共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 203 毫秒
1.
文中基于青海和周边地震台网72个台站以及震后布设的12个流动观测台站于2021年5月22—27日记录的青海玛多M7.4地震主震及1 357次余震资料，使用双差地震定位法重新对余震位置进行了修定，获得了1 289次余震修定后的震源位置。重新定位后，余震基本沿昆仑山口-江错断裂呈NWW向线性分布，震源深度由重新定位前主要集中于5～10km变为在5～15km深度范围内相对均匀地分布。根据重新定位后的余震分布特点并参考地质断层及现场考察的地震破裂带展布情况，依据成丛地震发生在断层附近的原则，选取了6个矩形区域内重新定位后的震源信息，联合采用模拟退火与高斯-牛顿算法反演获得了每个区域断层面的详细参数。结果表明，主干断裂为长约146km、总体走向为285°～290°的高倾角大型左旋走滑兼逆冲断裂。重新定位还显示，主干断裂东、西两侧有分叉现象，可能是大地震发生时期由于复杂的应力分配导致触发并新产生2条分支断裂，断裂整体显示为树形。西侧分支走向为306°,与主干断裂相交，夹角为21°。东侧分支走向近EW,与主干断裂的东段相连。 相似文献
2.
《中国科学:地球科学》2021,(7)
2021年青海玛多M_S7.4地震是近30年来青藏高原巴颜喀拉地块发生的又一次大地震,在空间上填补了该块体北边界东段的发震空白.文章采用双差定位方法对震后8天的余震序列进行重定位研究.结果显示:玛多地震余震序列总长度约170km,主震位于余震区中间,呈双侧破裂特征.余震主要呈北西西向的狭长条带状分布,整体走向为285°.震源深度剖面显示发震断层近垂直,在不同段落向西南和东北方向倾斜,表明发震断层具有复杂的几何形态.主震东南侧25km处存在余震稀疏段,长度约20km.在余震区东端出现马尾状分叉特征,展现了大型走滑断裂带的末梢效应.在西段北侧出现了NW向条带,可能是此次地震触发的分支断裂活动.本次余震序列的位置与昆仑山口-江错断裂东段距离最近,两者在空间展布上具有一定的重合度,推测其为本次地震的主要发震断层. 相似文献
3.
2021年5月22日青海省果洛州玛多县发生M_S7.4地震。为探究本次地震的发震构造及余震分布特征,选取2021年5月1日—6月3日青海测震台网观测到的33°～36°N,97°～99.5°E空间范围内的地震观测报告,利用双差精定位方法进行双差精定位处理。重定位后整体残差平均减小了0.23,深度在5～25 km间随机分布。根据地震迁移方向和震区地质构造,认为本次地震的发震构造为昆仑山口—江错断裂,玛多—甘德东段受主震触发影响爆发一系列小震,两条断裂之间可能因为本次地震产生一定联系。本次地震产生新的断裂,突破了两条断裂之前的空区,连接到玛多—甘德断层,使两条断层交叉相连,形成新的断层构造。 相似文献
4.
精确的余震序列定位及震源机制反演能够提供强震破裂尺度、发震断层面和区域应力场等信息,为震后应急决策和分析发震构造提供科学依据.本研究采用双差定位方法对2021年5月22日 青海玛多Ms7.4地震序列进行精定位,得到震后9天内共1055个事件的精定位结果;同时,利用青海、西藏、四川和甘肃台网记录的波形数据,采用近震全波形矩张量反演方法得到了玛多Ms7.4地震15次中等余震(Ms≥4.0)震源机制解,并进一步反演得到震源区构造应力场.地震定位结果显示,玛多主震位于玛多—甘德断裂与甘德南缘断裂之间,发震断层面较为陡立,余震序列在时间上呈现出不对称的双侧破裂模式,且沿主破裂面的两端均表现出分支破裂特征,说明本次地震触发了分支断层;震源机制结果显示15次中等余震包含12次走滑型和3次逆冲型地震,暗示主断层破裂受到局部异常结构的影响;另外,应力场反演表明震源区为近EW向挤压特征,与该区域最大水平主压应力优势取向一致.结合上述结果以及周边地质构造背景,我们认为玛多地震发震构造为位于巴颜喀拉地块内部一条NWW向的高倾角左旋走滑断裂,主破裂触发了东西两端分支断层活动,断层面的非均匀性控制了余震序列时空分布的差异性. 相似文献
5.
1 研究背景
2021年5月22日青海玛多地区发生MS 7.4地震,中国地震局针对此次地震快速组织开展了科学考察工作.根据科考阶段性成果交流形成的统一认识,玛多MS 7.4地震的发震断层为昆仑山口—江错断裂,地表破裂段为该断裂东段,即江错断裂段.为对震后震情形势进一步研判以及为前线科考人员提供"跟踪式"科技支撑,此次科考中对余震趋势评估成为一项重要工作内容. 相似文献
6.
1 研究背景
2021年5月22日青海玛多地区发生MS 7.4地震,中国地震局针对此次地震快速组织开展了科学考察工作.根据科考阶段性成果交流形成的统一认识,玛多MS 7.4地震的发震断层为昆仑山口—江错断裂,地表破裂段为该断裂东段,即江错断裂段.为对震后震情形势进一步研判以及为前线科考人员提供"跟踪式"科技支撑,此次科考中对余震趋势评估成为一项重要工作内容. 相似文献
7.
为了探讨 2021 年青海玛多MS7.4地震对后续地震的影响,基于 2021 年青海玛多MS7.4 地震的破裂模型及均匀弹性半空间模型,本文计算了该地震在震中附近主要断层面上产生的同震库仑应力变化,结果表明库仑破裂应力加载区主要集中在东昆仑断裂东段西部、玛多—甘德断裂中段、昆仑山口—江错断裂西段,而库仑破裂应力影区主要集中在东昆仑断裂中段东部、昆仑山口—江错断裂东段、玛多—甘德断裂西段、达日断裂.其次,本文计算了该地震对周围地区造成的水平面应力变化及位移场.位移场的水平分量表明震中西南和东北两侧物质向震中汇聚,而震中东南和西北两侧物质向外流出,从位移场的垂直分量来看,震中西南和东北两侧表现出明显的隆升,而在震中东南和西北两侧表现出明显的沉降.水平面应力在震中的北东-南西两侧(东昆仑—柴达木断块东侧和巴颜喀拉断块西侧)增加(拉张),而在震中的北西-南东两侧(东昆仑—柴达木断块西部和巴颜喀拉断块东部)降低(压缩),在昆仑山口—江错断裂段附近,水平面最小主应力近 NW向,水平面最大主应力近 SW向,在一定程度上抵消了该区域构造应力场(SW向挤压,NW向拉张),结合位移场说明该次地震是在构造应力场作用下的一次正常应力释放.从整体来看,水平面最小主应力和水平面最大主应力的方向分布类似于磁场线的分布,并且两者互相垂直. 相似文献
8.
利用CAP方法反演了2012年6月30日新源-和静Ms6.6地震序列震源机制解.反演得到Ms6.6地震节面Ⅰ的参数为:走向299°,倾角68°,滑动角164°;节面Ⅱ的参数为:走向35°,倾角75°,滑动角23°;P轴方位角166°,倾角5°,T轴方位角258°,倾角26°;矩震级Mw为6.3;矩心深度为21km.此次地震序列破裂优势方向为NWW,倾角以60°～90°为主,滑动角以±180°±30°为主;P轴方位的优势取向为近NS向,T轴优势取向为近EW向.初步分析表明,主震节面Ⅰ为发震断层,是走向为NWW、近乎直立的左旋走滑断层.此次6.6级地震震源断错性质和主压应力方向以及序列P轴优势方位与震源区周围构造应力场特征基本一致. 相似文献
9.
2021年5月22日02时04分(北京时间),青海果洛州玛多县发生MS7.4地震,震后余震不断.地质调查和卫星观测对地表断裂痕迹有较好的约束.然而,对于理解区域应力场、地震的产生、传播和终止具有重要意义的地下断层几何结构的约束精度略显不足.利用国家地震台网的连续波形记录,本研究首先基于双差定位法对玛多地震震后25天的余震序列进行重定位,结果显示余震序列大致沿NWW向的江错断裂呈线性分布,位于主震震中两侧,延伸总长~170 km.主震东南侧存在一余震稀疏区,在断裂带东西两端余震分布转向且出现分叉现象,反映出发震断层的复杂几何形态,这与前人研究结果基本一致.进一步采用波形反演方法和P波初动极性反演方法,获得了玛多震源区132个中小余震的震源机制解与震源矩心深度,并基于此对该主余型地震的发震构造与断裂形态进行了初步分析.震源机制解结果表明,玛多MS7.4主震的发震断裂主要为左旋走滑性质,余震与主震性质整体相同,在断裂带东段存在部分逆冲型余震.震源机制解约束的区域主应力方向约N60°E,与区内整体走滑断裂作用相一致.余震震源深度略微起伏,主要集中在10~12 km,且浅部余震较少,表明浅部应力可能主要通过主震释放,余震深度分布可能限定了主震同震破裂的下边界.玛多主震破裂起始于断裂带走向和倾向发生明显变化的位置,表明断裂带的复杂几何结构可能是此次玛多MS7.4地震初始破裂空间分布的决定因素.主震破裂结束的两端都有"马尾状"构造(或次级断层),表明这种分叉断层复杂的几何形态可能控制着主震破裂的最终位置. 相似文献
10.
2021年5月22日青海果洛州玛多县发生MS7.4地震,震中位于( 34.59°N, 98.34°E) ,其震源机制解显示该地震为高倾角走滑型(张喆,许立生, 2021).玛多地震的发震构造为昆仑山口—江错断裂,是东昆仑断裂的一条分支断裂(王未来等, 2021).玉树地震台位于甘孜—玉树断裂附近.玛多地震震中和玉树地震台均位于巴颜喀拉次级地块内,玉树地震台位于巴颜喀拉地块的南边界.此次地震震中处于玉树地震台的NE方向,距巴颜喀拉地块北边界85 km (图1). 相似文献
11.
STUDY ON SOURCE PARAMETERS OF THE 8 AUGUST 2017 M7.0 JIUZHAIGOU EARTHQUAKE AND ITS AFTERSHOCKS,NORTHERN SICHUAN 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 WU Wei-wei WEI Ya-ling LONG Feng LIANG Ming-jian CHEN Xue-fen SUN Wei ZHAO Jing 《地震地质》1979,42(2):492-512
On August 8, 2017, a strong earthquake of M7.0 occurred in Jiuzhaigou County, Aba Prefecture, northern Sichuan. The earthquake occurred on a branch fault at the southern end of the eastern section of the East Kunlun fault zone. In the northwest of the aftershock area is the Maqu-Maqin seismic gap, which is in a locking state under high stress. Destructive earthquakes are frequent along the southeast direction of the aftershocks area. In Songpan-Pingwu area, only 50~80km away from the Jiuzhaigou earthquake, two M7.2 earthquakes and one M6.7 earthquake occurred from August 16 to 23, 1976. Therefore, the Jiuzhaigou earthquake was an earthquake that occurred at the transition part between the historical earthquake fracture gap and the neotectonic active area. Compared with other M7.0 earthquakes, there are few moderate-strong aftershocks following this Jiuzhaigou earthquake, and the maximum magnitude of aftershocks is much smaller than the main shock. There is no surface rupture zone discovered corresponding to the M7.0 earthquake. In order to understand the feature of source structure and the tectonic environment of the source region, we calculate the parameters of the initial earthquake catalogue by Loc3D based on the digital waveform data recorded by Sichuan seismic network and seismic phase data collected by the China Earthquake Networks Center. Smaller events in the sequence are relocated using double-difference algorithm; source mechanism solutions and centroid depths of 29 earthquakes with ML≥3.4 are obtained by CAP method. Moreover, the source spectrum of 186 earthquakes with 2.0≤ML≤5.5 is restored and the spatial distribution of source stress drop along faults is obtained. According to the relocations and focal mechanism results, the Jiuzhaigou M7.0 earthquake is a high-angle left-lateral strike-slip event. The earthquake sequence mainly extends along the NW-SE direction, with the dominant focal depth of 4~18km. There are few shallow earthquakes and few earthquakes with depth greater than 20km. The relocation results show that the distribution of aftershocks is bounded by the M7.0 main shock, which shows obvious segmental characteristics in space, and the aftershock area is divided into NW segment and SE segment. The NW segment is about 16km long and 12km wide, with scattered and less earthquakes, the dominant focal depth is 4~12km, the source stress drop is large, and the type of focal mechanism is complicated. The SE segment is about 20km long and 8km wide, with concentrated earthquakes, the dominant depth is 4~12km, most moderate-strong earthquakes occurred in the depth between 11~14km. Aftershock activity extends eastward from the start point of the M7.0 main earthquake. The middle-late-stage aftershocks are released intensively on this segment, most of them are strike-slip earthquakes. The stress drop of the aftershock sequence gradually decreases with time. Principal stress axis distribution also shows segmentation characteristics. On the NW segment, the dominant azimuth of P axis is about 91.39°, the average elevation angle is about 20.80°, the dominant azimuth of T axis is NE-SW, and the average elevation angle is about 58.44°. On the SE segment, the dominant azimuth of P axis is about 103.66°, the average elevation angle is about 19.03°, the dominant azimuth of T axis is NNE-SSW, and the average elevation angle is about 15.44°. According to the fault profile inferred from the focal mechanism solution, the main controlling structure in the source area is in NW-SE direction, which may be a concealed fault or the north extension of Huya Fault. The northwest end of the fault is limited to the horsetail structure at the east end of the East Kunlun Fault, and the SE extension requires clear seismic geological evidence. The dip angle of the NW segment of the seismogenic fault is about 65°, which may be a reverse fault striking NNW and dipping NE. According to the basic characteristics of inverse fault ruptures, the rupture often extends short along the strike, the rupture length is often disproportionate to the magnitude of the earthquake, and it is not easy to form a rupture zone on the surface. The dip angle of the SE segment of the seismogenic fault is about 82°, which may be a strike-slip fault that strikes NW and dips SW. The fault plane solution shows significant change on the north and south sides of the main earthquake, and turns gradually from compressional thrust to strike-slip movement, with a certain degree of rotation. 相似文献
12.
地震断裂带形状是活动构造和地球动力学的重要资料。2021年发生的玛多地震序列提供了丰富的震源机制资料,为统计震源机制节面并估计玛多地震发震断层面形状提供了很好机会。文章对地震的震源机制资料进行基于密度的聚类来确定断层的几何形态。首先对收集到的玛多地震序列的震源机制解进行中心解求解，从而获得更为精准的数据,然后对其进行DBSCAN方法的聚类分析，得到断层的走向为113.5°，倾角为88.2°,通过震源机制反演应力场,并将应力场投影到断层上，得到断裂带的相对剪应力和相对正应力分别为0.84和-0.79,剪应力强度较大,滑动角为-0.72°。结果表明玛多地震是发震断裂受NE-SW的挤压和NW-SE的拉张,形成了较大的剪切力,从而促使近东西的江错断裂发生左旋走滑错动所致。 相似文献
13.
FOCAL MECHANISM AND SEISMOGENIC STRUCTURE OF THE M5.0 YUEXI EARTHQUAKE ON 1 OCT. 2014, SOUTHWESTERN CHINA 下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 The Oct.1,2014 M5.0 Yuexi earthquake occurred on the Daliang Shan fault zone where only several historical moderate earthquakes were recorded.Based on the waveform data from Sichuan regional seismic network,we calculated the focal mechanism solution and centroid depth of the M5.0 Yuexi earthquake by CAP (Cut and Paste) waveform inversion method,and preliminarily analyzed the seismogenic structure.We also calculated the apparent stress values of the M5.0 earthquake and other 14 ML≥4.0 events along the Shimian-Qiaojia fault segment of the eastern boundary of the Sichuan-Yunnan block.The result indicates that the parameters of the focal mechanism solution are with a strike of 256°,dip of 62°,and slip of 167° for the nodal plane Ⅰ,and strike of 352°,dip of 79°,and slip of 29° for the nodal plane Ⅱ.The azimuth of the P axis is 121° with dip angle of 11°,the azimuth of T axis is 217° with dip angle of 28°,and the centroid depth is about 11km,and moment magnitude is MW5.1.According to the focal mechanism solution and the fault geometry near the epicenter,we infer that the seismogenic fault is a branch fault,i.e.,the Puxiong Fault,along the central segment of the Daliang Shan fault zone.Thus,the nodal plane Ⅱ was interpreted as the coseismic rupture plane.The M5.0 Yuexi earthquake is a strike-slip faulting event with an oblique component.The above findings reveal the M5.0 Yuexi earthquake resulted from the left-lateral strike-slip faulting of the NNW Dalang Shan fault zone under the nearly horizontal principal compressive stress regime in an NWW-SEE direction.The apparent stress value of the Yuexi earthquake is 0.99MPa,higher than those of the ML ≥ 4.0 earthquakes along the eastern boundary of the Sichuan-Yunnan block since 2008 Wenchuan M8.0 earthquake,implying a relatively high stress level on the seismogenic area and greater potential for the moderate and strong earthquake occurrence.It may also reflect the current increasing stress level of the entire area along the eastern boundary,and therefore,posing the risk of strong earthquakes there. 相似文献
14.
北京时间2013年1月29日,哈萨克斯坦发生MS6.1地震,为了提高对地震震源机制解的认识,并进一步了解震源区的应力场特征,利用CAP方法反演了此次地震序列震源机制解.反演结果表明,MS6.1地震节面Ⅰ的参数：走向241°,倾角80°,滑动角7°;节面Ⅱ的参数：走向150°,倾角84°,滑动角170°;P轴方位为196°,倾角2°,T轴方位为105°,倾角12°;矩震级MW为6.1;矩心深度为13km;震源类型是左旋走滑型.此次地震序列破裂优势方向为NEE—SWW,倾角以30°～60°居多,滑动角以60°～120°、-60°～-120°居多;P轴方位的优势取向为近NE—SW向,接近水平的居优;T轴优势取向为近SEE—NWW向,接近垂直的居优;震源机制类型以倾向滑动型为主.反演结果与断层的分布、余震分布及哈萨克斯坦中天山（伊犁盆地西部）NEE—SWW向应力场有很好的一致性. 相似文献
15.
On August 8, 2017, Beijing time, an earthquake of M7.0 occurred in Jiuzhaigou County, Aba Prefecture, Sichuan Province, with the epicenter located at 33.20°N 103.82°E. The earthquake caused 25 people dead, 525 people injured, 6 people missing and 170000 people affected. Many houses were damaged to various degrees. Up to October 15, 2017, a total of 7679 aftershocks were recorded, including 2099 earthquakes of M ≥ 1.0.
The M7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake occurred in the northeastern boundary belt of the Bayan Har block on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, where many active faults are developed, including the Tazhong Fault(the eastern segment of the East Kunlun Fault), the Minjiang fault zone, the Xueshan fault zone, the Huya fault zone, the Wenxian fault zone, the Guanggaishan-Daishan Fault, the Bailongjiang Fault, the Longriuba Fault and the Longmenshan Fault. As one of the important passages for the eastward extrusion movement of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau(Tapponnier et al., 2001), the East Kunlun fault zone has a crucial influence on the tectonic activities of the northeastern boundary belt of Bayan Kala. Meanwhile, the Coulomb stress, fault strain and other research results show that the eastern boundary of the Bayan Har block still has a high risk of strong earthquakes in the future. So the study of the M7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake' seismogenic faults and stress fields is of great significance for scientific understanding of the seismogenic environment and geodynamics of the eastern boundary of Bayan Har block.
In this paper, the epicenter of the main shock and its aftershocks were relocated by the double-difference relocation method and the spatial distribution of the aftershock sequence was obtained. Then we determined the focal mechanism solutions of 24 aftershocks(M ≥ 3.0)by using the CAP algorithm with the waveform records of China Digital Seismic Network. After that, we applied the sliding fitting algorithm to invert the stress field of the earthquake area based on the previous results of the mechanism solutions. Combining with the previous research results of seismogeology in this area, we discussed the seismogenic fault structure and dynamic characteristics of the M7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake. Our research results indicated that:1)The epicenters of the M7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake sequence distribute along NW-SE in a stripe pattern with a long axis of about 35km and a short axis of about 8km, and with high inclination and dipping to the southwest, the focal depths are mainly concentrated in the range of 2~25km, gradually deepening from northwest to southeast along the fault, but the dip angle does not change remarkably on the whole fault. 2)The focal mechanism solution of the M7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake is:strike 151°, dip 69° and rake 12° for nodal plane Ⅰ, and 245°, 78° and -158° for nodal plane Ⅱ, the main shock type is pure strike-slip and the centroid depth of the earthquake is about 5km. Most of the focal mechanism of the aftershock sequence is strike-slip type, which is consistent with the main shock's focal mechanism solution; 3)In the earthquake source area, the principal compressive stress and the principal tensile stress are both near horizontal, and the principal compressive stress is near east-west direction, while the principal tensile stress is near north-south direction. The Jiuzhaigou earthquake is a strike-slip event that occurs under the horizontal compressive stress. 相似文献
16.
本文以完整的形式给出拉梅常数不相等情形的半无限弹性介质中任意倾角的矩形滑动断层引起的地震位移场解析表示式。以一些数值结果说明介质的泊松比、断层面的倾角、上界和下界对地面的地震位移场的影响。在比较1966年邢台地震的地形变资料和计算得到的各种走向、倾向、倾角、断层面长度、宽度、震源深度和错距的单个的矩形滑动断层引起的地面位移之后指出,简单的滑动断层错动模式不能同时很好地解释观测到的邢台地震的水平和垂直形变。为了解释观测结果,提出了一个复合的断层模式。这个复合断层模式由六个简单的矩形滑动断层构成。运用网格尝试法,得到了基本上符合观测到的水平和垂直位移场的震源参数。 相似文献
17.
本文采用新疆测震台网数字波形记录，利用CAP和P、S波初动和振幅比方法计算2018年9月4日伽师5.5级地震序列中MS≥2.5地震的震源机制解，结合地震烈度等震线和双差重定位后的地震序列空间展布等特征分析了此次地震的发震构造，反演了震源处应力场。结果表明，伽师5.5级地震呈NE向的节面I为发震断层面，属于左旋走滑断层，震源深度为9km，发震构造可能为浅部超基底断裂；地震序列中有21次为走滑型，4次为正断型，说明绝大多数序列的破裂方式与主震相近，表明余震应力场主要受主震震源应力场控制；P轴方位在NNE向有明显的优势分布且倾伏角较小，T轴方位在NWW向有明显的优势分布且倾伏角较小，说明震源处主要以NNE向水平挤压和NWW向水平拉张作用为主；此次伽师5.5级地震序列表现的浅部应力场与已有研究得出的震源区深部应力场基本一致，应力形因子R的最优解为0.17，说明震源处近NE向中间主应力σ2有一定挤压成分。 相似文献
18.
2019年10月28日甘肃夏河MS5.7地震发生于临潭—宕昌断裂与西秦岭北缘断裂之间，震中周边断裂的发育情况不明，断裂研究程度低，且无明确的地表断裂与该地震相关。本文通过遥感解译和野外调查，完善了震中周边断裂即临潭—宕昌断裂、夏河断裂东段和达麦—合作断裂的几何展布图像和新活动特征，结合小震精定位和震源机制，综合分析并构建了夏河地震的发震构造模型。研究结果显示:夏河地震的周边断裂包括两条已知、但研究程度不高的西秦岭北缘断裂和临潭—宕昌断裂，以及仅标绘在地质图上、活动未知的夏河断裂和达麦—合作断裂；首次发现了夏河断裂东段的新活动，活动性质兼具左旋走滑和向北逆冲，前人基于小震定位判定的发震断层（走向312°，倾向42°，倾角48°）可能是夏河断裂东段派生的一条隐伏分支，该分支在平面上与夏河断裂东段呈小角度斜交（夹角22°），在深部归并到夏河断裂，滑动方向（滑动角48°）与夏河断裂东段的活动性质（兼具逆冲和左旋）一致。夏河断裂东段在构造上可能归属于临潭—宕昌断裂西段，是西秦岭北缘断裂正花状构造的组成部分，2019年夏河MS5.7地震代表临潭—宕昌断裂西段的构造活动。 相似文献
19.
利用双差定位方法对2018年松原MS5.7地震序列中ML≥1.0地震重新定位，之后使用CAP方法求解松原MS5.7地震序列中强地震的震源机制解，再借助MSATSI软件包反演得到松原地区的区域应力场。综合分析以上研究结果得到如下结论:① 松原MS5.7地震序列发生在NW走向的第二松花江断裂与NE走向的扶余—肇东断裂交会处，将地震精定位结果沿两条断层走向作剖面分析，NW向剖面主轴长度约为5 km，震中分布均匀，NE向剖面主轴长度亦约为5 km，震中呈倾向NE的高倾角分布；② 该序列中的4次ML≥3.7地震的震源机制解具有良好的一致性:节面Ⅰ走向为NE向，节面Ⅱ走向为NW向，均为高倾角走滑断层。中强地震的震源机制节面解与第二松花江断裂性质基本一致，由此推断第二松花江断裂是本次松原地震的发震断层；③ 松原地区的主压应力方位角为N86°E，倾角为7°，主张应力方位角为N24°E，倾角为71°。松原地区的区域应力场既受到大尺度的板块构造运动的控制，又受到区域构造运动的影响。在太平洋板块对北东亚板块向西俯冲作用下，东北地区产生了近EW向的主压应力，受周边地质构造控制，松辽盆地内NE向断裂与NW向断裂交会处易发生走滑型地震，2018年松原MS5.7地震正是在这种构造作用控制下发生的中强地震。 相似文献