共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
基于前期ERA5逐月再分析数据, 应用3种机器学习算法(Lasso回归、随机森林和神经网络)对辽宁省初霜冻日期进行预测评估。Lasso回归算法提取对初霜冻日期预测有重要指示意义的气象要素特征集, 通过交叉验证和超参数调优建立初霜冻日期预测模型, 利用均方根误差(RMSE)和距平同号率方法定量定性地评估模型的预测效果。结果表明: 特征选择后的气象要素特征集建模提升了模型的泛化能力、可解释性和稳定性; Lasso回归模型在4月起报的预测效果最好(RMSE为6—8 d), 神经网络模型在5月起报性能最好(RMSE为6—9 d), 随机森林模型在3月起报性能最好(RMSE为8—9 d); 辽宁全省大部分站点距平同号率为50%—70%, 其中Lasso回归和神经网络模型为5月起报最高(约为68%), 随机森林算法为3月起报最高(约为62%)。特征选择和敏感性实验结果发现, 低植被覆盖比例是初霜冻日期预测关键预测因子, 植被覆盖率越高越有利于地表含水量保持, 降温容易产生霜冻, 初霜冻日期也就越易提前, 去掉低植被覆盖比例因子后模型预测效果显著下降, 也表明该因子是模型建模的前期关键因子。 相似文献
2.
FAN Ke 《大气和海洋科学快报》2009,2(5):251-254
The year-to-year increment prediction approach proposed by was applied to forecast the annual number of tropical cyclones (TCs) making landfall over China.The year-to-year increase or decrease in the number of land-falling TCs (LTCs) was first predicted to yield a net number of LTCs between successive years.The statistical prediction scheme for the year-to-year increment of annual LTCs was developed based on data collected from 1977 to 2007,which includes five predictors associated with high latitude circulations in both Hemispheres and the circulation over the local,tropical western North Pacific Ocean.The model shows reasonably high predictive ability,with an average root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.09,a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.9,and a correlation coefficient between the predicted and observed annual number of LTCs of 0.86,accounting for 74% of the total variance.The cross-validation test further demonstrated the high predictive ability of the model,with an RMSE value of 1.4,an MAE value of 1.2,and a correlation coefficient of 0.74 during this period. 相似文献
3.
Summary The main objective of this study was to develop empirical models with different seasonal lead time periods for the long range
prediction of seasonal (June to September) Indian summer monsoon rainfall (ISMR). For this purpose, 13 predictors having significant
and stable relationships with ISMR were derived by the correlation analysis of global grid point seasonal Sea-Surface Temperature
(SST) anomalies and the tendency in the SST anomalies. The time lags of the seasonal SST anomalies were varied from 1 season
to 4 years behind the reference monsoon season. The basic SST data set used was the monthly NOAA Extended Reconstructed Global
SST (ERSST) data at 2° × 2° spatial grid for the period 1951–2003. The time lags of the 13 predictors derived from various
areas of all three tropical ocean basins (Indian, Pacific and Atlantic Oceans) varied from 1 season to 3 years. Based on these
inter-correlated predictors, 3 predictor sub sets A, B and C were formed with prediction lead time periods of 0, 1 and 2 seasons,
respectively, from the beginning of the monsoon season. The selected principal components (PCs) of these predictor sets were
used as the input parameters for the models A, B and C, respectively. The model development period was 1955–1984. The correct
model size was derived using all-possible regressions procedure and Mallow’s “Cp” statistics.
Various model statistics computed for the independent period (1985–2003) showed that model B had the best prediction skill
among the three models. The root mean square error (RMSE) of model B during the independent test period (6.03% of Long Period
Average (LPA)) was much less than that during the development period (7.49% of LPA). The performance of model B was reasonably
good during both ENSO and non-ENSO years particularly when the magnitudes of actual ISMR were large. In general, the predicted
ISMR during years following the El Ni?o (La Ni?a) years were above (below) LPA as were the actual ISMR. By including an NAO
related predictor (WEPR) derived from the surface pressure anomalies over West Europe as an additional input parameter into
model B, the skill of the predictions were found to be substantially improved (RMSE of 4.86% of LPA). 相似文献
4.
降水作为全球水循环的重要组成,与人们的生产生活密切相关.有效的降水预测对于防灾减灾,以及经济的可持续发展至关重要.然而,由于影响降水过程的复杂性,当前降水预测还存在诸多挑战.针对我国东部夏季降水,我们提出年际增量结合经验正交分解的新统计预测方法.首先计算降水年际增量的主模态,然后针对主模态时间序列构建预测模型,用预测的... 相似文献
5.
Seongil Jo Yaeji Lim Jaeyong Lee Hyun-Suk Kang Hee-Seok Oh 《Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences》2012,48(3):205-212
In this paper, we apply three different Bayesian methods to the seasonal forecasting of the precipitation in a region around Korea (32.5°N?C42.5°N, 122.5°E-132.5°E). We focus on the precipitation of summer season (June?CJuly?CAugust; JJA) for the period of 1979?C2007 using the precipitation produced by the Global Data Assimilation and Prediction System (GDAPS) as predictors. Through cross-validation, we demonstrate improvement for seasonal forecast of precipitation in terms of root mean squared error (RMSE) and linear error in probability space score (LEPS). The proposed methods yield RMSE of 1.09 and LEPS of 0.31 between the predicted and observed precipitations, while the prediction using GDAPS output only produces RMSE of 1.20 and LEPS of 0.33 for CPC Merged Analyzed Precipitation (CMAP) data. For station-measured precipitation data, the RMSE and LEPS of the proposed Bayesian methods are 0.53 and 0.29, while GDAPS output is 0.66 and 0.33, respectively. The methods seem to capture the spatial pattern of the observed precipitation. The Bayesian paradigm incorporates the model uncertainty as an integral part of modeling in a natural way. We provide a probabilistic forecast integrating model uncertainty. 相似文献
6.
D. R. Pattanaik U. C. Mohanty H. R. Hatwar G. Srinivasan Y. V. Ramarao P. Sinha A. Brookshaw 《Theoretical and Applied Climatology》2008,92(3-4):165-179
Summary A comparative study was performed to evaluate the performance of the UK Met Office’s Global Seasonal (GloSea) prediction General
Circulation Model (GCM) for the forecast of maximum surface air temperature (Tmax) over the Indian region using the model generated hindcast of 15-members ensemble for 16 years (1987–2002). Each hindcast
starts from 1st January and extends for a period of six months in each year. The model hindcast Tmax is compared with Tmax obtained from verification analysis during the hot weather season on monthly and seasonal scales from March to June.
The monthly and seasonal model hindcast climatology of Tmax from 240 members during March to June and the corresponding observed climatology show highly significant (above 99.9% level)
correlation coefficients (CC) although the hindcast Tmax is over-estimated (warm bias) over most parts of the Indian region. At the station level over New Delhi, although the forecast
error (forecast-observed) at the monthly scale gradually increases from March to June, the forecast error at the seasonal
scale during March to May (MAM) is found to be just 1.67 °C. The GloSea model also simulates well Tmax anomalies on monthly and seasonal scales during March to June with the lower Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of bias corrected
forecast (less than 1.2 °C), which is much less than the corresponding RMSE of climatology (reference) forecast. The anomaly
CCs (ACCs) over the station in New Delhi are also highly significant (above 95% level) on monthly to seasonal time scales
from March to June, except for April.
The skill of the GloSea model for the seasonal forecast of Tmax as measured from the ACC map and the bias corrected RMSE map is reasonably good during MAM and April to June (AMJ) with higher
ACC (significant at 95% level) and lower RMSE (less than 1.5 °C) found over many parts of the Indian regions.
Authors’ addresses: D. R. Pattanaik, H. R. Hatwar, G. Srinivasan, Y. V. Ramarao, India Meteorological Department (IMD), New
Delhi, India; U. C. Mohanty, P. Sinha, Centre for Atmospheric Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology, Hauz Khas, New Delhi
110016, India; Anca Brookshaw, UK Met Office, UK. 相似文献
7.
云南夏季降水年际变化较大,影响因子众多,夏季降水的预测较为困难。使用1965—2017年云南省122个气象观测站的逐日降水资料和NCEP大气环流资料,采用年际增量的方法来预测云南夏季降水。文中基于云南夏季降水年际增量变化规律和影响夏季降水的环流形势及物理过程,选取了6个具有物理意义的预测因子,包括:前期2月南太平洋海温异常、前期2月东亚北部海平面气压异常、前期4月北美500hPa位势高度异常、前期5月太平洋北部海平面气压异常、前期1月印度半岛北部500hPa位势高度异常及前期2月澳洲以南地区200hPa高度场偶极子异常,来建立云南夏季降水预测模型。并对预测模型进行逐年交叉检验和1998—2017年逐年独立样本检验。交叉检验中夏季降水年际增量预测值和观测值的相关系数为0.85,相对均方根误差为8.0%。回报检验中夏季降水年际增量的相对均方根误差为9.1%,63.0%的异常年份预测值能够准确地预报出夏季降水异常。该预测模型有较好的预测能力。 相似文献
8.
基于时间尺度分离,利用NCEP第2代气候预测系统 (CFSv2) 每年4月起报的夏季月平均预测资料, 结合实际观测资料和再分析资料,对江淮流域及华北地区夏季降水距平百分率进行降尺度预测。将预测量和预测因子分为年际分量和年代际分量,在两个时间尺度上分别建立降尺度模型,两个预测分量之和为总预测量。对1982—2008年拟合时段的夏季降水距平百分率的回报结果表明:降尺度预测结果相对于原始模式结果预测技巧显著提高。降尺度预测与实况降水在江淮流域和华北地区的空间相关系数最大值超过0.8,多年平均值也分别提高到0.53和0.51;时间相关在每个站点也显著增强,相关系数为0.38~0.65。对2009—2013年进行独立样本检验,结果表明:降尺度模型能较好地预测出该时段的降水异常空间型态。同时,该模型对2014年夏季降水长江以南偏多、黄淮地区偏少的分布形势也有一定预测能力。 相似文献
9.
Statistical Downscaling for Multi-Model Ensemble Prediction
of Summer Monsoon Rainfall in the Asia-Pacific
Region Using Geopotential Height Field 总被引：16，自引：1，他引：15
The 21-yr ensemble predictions of model precipitation and circulation in the East Asian and western North Pacific （Asia-Pacific） summer monsoon region （0°-50°N, 100° 150°E） were evaluated in nine different AGCM, used in the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Climate Center （APCC） multi-model ensemble seasonal prediction system. The analysis indicates that the precipitation anomaly patterns of model ensemble predictions are substantially different from the observed counterparts in this region, but the summer monsoon circulations are reasonably predicted. For example, all models can well produce the interannual variability of the western North Pacific monsoon index （WNPMI） defined by 850 hPa winds, but they failed to predict the relationship between WNPMI and precipitation anomalies. The interannual variability of the 500 hPa geopotential height （GPH） can be well predicted by the models in contrast to precipitation anomalies. On the basis of such model performances and the relationship between the interannual variations of 500 hPa GPH and precipitation anomalies, we developed a statistical scheme used to downscale the summer monsoon precipitation anomaly on the basis of EOF and singular value decomposition （SVD）. In this scheme, the three leading EOF modes of 500 hPa GPH anomaly fields predicted by the models are firstly corrected by the linear regression between the principal components in each model and observation, respectively. Then, the corrected model GPH is chosen as the predictor to downscale the precipitation anomaly field, which is assembled by the forecasted expansion coefficients of model 500 hPa GPH and the three leading SVD modes of observed precipitation anomaly corresponding to the prediction of model 500 hPa GPH during a 19-year training period. The cross-validated forecasts suggest that this downscaling scheme may have a potential to improve the forecast skill of the precipitation anomaly in the South China Sea, western North Pacific and the East Asia Pacific regions, wh 相似文献
10.
1999年中国夏季气候的预测和检验 总被引：35，自引：6，他引：29
利用改进的中国科学院大气物理研究所短期气候预测系统（IAPPSSCA）,结合IAPENSO预测系统所预测的1999年热带太平洋地区的海温异常,对1999年中国夏季气候进行了适时集合预测。预测结果表明：IAPPSSCA较好地预测出了1999年夏季北半球大尺度环流场的异常情况,并较好地预测出1999年中国南涝北旱的大范围降水形势。IAPPSSCA对长江下游的强降水中心、中国南方大部夏季多雨的特征以及中国北方大部的干旱少雨形势的预测,与实测较相符。但IAPPSSCA预测的南方大范围雨带的北界比实测的略为偏北,北方的小范围的降水正距平区域也没有能预报出来。另外,对于月平均降水距平的预测亦存在较大的不确定性。这说明我们的预测系统还有待于进一步的改进和完善。 相似文献
11.
利用NCEP的气候预报系统第二版(CFSv2)提供的逐日降水模式资料,采用集合预报方法开展区域性夏季降水预报,使用出入梅日期均方根误差(RMSE)、准确率(ACCU),梅雨期长度均方根误差(RMSE)及梅雨雨强距平符号一致率(Pc)等3种方法评估模式资料对湖北省梅雨特征量的预报能力。结果表明:入梅预报提前13 d的ACCU可达0.5以上、RMSE小于3 d,出梅预报提前14 d的ACCU可达0.5以上、RMSE小于3 d,梅雨期长度预报提前14天的RMSE小于5 d,梅雨雨强预报提前14 d的Pc可达0.5以上。梅雨特征量总体预报时效为14 d左右,CFSv2模式资料对区域性夏季降水在梅雨延伸期时段表现出一定的预报技巧。 相似文献
12.
采用多尺度时空投影(MSTP)预测思路建立广东月降水和季节降水预测方法。通过EOF分解、小波分析和Lanczos滤波方法进行周期分解, 采用MSTP方法进行预测。借鉴年际增量法, 对预报结果用最小二乘法进行误差订正, 得到降水预测结果。PS预测评分和均方根误差10年独立样本检验(2006—2015年)结果显示:订正后, PS预测评分起伏较小, 68.8%的月降水和季节降水PS预测评分明显提高的年份超过6年, 且有87.5%的月降水和季节降水PS预测平均分达到70以上; 在±0.5个标准差范围内, 订正后均方根误差在40%以上的概率分布明显高于订正前, 订正后的月和季节降水占81.3%, 订正前占31.3%;在±1个标准差范围内, 概率分布在70%以上的月季降水订正前后相差不多, 订正后占56.3%, 订正前占50%。 相似文献
13.
14.
Jacques Derome Gilbert Brunet André Plante Normand Gagnon George J. Boer Francis W. Zwiers 《大气与海洋》2013,51(4):485-501
Abstract Two dynamical models are used to perform a series of seasonal predictions. One model, referred to as GCM2, was designed as a general circulation model for climate studies, while the second one, SEF, was designed for numerical weather prediction. The seasonal predictions cover the 26‐year period 1969–1994. For each of the four seasons, ensembles of six forecasts are produced with each model, the six runs starting from initial conditions six hours apart. The sea surface temperature (SST) anomaly for the month prior to the start of the forecast is persisted through the three‐month prediction period, and added to a monthly‐varying climatological SST field. The ensemble‐mean predictions for each of the models are verified independently, and the two ensembles are blended together in two different ways: as a simple average of the two models, denoted GCMSEF, and with weights statistically determined to minimize the mean‐square error (the Best Linear Unbiased Estimate (BLUE) method). The GCMSEF winter and spring predictions show a Pacific/North American (PNA) response to a warm tropical SST anomaly. The temporal anomaly correlation between the zero‐lead GCMSEF mean‐seasonal predictions and observations of the 500‐hPa height field (Z500) shows statistically significant forecast skill over parts of the PNA area for all seasons, but there is a notable seasonal variability in the distribution of the skill. The GCMSEF predictions are more skilful than those of either model in winter, and about as skilful as the better of the two models in the other seasons. The zero‐lead surface air temperature GCMSEF forecasts over Canada are found to be skilful (a) over the west coast in all seasons except fall, (b) over most of Canada in summer, and (c) over Manitoba, Ontario and Quebec in the fall. In winter the skill of the BLUE forecasts is substantially better than that of the GCMSEF predictions, while for the other seasons the difference in skill is not statistically significant. When the Z500 forecasts are averaged over months two and three of the seasons (one‐month lead predictions), they show skill in winter over the north‐eastern Pacific, western Canada and eastern North America, a skill that comes from those years with strong SST anomalies of the El Niño/La Niña type. For the other seasons, predictions averaged over months two and three show little skill in Z500 in the mid‐latitudes. In the tropics, predictive skill is found in Z500 in all seasons when a strong SST anomaly of the El Niño/La Niña type is observed. In the absence of SST anomalies of this type, tropical forecast skill is still found over much of the tropics in months two and three of the northern hemisphere spring and summer, but not in winter and fall. 相似文献
15.
In this work we evaluate seasonal forecasts performed with the global environmental multiscale model (GEM) using a variable resolution approach and with a high-resolution region over different geographical locations. Therefore, using two grid positions, one over North America and the other over the tropical Pacific-eastern Indian Ocean, we compare the seasonal predictions performed with the variable resolution approach with seasonal forecast performed with the uniform grid GEM model. For each model configuration, a ten-member ensemble forecast of 4?months is performed starting from the first of December of selected ENSO winters between 1982 and 2000. The sea surface temperature anomaly of the month preceding the forecast (November) is persisted throughout the forecast period. There is not enough evidence to indicate that a Stretch-Grid configuration has a clear advantage in seasonal prediction compared to a Uniform-Grid configuration. Forecasts with highly resolved grids placed over North America have more accurate seasonal mean anomalies and more skill in representing near surface temperature over the North American continent. For 500-hPa geopotential height, however, no configuration stands out to be consistently superior in forecasting the ENSO related seasonal mean anomalies and skill score. 相似文献
16.
利用风云四号气象卫星A星(FY-4A)红外云图,基于生成对抗网络方法,提出了红外云图外推预报模型,实现了华东区域未来3 h的云图预报,预报的时空分辨率分别为1 h和4 km。结果表明:该外推模型预报的云图可较好描述云团移动、发展和减弱趋势,对研究区域内云团的强度、位置和形态得到较为理想的预报效果。为了验证提出的云图外推模型的有效性,将其与光流法和轨迹门控循环单元模型进行比较。对比试验结果表明:该云图外推模型具有最优的预报效果,说明使用生成对抗网络进行云图外推具有较好的可行性,能有效应用于气象业务中监测云团的生消和移动并提前预警灾害性天气的发生,为天气预报提供重要的参考依据。 相似文献
17.
Sukanta Kumar Das Sanjib Kumar Deb C. M. Kishtawal P. K. Pal 《Theoretical and Applied Climatology》2012,109(1-2):81-94
Seasonal prediction of Indian Summer Monsoon (ISM) has been attempted for the current year 2011 using Community Atmosphere Model (CAM) developed at the National Centre for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). First, 30?years of model climatology starting from 1981 to 2010 has been generated to capture the variability of ISM over the Indian region using 30 seasonal simulations. The simulated model climatology has been validated with different sets of observed climatology, and it was observed that the simulated climatological rainfall is affected by model bias. Subsequently, a bias correction procedure using the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) 3B43 rainfall has been proposed. The bias-corrected rainfall climatology shows both spatial and temporal variability of ISM satisfactorily. Further, four sets of 10-member ensemble simulations of ISM 2009 and 2010 have been performed in hindcast mode using observed sea surface temperature (SST) and persistence of April SST anomaly, and it has been found that the bias-corrected model rainfall captures the seasonal variability of ISM reasonably well with some discrepancies in these two contrasting monsoon years. With this positive background, the seasonal prediction of ISM 2011 has been carried out in forecast mode with the assumption of persistence of May SST anomaly from June through September 2011. The model assessment shows an 11% deficiency in All-India Rainfall (AIR) of ISM 2011. In particular, the monthly accumulated rains are predicted to be 101% (17.6?cm), 86% (24.3?cm), 83% (21.0?cm) and 95% (15.5?cm) of normal AIR for the months of June, July, August and September, respectively. 相似文献
18.
Milovanović Boško Schuster Phillip Radovanović Milan Vakanjac Vesna Ristić Schneider Christoph 《Theoretical and Applied Climatology》2017,130(1-2):687-700
Monthly, seasonal and annual sums of precipitation in Serbia were analysed in this paper for the period 1961–2010. Latitude, longitude and altitude of 421 precipitation stations and terrain features in their close environment (slope and aspect of terrain within a radius of 10 km around the station) were used to develop a regression model on which spatial distribution of precipitation was calculated. The spatial distribution of annual, June (maximum values for almost all of the stations) and February (minimum values for almost all of the stations) precipitation is presented. Annual precipitation amounts ranged from 500 to 600 mm to over 1100 mm. June precipitation ranged from 60 to 140 mm and February precipitation from 30 to 100 mm. The validation results expressed as root mean square error (RMSE) for monthly sums ranged from 3.9 mm in October (7.5% of the average precipitation for this month) to 6.2 mm in April (10.4%). For seasonal sums, RMSE ranged from 10.4 mm during autumn (6.1% of the average precipitation for this season) to 20.5 mm during winter (13.4%). On the annual scale, RMSE was 68 mm (9.5% of the average amount of precipitation). We further analysed precipitation trends using Sen’s estimation, while the Mann-Kendall test was used for testing the statistical significance of the trends. For most parts of Serbia, the mean annual precipitation trends fell between −5 and +5 and +5 and +15 mm/decade. June precipitation trends were mainly between −8 and +8 mm/decade. February precipitation trends generally ranged from −3 to +3 mm/decade.
相似文献19.
基于DERF2.0的月平均温度概率订正预报 总被引：2，自引：1，他引：1
国家气候中心第二代月动力延伸模式回算资料的分析表明,二代模式月平均温度预报与观测实况仍然存在较大偏差,模式预报有较大改进空间。本文采用非参数百分位映射法对模式月平均温度预报进行概率订正,该方法基于模式集合平均给出的确定性预报,结合模式回算资料各集合成员计算得到的模式概率密度分布,给出确定性预报在模式概率密度分布中的百分位值,并将百分位值投影到观测资料的概率密度分布中,得到模式预报的概率订正值。对订正前后模式预报的检验评估显示,该订正方案不仅有效降低了模式预报与实况的均方根误差（RMSE）,对月平均温度距平分布的预报技巧也有所改善,不同超前时间模式预报的预测技巧评分（PS）和距平相关系数（ACC）均有提升,同时模式预报误差的大小对订正效果无明显影响。从分月的订正预报结果来看,对夏季各月的温度预测技巧的提升整体高于冬季各月。 相似文献
20.
Application of Artificial Neural Networks to Rainfall
Forecasting in Queensland, Australia 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
In this study,the application of artificial intelligence to monthly and seasonal rainfall forecasting in Queensland,Australia,was assessed by inputting recognized climate indices,monthly historical rainfall data,and atmospheric temperatures into a prototype stand-alone,dynamic,recurrent,time-delay,artificial neural network.Outputs,as monthly rainfall forecasts 3 months in advance for the period 1993 to 2009,were compared with observed rainfall data using time-series plots,root mean squared error(RMSE),and Pearson correlation coefficients.A comparison of RMSE values with forecasts generated by the Australian Bureau of Meteorology’s Predictive Ocean Atmosphere Model for Australia(POAMA)-1.5 general circulation model(GCM) indicated that the prototype achieved a lower RMSE for 16 of the 17 sites compared.The application of artificial neural networks to rainfall forecasting was reviewed.The prototype design is considered preliminary,with potential for significant improvement such as inclusion of output from GCMs and experimentation with other input attributes. 相似文献