共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 218 毫秒
1.
采用CAP（Cut and Paste）方法反演了2016年1月21日青海门源MS6.4地震的震源机制解，其最佳双力偶解节面I走向339°，倾角49°，滑动角111°：节面Ⅱ走向129°，倾角45°，滑动角68°，矩震级MW5.92，矩心震源深度约为9 km，地震破裂类型为逆冲型地震。结合余震序列展布及震区的活动构造特征，判定发震断层面为节面I，推测此次地震的发震断裂为冷龙岭断裂。 相似文献
2.
2016年12月8日呼图壁县发生MS6.2地震，由于初始定位误差较大，余震序列分布离散，对呼图壁地震的发震断层尚不清楚。本研究采用CAP方法反演主震及余震中MS ≥ 3.5地震的震源机制解，并采用双差定位方法对余震进行重定位，得到了637个地震的震源参数。结果显示，呼图壁地震主震的最佳双力偶节面解为：节面Ⅰ走向82°，倾角18°，滑动角61°；节面Ⅱ走向292°，倾角74°，滑动角98°。其中节面Ⅱ为本次地震的破裂面。重定位后，主震的震源位置被重定为（86.36°E，43.79°N），震源深度14 km，根据余震的分布特点、震源机制解特征和区域构造特征，呼图壁地震的发震断层并不是南倾的准噶尔南缘断裂，而是在其北边的霍尔果斯-玛纳斯-吐谷鲁断裂带上的一个反冲断层。在北天山区域内，由于构造反转的作用，存在诸多倾角在45°~55°之间的北倾的断层。根据GPS的资料显示，天山北部地区的应力在新生代晚期已开始积累，这增加了天山北部前缘的发震概率。 相似文献
3.
采用吉林、黑龙江、辽宁和内蒙古地震台网记录的地震波形数据，利用ISOLA近震全波形反演方法对2019年5月18日吉林宁江MS5.1地震进行全矩张量反演。结果表明，该地震的最佳断层面解节面Ⅰ走向304°/倾角81°/滑动角26°，节面Ⅱ走向210°/倾角65°/滑动角170°；最佳矩心深度6km，矩震级MW5.0。根据宁江MS5.1地震序列展布形态，推断节面Ⅱ可能为优势发震断层面，即本次地震的主控断裂为扶余-肇东断裂，和与其正交的第二松花江断裂共同控制着余震展布方向。全矩张量解在Husdon震源类型图上的投影显示本次地震具有明显的非双力偶成分，是1次体积增加的张性破裂。根据区域地质构造特征和震源区接收函数、电磁测深和地下热结构等地球物理研究结果，综合分析认为在西太平洋板块作用形成俯冲带的同时，也相应地产生了热物质上涌，这些地球物理过程可能会改变莫霍面形态，使其向上突起并作用于活动断层，从而形成此次吉林宁江MS5.1地震。 相似文献
4.
2015年1月14日乐山金口河M5.0地震发生在历史地震强度较低的川南山区与四川盆地交界一带。基于四川区域地震台网的震相报告与波形资料，采用双差定位法对地震序列进行重新定位，同时，采用CAP波形反演方法及HASH方法反演了主震及序列中8次ML≥2.0地震的震源机制解。另外，利用Coulomb3计算了主震发生后库仑应力改变量，得到的结果如下：①重新定位结果显示，金口河M5.0地震位于（103.18°E，29.32°N），震源深度16.6km，略深于波形反演结果（12km）。序列分布在NNW向天全-荥经断裂和NE向西河-美姑断裂的交汇部位，余震序列在空间上呈NE向展布。②M5.0主震的机制解为节面Ⅰ：走向350°/倾角46°/滑动角107°，节面Ⅱ：走向146°/倾角47°/滑动角73°，表现为走向NW（NNW）、中等倾角的逆冲型运动方式。序列中其余8次ML≥2.0余震大多以走向NE的逆冲型地震为主，个别为走滑或正断层类型。主震和大部分余震的节面方向不一致，主震节面方向与余震长轴方向也不一致。③主震后库仑应力改变量显示，余震主要发生在主震引起的库仑破裂应力增加的区域。综合分析推测，NNW向天全-荥经断裂为本次地震主震的发震构造，倾向NE的机制解节面Ⅰ指出了该断裂的几何产状；M5.0主震发生后，立即触发了其旁侧的NE向西河-美姑断裂，并激发了多次余震。 相似文献
5.
基于新疆测震台网的宽频带观测记录，利用CAP方法反演2017年8月9日精河MS6.6地震及早期14次MS≥3.0余震的震源机制解，应用MSATSI软件反演震源处应力场。结果表明，此次地震为逆断型，结合震源机制解和附近地质构造背景，推断此次地震的发震构造为库松木契克山前断裂的东段，节面Ⅰ走向89°，倾角43°，滑动角91°为发震断层面。14次余震中有11次为逆断型地震，1次为正断型地震，2次为走滑型地震。P轴在近NS向有明显的优势分布且倾角较小，T轴倾角较陡，表明震源处主要以近NS方向的水平挤压作用为主。反演得到的震源深度分布在12~21 km，深度优势分布为15~20 km，略小于主震的震源深度21 km。应力场的反演结果与震源机制参数统计结果一致，均显示震源处主要受近NS向水平应力场控制。 相似文献
6.
本文应用ISOLA近震全波形方法，以2017年1月4日西藏仲巴4.7级地震为例，反演稀疏台网记录的中小地震震源机制解。该地震反演所得最佳双偶机制参数为：节面Ⅰ的走向109°/倾角85°/滑动角-177°，节面Ⅱ的走向19°/倾角88°/滑动角-4°，最佳矩心位置为30.590°N、83.784°E，最佳质心深度为6km，矩震级MW4.6。震源机制反演结果表明此次地震是一次走滑型为主的事件，其与震源区域附近历史地震震源机制解具有相同性质。本文还应用CSPS初动扫描法，利用P波初动资料和近震波形联合约束反演此次地震的震源机制，并与ISOLA近震全波形反演结果进行比较，结果表明，联合少量台站的的三分量波形数据，能够定量地判断最佳震源机制解，降低了P波初动反演结果的非唯一性，同时也约束了由于少量台站参与全波形反演引起的解的不稳定性。本文研究为中小地震震源参数测定提供了一种简单有效的方法，具有较高的稳定性和可靠性。 相似文献
7.
基于青海和甘肃区域地震台网记录的宽频带地震波形和震相观测数据,利用近震全波形反演方法和双差定位方法分别对2022年1月23日青海德令哈MS5.8地震进行全矩张量反演和地震序列重定位研究。矩张量反演结果表明主震为一次典型走滑型地震,最佳断层面节面Ⅰ走向78°、倾角88°、滑动角－22°,节面Ⅱ走向169°、倾角68°、滑动角－177°,矩心深度为9 km,矩震级为MW＝5.5。定位结果显示余震优势展布方向为NNW－SSE,长度约16 km,余震震源深度优势分布在7～12 km之间。综合分析表明,节面Ⅱ与余震精定位所勾勒出的断层面走向和倾向较为一致,推断NNW走向的断层面为可能发震断层面,认为德令哈地震是发生在祁连山断裂带的向W倾、倾角约为68°的右旋走滑断裂上。在印度板块向欧亚板块俯冲挤压作用下,青藏高原东北部构造块体应力不断积累,造成祁连山断裂带内断层失稳而发生此次青海德令哈MS5.8地震。 相似文献
8.
2009年7月9日19时19分，云南姚安发生MS6.0地震。10日17：02、13日00：01又相继发生MS5.2、MS4.7地震。利用近震CAP方法反演震源机制解发现，此次地震震源破裂方式以走滑为主，主震震源机制解2个节面走向分别为203°、295°。已有的考察资料尚未显示活动，故难以确定实际发震面。为此，采用相对质心震中确定破裂方向性的方法，利用主震与参考地震之间的P波到时差和CAP反演输出的波形时移，计算得到姚安地震起始震中与质心震中间的差异，推断震源机制解中走向为295°的节面为实际发震面，并对定位误差、发震时刻不准确以及机制解差异等因素进行了分析，发现这些因素对确定发震断层影响不大。 相似文献
9.
本研究利用新疆区域数字地震台网的波形资料，采用CAP方法反演了2016年11月25日阿克陶6.7级地震的前震、主震及11次MS ≥ 3.6余震序列的最佳双力偶震源机制解，得到阿克陶6.7级地震最佳双力偶机制解：节面Ⅰ走向20°/倾角69°/滑动角-10°；节面Ⅱ走向114°/倾角81°/滑动角-159°，表明此次阿克陶6.7级地震为一次走滑型地震事件，结合震源区的地震地质构造及余震序列空间分布等已有研究成果，判定节面Ⅱ代表了主震的发震断层面。主震最大主压力轴方位为339°，与震源区附近历史中强震P轴近NW向的优势方位基本一致。其4.8级前震的震源机制解为走滑型，与主震震源机制解具有较高的一致性。11次余震中有6次为走滑型地震，3次为逆断型地震，1次正断型地震，1次混合型地震，且多数地震具有近NW向的P轴方位。此次6.7级地震序列的震源深度分布于6~16km之间，而大部分地震为9~13km，与本文计算得到的主震的震源深度10km相差不大。此外，初步分析了兴都库什-帕米尔地区强震活动与此次阿克陶6.7级地震的关系。 相似文献
10.
利用新疆区域数字地震台网波形资料，采用CAP方法反演了2015年7月3日新疆皮山6.5级地震主震及部分MS≥3.6余震的震源机制解和距心深度。研究结果显示，皮山6.5级地震主震最佳双力偶解节面I：走向290°/倾角55°/滑动角96°；节面Ⅱ：走向101°/倾角35°/滑动角82°，最佳矩心深度16km，表明该地震是一次逆冲型事件。通过反演部分MS≥3.6余震的震源机制解发现，早期余震的破裂方式与主震较为一致，随着时间的推移余震震源机制出现走滑型和正断型，表明早期余震的破裂受主震影响较大，随着序列的发展变化，后期震源区应力场可能出现一定程度的调整。统计皮山6.5级地震序列P轴方位发现，优势方位为NNE向，与该区域构造应力场方向较为一致。结合地震序列的震源机制及他人精定位结果和震源区地质构造情况，初步解释了导致此次地震的原因。 相似文献
11.
采用CAP方法反演2010年玉树7.1级地震序列前震、主震及余震19个ML≥4.0事件的震源机制解，19个结果以走滑类型为主，前震、主震的震源机制解十分接近，反映出前震、主震之间密切的联系；震源深度集中在7~12 km，震源最浅（4.5 km）与最深（34 km）的两个余震事件具有明显的逆冲性质，表现出明显的边界特征；19个事件的震中分布在甘孜-玉树断裂北支玉树-隆宝断裂上，目前已经证明该断裂即为玉树地震的发震构造。自SE-NW沿玉树-隆宝断裂走向拉一剖面，观察震源深度沿剖面的变化情况，可看出玉树-隆宝断裂西北段震源深度要大于东南段，该段主要是余震活动的中后期，因此在地震活动的中后期，余震向地壳深部扩展，断裂累积的应变能得到更进一步的释放；P轴方位角优势分布集中在220°~230°，T轴方位优势分布集中在310°~320°，两个优势分布互相垂直性与单个事件的沙滩球应力轴一样，说明玉树地震的震源机制解类型较为简单；玉树周边地区应力场分布比较均匀，并不像汶川周边地区那么复杂，本次玉树地震为巴颜喀拉地块与羌塘块体边界处甘孜-玉树断裂应变能量的正常释放。 相似文献
12.
2019年6月17日在四川宜宾市长宁县（28.34°N，104.90°E）发生MS6.0地震，余震发育。本文利用区域测震台网的地震观测数据基于CAP方法计算了28°~29°N，104°~105°E范围内的14个MS>3.0以上地震的震源机制解，结合全球矩心矩张量目录和部分前人研究结果中该区域的共27个震源机制解数据，应用MSATSI软件反演了研究区域的应力场。将研究区域按0.1°×0.1°划分成25个应力网格，最终得到9个网格的应力分布结果，大多数应力场方向稳定，根据主震所在应力网格点得到主震的断层类型为主逆冲型。本文研究成果为四川长宁地区的孕震机理、活动构造以及地震趋势判定提供了可靠的参考依据。 相似文献
13.
采用双差定位法对山东莱州地震序列重新定位,通过CAP方法反演M4.6地震震源机制,在此基础上初步探讨莱州地震序列发震构造。结果显示:精确定位震中位置主要位于柞村—仙夼断裂的NW方向,深度剖面显示从SE方向到NW方向断层深度呈由浅逐渐变深的趋势,这均与柞村—仙夼断裂位置、走向、倾向特征较为吻合;M4.6地震震源机制解的节面Ⅰ与柞村—仙夼断裂走向、倾角较为接近。综合精确定位震中位置、剖面深度分布特征、M4.6地震震源机制解及宏观调查烈度分布等结果与柞村-仙夼断裂产状之间的关系,初步推测柞村—仙夼断裂可能为莱州地震序列的发震断层。 相似文献
14.
利用模板匹配方法对2015年11月23日青海省祁连县M_S5.2地震进行遗漏地震检测研究,由于主震后短时间内目录中遗漏事件较多,故对主震后1天的连续波形进行检测。主震后1天内青海测震台网记录到的余震个数(包括单台)共62个,选取主震后M_L1.0以上余震30个作为模板事件,通过匹配滤波的方式扫描出遗漏地震31个,约为台网目录给出的0.5倍。基于包络差峰值振幅与震级的线性关系估测检测事件的震级参数,最后将检测后的余震目录与台网余震目录在主震后1天内的最小完备震级进行对比分析,结果发现检测后最小完备震级从M_L1.2降到了M_L0.7,得到青海测震台网在祁连地区最小完整性震级为M_L0.7。 相似文献
15.
Seismic relocation,focal mechanism and crustal seismic anisotropy associated with the 2010 Yushu MS7.1 earthquake and its aftershocks 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 The 2010 Yushu MS7.1 earthquake occurred in Ganzi-Yushu fault, which is the south boundary of Bayan Har block. In this study, by using double difference algorithm, the locations of mainshock (33.13°N, 96.59°E, focal depth 10.22 km) and more than 600 aftershocks were obtained. The focal mechanisms of the mainshock and some aftershocks with MS>3.5 were estimated by jointly using broadband velocity waveforms from Global Seismic Network (GSN) and Qinghai Seismic Network as well. The focal mechanisms and relocation show that the strike of the fault plane is about 125° (WNW-ESE), and the mainshock is left-laterally strikeslip. The parameters of shear-wave splitting were obtained at seismic stations of YUS and L6304 by systematic analysis method of shear-wave splitting (SAM) method. Based on the parameters of shear-wave splitting and focal mechanism, the characteristics of stress field in seismic source zone were analyzed. The directions of polarization at stations YUS and L6304 are different. It is concluded that after the mainshock and the MS6.3 aftershock on April 14, the stress-field was changed. 相似文献
16.
On July 20, 1995, an earthquake of M
L=4.1 occurred in Huailai basin, northwest of Beijing, with epicenter coordinates 40.326°N, 115.448°E and focal depth 5.5 km.
Following the main shock, seismicity sharply increased in the basin. This earthquake sequence was recorded by Sino-European
Cooperative Huailai Digital Seismograph Network (HDSN) and the hypocentres were precisely located. About 2 hours after the
occurrence of the main shock, a smaller event of M
L=2.0 took place at 40.323°N, 115.447°E with a focal depth of 5.0 km, which is very close to the main shock. Using the M
L=2.0 earthquake as an empirical Green’s function, a regularization method was applied to retrieve the far-field source-time
function (STF) of the main shock. Considering the records of HDSN are the type of velocity, to depress high frequency noise,
we removed instrument response from the records of the two events, then integrated them to get displacement seismogram before
applying the regularization method. From the 5 field stations, P phases in vertical direction which mostly are about 0.5 s
in length were used. The STFs obtained from each seismic phases are in good agreement, showing that the M
L=4.1 earthquake consisted of two events. STFs from each station demonstrate an obvious “seismic Doppler effect”. Assuming
the nodal plane striking 37° and dipping 40°, determined by using P wave first motion data and aftershock distribution, is
the fault plane, through a trial and error method, the following results were drawn: Both of the events lasted about 0.1 s,
the rupture length of the first one is 0.5 km, longer than the second one which is 0.3 km, and the rupture velocity of the
first event is 5.0 km/s, larger than that of the second one which is about 3.0 km/s; the second event took place 0.06 s later
than the first one; on the fault plane, the first event ruptured in the direction γ=140° measured clockwise from the strike
of the fault, while the second event ruptured at γ=80°, the initial point of the second one locates at γ=−100° and 0.52 km
from the beginning point of the first one. Using far-field ground displacement spectrum measurement method, the following
source parameters about the M
L=4.1 earthquake were also reached: the scalar earthquake moment is 3.3×1013 N·m, stress drop 4.6 MPa, rupture radius 0.16 km.
Contribution No. 99FE2022, Institute of Geophysics, China Seismological Bureau.
This study is supported by the Chinese Joint Seismological Science Foundation (95-07-411). 相似文献
17.
The 2018,Songyuan,Jilin M_S5. 7 earthquake occurred at the intersection of the FuyuZhaodong fault and the Second Songhua River fault. The moment magnitude of this earthquake is M_W5. 3,the centroid depth by the waveform fitting is 12 km,and it is a strike-slip type event. In this paper,with the seismic phase data provided by the China Earthquake Network, the double-difference location method is used to relocate the earthquake sequence,finally the relocation results of 60 earthquakes are obtained. The results show that the aftershock zone is about 4. 3km long and 3. 1km wide,which is distributed in the NE direction. The depth distribution of the seismic sequence is 9km-10 km. 1-2 days after the main shock,the aftershocks were scattered throughout the aftershock zone,and the largest aftershock occurred in the northeastern part of the aftershock zone. After 3-8 days,the aftershocks mainly occurred in the southwestern part of the aftershock zone. The profile distribution of the earthquake sequence shows that the fault plane dips to the southeast with the dip angle of about 75°. Combined with the regional tectonic setting,focal mechanism solution and intensity distribution,we conclude that the concealed fault of the Fuyu-Zhaodong fault is the seismogenic fault of the Songyuan M_S5. 7 earthquake. This paper also relocates the earthquake sequence of the previous magnitude 5. 0 earthquake in 2017. Combined with the results of the focal mechanism solution,we believe that the two earthquakes have the same seismogenic structure,and the earthquake sequence generally develops to the southwest. The historical seismic activity since 2009 shows that after the magnitude 5. 0 earthquake in 2017,the frequency and intensity of earthquakes in the earthquake zone are obviously enhanced,and attention should be paid to the development of seismic activity in the southwest direction of the earthquake zone. 相似文献
18.
The seismogenic fault and the dynamic mechanism of the Ning’er, Yunnan Province MS6.4 earthquake of June 3, 2007 are studied on the basis of the observation data of the surface fissures, sand blow and water eruption, land-slide and collapse associated with the earthquake, incorporating with the data of geologic structures, focal mecha-nism solutions and aftershock distribution for the earthquake area. The observation of the surface fissures reveals that the Banhai segment of the NW-trending Ning’er fault is dominated by right-lateral strike-slip, while the NNE-trending fault is dominated by left-lateral strike-slip. The seismo-geologic hazards are concentrated mainly within a 330°-extending zone of 13.5 km in length and 4 km in width. The major axis of the isoseismal is also oriented in 330° direction, and the major axis of the seismic intensity VIII area is 13.5 km long. The focal mechanism solutions indicate that the NW-trending nodal plane of the Ning’er MS6.4 earthquake is dominated by right-lateral slip, while the NE-trending nodal plane is dominated by left-lateral slip. The preferred distribution orientation of the aftershocks of MS≥2 is 330°, and the focal depths are within the range of 3~12 km, predominantly within 3~10 km. The distribution of the aftershocks is consistent with the distribution zone of the seismo-geologic hazards. All the above-mentioned data indicate that the Banhai segment of the Ning’er fault is the seismogenic fault of this earthquake. Moreover, the driving force of the Ning’er earthquake is discussed in the light of the active block theory. It is believed that the northward pushing of the Indian plate has caused the eastward slipping of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, which has been transformed into the southeastern-southernward squeezing of the southwest Yunnan region. As a result, the NW-trending faults in the vicinity of the Ning’er area are dominated by right-lateral strike-slip, while the NE-trending faults are dominated by left-lateral strike-slip. This tectonic 相似文献
19.
In this paper changes in focal mechanisms) parameters of wave spectra, and stress drops for the Ms=5.0 forcshock and Ms=6.0 mainshock in February 2001 in Yajiang County, Sichuan, and seismicity in cpiccntral region are studied. Comparison of focal mechanisms for the Yajiang earthquakes with distribution patterns of aftcrshocks, the nodal plane Ⅰ, striking in the direction of NEN, of the Yajiang M=5.0 event is chosen as the faulting plane, the nodal plane Ⅱ, striking in the direction of WNW, of the M=6.0 event as the faulting plane. The strikes of the two faulting planes are nearly perpendicular to each other. The level of stress drops in the cpicentral region before the occurrence of the M=6.0 earthquake increases, which is consistent with increase of seismicity in the epicentral region. The rate decay of the Yajiang earthquake sequence, changes in wave spectra for foreshocks and aftershocks,and focal mechanisms are complex. 相似文献
20.
贵州沿河MS4.9地震发生在历史地震强度较低的上扬子地块凤冈SN向隔槽式褶皱变形区。通过地震地质背景分析、震害调查、震源机制解、断层调查和库区水位变化情况等,得到主要认识如下:由于震源深度浅、灾区老旧自建房抗震性能差,导致本次地震直接经济损失严重;本次地震主震的机制解为节面Ⅰ:走向61°/倾角35°/滑动角135°,节面Ⅱ:走向190°/倾角66°/滑动角63°,表现为走向NE、逆冲兼平移型运动方式;结合等震线走向及震中主要断层性质,判断NE向沿河断层为本次地震主震的发震构造,并进一步推测此次地震为水库诱发断层活化引起的地震。 相似文献