平均速度,东北部最低,西部最高,约为3.48-3.68km/s,在大范围内未发现明显的地壳低速层.华南大部分地区存在上地幔低速层,低速层起始深度为75-106km 左右,低速层中 S 波最小速度约为4.28-4.38km/s.尽管华南大部分地区存在上地幔低速层,但各主要层位分界明显,层面平缓,在较大尺度地下构造横向变化较小,除西部褶断区、东南沿海断裂系等边缘区域为构造活动区外,华南主体的地壳上地幔构造仍属于较稳定的大陆块体构造. 相似文献
10.
本文利用30个基准台所记录的238条长周期面波资料,经过适配滤波和分格频散反演,得到中国大陆及邻区147个分格10-105s的纯路径频散,进而反演出青藏高原及邻近地区深至170km的剪切波三维速度结构.研究表明,青藏高原中西部地区和东部地区的地壳平均厚度分别为70±7km和65±7km,地壳平均剪切波速度分别为3.55和3.62km/s,上地幔顶盖平均速度分别为4.63和4.61km/s; 岩石层厚度均为120±10km;东部地区下地壳内30-40km深度处普遍存在低速层;青藏高原及其东侧的上地幔低速层内有横贯东西且明显向上隆起的低速腔.滇西缅北地区的地壳厚45±5km,上地壳及下地壳内都有低速层;上地幔顶盖的速度为4.42km/s,比青藏高原本体及恒河平原都低.恒河平原地壳厚34±2km,速度平均为3.45km/s;上地幔顶盖厚86±10km,速度平均为4.63km/s,顶盖内55-83km深处有一个低速夹层. 相似文献
11.
利用我国地震台站记录的瑞利波观测资料，通过适配滤波频时分析技术进行数据处理，获得了穿越我国东南及陆缘地区的瑞利波频散.使用随机反演理论取得了东南大陆及陆缘地带4°×4°网格的纯路径频散数据.在网格反演的基础上使用Harkrider的面波反演程序求得了该区剪切波的三维速度结构.结果表明：1.华南大陆Moho界面埋深为30-40km，并由西向东逐渐减薄，在陆缘与浅海地域为25-28km，具有明显的分区特征.2.上地幔低速层埋深为60-0km，变化幅度较大，这与深部断裂分布及深层过程有关，但NS向剖面上各界面的起伏变化均比EW向剖面平缓.3.东南陆缘是东亚大陆的海陆过渡带，在深部表现为Moho界面埋深和地壳平均速度降低的地带，地幔深部界面的起伏形态充分表明，深浅介质结构和物质耦合的不均匀性. 相似文献
12.
Introduction Rayleigh wave is a kind of seismic wave propagating along the surface of the Earth, its propagation speed depends chiefly on the S-wave velocity structure of the Earth. Rayleigh wave energy of different periods concentrated in different depth ranges. The layered structure of the Earth causes the phenomenon of dispersion of surface waves, that is, surface waves of different periods are propagated with different speeds. By measuring the dispersion curves of surface waves the S-wav… 相似文献
13.
THREE-DIMENSIONAL S-WAVE VELOCITY DISTRIBUTION BASED ON AMBIENT NOISE ANALYSIS IN EASTERN NORTH 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 We apply ambient noise tomography to continuous vertical component broadband seismic data between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2011from the regional networks of 190 stations deployed by China Earthquake Administration in Hebei, Shanxi and Inner Mengolia. Ambient noise cross-correlations were performed to produce the Green's functions of each station-pair. Firstly, we used the multiple-filter analysis method to extract surface wave group and phase velocity dispersion curves from inter-station paths at periods from 7 to 40s. Then the study area was discretized into a 0.2°×0.2° grid to obtain the group and phase velocity distributions using O'ccam inversion method. After that, three dimensional (3-D) S-wave velocity structures from the surface down to 50km are inverted from group and phase velocities dispersion results. the results of S wave velocity distribution maps generally demonstrate good correlations with surface geological and tectonic features, and they also clearly revealed the lateral velocity variation in the crust. In the mid-upper crust, the basins are clearly resolved with low S wave velocity due to its thick sedimentary layer, and the Taihang and Yanshan uplifts show relative higher S wave velocity distribution. With the increase of depth (>30km), the S wave velocity distribution presents a contrary characteristic compared to that of the shallow layer, and the S wave velocity beneath the Taihang and Yanshan uplifts are much lower than basin areas, which is possibly correlated with the thickness of the crust. 3-D S wave velocity shows a low-velocity zone at~10~20km depth observed beneath the Tanshan-Hejian-Xintai-Cixian belt and Bohai Bay. the low-velocity zone at~20~30km depth beneath the Datong area may be associated with the thermal material in the crust-mantle. Our S wave velocity distribution maps clearly show that Taihang Mountains is not only the boundary of topography and tectonic zone, but also the transition zone of high and low S wave velocity. 相似文献
14.
Love and Rayleigh Wave Tomography of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and Surrounding Areas 总被引：8，自引：0，他引：8
Surface wave data were initially collected from events of magnitude Ms ≥ 5.0 and shallow or moderate focal depth occurred between 1980 and 2002: 713 of them generated Rayleigh waves and 660 Love waves, which were recorded by 13 broadband digital stations in Eurasia and India. Up to 1,525 source-station Rayleigh waveforms and 1,464 Love wave trains have been processed by frequency-time analysis to obtain group velocities. After inverting the path-averaged group times by means of a damped least-squares approach, we have retrieved location-dependent group velocities on a 2° × 2°-sized grid and constructed Rayleigh- and Love-wave group velocity maps at periods 10.4–105.0 s. Resolution and covariance matrices and the rms group velocity misfit have been computed in order to check the quality of the results. Afterwards, depth-dependent SV- and SH-wave velocity models of the crust and upper mantle are obtained by inversion of local Rayleigh- and Love-wave group velocities using a differential damped least-squares method. The results provide: (a) Rayleigh- and Love-wave group velocities at various periods; (b) SV- and SH-wave differential velocity maps at different depths; (c) sharp images of the subducted lithosphere by velocity cross sections along prefixed profiles; (d) regionalized dispersion curves and velocity-depth models related to the main geological formations. The lithospheric root presents a depth that can be substantiated at ~140 km (Qiangtang Block) and exceptionally at ~180 km in some places (Lhasa Block), and which exhibits laterally varying fast velocity very close to that of some shields that even reaches ~4.8 km/s under the northern Lhasa Block and the Qiangtang Block. Slow-velocity anomalies of 7–10% or more beneath southern Tibet and the eastern edge of the Plateau support the idea of a mechanically weak middle-to-lower crust and the existence of crustal flow in Tibet. 相似文献
15.
根据欧亚大陆及西太平洋地区58个数字地震台站约12000个长周期波形记录,挑选出4100条面波大圆传播路径,采用面波频散及波形拟合反演方法,对东亚及西太平洋边缘海地区(60°E-160°E,20°S-60°N)的地壳上地幔进行了高分辨率三维S波速度成像. 结果表明,从上地壳到70km深,在东亚东部及西太平洋边缘海地区为高速分布,西部以青藏高原为中心呈极低速分布. 自地中海经土耳其、伊朗、喜马拉雅山到缅甸、印尼群岛的特提斯汇聚碰撞带,显示为低速异常链. 从85km至250km深,在东亚东部及西太平洋边缘海,自北向南显示出一条巨型低速异常带,西部地区为高速异常分布.以东经110°E为界,东西两部分岩石圈、软流圈的结构与深部动力过程有着巨大的差异. 此界线以西主要是印度板块与欧亚板块碰撞引起的岩石圈汇聚增厚区,东部则主要是由于软流圈上涌(地幔热物质上升)引起的岩石圈拉张减薄区. 相似文献
16.
Group velocities of Rayleigh and Love waves along the paths across the Black Sea and partly Asia Minor and the Balkan Peninsula are used to estimate lateral variations of the crustal structure in the region. As a first step, lateral variations of group velocities for periods in the range 10–20 s are determined using a 2D tomography method. Since the paths are oriented predominantly in NE–SW or N–S direction, the resolution is estimated as a function of azimuth. The local dispersion curves are actually averaged over the extended areas stretched in the predominant direction of the paths. The size of the averaging area in the direction of the best resolution is approximately 200 km. As a second step, the local averaged dispersion curves are inverted to vertical sections of S-wave velocities. Since the dispersion curves in the 10–20 s period range are mostly affected by the upper crustal structure, the velocities are estimated to a depth of approximately 25 km. Velocity sections along 43° N latitude are determined separately from Rayleigh and Love wave data. It is shown that the crust under the sea contains a low-velocity sedimentary layer of 2–3 km thickness, localized in the eastern and western deeps, as found earlier from DSS data. Beneath the sedimentary layer, two layers are present with velocity values lying between those of granite and consolidated sediments. Velocities in these layers are slightly lower in the deeps, and the boundaries of the layers are lowered. S-wave velocities obtained from Love wave data are found to be larger than those from Rayleigh wave data, the difference being most pronounced in the basaltic layer. If this difference is attributed to anisotropy, the anisotropy coefficient = (SH - SV)/Smean is reasonable (2–3%) in the upper layers, and exceeds 9% in the basaltic layer. 相似文献